Andrew Sullivan Says He Had An Orgasm When Sarah Palin Tweeted About His Newsweek Article
As NewsBusters reported Tuesday, former Alaska governor Sarah Palin was quite displeased to find out that Trig Truther Andrew Sullivan actually had an article published on the cover of Newsweek with the headline "Why Are Obama's Critics So Dumb?"
During an online chat about the piece Tuesday, Sullivan told participants that he had an orgasm when he saw Palin's tweet (vulgarity warning):
Comment From Mike D: Palin called you a "conspiracy kook" and blasted Newsweek for allowing you a cover. Do you ever worry that your more controversial views will overshadow your other writing?
Andrew : No. Palin's tweet made me come in my pants. I write what I think is true. I don't give a damn about "reputation." If I'm wrong I correct or re-think. Once a writer worries about these things, he's like an actor watching the audience. In my opinion, far too many journalists worry about their reputation.
That wasn't his only vulgarity during the chat. He dropped at least two f-bombs.
Classy guy representing Newsweek, dontcha think?
- Noel Sheppard's blog
- Login to post comments
Comments
Classy??
Submitted by Joe W. on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 5:41pm.
Sure. He has LOTS of class, Noel. All 3rd Class, however.
My, oh my!
Submitted by Newsbubba on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 5:42pm.
Bill Maher is going to see this, and really be jealous that he isn't the biggest scumbag (in the true meaning of the word) on the planet.
His next few shows should be real winners trying to top this!
Sullivan didn't mean it, he was looking at the cameraman.
Submitted by UpNorth on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 5:45pm.
Or, thinking about the drunk homeless guy he found passed out last night.
Hey, I just write what I think is true.
~He'll...
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 5:44pm.
..pee in his pants the day he opens his door and sees Todd Palin standing there.
I'm still wondering, Bru.
Submitted by Newsbubba on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 7:06pm.
I can't believe that Todd Palin has gone as long as he has without pounding the poo poo out of some of these people who come after his family in such a personal way.
His wife is a politician, and can expect to be savaged by the cowards who make up the Democrat Party, but his kids aren't.
He needs to call these bastards out and invite them to meet him anytime, anywhere and say it all to his face. I'm betting that not one of them would show up, and that will tell the public something about them.
Are you really that confused?
Submitted by Mashugana on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 7:21pm.
The Palins are worth millions. An assault charge against Todd could lead to a multimillion dollar lawsuit. He's not that kind of dumb.
I thought Palin quit politics?
Who told you Palin quit politics?
Submitted by Kansasgirl on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 9:44pm.
Oh, thats right, another projection from a troll.
~Mash
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 9:59pm.
Look at your comment. Back to mine. Back to yours. NOW BACK TO MINE. Sadly, it isn't mine. But if you stopped trolling and started posting legitimate crap it could LOOK like mine.
Look down, back up, where are you? You're scrolling through comments, finding the ones that your comment could look like. Back at mine, what is it? It's a highly effective counter-troll. Look again, MY COMMENT IS NOW DIAMONDS.
Anything is possible when you have a brain.
I'm on a Laptop
~Sigh
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Wed, 01/18/2012 - 12:25pm.
Looks like no one's an Old Spice Man fan.
Old Spice man
Submitted by fed3rd on Wed, 01/18/2012 - 1:20pm.
Very Funny. My son got a photo with him at Comic-Con in July. The new guy (Terry Cruz) is not funny!!!!!
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2012/01/17/andrew-sullivan-sa...
FEDIII
Who said anything about
Submitted by killa37 on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 10:30pm.
Who said anything about 'assault'??? I think just the idea that Todd Palin could show up in front of this guy (as well as Donkeyface, Dopey Letterman, and all the other queebies who have been brave enough to trash his wife - from the safety of their TV shows) would get another type of uncontrolled 'accident' from another body orifice - namely, sh*tting his pants!!!
... and what jury would convict him?
Submitted by Newsbubba on Wed, 01/18/2012 - 10:32am.
