Dem Senator Destroys David Gregory's Case About Racism In Tea Party
David Gregory on Sunday asked what he must have thought was a loaded question concerning alleged racism in the Tea Party.
Likely much to his surprise, both his Republican and Democrat guests on "Meet the Press" said they hadn't seen any evidence of that (video follows with transcript and commentary):
DAVID GREGORY, HOST: But, you know, it's--is that point, there are a lot of folks who, supported by the tea party, in the tea party, say, `Oh, there's a mainstream movement.' But there are others who say it is anything but. As a matter of fact, the Institute for Research and Education on Human Rights and the NAACP are releasing a report this coming week. And here it is, I'll show it on the screen. The "Tea Party Nationalism, a critical examination of the Tea Party movement and the size, scope and focus of its national factions." And there are some serious charges that I want you to respond to. "The result of this study contravenes many of the Tea Parties' self-invented myths, particularly their sole concentration on budget deficits, taxes, and the power of the federal government. Instead, this report found Tea Party ranks to be permeated with concerns about race and national identity and other so-called social issues. ... Tea party organization have given platforms to anti-Semites, racists and bigots, Further, hard-core white nationalists have been attracted to these protests, looking for potential recruits and hoping to push these (white) protestors toward a more self-conscious and ideological white supremacy." If you're senator, do you think these elements in the tea party need to be dealt with and need to be rebuffed?
KEN BUCK, REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE FOR COLORADO SENATOR: Absolutely. First of all, I haven't seen it. I've been to over 800 events in Colorado in, in the last 20 months. I have not seen that. And, and I find it offensive that folks would try to label the tea party in that way. It's just not true in Colorado. I don't know if it's true in other states, I haven't been to the other states. But I can tell you that if there are people that hold those views, they are quickly asked to leave meetings. I have not seen them in, in meetings.
MR. GREGORY: Senator, is this a legitimate question? Is this a mainstream movement? Because this is high stakes in your, in your campaign, in this debate.
SEN. MICHAEL BENNET (D-CO): Yeah. Well, you know, David, over the last 22 months, I've had town halls in every part of our state, red and blue, and said the same thing in all those places. And what I'll tell you is this, my favorite rooms are the ones where there are Democrats, Republicans, unaffiliated voters, and tea party people, because when folks are together in a room, they actually have to listen to each other. I think one of the things that we are facing right now is that we've stopped listening to each other in our politics. So I haven't seen a lot of that either, and I have had the opportunity to engage with people who are self-described tea party people, to have a serious conversation rather than just a bunch of slogans about how we are not going to become--you know, what, what we need to do so that we're not the first generation of Americans who leave less opportunity, not more, to our kids and our grandkids.
A good attorney knows not to ask a question of a witness if he doesn't already know the answer.
The wisdom of this approach was clearly evident in this MTP segment, for Gregory never would have brought this issue up if he knew Bennet was going to completely agree with Buck.
In the end, his guests answered his obviously loaded question with blanks.
Wasn't it marvelous?
- Noel Sheppard's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
If only...
Submitted by jdlybrand on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 4:52pm.
...Gregory and his ilk would crawl out from their insulated caves and see first hand what they're talking about., they might garner a little respect from folks like me. Truth is, they can't handle the truth.
"What a revoltin' development this is!"
Chester Riley
That settles it...........
Submitted by Tomorama on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 4:59pm.
Shit, if the NAACP says there is racism they must be correct as they are so mainsteam in their thinking.
A liberal funded institution for civil rights THAT HAS TO KEEP MAKING IT UP IN ORDER TO KEEP THEIR FUNDING, hmmm, another mainstream outfit.
Ya, Obama sat in a black theology church for twenty years and WE were not able to say he believed what his paster believed, even though said pastor married him and baptized his kids.
Yep, this makes perfect sense to me, but I am a dumb Conservative.
Didn't the president just say
Submitted by metaphorsbwithu on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 5:00pm.
Didn't the president just say that blacks don't watch Meet the Press?
Maybe Gregory should start asking about racism at NBC and in the MSM in general ... and the Democrat Party for that matter.
