Stephen King Bashes Reagan and Republicans For Making His Taxes Too Low
Horror writer Stephen King on Tuesday bashed Ronald Reagan and a number of Republicans at a Wake the State rally in Sarasota, Florida.
His main beef with conservatives is they allow him to pay too little in taxes (video follows with partial transcript and commentary):
STEPHEN KING: I'm from Maine, but I pay taxes in Florida, too. Let me tell you something: in Maine last November, three candidates ran, the Tea Party guy won by one percent. He's a minority governor. And you know what? The guy's a stone brain. And I thought to myself, "Well, that's alright. I'm a snow bird. I'm gonna go to Florida. Things will be better in Florida."
And on the way down here I drove and I heard about this guy in Wisconsin, his name was [Republican Governor Scott] Walker and apparently he wanted to stop collective bargaining. That’s supposed to balance the budget. That’s the magic bullet. So you’ve got [Republican Governor Paul] LePage in Maine, Walker in Wisconsin, you got [Republican Governor Rick] Scott in Florida. It’s Larry, Curly and Moe. That’s what we got right here.
Now you might say, "What are you doing up there? Aren’t you rich?" The answer is: thank God, yes. Because I grew up poor. I lived in a family where my mother asked donated commodities from a Republican administration and got turned down. That’s where I came from. And you know what? As a rich person I pay 28 percent tax. What I want to ask you is why am I not paying 50? Why isn’t anybody in my bracket not paying 50?
Stop the tape. King in 2010 either didn't make a lot of money or he doesn't know what today's federal income tax brackets are. According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 28 percent bracket for married couples began at $137,300 in income and ended at $209,250.
Can you imagine the kind of recession we'd have if couples making over $137,300 were taxed at 50 percent?
But the ignorance or dishonesty on display didn't end there, for the highest federal bracket is 35 percent for couples making over $373,650, which doesn't include additional "Alternative Minimum Taxes" if they apply.
As such, if King and his wife are only in the 28 percent bracket, it's either because he didn't sell a lot of books last year, or his accountant did a great job reducing their income with write-offs and expenses. If the latter, King could certainly instruct his tax advisor to not take any deductions at all thereby paying the maximum amount of tax provided in the law.
Of course, therein lies the income tax hypocrisy of most liberals: they advocate higher taxes as they do everything within their power to pay as little as possible.
Let's continue:
KING: Well you know what? You know what? The Republicans would tell you, from John Boehner to Mitch McConnell to Rick Scott that we can't do that because if we tax guys like me, there won't be any jobs. It's bull. It's total bull.
Well, it's not just Republicans that made this claim.
King must have been asleep or out of the country when Barack Obama and Bill Clinton stood in front of television cameras in December telling the American people that it would be devastating to the economy to not extend the Bush tax cuts. Ditto when Obama's tax plan passed the Senate 81-19 with only 13 Democrats voting "No," and when it passed the House 277-148 with 139 Democrats voting "Aye."
But idiots like King think it's only Republicans that believe higher taxes are bad for the economy.
Not surprisingly, that wasn't the last absurd comment the horror author made Tuesday:
KING: These people come from the Party of Ronald Reagan, the Great Communicator, who one year put down on his taxes that he gave $10,000 to charity. Well, my wife and I - my wife is here, right there in the Crayola shirt - we try to make up the difference, the shortfall, that 22 percent that we don’t pay, by giving it away. But you know what, I haven’t seen a lot of that going around.
Big Hollywood's John Nolte marvelously responded to this nonsense Wednesday:
Yes, his elitist, holier-than-thou and arrogantly mistaken belief that a whole lot of people in the most charitable country in the world aren’t as charitable as he is, is off-putting in the extreme. But that he’s able to give that 22% of his income not swallowed up by the blackhole of the government directly to the causes he believes in is a beautiful thing. This is exactly why raising taxes is a terrible idea. Regardless of what people do with their money, whatever they do with it is better for this economy than what the government does with it. [...]
Also, King ripping on Reagan giving “only” $10,000 to charity one year is hilarious. Even if it’s true, I’m happy to play that game. Could someone remind Mr. King that in 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004, Barack Obama gave a TOTAL of just over $10,000 to charity. But please don’t remind King that Vice President Joe Biden’s charitable giving was beyond laughable, I’d hate to see a best-selling author cry.
Then there’s this. Newsflash, Stephen King: You wouldn’t be so gosh-darned alone in your awesome philanthropy if someone like Ronald Reagan was president.
