Maddow Ends Show With Santorum's Vulgar 'Google Problem,' Calls Dan Savage a 'Genius'
Having spent the past week mercilessly attacking conservative talk radio host Rush Limbaugh for his comments concerning Georgetown University law student and women's rights activist Sandra Fluke, MSNBC's Rachel Maddow closed Wednesday's program by discussing at length Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum's vulgar "Google problem."
You see, calling a liberal woman a slut is practically a hate-crime, but referring to a conservative man as the disgusting byproduct of anal sex is "genius" (video follows with transcript and commentary):
MADDOW: We have an update for you, on the Rick Santorum Google problem. You know what the Rick Santorum Google problem is, right? I might have mentioned it a couple times on this show.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIPS)
MADDOW: It is the problem he has, and then you have when you Google him. If you do not know what I mean, you can Google Santorum, do not do it at work, do not do it in front your mom.
That’s because if you put Santorum into the Google search engine, you get information, you get vivid, vivid information, but you don’t get what you were looking for about Rick Santorum.
I am not going to ask you about Rick Santorum and campaigning against MSNBC and what he can or cannot Google.
CHRIS HAYES, MSNBC HOST: I mean, there’s no way to find out about Rick Santorum. You can’t just type that into the Google.
MADDOW: I cannot research it.
HAYES: There’s nothing that come back.
MADDOW: I should say, I can research at home, but I can’t research it at work.
You can Google it, it’s safe. It’s not like Rick Santorum.
(END VIDEO CLIPS)
MADDOW: Until recently when you typed the word Santorum into the Google search box, the first result even more prominent than Rick Santorum’s campaign Web site was a Web site called Spreading Santorum. Spreading Santorum was a created in 2003 to frankly retaliate against Rick Santorum for equating same sex relationships with bestiality. That’s why everybody calls him the man on dog guy. That’s what he said it was like to be gay, man on dog. That’s what he said.
The Web site spreadingsantorum.com turned Mr. Santorum’s last name into a euphemism for something I will not describe on television. But its creator, the genius, Dan Savage, got so many people linked to spreadingsantorum.com that it became the most prominent search result on Google for the word Santorum, for years.
"The genius, Dan Savage."
This "genius" decided to have a contest years ago to create a new meaning for Santorum. The "winner" was "The frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex."
As Maddow said, this "genius" got so many people to link to this that the Google algorithm until recently placed it first at its search engine.
It must also be noted that this "genius" told HBO's Bill Maher last year that he wished Republicans were "all f--king dead." This was moments before he proudly said, "I sometimes think about f--king the s--t out of Rick Santorum...I’m up for whipping up some santorum in Santorum."
So you see, Maddow thinks calling a women's rights activist a slut warrants someone being thrown off the radio.
But create a vulgar term for a conservative that goes viral and becomes the number one Google result, and talk about having violent, gay hate-sex with a former United States Senator, and you're a "genius."
See ANY double standard here? Maybe you will when you find out how disappointed Maddow is now that the vulgar term for Santorum has dropped at Google:
MADDOW: But then over the past week or so, something changed. Now, this with a first noticed by a Twitter user named Anthony Hick, who asked, quote, "Did Google de-rank Spreading Santorum? First or second result for seven years and suddenly busted off the main page."
And you know what? It’s true. As the blog Search Engine Land pointed out with screen caps that they posted, the first result used for typing Santorum Google, right? If you go to Google.com, type in Santorum, the first result used to be the site Spreading Santorum. But last week, the first result change to Mr. Santorum’s official campaign Web site and Spreading Santorum got bumped down to the bottom of the first search page.
So, so far down it wouldn’t appear on your screen unless you scrolled. Then all of a sudden, though, Spreading Santorum started moving back up the search results page.
So, of course, figuring this out, THE RACHEL MADDOW SHOW has been Googling Santorum madly ever since, despite my strict instructions not to do so at work. Interestingly, not all of us are getting the same results. Some of us have gotten even better result in the number one spot.