YES
Submitted by ricklail on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 5:47pm.
When I heard him say that, blacks don't watch MTP, I spewed my Diet Pepsi all over my desk at work.
Actually We the People ought
Submitted by Barack_must_go..... on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 6:30pm.
Actually We the People ought get up real close & personal with Barack Obama , the supposed president of all citizens of the United States of America , not just those of color, as has been his practice up till now.
We need to question him about just what the f$ck is wrong with that giant , don't fit in his head it's so big ( according to Joey B. ) brain of his.
This guy ought to receive an Academy award or even another international prize as the stealth racist of our time.
He along with his co conpiritor wife have made their absolute disdain for America in general , our Founding Fathers , any & all institutions of business and white folks in general through both their words , but moreso their actions.
They refuse to accept or see this country through the eyes of the average middle to upper middle class , even though this predominently white segment of the population is unequivically the back bone of America. Instead they choose to see it from the black or persons of color perspective. This myopic view is destoying this country from within our very own White House at an alarmingly quick pace.
Programs such as free health care for all , no soda or a 10% tax , putting free refridgerators in stores so they'll sell apples , no cheeseburger , french fry zones , anti Christian while pro muslim policies , don't prosecute then sweep under the carpet blatent black on white racism , president engaging every group including illegal aliens yet wouldn't be caught dead addressing a white only crowd are but a few are but a few of the irrefutable facts that prove me right.
It's about time We the People call a spade a spade then get on with the countries business.....because Barack sure as hell isn't going to.
Look , the first black man in the president role has been & continues today to be a complete & utter failure , any honest man , woman , child or pet would & should admit this if we truely want to move forward.
This failure is not the fault of any one group in this country , it's simply the facts of life.
Approximately 68% of voters chose Barack Obama , knowing full well the color of his skin and still they hoped and believed in his " Hope & Change " bullshit. So better luck next time , as it is he Barack Obama that let this country down & not the other way around.........that's the Gods honest truth no matter what those douchebags over at MSNBC tell you to the contrary.
Barack_Must_Go.....
Racist Teabaggers...
Submitted by adamsmith on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 9:24am.
Barack_must_go.....I'd say that's the most common sense observation of what's really going on I've read anywhere yet. Everyone seems to be beating up whitey lately(even self loathing, guilt ridden libbies)and whitey gets called a Racist on it. World upside down and all that.
Gregory and the rest of his ilk have been pushing this "Tea Party is Racist" garbage for as long as the Tea Party has been in existence. The Tea Party plain and simple is about stopping Uncle Sam from becoming Robin Hood with our money. Wealth redistribution is robbery. If an individual did what the government does, he'd be sitting in jail for extortion, robbery, and God only knows what else. It seems wanting the government out of our pockets for their own enrichment as well as paying for their reelections is racist. Count me in. Like everyone else in the Tea Party, the only color that matters to me is GREEN. Just because I want to keep more of what I earn doesn't make me a racist. Obama's policies on the other hand are pure "HATE WHITEY"......
I was listening to Boy
Submitted by killa37 on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 5:09pm.
I was listening to Boy Blunder flapping his purple lips last week at some 'fire and brimstone' rally - probably with a bunch of paid attendees - and the whole thing sounded pretty racists, divisive, and incendiary to me......but, hell, I'm a racist bigoted hate-filled white conservative, so who am I to make any comments on it?????
And didn't Soetoro Hussein make some kind of a public commercial a couple of months ago, encouraging the 'blacks and asians and hispanics' to be sure and vote?? That sounds a little racist to me, but, like I said, I'm not really qualified to comment on it.............
Gregory would have to be bigot to promote such a bigoted ..
Submitted by Gary Hall on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 5:07pm.
Gregory would have to be bigot to promote such an intolerant.. no, bigoted view.
(;~/ gary
Maybe so, but he's just
Submitted by ampul man on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 6:24am.
Maybe so, but he's just another Demo Flack.
CNN, the Clinton News Network---Bill decides; Hill reports
The IREHR?
Submitted by Galvanic on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 5:26pm.