Not one, except maybe in NYC or Californicate.
What a disgusting pig
Submitted by pockets64 on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 5:49pm.
I bet he likes the term "tea bagger" as well.
This is what the Democrat party of my grandfather and uncles has turned into. I'm glad my father got smart and went Republican and taught me to think.
Every "contact" Sullivan has
Submitted by Free Stinker on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 5:50pm.
Every "contact" Sullivan has with Sarah is the highlight of his life, but for Sarah, it's just Tuesday.
/// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 /// خال
High road, Sarah
Submitted by Mashugana on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 5:52pm.
You're just giving the guy more ammo. Shit's like this are only in business when their subjects attack back.
Sullivan -- No-Class Act in a Low-Class Sideshow
Submitted by Galvanic on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 5:56pm.
Andrew : "No. Palin's tweet made me come in my pants. I write what I think is true. I don't give a damn about "reputation." If I'm wrong I correct or re-think."
If that's so, I don't recall Sullivan ever retracting his claim that Sarah Palin's son Trig was actually her daughter's baby, which was dispelled when the biologically-negating evidence of Bristol's own pregnancy was announced.
As for his ejaculation reference, it would appear that personal conversations with Sullivan are like talking to an adolescent.
"Palin's tweet made me come
Submitted by redfish on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 9:19pm.
"Palin's tweet made me come in my pants." -- Andrew Sullivan
Note --- this is coming from a man who said he's a "true social conservative", who says he's only in favor of same-sex marriage because he thinks its pro-family, who says he tried to live according to conservative values but realized that denying his sexual orientation made him miserable.
Being vulgar in a public forum like that, I can't believe a word he says.
I'm confused...Isn't Andrew Sullivan...
Submitted by PrairieSky on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 5:58pm.
gay? I'm assuming he's speaking figuratively here, but if not, why would Sarah Palin, or any other woman, induce such a, uh, reaction, from him??
That said, this is typical of the garbage that he regularly produces...And how sad it is to see how far Newsweek has fallen. There was a time when Newsweek was a worthy read, but no longer, and it hasn't been that way for a long time now.
"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction...It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them (our children) to do the same." ~President Ronald Reagan
That's some power Palin has
Submitted by Marsh on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 6:30pm.
It's the first time a woman ever made Andrew come and she wasn't even in the room..
Orgasm
Submitted by canuck on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 6:34pm.
Obviously this Brown Ringer is expanding his horizons...used to be only the sight of Michael Moore's obese rectal fat did that.
Oh, man!
Submitted by Newsbubba on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 7:10pm.
I was just headed out the door to dinner!
Thanks a lot, bubba. It may be a "liquid" night after that mental image.
I'm sure LardAss Moron has a
Submitted by killa37 on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 10:28pm.
I'm sure LardAss Moron has a hard time finding ANY of his body parts (besides his fingers and his mouth) - especially THOSE!!!
I have to wonder
Submitted by chazski on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 6:50pm.
I have to wonder what he may have been doing to himself while tweeting. Considering his orientation, I doubt Sarah had anything to do with it.
Andrew Sullivan is an
Submitted by kg on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 6:53pm.
Andrew Sullivan is an insignificant twit writing for an insignificant magazine.
"DumbAssity of Dope"
Sullivan is just another gay attention whore like Dan Savage.
Submitted by SickofLibs on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 6:56pm.
"Look at me, look at me, I'm controversial!"
So now we know
Submitted by CO2Maker on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 6:57pm.
Sullivan tweets with only one hand!
Full of BS
Submitted by HockeyKid on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 7:14pm.
Sullivan claims he never listens to reviews, saying it would be "like an actor watching the audience".
Given that EVERY actor who's ever trod the boards has literally lived for the audience's reaction, I think Sullivan's admission is quite telling. He writes everything he writes for the purpose of massaging his own ego with the kudos of his readers. Apparently, he's a literary masturbator as well. How congruous.