The definition of Santorum courtesy of urbandictionary.com. We have to redact a lot of it, as you can see here. It is an even more graphic description than what was up at Spreading Santorum. It’s, in fact, stunningly graphic.
Now, why the Santorum search results page is constantly changing is at this point unclear. Google released a statement on Wednesday saying, quote, "We make more than 500 changes to our algorithms in a typical year. With each of those changes, sites will shuffle the different positions in our search results. We have not manually taken action to change the ranking of the site."
So with this added dose of unpredictability in terms of what your results are going to be, I think Rick Santorum’s Google problem if it didn’t get worse, got a lot more interesting. Now, there’s more of a reason to keep typing the word Santorum into the search box and hitting return, you never know what you’re going to get. You should definitely wash your hands regardless.
And probably don’t do it at work. And don’t talk to your mom, just alone.
Did I mention that Maddow and her network think it's heinous to call a women's rights activist a slut?
(H/T Barry Popik)
- Noel Sheppard's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
You had me excited for a split second...
Submitted by c5then on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 11:26am.
I read: Maddow Ends Show...
Then I finished the line..
sigh
Madison and Jefferson and Franklin built a Republic - Roberts killed it!
Like!
Submitted by Tugboat Phil on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 11:46am.
+100!!
...
Submitted by BondPlainBond on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 11:21am.
...
Rather... speechless at this.
The Daily Caller has a true
Submitted by celator on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 11:22am.
The Daily Caller has a true (but funny) count of a word used constantly by Maddow, lately. This would be a great case analysis by Dr Sam. Says a lot about what Maddow thinks about, all the time, apparently.
http://dailycaller.com/2012/02/27/msnbc-host-rachel-maddows-new-favorite...
I'm going to go out on a limb and
Submitted by agingcynic on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 11:27am.
guess that a hundred consecutive entries of "Santorum" into Google isn't the only nasty stuff on Rachel's home computer....
Funny, I just googled 'Maddow',
Submitted by SickofLibs on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 11:34am.
and the first 500 results all had 'chronic yeast infection' in the summary line.
'chronic yeast infection'
Submitted by Tugboat Phil on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 11:47am.
How can that be? Isn't that a problem for women?
Hahaha
Submitted by Denny Crane on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 10:31pm.
I googled maddow and number 5 has a very nasty word in the title. Can we have a lame 4 minute long giggle fest like she did now?
We Are The 53%
Homo-Centric View.....
Submitted by adamsmith on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 11:37am.
This mentally deranged Vagitarian sees everything thru the HomoGlass. There is no other world for her. Unfortunately, homosexuals will in the near future be nonexistant. As Michael Savage had commented last week, and I threw out as red meat to the HuffingPosters five years ago, with greater diagnostic testing, the gene for homosexuality will be discovered soon. With amniocentisis advancing the way it is it's inevitable. They are basically going to have a survival rate on par with Down's Syndrome today, ie. most will be aborted. All this Gay Rights stuff will be for nought, there won't be any. Who wants to have a gay kid on purpose? Ironically they will only be born to people whom don't view abortion as an option...
Watch this nut sometime with the sound off. The gestures,facial expressions,etc. She as with Ed the Red, Crazy Larry the Commie, Reverend of What?Al Sharpton et al, belongs in the proverbial rubber room. She has to be the stupidest Rhodes Scholar I've ever witnessed in action. Maddow belongs in a tent with crack heads defecating on police cars around her. She doesn't have any journalistic talent, not enough to be on TV. Hopefully she goes the way of Olbergoebbels and Chunck Uygar. Then again I don't care, I listen to Michael Savage when shes spewing.....
Dan Savage gets his own TV show
Submitted by airedaletwo on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 11:20pm.
Gawker has reported that Dan Savage is getting his own TV show on the libeal MTV. This IMO is how he's being rewared for this high level discoruse and civility. If he'd directed his venom toward a Democrat he'd have been cut off even from things like the alternative papers where I think he got his start. Everytime I hear a Democrat talking about how they are the civil ones and the Republicans are horrible I just want to vomit all over them. FWIW I don't think you can do Google Bombs anymore like he did to Santorum which is still in Santorum's Wikipedia page and stll shows up if you Google Santorum as the #3 and 4 entries as well as other articles later. You can bet Google would have fixed that so it no longer showed up during searches if Santorum were a powerful Democrat, but he's not.