I had never heard of these folks before, so I went to their website and checked "About Us." Their 'new statement' says a lot about the 'findings' of their alleged study. See for yourself.
http://www.irehr.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=6&Itemid=16
That NBC would use these guys as a source of information is indicative of how low they've gone.
Darnit Gal...
Submitted by jdlybrand on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 5:28pm.
...beat me to the punch by three minutes. I guess brilliant minds think alike! :-)
"What a revoltin' development this is!"
Chester Riley
thanks, Gal, for looking that up!
Submitted by motherbelt on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 5:32pm.
I was about to; now I don't have to!
What a load of propaganda!
Another of the media's unlabeled "watchdog" groups.
Poverty rates have gone up. Racial disparities that impose special penalties on black and brown people remain hidden inside terrifyingly high rates of unemployment. Bank foreclosures have undermined even the chance of home ownership for too many. Public education, human services and the social infrastructure remain underfunded....
Gosh, this sounds like a Democrat's stump speech!!
I call them Fear Institutes
Submitted by Galvanic on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 6:31pm.
Their primary purpose is to fabricate "study" data to substantiate political rhetoric, and stick their academic-sounding name on it to make it look credible.
The Southern Poverty Law Center fulfills a similar role. I wouldn't be surprised to find a link between the two.
I'll bet you were shocked to
Submitted by motherbelt on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 7:55pm.
I'll bet you were shocked to hear that the NAACP is a partner in releasing this "study."
I know I certainly was!
Shocked face
Stunned
Submitted by Galvanic on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 9:11pm.
I guess if these two prestigious organizations report it, it must be true. :-p
I started laughing before I
Submitted by Radical1979 on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 6:27pm.
I started laughing before I finished the first paragraph! This is the source of the report Gregory quoted? And they expect to be taken seriously?
The last paragraph sums it up pretty well...
Submitted by ontheright on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:33am.
"We aim to continue examining racist, anti-Semitic, and far right social movements..."
But they sure as hell won't examine far left social movements like - elf, peta, greenpeace, code pink, black radical congress, communist party USA, democrat socialists USA, left turn, 10:10, etc. etc. etc. etc.
...or how about examing the likes of these racist bigots - jesse jackson, al sharpton, the new black panthers, jeremiah wright, king jr., burris, rangel, waters, obamalinsky, the entire congressional black caucus, etc. etc. etc.
A guy can dream...
oTr
Nice job David
Submitted by jdlybrand on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 5:26pm.
Gregory may as well have used Al Gore as an unbiased source on the need for carbon credits.
http://www.irehr.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=6&Itemid=16
"What a revoltin' development this is!"
Chester Riley
delete
Submitted by motherbelt on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 5:31pm.
delete
"Likely much to his surprise"?
Submitted by yutsnark on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 5:35pm.
"Likely much to his surprise"? I doubt it.
Any experienced interviewer would expect a savvy politician to field such a question thusly: . "1. I've been out listening to a zillion people in this great state of ours... 2. They're all good, solid Americans. 3. Once they get to know me, they all want to vote for me."
imo
Submitted by TerryWest on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 5:39pm.
It's the caucasian dominated main stream media and the democratic party themselves who have exploited and are continuing to manipulate the black & hispanic race, dictate their agenda, high jack their voice, and determine their direction.
At some point one has to ask, how's this self anointed overseer program working out for me?
The NAACP
Submitted by gfrrman on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 11:47pm.
and "people of color" have always bitched about the use of the word plantation, yet they have been living on the plantation of the Democrat party for years, so I have to say just shut it when I hear any BS like this!!!
The Hack Strikes Again
Submitted by pbthinker on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 5:41pm.
When they appointed David Gregory to be the new host of Meet the Press, I knew the fix was in. He was little more than a partisan hack, when he was the White House Correspondent for NBC and now he's going to be asking the questions.
I've seen rally after rally, been to a local one, read websites, and what they're saying is not true. People that have been there know that so, if people like Gregory, are trying to paint it this way, you just know they have an agenda.
Tea Parties are all about fiscal responsibility, reigning in the debt, not spending our children and grandchildren's future. It was all brought on when they passed the porkulus bill and just got stronger, as Obama pushed his extreme liberal agenda. They can make it about race all they want, the problem is they're wrong.
