Dan Rather: 'I Wish Every American Could See' Sunday's Tea Party-Bashing 'Newsroom' on HBO
As NewsBusters reported earlier, Sunday's episode of HBO's The Newsroom was an absolute disgrace that included numerous attacks on elected members of the Tea Party including a disparaging comparison of Congresswoman Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) to the late Joe McCarthy.
Much to my astonishment, former CBS Evening News anchor Dan Rather actually loved the show writing at Gawker, "This whole episode is something I wish every American could see and ponder" (photo courtesy Gawker):
[I]t reveals the danger of big business being in bed with big government, whether the government is led by Republicans or Democrats. This is especially dangerous when it comes to big businesses that own, as a small part of their overall operations, a national-distribution news organization.
In this episode, the most important, most interesting, most revealing scene is where the owner of the corporation (played superbly by Jane Fonda) tells the head of her news division, "I have business in front of this Congress!" She's complaining about her anchorman and his newscast covering news in ways she knows will displease Congressional leaders whom she needs for business advantage.
Actually, she was complaining about far more than that.
Fonda told the head of her news division that he had rebranded the network "as MSNBC’s more combative brother" doing news exclusively "for the Left."
I guess Rather either missed that part or just didn't think it was important to mention in his review.
Far more important is that this episode mixed real politicians with fake ones depicting Tea Party candidates as something they're not, but why should we think Rather - who had no problem presenting false documents about a sitting president weeks before he was up for reelection - would be worried about manufactured characters?
And why should we think Rather would be at all concerned that likely 50 percent of the country would be offended by the content in this episode?
Instead, he gushed:
This whole episode is something I wish every American could see and ponder, especially in the context of the two preceding installments. They would then understand how a combination of big business and big government, working for their mutual benefit — not the public interest but rather their own interests — affects the news we see and hear.
And what about anchors and their staffs "working for their mutual benefit - not the public interest but rather their own interests" - and how that "affects the news we see and hear?"
That's what was far more visible in this episode and far more disturbing. But not to Rather:
Give it five stars so far. If they keep this up — if they can maintain the quality — they will have produced a classic.
It makes you sick thinking this man used to be one of the most powerful newsmen in the country, doesn't it?
Imagine praising something that would totally offend about half the nation.
But maybe I shouldn't be so shocked. He did compare the first episode to one of the greatest films of all time, "Citizen Kane."
Sheesh!
To receive my articles hot off the presses follow me on Twitter ow.ly/btalc and Facebook ow.ly/btald.
— Noel Sheppard (@NoelSheppard) June 9, 2012
- Noel Sheppard's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Well, dude . . .
Submitted by Galvanic on Mon, 07/09/2012 - 5:55pm.
. . . Every American can see "Newsroom" just by watching the TV network evening news programs. No need to subscribe to HBO.
No surprise that Rather likes the show. He practiced its philosophy until even his bosses couldn't stand him anymore.
Let's see how things sift out this November.
Submitted by needle on Mon, 07/09/2012 - 6:00pm.
Let's see how things sift out this November.
This is not a prediction, but I have a hunch that the people doing the bashing that counts will be those feisty wascally Tea Party folks.
I say if the elites in the MSM want to complain about the Tea Party, I hope the Tea Party gives them a shellacking worth whining about this Nov 6.
- Looking forward to the self-annihilation of the Manipulated Stories Machine.
And I wish....
Submitted by journoprof on Mon, 07/09/2012 - 6:02pm.
And I wish Dan Rather would quit trying to masquerade as a journalist. He should just officially join the Democrats as a paid hack...instead of shilling for them for nothing.
Unpaid?
Submitted by minky on Tue, 07/10/2012 - 12:38am.
So you think the Dems weren't paying him, huh?
oh..
Submitted by Mark81150 on Tue, 07/10/2012 - 8:46am.
Just in back slaps.. Rather was always their attack dog, and the democrats knew it.
The irony is that the tea party isn't about corp welfare
Submitted by OffTheLows on Mon, 07/09/2012 - 6:01pm.
or any welfare. The mantra has been lower the rate, broaden the base and equalize the playing field for all business. Let market forces determine where America can be most competitive, lower barriers to entry and make conducting business as simple as possible. Will some stray from that message, probably, but the other side of the aisle is more hopeless on that front.
In contrast, the left has done everything imaginable to make business as complex as possible (regs and tax complexity) and about favoring thru corporate welfare specific industries that align with their ideological goals.
Rather
Submitted by Jersey Girl on Mon, 07/09/2012 - 6:09pm.
I see Rather-biased hasn't changed a bit.
One thing America did get to see........was his ignominious dismissal from CeeBS.
One nincompoop gone; a few thousand to go.
Submitted by needle on Mon, 07/09/2012 - 6:21pm.
Dan Rather: “['Newsroom' on HBO] reveals the danger of big business being in bed with big government, whether the government is led by Republicans or Democrats.”