Tea Party
Submitted by eafalf on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 11:45am.
Does no one recall the pejorative used repeatedly on MSNBC to describe the Tea Party protesters. This is the most apt comparison to the whole Rush thing that I have thought. Virtually all of the Tea Party protesters are private citizens, not shoving their face in the first TV camera that comes by, but it is perfectly fine for the media to hurl vile insult after vile insult at them.
Nice try
Submitted by Tugboat Phil on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 11:50am.
but it's a proven, scientific fact that Tea Party members are actually, racist, hate-mongering, homohating, militia member, Bible clinging neanderthals.
At least, that's what I heard on the network news.
On a side note. It was kind of sad to see that Mr Maddow got cut by the Colts yesterday.
Glad I hung on to my
Submitted by almostacowboy on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 1:57pm.
"Neanderthal" t-shirt.
Not that I care
Submitted by fivestring_assassin on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 11:58am.
what anyone does in the privacy of their own bedroom,,,,but to read the writings of Dan Savage one can only conclude that he is a seriously deranged person
He has a free column in our local free left wing lunatic newspaper that I periodically pick up for laughs...His column describes in detail some pretty sick things he enjoys doing with his butt buddies
And Maddow considers him a "genius?
Thats MSNBC for ya...Morons Spewing Nothing But Crap
Not that I care
Submitted by fivestring_assassin on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 11:58am.
what anyone does in the privacy of their own bedroom,,,,but to read the writings of Dan Savage one can only conclude that he is a seriously deranged person
He has a free column in our local free left wing lunatic newspaper that I periodically pick up for laughs...His column describes in detail some pretty sick things he enjoys doing with his butt buddies
And Maddow considers him a "genius?
Thats MSNBC for ya...Morons Spewing Nothing But Crap
help
Submitted by Darth Vader on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 1:06pm.
This whole Santorum google bull***t angers me to the core. How can we aggravate and annoy these bastards? Go after sponsors? I've already tried to get in touch with MSNBC and obviously they don't answer for the filth they peddle day after day. So I'm asking your for your help Newsbusters? What do we do? I can't stand to sit by and watch these pukes operate like this. WE MUST ACT OR THIS CANCER WILL GROW & GROW UNCHECKED!
Vader
Lord Vader, I can feel your anger
Submitted by GW on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 1:45pm.
But by asking what we can do, you have identified yourself as the Episode 3 "Is Padme Alright?" Vader, not the Episode 5 "killing Admirals left and right" Vader.
Seriously, contributing to NewsBusters is a great place to start. And getting the word out helps, too.
Vader
Submitted by gomerspile on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 3:44pm.
Agreed 100%,
Why Rage-hole, you disgusting pig.
Submitted by drsamherman on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 1:37pm.
So let's start thinking up terms for the wannabe man, shall we?
BOTH of them are wannabe men.
Maddow: noun
Submitted by gomerspile on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 3:20pm.
Wow will you look at the Maddow on that transvestite!!!.
I Googled Maddow
Submitted by Conservator on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 3:20pm.
And I'm ashamed to post a link to such a vulgar site, but it was listed ninth in my Google search.
http://fuckyeahrachelmaddow.tumblr.com/
Is this like the site that she and Chris Hayes joked about with regards to Santorum?
⇒ I've often wondered
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 3:22pm.
I've often wondered what happened to Tumbler. NOT!
~Classy
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 3:28pm.
If you all will excuse me, I'll be over at the dailyKos where I can read reams of sexual innuendo directed at the female opposition, vulgar attempts at humor, and be told to go get f*@ked, and at least have the satisfaction of knowing that those doing it aren't on the same 'side'.
I'm with you Bru
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 3:37pm.