Second newsflash: Conservatives give more to charity than liberals. So it looks as thought [sic] that loneliness you feel is in your own ideological backyard.
That King doesn't know any of this is not at all surprising as he has over the years made numerous public statements devoid of facts or logic.
This continually leads us at NewsBusters to recommend he stick to writing fiction - his grasp on reality is tenuous at best.
- Noel Sheppard's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
What's stopping you, King?
Submitted by jon_torlin on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 12:26pm.
Hey King, your wallet is in your possession, right? It's not like those TommyKnockers that make you do things against your will, what's keeping you from sending in more of your own money if you think you don't have enough taxes taken out? You better do it or the Langoliers are gonna eat you up!
-Jon
Touche!
Submitted by Pilgrim1949 on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 12:34pm.
These Lib fat cats (the massive Mr. Moore included!) have nothing whatsoever preventing them from opening their benevolent hearts and wallets and pouring forth a commensurate stream of money (instead of misdirected vitriol) towards the ever-insatiable maw of the IRS.
After all, since taxes are "voluntary" (*cough, spit, chortle!*) these uber-compassionate Libs should be leading the charge and showing, by their generous example, how the rest of the peasants should be supporting and feeding the governmental leviathan.
Any moment now, any minute, just waiting for them to descend upon Washington with mucho dinero to lavish upon ----- their favorite Lib Senators and Congresscritters.....
"Ye canne change the laws of physics....." but some politicians believe that with the right legislation you can pretend they don't really apply to your own pet projects...
Massachusetts Tried It
Submitted by libBuster on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 4:11pm.
Massachusetts let people sign themselves up to pay a higher tax rate. There were very few volunteers. Not even John Kerry signed up.Why is there a picture of Janet Reno in this article?
Submitted by WhoIsJohnGalt on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 3:22pm.
-he heI gotta say - I was thinking
Submitted by killa37 on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 11:40pm.
I gotta say - I was thinking along the same lines!!! Except King is better looking than Reno, although she is more masculine!!!All he has to do is, at tax time.
Submitted by OldJoe on Fri, 03/11/2011 - 7:23am.
Fire the accountants. King does not HAVE to take any deductions. Just list his income, take the standard deduction. The tax table will instruct him on how much to write on the check to the IRS. Thank you, dear TaxpayerWhat a moron
Submitted by hbnolikeee on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 12:29pm.
Hey King, send the government all your money. Believe me, they'll take. What a grandstanding fool.Ive heard from this jerk before
Submitted by brutony1 on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 12:38pm.
And he better STFU about "us" because were the ones who buy his books, or I should say bought in past tense, cause I wouldnt buy a pamphlet from this hater anymore!When will liberals WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE! -Me
Hey Stevie...time to DONATE those MILLIONS you have
Submitted by redright88 on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 12:39pm.
Barry and the dems are glad to accept it...form CHUMPS like youHERE'S DIRECTIONS ON HOW TO WRITE A CHECK.........
Submitted by Herbster on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 12:53pm.
Dear Mr. King.......Take checkbook.....open checkbook.....take pen......write LARGE check payable to the U.S.Treasury....put in envelope and mail. A typical liberal....do as I say, not as I do. All this loudmouth has to do is write a check to the government if he feels under taxed. Never happen. Just full of hot air....as usual. His formulaic books suck, but at least he's good for a laugh.He says he does
Submitted by astonrickenbach on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 1:30pm.
FTA " Well, my wife and I - my wife is here, right there in the Crayola shirt - we try to make up the difference, the shortfall, that 22 percent that we don’t pay, by giving it away. But you know what, I haven’t seen a lot of that going around."We aren't taxed too little, we spend too much
Submitted by nkviking75 on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 12:54pm.
It's just amazing how these fools can't accept the reality that we're spending far too much money (unless it has to do with defense). When Reagan cut taxes, federal revenue INCREASED, but the Democrat Congress increased spending even faster. The real "stone brains" are on the left.“Always love your country — but never trust your government!" -- Bob Novak (1931-2009)
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
Viking
Submitted by Model850 on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 4:01pm.
Just curious; Why do you exempt defense from fiscal restraint? Do you not agree there is waste in DoD spending, just as there is in every other federal department? I don't advocate "gutting" defense but I'm certain savings are possible from that area of spending.This is another example of
Submitted by Beukeboom on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 12:59pm.
