Dan Rather Loves 'The Newsroom': It's a 'Classic' Like 'Citizen Kane'
Former CBS News anchor Dan Rather, who ultimately resigned in disgrace for airing an attack piece on George W. Bush using phony documents, loves the new HBO show Newsroom and explained why in a review for Gawker. With no sense of irony, he praised, "I especially liked the emphasis on the necessity of having sources and doing real reporting (maybe not enough emphasis on this to satisfy me.)"
Rather added, "Also, the depiction of when to go with a story, when and what to lead with on a newscast is good." The journalist, who has been exiled to HD Net, went so far as to compare the show to Citizen Kane (a film often ranked as the greatest movie of all time). Rather gushed, "[Newsroom] has the potential to become a classic."
Perhaps one reason that Rather likes Newsroom so much is that Aaron Sorkin, the liberal/writer creator, initially exonerated him in the pages of the pilot script.
In another scene McCallister responds to pressure from his boss, UBS News president Charlie Skinner (Sam Waterston)
Will: Charlie, I can’t go after Halliburton and miss.
Charlie: Oh report the goddam news, Will.
Will: You remember a guy named Dan Rather?
Charlie: Dan got it right.Story Continues Below Ad ↓
That exchange was ultimately cut from broadcast. Rather particularly liked the show's depiction of journalism as a fight for truth:
There is a battle for the soul of the craft that goes on daily now in virtually every newsroom in the country. It's a fight that matters, not just for journalists but for the country. It centers on whether news reporting is to be considered and practiced—to any significant degree, even a little—as a public service, in the public interest ,or is to exsist solely as just another money-making operation for owners of news outlets.
As the Newsroom character MacKenzie (Emily Mortimer) says, in challenging the anchorman Will McAvoy (Jeff Daniels) to be a crusader for quality journalism, "There is nothing more important in a democracy than a well-informed electorate. When there is no information or, much worse, wrong information, it can lead to calamitous decisions that clobber any attempts at vigorous debate."
This is the battle being lost in almost every newsroom, in every place around the world. Ratings (or circulation), demographics, and profits rule. Any talk of the public interest or of doing quality journalism of integrity with guts is considered passé.
Newsroom, remember, is a program that attacks the Tea Party and features an anti-American rant. In the pilot Jeff Daniels' character complained, "America is not the greatest country in the world anymore."
The oddest moment in the review came when Rather dismissed critics of Newsroom this way: "Maybe it's because they are print people." Of course, non-print reporter Jake Tapper, the senior White House correspondent for ABC News, also panned the program.
The full Gawker review can be found here.
- Scott Whitlock's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Just as corrupt and as
Submitted by John21 on Mon, 06/25/2012 - 4:16pm.
Just as corrupt and as useless as when he was a talking head for the liberal agenda propaganda network.
No facts, no evidence and just make it up as you go along because you feel it to be right.
Newsroom....
Submitted by gxa99 on Mon, 06/25/2012 - 5:39pm.
...is what actually goes on behind the scenes at MSNBC, ABC, CBS, etc. Just a matter of time before FOX gets totally bashed. Another "By libs for libs" hollywood propaganda series...
Dan you ignorant slut.
Submitted by vote24 on Mon, 06/25/2012 - 7:55pm.
It is nearly unbelievable the extent to which they will go, to control information. So I now realize. Rather and his peers completely know that We know he is full of sh.t. But as long as they can keep fooling some of the people most of the time, they will battle on. As long as we simply let them.
I don't recall Citizen Kane being a stinking communist puke
Submitted by Dave. on Mon, 06/25/2012 - 8:46pm.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Dan Rather = Tool
Submitted by RayRayII on Mon, 06/25/2012 - 8:58pm.
What's the frequency Kenneth? Dan, don't go away mad, just go away.
Rather would fit
Submitted by journoprof on Tue, 06/26/2012 - 12:58am.
Dan Rather, who wouldn't know ethical, objective reporting if it bit him, would fit right in at MSNBC. What a quaint thought ...objective reporting.
Rather should go the way of "Rosebud"...
Submitted by NJRightWinger12 on Tue, 06/26/2012 - 11:45am.
And get tossed into the fire-oops, I revealed the ending, for those of you whove never seen this over 70 yr old classic!