Nothing here I need to see.
agree ladies*
Submitted by cajun2 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 3:39pm.
It seems that NB has become a haven for sailors on leave..think I will take a "leave" myself
Humor
Submitted by gomerspile on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 3:39pm.
But vulgar humor is ok, if directed at a man? Don't give me the line of crap about stooping to their level. This is called retailiation, you give it ,,,expect to get it back. You make it vulgar , you'll get vulgar.
⇒ Retailiation?
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 3:43pm.
Is that when you buy wholesale and sell retail?
Spell check
Submitted by gomerspile on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 3:48pm.
was slower than my post....
⇒ Knew what you meant
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 3:51pm.
It wasn't a for real spell check, just a joke.
I knew
Submitted by gomerspile on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 4:10pm.
that ,, I like a good joke
I knew
Submitted by gomerspile on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 4:10pm.
that ,, I like a good joke
~Tell it to the mod who deleted your post
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 3:46pm.
.
Don't care
Submitted by gomerspile on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 4:07pm.
if the mod deleted it, went to Mad Cow's facebook page and put it right there for her/him/it to see. Your middle of the road turn the other cheek is the kind of crap that got us here in the first place. The left know's we will always be turning our cheek, just to get the other one slapped.That is why they do it. Oh we need to be civil, Like hell, those days are over, we need to be in the face of the left, just like they do....if not this site is useless, it won't be anything but a place for people tho piss and moan about what they need to do, but don't have the nads to do it...
~Spew it somewhere else
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 4:13pm.
Like on Maddow's FB page, for instance.
You don't have a leg to stand on here, and taking shots in the dark about what you presume my views to be just makes you look foolish.
?
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 3:47pm.
Who directed vulgar humor directed at a man at NB?
No one
Submitted by gomerspile on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 4:30pm.
from here, it was how Maddow went on and on with his twin sister last night about the Santorum slander, so I came up with my own definition of a Maddow, seems like brunette somebody didn't like the fact that vulgar comments were being used toward a member of the iffy female perversion. so my post was deleted my the "mod" , much to the delight of Brunette somebody....
No one
Submitted by gomerspile on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 4:31pm.
from here, it was how Maddow went on and on with his twin sister last night about the Santorum slander, so I came up with my own definition of a Maddow, seems like brunette somebody didn't like the fact that vulgar comments were being used toward a member of the iffy female perversion. so my post was deleted my the "mod" , much to the delight of Brunette somebody....
~Try hitting the 'Save' link ONCE
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 4:33pm.
Since it's only function is to post your comment, not come galloping to your rescue.
Hmmm
Submitted by gomerspile on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 4:07pm.
thought you were going to Kos... those were my last words to you...
"those were my last words to you"
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 4:18pm.
Making even less sense than directing vulgar insults to Maddow on a site she probably doesn't look at.
~He's fighting for truth, justice, and the American Way
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 4:30pm.
by making incoherent comments about putting male body parts on women.
That'll teach them libs.
And
Submitted by gomerspile on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 4:35pm.
what is that you are doing that adds to the party, except trying to find ways to criticize.
oh yes he is a lib*
Submitted by cajun2 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 4:35pm.
He is attacking women for complaining about a made up story by the left about conservatives attacking women.
Liberalism is a mental illness.
not
Submitted by gomerspile on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 4:52pm.
attacking women, attacking MadCow, you didn't get to see my post, and trust me I am so far removed from the liberal establishment, I scare myself at times. Cajun if you read the actual story from NB, you would see that Madcow was attacking a conservative,I in turn attacked her, and no one else, Brunette , stuck her nose in my post about it being vulgar, it was removed by the Mod, then she had to comment about it being removed. Get your fact straight....
~Deja vu
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 4:53pm.
Apparently, I'm supposed to blush and look away when someone gets a nasty comment deleted and comes after me for it.
I need to write this stuff down.
I never came after you
Submitted by gomerspile on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:05pm.
you replied to my comments, to which I gave my opinion,even when I chose to end the thread you continued to come back for just one more. Now Dont reply and neither will I. done with you can't you do the same.