This is another example of someone who is completely ignorant of the situation and/or topic being given a platform to spew forth their ignorance while the MSM gives his ignorance undue credance. BTW, Mr. King, if you truly are wishing to pay more taxes, I request you bypass the federal government and just send your substantial donation to me. I'll be glad to accept it since it would make you feel so much better.Pick a charity and STFU !!!
Submitted by xyzzypoofs on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 1:12pm.
Use your free will to support worthwhile charities if you think you have too much money doofball.Hey! I already called dibs on
Submitted by Beukeboom on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 1:31pm.
Hey! I already called dibs on becoming his favorite charity!washed up, has been
Submitted by cyborg0012 on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 1:14pm.
He's struggling to be relevant. Most has-beens try to squawk about political subject when their career is on the wane. It's just their ego; this is the way they still fool themselves into believing they're still important. No one reads his stuff any more.Note, the crybaby of the
Submitted by jdhawk on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 1:41pm.
Note, the crybaby of the left, King, didn't buy a vacation home in California aka "tax the crap out of you, state," but instead choose Florida, a state that has no state income tax, sales tax that is 50% less than California's, and property tax that ranks as the lowest in the southern U.S. By the way, there is no way that this idiot is paying 28% in federal income taxes unless he has no royalties coming from his movies and books and his income is soley derived from captial gains, dividends, and interest. And, in that case, he paid income tax on the original earned income in the range of over 50% including all taxing authorities. So that now he can pay taxes on it again as it earns money from being invested. If you add it up, he is paying 80% plus in taxes on the money earned and invested. What a country! But, hey, maybe King is trying to invent a new genre, speaking fiction!This is one weird (and dumb) dude...
Submitted by PrairieSky on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 1:51pm.
Doesn't this fool know or understand that he can pay more in taxes if he chooses to?? Why anyone with a brain would want to I don't know, but if he wants to give more of his money to the government, so they can go waste it, it's completely up to him. Hey, Stevie, break out that checkbook, bud!
I love these rich, liberal idiots bi#$%ing about the fact that we the people should be paying more in taxes. It's easy for them to say...they're loaded. But the rest of us would rather hang onto as much of our money as is possible, thanks. And I wonder if King would be as generous with his money if a Republican president was in office?? Somehow, I doubt it.
"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction...It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them (our children) to do the same." ~President Ronald Reagan
Oh the horror. How about he
Submitted by Miss_Me_Yet on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 2:08pm.
Oh the horror. How about you write a novel about it, then Michael Moore can make into a propaganda film, and we'll just ignore both ?
This way you can make yourself even more useless than usual Stevarino, why dontcha?
Liberals ... we can't live with them, they couldn't survive without us ...
Yawn. Another rich liberal
Submitted by Smartypants on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 2:08pm.
Yawn. Another rich liberal griping because his taxes aren't high enough. Of course, he can pay whatever he wants, or even donate his entire fortune to charity. Instead, he chooses to bash Reagan and Republicans for lowering taxes on everyone. The cheapskate nature of Democrats is overlooked (i.e., John Kerry, Al Gore, B.O. et al) while Republicans continue to be the bogeymen. All the while, he makes up facts to support his flawed conclusions. Liberals live in a land of make-believe. They do not use reason, logic or facts to form conclusions in their minds; instead they use emotion-based drivel. They must create good guys and bad guys in their minds, and then everything flows from that isolated thinking.One more point: A huge flaw
Submitted by Smartypants on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 2:18pm.
One more point: A huge flaw in the argument of these rich libs, who state that their taxes sould be higher, is the fact that neither party has ever (to the best of my knowledge) proposed a tax solely on the super-wealthy (of which which King surely is a member). The tax proposals always include the top tax brackets starting in the more "average" $200-$300K range. I'm going to assume, in a typical year of writing the same book over and over, King makes far more than $300K. A married couple making $300K might be comfortable in many ways, but they are not enormously wealthy. This is why the "tax the rich" argument is a specious one. There are never proposals to tax only the rich; it really is all about taxing the upper middle class. It is no different when I hear Warren Buffett and his ilk spout about higher taxes. There are no proposals, even by Democrats, to tax only billionaires and their buddies. So, we get billionaires and hundred millionaires essentially arguing that taxes should be higher on the upper middle class. Does that make sense?Put YOUR money where YOUR mouth is
Submitted by ruby2ssday on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 2:23pm.