This only goes to prove....
Submitted by Kingfish17 on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 5:54pm.
This only goes to prove that even the occasional Democrat Senator can be racist too. How dare he not tow the line that the Tea Party is composed of racists! He must be a racist himself.
/sarc
"You can’t go take a trip to Las Vegas...on the taxpayer’s dime." Barack Obama
Confused
Submitted by xraynova on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 6:17pm.
"Instead, this report found Tea Party ranks to be permeated with concerns about race and national identity and other so-called social issues. ... Tea party organization have given platforms to anti-Semites, racists and bigots..."You people who actually watch MTP... are you sure Gregory was talking about the Tea Party? That looks like he's reading an analysis of the Rainbow Coalition, or the naacp itself.
How could I have missed all those Tea Partiers using disparaging remarks about Hymietown?
How many Tea Partiers did I miss describing how they'd cross the street if they saw a black guy walking along toward them?
Did I just say "You People ?" Good thing no blacks are watching MTP.
Hey Gregory
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 6:21pm.
Hey Gregory. Isn't it about time your level of specifity ventured beyond "some have said"?
Absolutly Cool
Submitted by Boudin on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 7:59pm.
I live for the day when someone ask's the questioner exactly that.
I am sick of it,
Leadership of the NAACP
Submitted by Redrowan2000 on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 6:21pm.
Leadership of the NAACP
Racists posing as victims.
I'm sure the organization at it's founding had good intentions and as the years went on the race baiters took over and are now a self serving organization. Well hell even if the Tea party isn't racist, lets make em prove it. Sir how often do you beat your wife
"Don't let the bastards grind you down."
Red
NAACP not credible
Submitted by Catherwood on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 6:21pm.
Gregory bases his assertions on a report by the NAACP? His entire premise is based on the assumption that the NAACP is telling the unbiased truth which , of course, is not possible. The NAACP will say anything, do anything to discredit the Tea Party. It matters not whether what the NAACP says is the truth or not. Its consintuents will lie, cheat, and fabricate any nonsense to further their agenda. Gregory's dependence on the NAACP's veracity demonstrates what a low class, Dem hatchet man he is.
For all the sputtering about
Submitted by Radical1979 on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 6:24pm.
For all the sputtering about racism, white supremacy, etc, running rampant in the Tea Party movement, I still have yet to see one iota of fact involved. Where are the leaflets printed and handed out by the Tea Party? Where are the videos proving this? It's well known by now that if there are any racist signs at Tea Party events, they are usually from plants, and either way, they are told to leave by true Tea Party members.
The press just doesn't get it, we know they're full of it and we're not going to take it anymore.
Rubbish
Submitted by Anna on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 6:27pm.
This group is joined at the hip with the NAACP, and their intention is to destroy the tea party movement because it doesn't agree with their agenda! From their website, I see that there are only four people that constitute the "institute" and one of them is the lifetime member of the NAACP who wrote up the resolution against "racism in the tea party" that the NAACP passed this year. Read what he says from a recent trip to the UK where he talks about his conversations with the Brits about countering the tea party forces, and then read the speech that he wrote for an NAACP meeting about the tea party movement.
Bottom line - they have decided that the most effective way to counter the tea party movement is to poison it by calling it racist, nationalist and bigoted.
Excerpt from Leonard Zeskind's presentation to the NAACP National Convention - July 11, 2010
Leonard Zeskind
I am going to talk briefly about the Tea Party phenomenon and why it is important for all of our branches to educate themselves and their communities about this dire threat.
The Tea Parties are a little bit like a poison apple--with three layers. At their center is a hard-core group of over 220,000 enrolled members of five national factions, and hundreds of thousands more that we have not yet counted but are signed up only with their local Tea Parties. At the next level is a larger less defined group of a couple of million activists who go to meetings, buy the literature and attend the many local and national protests. And finally there are the Tea Party sympathizers. These are people who say they agree with what they believe are the Tea Parties' goal. These rank at about 16% to 18% of voters, depending on which organization is doing the polling. That would mean somewhere between 17 million and 19 million adult American voters count themselves as Tea Party supporters.