Does this completely out-of-touch bozo actually think this is the sort of thing that the Tea Party movement endorses? CBS and the rest of the DNC media really should seriously drug test their staff, and also test them for basic competency.
Noel comments: It makes you sick thinking this man used to be one of the most powerful newsmen in the country, doesn't it?
Yes it does, but we are at least rid of that particular nincompoop; we have only a few more thousand to go.
- Looking forward to the self-annihilation of the Manipulated Stories Machine.
It says something that HBO
Submitted by Slyrr on Mon, 07/09/2012 - 7:52pm.
It says something that HBO has to drag Dan Rather (of ALL people) out of his crypt to peddle their show. Dan Rather was a scumbag who was caught red-handed, deliberately lying in an attempt to change the outcome of an election. Everyone in CBS (including Rather) who was complicit in the scam was fired and got thrown out of their jobs in disgrace.
Bear that in mind. HBO needed to get a man who was fired from his job for lying to the American people in order to pimp their cheesy show. Rush nailed this show by quoting from a blog about it. The show was described as a liberal safari, where pretenders are dressed up in Republican costumes so that liberals can go out and shoot them without the risk of those mean ol' Republicans shooting BACK.
In Hollywood, the liberal left's perpetual 'safe haven', they are free to put whatever words they want into the mouths of actors and send them stumbling out onto the stage, pretending they're Republicans, for no other reason than to falsely portray the Right the way that liberal leftists IMAGINE them to be.
It's completely appropriate that Dan Rather pimps for 'Newsroom'
Submitted by needle on Mon, 07/09/2012 - 9:33pm.
If the the medium is the message, then 'Newsroom' is a fountain of Liberal lies.
- Looking forward to the self-annihilation of the Manipulated Stories Machine.
ONION NEWS NETWORK, comes out on top in fake news ratings
Submitted by upcountrywater on Mon, 07/09/2012 - 7:58pm.
As if the world needs another fake news network...
And to top that off it's net even funny!!!
And here's Rather on the cutting edge of fake but accurate bender.
ONN is waaaay better....
A blast from the past...
You Didn't Build That.
Dan Rather should have been off the air years ago!
Submitted by Mary Louise Turner on Mon, 07/09/2012 - 10:15pm.
Dan Rather has l-o-n-g since gone certifiable. He should have been fired the night he walked off the CBS News set when a US Open tennis match ran overtime (in 1991, if I recall). This man only is on TV because of his insane and inane ego. Whereas Walter Cronkite was Benedict Arnold with a mike and a camera, Mr. Rather was, and still is, a deeply disturbed individual with extra jokers in his deck.
Religious Idiots
Submitted by Smbeane1 on Mon, 07/09/2012 - 11:54pm.
I'm afraid the religious idiots are destroying our party. We get rid of them and I believe more people will join our party. Don't think it'll happen though.
Religious Idiots?
Submitted by Dave. on Tue, 07/10/2012 - 12:21am.
If it weren't for people seeking religious freedom, you would most likely be living under a rather severe tyranny right about now.
Perhaps you would find North Korea more palatable, as the religious people there have been either incarcerated or eradicated.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Which idiots to get rid of?*
Submitted by cajun2 on Tue, 07/10/2012 - 12:48am.
The ones who believe that the government owes YOU comfort without contribution? The ones who believe killing an unborn is a "right"? The ones who agree to "death panels" cause old people are in the way? The ones who believe abusing children and living a life of depravity is "normal"? The ones who want to rid this country of our military when leaders in other countries are bragging about destruction of America? The ones who believe its ok to burn buildings, create chaos and riot in the streets is the way to make "change"?
Religious idiots are the least of our troubles..
So, a four week wonder, with a few posts under your
Submitted by UpNorth on Tue, 07/10/2012 - 12:58am.
belt, and you're already telling us to "get rid of them", referring to religious people? My, you're in for what will probably be a very short career here at NB. The first rule of civil discourse is, don't p**s off the people you're trying to sway to your side of an argument. You've already failed.
Religious Idiots?
Submitted by Humblepie on Tue, 07/10/2012 - 2:14am.
How quaint, I've been call a lot of things but a "Religious Idiot" for just having a love for God and freely choose to follow him is a new and novel concept. Would I be more enlightened in your eyes if I embraces abortion on demand? I know, how about I let the government control every aspect of my life as they surly know better than God.
Funny part of this whole thing is my conservative views are the same now as before. The only thing that has changed is God is now in charge of my life. I have faith that he will take care of me and provide for my needs. Seems that most of country now has faith their government check will be there the first of the month.
May I suggest you try a few Tea Party gatherings. You will find "Religious Idiots" there, but, you'll also find people representing the broad spectrum of America. The only thing they have in common is the desire to bring a halt to big government and give back the personal freedoms that we took for granted and loss.
Until then, may God be with you.
LOL, just what party are you
Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Tue, 07/10/2012 - 6:13am.
LOL, just what party are you a part of? Most likely the Democrap party.