Of course he could send a donation check to the IRS and it would be gladly accepted. That should help heal his remorse about not paying enough taxes. But, you have to translate what he (and other rich demos) are saying. Words have special meaning to them. In the phrase "my taxes are too low" the word "my" does not have the same meaning to him as it does to the rest of us. In this context, the word "my" means literally "your". You see he doesn't really think his taxes are too low, he thinks YOUR taxes are too low. Learn the language of these folks and you will be enlighted.He already is
Submitted by astonrickenbach on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 2:38pm.
FTA " Well, my wife and I - my wife is here, right there in the Crayola shirt - we try to make up the difference, the shortfall, that 22 percent that we don’t pay, by giving it away. But you know what, I haven’t seen a lot of that going around." Which isn't that actually a libertarian idealism where taxes are low and people who have wealth are free to distribute it to people in need?So
Submitted by HockeyKid on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 4:01pm.
You concluded from the article that King is a libertarian. I suggest some continuing ed classes in reading comprehension."Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me
Actually no.
Submitted by astonrickenbach on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 9:40pm.
I didn't conclude anything. I was actually asking a question and am trying to figure out how this is considered a lack of reading comprehension. In my area,many of the libertarians espouse low taxes and limited government funding of any and all programs except those stated in the constitution. They are stating that it is up to individuals and businesses to fund this programs through charitable donations. This is what King stated he is doing (assuming when he states he is giving his money away it is going to charities or non-profits). So my question once again is this philosophically what all libertarians believe or just the ones that I know of?What shortfall are you talking about?
Submitted by Kingfish17 on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 10:17pm.
Mind fleshing out your point with a little math? And, since when does being libertarian mean anything about giving a certain percentage of income away?"You can’t go take a trip to Las Vegas...on the taxpayer’s dime." Barack Obama
Fleshing what out with a
Submitted by astonrickenbach on Fri, 03/11/2011 - 10:08am.
Fleshing what out with a little math? "And, since when does being libertarian mean anything about giving a certain percentage of income away?" I will re-post what I asked. "In my area,many of the libertarians espouse low taxes and limited government funding of any and all programs except those stated in the constitution. They are stating that it is up to individuals and businesses to fund this programs through charitable donations.....So my question once again is this philosophically what all libertarians believe or just the ones that I know of?" So I am going to assume from your answer that No, the original stance of being libertarian does not involve giving your money to help charities and causes that the government should not be funding. If that is the case, then you have answered what I have asked.Libertarian
Submitted by Kingfish17 on Fri, 03/11/2011 - 11:11am.
True libertarians believe that government should not be involved in programs that redistribute wealth. Any redistribution, through charities, should be on a voluntary basis.
"You can’t go take a trip to Las Vegas...on the taxpayer’s dime." Barack Obama
Thanks.
Submitted by astonrickenbach on Fri, 03/11/2011 - 3:54pm.
That answers the question I was asking. It is kind of what I thought I just wanted to get a different opinion on it.What shortfall
Submitted by astonrickenbach on Fri, 03/11/2011 - 10:10am.
Oh and to answer your question, I was posting a direct quote by King who referred to a shortfall. I have no idea what he means so you would have to ask him for some clarification.Of course if we actually analyze his actions...
Submitted by WhoIsJohnGalt on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 4:05pm.
He states that he and his wife give away that 22%. To charity, we are led to assume by his choice of words. Which means that he believes the government is not as efficient/benevolent/kindly/competent as a private charitable organization, yet he advocates that the government SHOULD confiscate for the purposes of redistribution, private wealth. If he were consistent, he would send his excess wealth to the IRS, rather than a charity. Something tells me that if he were doing that, it would NOT be a state secret...we'd all hear about it as a way to bash conservative fiscal arguments.Shame on those mean-spirited repubs....
Submitted by Dave. on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 2:34pm.
...for hiding Stevie's checkbook, which is obviously what is preventing him from sending more money to the IRS.
I bet this idiot has no clue how much he actually pays in taxes.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Everyone knows that if anyone feels they are 'undertaxed',...
Submitted by jawebster1 on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 2:47pm.
then they are free to pay more. The I.R.S. will be happy to accept the money. If this guy feels he doesn't pay enough in taxes, then it is his fault and his fault alone and not the fault of Reagan and the Republicans!It's Patriotic not to Pay Income tax
Submitted by slegnaz on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 2:57pm.