This is an overwhelmingly white and solidly middle class slice of the population, slightly older and less troubled financially than the rest of us. Please, remember this point when some political pundit or the other tells you these are economically strapped Americans hitting out at scapegoats. These are not populists of any stripe. These are ultra-nationalists (or super patriots) who are defending their special pale-skinned privileges and power.
There are six national Tea Party factions: FreedomWorks Tea Party, headed up by Dick Armey--a man who needs no further introduction to this meeting. There is Tea Party Nation, which held the convention in Nashville last February where Sarah Palin of the "real Americans" spoke. There is 1776 Tea Party, the leadership of this group comes directly from the Minuteman Project, the anti-immigrant vigilante group. There is the Our Country Deserves Better PAC, responisble for organizing the cross-country Tea Party Express bus tours. There is also ResistNet which sponsors Tea Parties and Tea Party Patriots.
Now much of the media attention has been focused on FreedomWorks Tea Party, because it is headquartered in the DC area, and because Dick Armey was a big deal Republican. There are some who mistakenly speculate that this is an "Astroturf" phenomenon, that is a fake grassroots thing conjured up solely by Republican money and party officials.
But it is a real grass roots problem for us, and Dick Armey's FreedomWorks Tea Party is not one of the larger Tea Party groups. ResistNet and Tea Party Patriots are actually the largest of the six national factions.
The Tea Parties are not just about taxes and budgets. They are against everything we are for, beginning with President Barack Obama. From health care reform to immigration reform, from a jobs program to unemployment benefits to union check off. And, as Rand Paul the Republican candidate from Kentucky has shown us, they are also against federal civil rights legislation.
Indeed, major sections of the Tea Party movement are opposed to the Fourteenth Amendment and equality before the law (because the oppose birth-right citizenship for the children of undocumented immigrants). And some--the followers of Texas Cong. Ron Paul among them--are even opposed to the Seventeenth Amendment and the direct election of United States Senators.
Now when polling was first started on the Tea Parties, one California poll showed that people of color were less likely than white people to know much about the Tea Parties. That was only natural, since the Tea Parties were recruiting at gun shows not at African American barbershops.
Now that the spitting, and name calling on Capitol Hill has occurred, we all know more about this problem. Nevertheless, there is much more to learn.
The Tea Parties say they want to "Take This Country Back." We have to ask, from whom do they want to take the country away? Who do they want to give it to?
Our response is to say: One Nation. One Dream.
http://www.irehr.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=61:exc...
-------------------
IREHR in the UK
From the reaction of the audiences during my recent Searchlight-sponsored speaking tour of the United Kingdom, July 17-21, it appears that there is a high level of interest and concern about the influence of the Tea Parties on the political scene here in the United States. During the weeklong series of events around England and Wales, I also had an opportunity to learn more about the successful organizing strategies of Hope Not Hate—the Searchlight campaign to counter the growing electoral influence of the British National Party (BNP).
The tour began in London at a Labour Friends of Searchlight conference. Early in the day, highly-regarded Labour MP John Cruddas encouraged the crowd to learn from one another, and declared that Labour “must create a party rooted in a culture of organizing.” Continuing the organizing thread, I used my keynote speech to discuss the organizing techniques utilized by the Right in the United States. From the Christian Coalition to the Tea Parties, the Right has adapted new organizing techniques to stymie progressive change. The conference concluded with a debate featuring four of the top contenders to become the new leader of the Labour Party.
After the conference, I had the opportunity to talk with three of Hope Not Hate’s newest organizers from the hugely successful campaign in Barking and Dagenham—the main electoral target of the BNP in 2010 where they thought they could take over the local council. The tireless efforts of Hope Not Hate organizers like Ellie, Sam, and David, combined with the hard work of the many dedicated volunteers, helped prevent all fifty-one candidates from the British National Party from getting elected. David, Ellie, and Sam and I talked extensively about how the Hope Not Hate campaign has been able to move forward while still watching their backs.