Could
Submitted by gomerspile on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 4:45pm.
you please explain the incoherent part.? No you cant, can you ? are you one of the typical people that think you own the site ,just because your post are so adult like and educational, or do you just like to find things to bitch about, because it is not something you would say. Was it ok for her or NB to talk about the act of a Santorum, I didn't know what it was until I read the story here, then I looked it up. thought it was disgusting and expressed my own version of the manbeast called Maddow. In case your wondering I have put a hell of a lot more into this country, than you could ever fathom, so yes it is about fighting, fighting back!!!!
well gomer*
Submitted by cajun2 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 4:47pm.
It appears you need some help in identifying the "enemy"
I know the
Submitted by gomerspile on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:04pm.
enemy and they are coming from the left and the Rhinos in the middle......
Rhinos
Submitted by Tugboat Phil on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 6:21pm.
Did you mean RINOs? Go check the glossary at Dkos.
~Someone named Savage came up with that smear
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 4:50pm.
Go find him and yell at him. You're wasting your pea shooter ammunition, here.
and
Submitted by gomerspile on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:01pm.
she chose to relay his words via her show, repeatedly, ,,look if your a fan of her,s and it seems you are, that's fine I don't care, you need to reload your pea-shooter.your the one taking all the offense, are you sure your not a lefty troll?
Gomer
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:19pm.
You are so absurd right now it's comical. Bru, a left troll? You are really walking in oil covered with marbles and trying very hard to stay upright, but it's not working.
~Oh yeah
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:19pm.
I'm totally a fan of hers.
You've been a member here how long?
I did
Submitted by gomerspile on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 4:33pm.
post it on her face book page.
~Can't find it, which thread?
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 4:48pm.
I don't see it in the four most recent threads I checked, and it isn't posted to her Wall, either.
I'd love to see the reaction to that.
right here
Submitted by gomerspile on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 4:58pm.
Limbaugh can't help himself
maddowblog.msnbc.msn.com
The controversy surrounding Rush Limbaugh's attacks on Sandra Fluke appear to be moving from the front page, but the story is hardly finished.
Like · · Share · Yesterday at 2:42pm · ,at the bottom of the post, look for the german shepherd picture...seems like you forgot to do your homework,,,,you wouldn't be the real troll on here would you. I back up what I do.
gomer
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:09pm.
That's not her facebook page. Think before you speak and remove all doubt.
Think
Submitted by gomerspile on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:16pm.
before you speak that is a story on her face book page I could not copy and past the comments, so I copied the story that My post was on , then sugested if you want to go to the bottom of the replies you would see the post ,
Happy now.
The Rachel Maddow Show
More than 40 advertisers have backed away from him so far, and Rush Limbaugh still rolls on. He has even found a new target, investigative journalist Tracie McMillan.
Bonus: Tracie's a guest on the show tonight.
Limbaugh can't help himself,
~I found it
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:18pm.
He went and pasted his comment into a day old thread at the bottom of her FB page, a thread that links to a story on her blog, which is why the blog address is in there. I won't link more directly to it, since his name is on there.
Apparently, I was supposed to open every thread all the way down the page and scan every single comment looking for it, rather than simply asking. You learn something new every day.
Oh I,m sorry
Submitted by gomerspile on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:20pm.
didn't that offend you looking at it again, I'm done with you, I asked you nicely, now I,m just done tnuC.
~Have we met?
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:33pm.
.
~You look familiar
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:34pm.
.
Does someone think the mods can't spell backwards?
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:42pm.
.
good one Ms Rad*
Submitted by cajun2 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:47pm.
It's called OGE.
As long as it isn't about them!!!
dip
Submitted by gomerspile on Fri, 03/09/2012 - 8:42am.
Song by GFR
~I haven't had this much fun since I was called Hitler
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:32pm.
.
~Ambitious little fella, aren'tcha?
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:32pm.
.
~You flatter me, truly
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:31pm.
.