"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me
I guess Journalists and the
Submitted by Sude23 on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 7:24pm.
I guess Journalists and the media can start telling people what they think is true, oh wait they already do that...
Putting on my white coat for a second.
Submitted by drsamherman on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 7:47pm.
Having looked at Andrew Sullivan's behaviors, conversations and actions over the past few years, I could not but make a few observations purely from a psychiatric point of view:
1) To a large extent, his obsession of Palin seems driven by a single factor, namely Trig's birth. As all of you may recall, he was out of the gate with the charges that Trig was really Bristol's child and Sarah had feigned pregnancy to cover for her then-teenage daughter. He used his well known medical expertise to such extent that phrases like "she did not look pregnant", "why would she travel when that close to delivery" and "her staff did not know" became part of his usual responses about her. Whether these were his original lines or he simply parroted another liberal, or even if he was talking about her political viewpoints in general, the focus of his attention remained Trig. A relevant issue is why he was so obsessed with Trig to start. It is an obsession, which is by definition a fixed, false idea that goes beyond the dimensions of a delusion to the point where it interferes with otherwise normal functioning. Slowly there is a compulsion being formed, which is by definition a repetitive act which similarly interferes with otherwise normal function. He is not quite compulsive on the Trig issue yet, but give it more time and he will be.
2) He has always claimed that he does not care what critics think, yet he vociferously attacks anyone who criticizes his positions. He seems a trifle too concerned with people accepting his opinions without question, and certainly without opposition to them. In the context of being a political commentator, the discordance is glaring. By nature, politics is an arena of disagreement and vastly differing opinions. It is also gladiatorial in its nature as to how those disagreements unfold, are revealed and either quickly disposed of or simply fade away in irrelevancy. As he has been in the political arena so long, the criticism and vitriol he brings against even those of similar political philosophy to his (certainly not the conservative he has been labeled) is, as I have stated, discordant with his protests that he really does not care about what his critics think. He would not invest such time going after them if he really was apathetic of criticism.
3) He proudly wears the conservative mantle so long as he goes on Bill Maher or other liberal programs to badmouth what conservatives do, and in particular Republicans. I don't remember ever hearing or seeing or reading any positives on his part towards conservatives or Republicans. There is no reconciliation between how he loves to wrap himself in the conservative label yet he certainly displays zero philosophical agreement with any recognized conservative leader outside of the media. Would Andrew Sullivan even pretend to be in agreement with the likes of Paul Ryan or Jonah Goldberg? No. The conservative label is more like camouflage so he can be part of the transparent liberal strategy of saying see even a "conservative" agrees with us.
In short order, I find Andrew Sullivan to be someone with a high degree of mendacity, narcissism and a touch of sociopathy as witnessed by his obsessions with Sarah Palin. I also find him to be a hypocrite, because he would defend a liberal woman's privacy to the death while he would not accord a conservative woman the same right.
Were I a Freudian, which I must say I am NOT, I would also ask why a gay male is so obsessed by a straight woman's reproductive status. I might also ask why he seems so genitally-compulsive, but that is another story.
As an HIV patient, Sullivan
Submitted by stratman on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 11:48pm.
As an HIV patient, Sullivan is susceptible to neurological damage even if his viral loads are held in check with antivirals regimens. I have no idea if he is classified as having AIDS, but that would not help him neurologically. Sullivan's mentation could be affected currently or damaged by past Cerebral Toxoplasmosis, Cryptococcal Menengitis, Progressive Multifocal Leukencephaly and/or AIDS dementia complex for instance. But these may not explain Sullivan's vicious affect. He may of been this way before HIV infection.
Jeez, strat, you're starting
Submitted by killa37 on Wed, 01/18/2012 - 12:39am.
Jeez, strat, you're starting to sound like that troll Cleventine, or whatever his other name was when he came back - you know, the guy who knew more about psychiatry and psychology than Dr. Sam.....................but you're probably right about the HIV positive thing, and my own laymen's assessment is that he has cranial-rectalitis, compounded by fecal-opticalitis. As well as, of course, ejaculatus interuptus.
