Howard Kurtz: Why No Outrage Over Democrat Saying Republicans Want to Kill Women?
As NewsBusters previously reported, Congresswoman Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.) said Wednesday Republican freshmen in the House "are here to kill women."
On CNN's "Reliable Sources" Sunday, host Howard Kurtz correctly wondered why this didn't cause any media outrage (video follows with transcript and commentary):
HOWARD KURTZ, HOST: But I wonder if you think enough attention was paid to -- you know, we often talk about when conservatives say things like "You lie," it gets a lot of attention. Here's Democratic Congresswoman Louise Slaughter saying Republicans want to kill woman. And I didn't see a lot of outrage about that. I mean, that's pretty hot rhetoric.
MATT LEWIS, DAILY CALLER: Well, especially if you look at it in the context of where we've been. I was on your show, like, a month ago, and we were talking about the heated rhetoric and about the new tone that we should have in the wake of the Gabby Giffords thing. I mean, so all this talk about toning down the rhetoric, and here you have a Democrat using what I think is unacceptable political rhetoric for politics.
KURTZ: Not that there hasn't been hot rhetoric on both sides.
Sure, but the hot rhetoric from Republicans always gets reported, Howie - and that's the difference.
But that wasn't the end of this discussion, for there was another surprise moments later:
KURTZ: Julie Mason, President Obama, at first, for weeks, seemed rather disengaged, staying on the sidelines. Then, in the last few days, he started briefing reporters at 10:00 at night.
Did the White House make an attempt to convince journalists that the president was really driving this process at the end?
JULIE MASON, POLITICO: At the end. And really, this shows a real maturing of how the White House handles these political situations, because he got in at the very end and they inoculated him. If they come out with a deal, he gets the credit. If the deal breaks down, and the government shuts down, then it's not Obama's fault because he wasn't really involved. It was Congress' fault.
KURTZ: Are you suggesting that that is reality or that this is a spin that the media happily swallowed?
MASON: Oh, it's a complete spin. And the worst thing about this was -- is that when they did come out with a deal, the media was piling on saying this is great for Boehner, this is great for Obama, they worked it out, when really the entire situation was a failure of leadership. How did it get that far?
KURTZ: Yes. Well, in part, because the Democrats didn't pass the budget last year when they controlled both houses.
Indeed. So why hasn't there been media outrage about that as the government moved towards a shutdown that was narrowly averted late Friday evening?
Unfortunately, Kurtz didn't address that hypocrisy.
Too bad.
- Noel Sheppard's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
That's a rhetorical question,
Submitted by motherbelt on Sun, 04/10/2011 - 4:30pm.
That's a rhetorical question, right?
We know the answer to Kurtz's question
Submitted by Galvanic on Sun, 04/10/2011 - 4:30pm.
The MSM generally agrees with the sentiment if not detail in the hyperbole.
"Unfortunately, Kurtz didn't
Submitted by VBaxter on Sun, 04/10/2011 - 4:55pm.
"Unfortunately, Kurtz didn't address that hypocrisy."
It's okay Noel. He already gave facts and made sense for 2 minutes. That's enough for the week.
Ron Paul 2012
RE: Unfortunately...
Submitted by maddog98 on Sun, 04/10/2011 - 9:00pm.
Noel - it's NOT a perfect world. WE ALL SHOULD BE PRAISING him for highlighting such disparities. I do like your columns & this is still a good one, but we must start the change SLOWLY...
Keep it going....
Indeed you should...
Submitted by Jer on Mon, 04/11/2011 - 1:15am.
Kurtz has called out Dems far more often than what the good folks at NewsBusters would believe, and his rousing defense of Limbaugh on several occasions has been the stuff of legends--not very fond ones--on the lefty blogs.
Jer
Decisions, decisions---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 04/12/2011 - 12:50am.
Ginger, or Mary Ann?
Budweiser, or Coors?
Joe Scarborough, or Howie Kurtz?
MD
Well...
Submitted by octavioj on Sun, 04/10/2011 - 5:11pm.
One has to remember that Julie Mason used to be White House correspondent for the Washington Examiner, not exactly a bastion of liberal media. I was actually surprised she moved to Politico.
Louise Slaughter (D)
Submitted by okiehawk44 on Sun, 04/10/2011 - 8:24pm.
The media couldn't respond to Slaughter's comments right away because they were looking for their dead sister's false teeth before appearing on camera.
ROFLMAO!
Submitted by tinydancer on Mon, 04/11/2011 - 7:12pm.
ROFLMAO!