⇒ Please Ban gomerspile
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:50pm.
He's spamming this thread with Bill Maher's profane reference to women.
Yes, we know how to read backwards also.
~He should have gone with pig Latin
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:52pm.
That stuff always throws me.
And of course the "pig" part
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:54pm.
would be so appropriate
~We gotta over-achiever, here
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:30pm.
.
~
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:30pm.
.
~
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:29pm.
.
~
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:29pm.
.
~
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:29pm.
.
~
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:28pm.
.
~
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:27pm.
.
Had to say it 13 times?*
Submitted by cajun2 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:25pm.
Getting a post deleted is nothing compared to asking to be hammered. Start working on your new account troll
ADMIN ALERT*
Submitted by cajun2 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 10:09pm.
Would someone please get rid of gomers pile of garbage.
⇒ Maddow introduces a split
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 3:29pm.
Maddow evidently agrees that sexual vulgarity is fair in depicting select public people.
In so doing, Ms. Maddow pustulates her kind of homosexuality is acceptable while the machinations between male homosexuals is vulgar.
Why does she seek to introduce a split into the homosexual movement.
What does this say about the left?
Submitted by taznar on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 3:45pm.
"As Maddow said, this "genius" got so many people to link to this that the Google algorithm until recently placed it first at its search engine."
What does it say about the left that this is what they want? That this is what they link to?
What does it say about what kind of people they are?
Mad dog, not Maddow
Submitted by russedav on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 3:46pm.
Mad dog, not Maddow
This is what I posted about
Submitted by gomerspile on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 4:54pm.
So is NB going to block their own story, wasn't this offensive Brunette, if this had been said about a women would it have been over the line?
"The genius, Dan Savage."
This "genius" decided to have a contest years ago to create a new meaning for Santorum. The "winner" was "The frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex."
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2012/03/08/maddow-ends-show-s...
Big difference
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:11pm.
between reporting on something vile someone says, and saying it yourself. Tell me, would you say that Maddow comment to your mother/sister/daughter/wife?
This isn't a Bill Maher site you know.
Rad
Submitted by Tugboat Phil on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 6:25pm.
Study Hall must have rolled over into Detention today. They should remove the WiFi from there.
I doubt he'd say those things to "mom" or the meals would stop coming to the basement.
Tugboat
Submitted by Radical1979 on Fri, 03/09/2012 - 9:04am.
Someone is back in school. He thinks because spelling backwards was in a song lyric it makes it acceptable.
Yeah, the "Genius" Dan Savage......
Submitted by djwolf12 on Fri, 03/09/2012 - 7:02pm.
has first hand experience in Santorum, by his own account. Just Sayin.....
No one was watching anyways
Submitted by bull579 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:19pm.
I she gets more viewers on this website than she does on actual TV
The true culprit
Submitted by Model850 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:27pm.
The culprit most complicit in the whole disgusting Santorum "Google problem" is Google itself. The fact that the company allowed the "problem" to exist at all speaks volumes about its executives' political ideology.
I've read the excuses Google offered as to why they couldn't do anything about it and I call B.S. The programmers who work for Google are incredibly talented and intelligent, and had they been directed to by management easily could have filtered out every vile reference to Santorum without censoring actual (civil) negative search results. Google's management decided against that, and the most plausible explanation for that decision is politics.
Well
Submitted by Tugboat Phil on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 6:27pm.
considering that their CEO has a revolving door into the White House and they regularly collaborate with dictators to suppress information, I doubt that correcting Savage's food supply is on their To Do List.
Madcow
Submitted by djwolf12 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 7:57pm.
Rachel, Rachel, Rachel. By praising the words of Dan Savage, you are giving aid, comfort, and approval for a disgusting and vile person that said (on Bill Maher's show, real shocker there) that he would love to have angry hate sex (rape) with Rick Santorum. And yet Rush Limbaugh is the one that is ruining this country? Your words and actions are rediculous, proposterous, and you should know better.
Rachel Madcow must resign immediately. If she refuses, then Boycott ALL of her sponsors.