Killa
Submitted by stratman on Wed, 01/18/2012 - 2:25am.
You do know I am a physician. While I would not claim to know psychiatry and neurology to the extent of Sam's level, I won't dummy down on participating either. My post was complimentary to Sam's which he would understand, not a competing comment meant to negate him. In no way was I diagnosing. However, Sullivan seems like one pissed off guy that thinks the universe betrayed him and persists in misdirecting his anger onto others.
The take home message from my post is that long term HIV patients are at risk for neurological changes, none for the better, regardless of viral load. That is significant for our society given HIV patients are living longer lives and may require more services if their neurological status degrades.
Ahhhhhhhhh, c'mon, strat -
Submitted by killa37 on Wed, 01/18/2012 - 2:39am.
Ahhhhhhhhh, c'mon, strat - you KNOW that I was jivin' your ass, right??? I'm just in a rather off-the-wall mood tonight. We had a big thunder/lighing/rainstorm today - my power was off, I couldn't work, the ocean was dirty, I couldn't surf...........I've got a Hawaiian version of 'cabin fever'!!! So I needed to say something stupid somewhere, you know???
I'm sure Dr. Sam understands, as well as you...............I just wanted to bust this clown Sullivan's balls (if he has any after that premature eviction) for being such a twerp.
The weirdness of the whole
Submitted by stratman on Wed, 01/18/2012 - 3:19am.
The weirdness of the whole thread is throwing my chakras off. Have to talk with my niece who teaches yoga about realigning them with one of those pretzel positions. Not.
It's all good, Killa. But please do me a favor and never use the words "Sullivan" and "balls" in the same sentence again. Not cool, my friend. I had to find a remedy and ended up with a killa moment from the movie Clueless (time frame 50 - 60 seconds).
That movie clip was
Submitted by killa37 on Wed, 01/18/2012 - 1:49pm.
That movie clip was weird.............I've never seen it. I guess those are like.......valley girls, you know?? Brings back memories of my teenage soccer girls - except that they'd never get away with that stuff. I even called them 'meat' once in a while, just to bring them back to reality!!! But they loved me............I still see a lot of them around - some are married, some are mothers allready, some have careers, and some are still 'home-girls'. But most of them are upstanding citizens, as far as I can tell.
Sorry about your chakras being off...........didn't the Rolling Stones do a song called 'Chakras Off'........................'I can only get my chakras off when I'm sleeping'??? Sumpin' like that.
Toxo or Crypto are most likely.
Submitted by drsamherman on Wed, 01/18/2012 - 1:01am.
Toxo works relatively quickly in the midbrain, and Crypto can present more in the summer months. I didn't see signs of either in the video, but the antiretrovirals also inhibit clearance of multiple psych drugs so maybe he needs a Seroquel holiday!
Didn't see the video. Have
Submitted by stratman on Wed, 01/18/2012 - 2:35am.
Didn't see the video. Have no desire to watch him spew hate, even less to see him after a Seroquel washout. How toxic can Sullivan go? He's all yours at that point, my friend.
I'd wager the only reason
Submitted by Bodini on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 8:00pm.
I'd wager the only reason he spunked in his pants is that his Elton John inflatable doll sprung a leak!
Andrew Sullivan Says He Had An Orgasm...
Submitted by stage9 on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 8:43pm.
When Sarah Palin Tweeted About His Newsweek Article.
What he failed to reveal is that he had his rod shoved up Tom Ascheim's rear end at the time.
"If God is dead, somebody is going to have to take his place. It will be megalomania or erotomania, the drive for power or the drive for pleasure, the clenched fist or the phallus, Hitler or Hugh Hefner." — Malcolm Muggeridge
so stage9*
Submitted by cajun2 on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 9:53pm.
You seem to know a lot about Andrew Sullivan. You "write" just like him.
Well there you have it, the media confesses
Submitted by Boudin on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 9:01pm.