After a day exploring London, I met back up with my guide for the week, Searchlight’s Matthew Collins. Before becoming a Searchlight staffer, Matthew risked his life for several years working undercover inside the BNP to provide valuable information to anti-fascists. Over the course of the trip, Matthew and I spent hours talking about his organizing work with Searchlight and about his time among the fascists as he’s chronicled in a new book, due out this fall, Behind the Flags: The True Story of a Young Life Among the Nazis, Gun-Runners and Politicians of the British Far-Right.
The two of us traveled to Cardiff, Wales, then on to Birmingham, and up to Manchester, before returning to London. At each of these events, the vast majority of the attendees responded that they closely followed American politics and were concerned about the rise of the Tea Parties. In my presentations, I discussed the birth of the Tea Party movement, and the size, scope, and ideology of the national factions.
Back in London for the final event of the tour, we held a public meeting to discuss the Tea Party phenomenon in the council chambers of Unison—Britain’s biggest public sector trade union. At the end of my presentation, there was tremendous interest in hearing about efforts to counter the rapid growth of the Tea Parties. We discussed the resolution passed by the NAACP condemning racism in the Tea Parties, and the NAACP delegates who held up “Hope Not Hate” signs on the convention floor.
After our last event of the tour, we went for a curry with Narmada Thiranagama, one of the trade unionists in the Searchlight delegation that visited the United States during the 2008 elections. I helped organize the delegation’s trip to Washington DC, Maryland, Virginia, and Pennsylvania. During the trip, we met with immigrant rights and trade union leaders, campaign strategists and local community organizers to give the delegation a real taste of the campaigning. Speaking of tastes, Narmada and I even found time for a side-trip to Pat’s King of Steaks for some real Philly Cheese Steaks (none of that English-Only nonsense served up by Geno’s for us, thank you!).
Special thanks to Searchlight, Hope Not Hate, Unison, and the many people who came out to these events. There is much that we have to learn from one another, and I look forward to continuing the conversation.
http://www.irehr.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=62:british-learn-about-tea-parties&catid=16:blog&Itemid=4
Leonard Zeskind is president of IREHR. For almost three decades, he has been a leading authority on white nationalist political and social movements. He is the author of Blood and Politics: The History of White Nationalism from the Margins to the Mainstream, published by Farrar Straus & Giroux in May 2009. He has written for The American Prospect, Rolling Stone, The Nation, The New York Times and the Los Angeles Times, among other publications. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation named him a Fellow in 1998 (one of its so-called “Genius Grants”). The Petra Foundation gave him a fellowship in 1992. He has testified before a Parliamentary Subcommittee in the United Kingdom, and given public lectures at universities in London and Berlin. Prior to 1982, he was a community activist and worked in industry for thirteen years: on an automobile assembly line, installing refrigerator motors in vending machines, and as a welder and first class fitter in steel fabrication plants. He is a lifetime member of the NAACP, and has served on the board of directors of the Petra Foundation and the Kansas City Jewish Community Relations Bureau.
Anna---
Submitted by matthewdean on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 8:15pm.
Interesting and informative articles.
Appreciate you posting them.
MD
Au contraire!
Submitted by troglodyt on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 6:57pm.
Likely much to his surprise, both his Republican and Democrat guests on "Meet the Press" said they hadn't seen any evidence of thatJudging from your transcript Bennet didn't talk about racism at all and wasn't really asked about it either. Add to that, that he didn't answer the question about whether he thinks the Tea Party is mainstream or not. Buck, on the other hand, after giving the required answer, quickly dismissed the claim out of hand. This in return makes the following claim quite doubtful: But I can tell you that if there are people that hold those views, they are quickly asked to leave meetings. How can he be so sure of that if he hasn't seen one instance of racism and thereby doesn't know how the audience would react?
I am one of those white,
Submitted by Captain Repus on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 7:04pm.
I am one of those white, racist, homophobic, anti-illegal alien, tea party supporting bigots. Every day, and especially on Sunday mornings I better understand why.
November 2, 2010 and November xx, 2012 are target dates to flush the toilet called congress and the White House.
For the first time in my adult life I am ashamed of my country.
I don't get David Gregory.
Submitted by samhermanmd on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 7:04pm.