Prior to 1913 Americans didn't pay a dime to the IRS. Commerce was high as was patriotism. There wasn't an IRS to harrass us like tax collecting goon bureaucrats harrassed Germans,Italians and other Eurpopeans to pay for war and war implements, social programs and other wasteful socialistic schemes. Prior to 1913,the inflation happy Federal Reserve had not been created and the two US senators that represented the states in congress were choosen by the state legislatures. They were subject to recall if they failed to represent the states honestly and effectively! Prior to 1913 Congress had to raise the money via apportionment. The money had to be raised first and then the bill voted on and the budget better not have any red ink over-runs. The US senators watched out for their state like a hen watches her chicks making certain that his state didn't pay an unequal share of the taxes to meet the budget. Steven King lives in a fantasy world as do most fiction writers. They make millions selling garbage to readers who are miseducated in our taxpayer supported public schools. It's no wonder that the appeal to trashy novels in America is so high.Dufus
Submitted by PrimalElements on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 2:59pm.
Just write a check Steve...................you hypocrite.Do some people
Submitted by HockeyKid on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 4:06pm.
really not understand the difference between taxes and charity? Oh, and Mr. King, I suggest that the reason you don't see much fiscal altruism "going around" is that you hang out with liberals. They talk a big game, but when it comes to the Benjamins, their Starbucks and Priuses come first."Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me
Change the Federal Income Tax Forms
Submitted by Kingfish17 on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 4:25pm.
Republicans need to change the federal income tax forms. Add a check off box that allows people to increase their federal tax rate up to 100% of their wages. We need to make it as easy as possible for these hypocrites to increase what they pay in federal taxes. Of course, they won't, but then when these liars say they should be paying more taxes, it's easy to ask them why they didn't check off the box that enabled them to.
"You can’t go take a trip to Las Vegas...on the taxpayer’s dime." Barack Obama
I think it's time we call their bluff
Submitted by JakeMo on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 8:53pm.
You say that in jest. But I think it's time we call their bluff. It needs to be added to the 2011 tax code they're working on right now.Add a check box at the end, right after the Presidential Campaign contribution ripoff box that says: "YES, I would like to double my tax burden. I will pay twice what I owe."
And in return, the IRS will send them a T-shirt that says, "I want you to think I care about you. Please like me."
Sure
Submitted by Boudin on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 9:03pm.
Please like me
A "Kiss me I'm Irish" shirt would probably work better
t-shirt
Submitted by Agnostic on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 9:05pm.
How about a red t-shirt with the words "We are all Socialist NOW" in yellow.Not jesting at all
Submitted by Kingfish17 on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 9:15pm.
I've been pushing the idea of adding a check-off box to voluntarily raise individual tax rates on IRS forms for years. I would love to see the headline:
This Years IRS filings show that 99.999% of Americans do not want to pay more in taxes!
"You can’t go take a trip to Las Vegas...on the taxpayer’s dime." Barack Obama
Hey Stevie
Submitted by donabernathy on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 7:16pm.
write a bigger check on April 15..... Jeebus...... and you make a living with a penwhat a dope
roflmao
Suggestions for Steve
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 7:42pm.
Here's a thought, sell you house in Sarasota and donate the money to the IRS, give you house in Maine to the local government for the homeless and live in a house more appropriate to the working class.
This is the guy who started writing a book on the internet and asked people to send him money as he wrote each chapter. He got mad when people didn't send in money. Putz.
Hey Stevie!!! Write ME a 7
Submitted by killa37 on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 11:39pm.
Hey Stevie!!! Write ME a 7 figure check, and chalk it up to some charity...........since you're so damn anxious to make up that 22% that you AREN'T paying in taxes, because the EVIL Ronald Reagan MADE you do it!!!! I'll hire some more guys, do something productive, help the crappy economy here in the People's Republic of Hawaii - now governed by that Marxist hippie cretin Neil Uber-Commie (who doesnt' seem to be able to find Barry Soetoro's birth certificate!!!). Talk about being owned by the unions!!! Well, that's another subject............. And, I'll also read some of your books, which is something I've never done.Apparently King is one of
Submitted by Cowboy on Fri, 03/11/2011 - 12:14am.
Apparently King is one of those progressives who complains his taxes are too low, but doesn't send in any extra. "I think that we're all mentally ill. Those of us outside the asylums only hide it a little better - and maybe not all that much better after all." — Stephen KingWho's stopping King from
Submitted by talkradio55 on Fri, 03/11/2011 - 6:53pm.
Who's stopping King from giving more money voluntarily out of his own pocket. Liberals love high taxes because they don't pay taxes. They hide their money in shelters in Swiss ban accounts and force us to pay. Hey Stephen, STAY OUT OF MY POCKETS!!!! As Rush told an idiot liberal caller years ago, "YOU CHEAP BASTARD!"