I write what I think is true. I don't give a damn about "reputation." If I'm wrong I correct or re-think. Once a writer worries about these things, he's like an actor watching the audience.
Guess we were right, the libtards DO lie!
This dope makes the case for
Submitted by killa37 on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 10:26pm.
This dope makes the case for premature eradication..............and if he's this 'easy', he probably isn't too popular with his boyfriends either.
Good
Submitted by pug lover on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 11:51pm.
Analysis on Andrew S., Dr. Sam.
think
Submitted by driguana on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 11:54pm.
"I write what I think is true..." that's pretty telling since the idiot obviously doesn't think.
Andrew Sullivan, McBoobs, Morning RINO and others
Submitted by David Kramer on Wed, 01/18/2012 - 12:00am.
Are just Mobys. Attempting to call themselves conservatives is just part of their propagandist tilt.
I thought Andrew Sullivan would be more excited over...
Submitted by jawebster1 on Wed, 01/18/2012 - 4:52am.
Todd Palin than Sarah Palin. Was I misinformed?
Huh?
Submitted by pcnav on Wed, 01/18/2012 - 12:06pm.
So this Sullivan guy thinks that it isn't important to have your facts straight before you publish? Just write what you feel is correct?
Let the libel suits begin. Take his house Sarah Palin.
Old Spice Guy
Submitted by fed3rd on Wed, 01/18/2012 - 1:13pm.
Very Funny. My son got a photo with him at Comic-Con in July. The new guy (Terry Cruz) is not funny!!!!!
FEDIII
Poor Andrew must have the heartbreak of AIDS dementia
Submitted by frank14 on Wed, 01/18/2012 - 1:47pm.
so his rants are not surprising.
⇒ Sullivan spewing
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Wed, 01/18/2012 - 2:10pm.
Sullivan shouldn't be calling attention to his ability to spew toxic bioburden.
Andrew Sullivan's books on Amazon
Submitted by jpwcpa on Wed, 01/18/2012 - 5:43pm.
None of the books authorized by Mr. Sullivan and currently available on Amazon rank in the top 200,000 in sales. In fact, the same can be said about more recent books authored by other members of the Sarah Haters Club - Levi Johnston, Joe McGinnis, Keith Olbermann and Frank Bailey. On the other hand, both books written by The Alaskan Goddess rank far higher than any of the haters. That's got to be quite galling to the haters who make a living as writers.
Dumb and Dumber: Newsweek and Andrew Sullivan
Submitted by berlet98 on Wed, 01/18/2012 - 7:04pm.
Dumb and Dumber: Newsweek and Andrew Sullivan
It may be childish and immature to call someone or some groups dumb although most of us, myself included, have hurled the dumb epithet at one time or another. Personally, lately I've mainly confined my allegations of dumb, stupid, inept, incompetent, etc. to politicians and their lackeys and always with bases in fact.
It’s one thing in casual conversation to call someone or some group dumb when they have acted or spokenly stupidly–Barack Hussein Obama and the Occupy Wall Streeters come to mind. It’s quite another when a formerly-respected journalist and national periodical label an entire political movement “stupid.”
The author of the "stupid" label in this week's Newsweek, which the magazine changed to "dumb" in its headline, was Andrew Sullivan, the conservative turncoat and exceptionally hate-filled homosexual and unabashed Obama-idolator known for his vituperative language. Sullivan is known, too, for his committment to the hackneyed Blame-Bush ruse, pinning all this president's failures on the previous administration.
Still, for Newsweek to publish its weekly featuring the headline, "Why Are Obama's Critics So Dumb?" subtitled, "Andrew Sullivan on the Man with a Plan," is so far beyond the propriety pale that it suggests Sullivan has succumbed to dementia and that one of Obama's prime MSM publications has succumbed to bankruptcy and doesn't give a rat's ass what the public thinks of it.
Actually, Sullivan's dementia speaks for itself and Newsweek is on the verge of going belly-up. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=12154.)