He looks anesthetized or under heavy sedation. His deadpan delivery is about as interesting as reading the tax tables.
Speaking of deadpan I don't
Submitted by Captain Repus on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 7:12pm.
Speaking of deadpan I don't think I have ever seen/heard a more un-inspiring, disinterested sounding, monotone candidate in my life than Bennet. Sounds like he really doesn't want the job.
irehr
Submitted by Judith on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 7:24pm.
They want one nation but from all that is being said and written, it does not include us whites. You cannot be African and American, pick...its either one or the other. If they are so unhappy why don't they establish their own domain. But, wait...who would develop all that we (and they) have here in the US
I think it is a little unfair
Submitted by Boudin on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 7:49pm.
To pretend that everyday hard working Blacks feel the same way these supposed "leaders" of some civil rights group feel. In-fact I know many that are insulted by these groups, NAACP being one of them.
Who knew?
Submitted by Boudin on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 7:41pm.
SEN. MICHAEL BENNET (D-CO): I haven't seen a lot of that either, and I have had the opportunity to engage with people who are self-described tea party people, to have a serious conversation rather than just a bunch of slogans about how we are not going to become--you know, what, what we need to do so that we're not the first generation of Americans who leave less opportunity, not more, to our kids and our grandkids.This guy sounds sane to me, and claims to be a dimwit? Now maybe he is a nut-case, but he can fake it in a pinch. David Gregory should be ashamed of this line of questioning, considering he could not offer any examples, only hear-say. But no-doubt, he considers it a missed opportunity?
Tim Russert . . .
Submitted by rick.bren on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 7:44pm.
we sure miss you!
I would love to know, Mr. Gregory....
Submitted by motherbelt on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 8:01pm.
Exactly who are these anti-Semites, racists and bigots that have been given a platform by the Tea Party?
Based on your question, I'm
Submitted by GregE on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 9:57pm.
Based on your question, I'm wondering, is Louis Farrahkan in the TEA party movement?
mmmm
Submitted by 10ksnooker on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 8:12pm.
But the party of the KKK, who has made a race industry of calling others racists, is loaded with present and older racists.
I wonder why Democrats want to distract people so much from the truth.
Truth To Power
Submitted by rammingspeed on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 8:21pm.
This is the only way Gregory and the rest on the left are going to get any reality check. They're so steeped in their ideology and so insulated from the truth - due to the cushiness of the Amercian way of life - they can't imagine being wron in any way. When their own kind hits them, they'll be more likely to pay attention.
Inane claim
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 8:28pm.
Here we have the NAACP claiming:
"Instead, this report found Tea Party ranks to be permeated with concerns about race and national identity" Seriously? An organization whose name promotes the ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE dares condemn another group because of what they SUSPECT?Racism, racism, racism
Submitted by GregE on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 9:23pm.
What the HECK would the media be saying about the TEA party, if the president was lily white??? Would they all be in an asylum due to wanting to degrade the TEA party movement but having no earthly idea how to do it and losing their minds over that confusion?
Greg E---
Submitted by matthewdean on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 9:29pm.
Picturing that situation gave me the best laugh I've had this weekend !!
MD
I think this week's prattle
Submitted by bkeyser on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 9:37pm.
I think this week's prattle is "crazy" or "nuts." Gregory was seemingly suffering flashbacks, or jumping the gun trying to install some relevance into the NAACP. I don't think we've officially come back to "racist" yet. (NBC: First you create some false importance for the obsolete NAACP, then you claim racism when Conservatives don't fall on their knees in deference.)
So, the story is Gregory = Idiot.
Submitted by LibertyAtStake on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 10:16pm.
And, the news, is, what, exactly?
http://libertyatstake.blogspot.com/
"Because the Only Good Progressive is a Failed Progressive"
To be fair to David Gregory, he had President Obama as a
Submitted by Rush Fan on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 4:34am.
guest on his show a few weeks ago, and Gregory asked a similar question to President Barack H. Obama. Here is the relevant portion of the transcript:
DAVID GREGORY, HOST: Mr. President. There are a lot of folks who, supported by the Democrat Party, say, `Oh, they are just a mainstream movement.' But there are others who say it is anything but. As a matter of fact, the Imperial Klans of America, the KKK, the Church of the American Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, the Knights of the White Camellia and other human rights organizations are releasing a report this coming week. And here it is. I''ll show it on the screen. The "Status of the Democrat Party, a critical examination of the Present Day Democrat Party movement and the size, scope and focus of its national factions." And there are some serious charges that I want you to respond to. The result of this study contradicts many of the Democrat Party's self-invented beliefs, particularly their sole concentration on budget deficits, taxes, redistribution of wealth, and the omnificent power of the federal government. Instead, this report found "Democrat Party ranks to be permeated with concerns about racial discrimination against people of color, the belief that the overwhelming majority of white people continue to take for granted the relative privileges accruing to their skin color, .... The Democrat Party organization has given platforms to anti-whites, racists, and bigots. Further, the Democrat Party has promoted America as institutionally an oppressive nation, class warefare, open borders, mass immigration and social welfare benefits and amnesty for illegal aliens, a dramatic expansion of social welfare programs funded by ever-escalating taxes, defending suspected anti-American terrorists, and bringing American foreign policy under the control of the United Nations. Moreover, now that your administration has dismissed most of the charges against the hard-core New Black Panther Party, they have been looking for potential recruits in the Democrat Party, as well as in the the NAACP and your union buddies, to help them with voter indimidation in future elections such as brandishing nightsticks and hurling racial taunts at white voters and Republicans as they seek entry to polling station throughout the country. Mr. President, as the leader of the Democrat Party, do you think these elements in the Democrat Party need to be dealt with and need to be rebuffed?
PRESIDENT Barck H. OBAMA: David, just as I did almost 130 times when I was Illinois State Senator, I'm going to have to take a pass on taking a stand on commenting on your question.
-------------------------------
As you can see from the transcript of David Gregory's interview with President Barack H. Obama, Mr. Gregory is one of the most fair, balanced, honest and hardhitting journalist on television.
Racism for fun and profit
Submitted by ZuccoZoid on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 11:33pm.
What was once a genuine and noble struggle for civil rights has degenerated into a mafia-style business. Nice freedom of speech you got there pal, hate to see anything happen to it.
High profile politicians have openly called us thugs, racists and Nazis for simply believing the gov't has too much centralized power and takes too much of our money - in a recession, no less.Meanwhile they fly around in private luxury jets to scold us about energy consumption. We'll see how awake the citizens really are in November, or if it's all been just a lot of hot CO2.
The CIA Is Homophobic
Submitted by im41 on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 11:40pm.
Yea, we are all racist, but, but, but, the CIA is homophobic- this just might be the funniest thing I have seen this year.
Dr. David Manning : CIA Hacked My Website And Are Calling Me A HOMO!It was a trick Q
Submitted by bobbys on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 11:57pm.
It was a trick Q or a Loaded Q ... .
Here is a Part of what was sent to the NAACP.
>>>Now that the spitting, and name calling on Capitol Hill has occurred, we all know more about this problem. Nevertheless, there is much more to learn.
The Tea Parties say they want to "Take This Country Back." We have to ask, from whom do they want to take the country away? Who do they want to give it to?
Our response is to say: One Nation. One Dream.
Leonard Zeskind, author of Blood and Politics: The History of the White Nation<<<<.
The spitting and name calling is a lie and unproven and if it was true was not tied into any particular person or group.
David Gregoty asked, A Are you beating your Wife Q....
If you're senator, do you think these elements in the tea party need to be dealt with and need to be rebuffed?. If he said they must be dealt with he would be admiting there are such groups . If he said we need to rebuff them he would be admiting there are such groups in the Party. Mr. Gregory is trying to play "Gotcha" .. Im surprised he did not ask What newspapers he reads or what SG cases he disagree with or What Actors won the 1978 OscarsMaybe someone should ask Mr.
Submitted by big.league.slider on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 1:11am.
Maybe someone should ask Mr. Gregory if the Democrat party ever "dealt with and rebuffed" Senator Byrd's klan involvement?
The Tea Party is a diverse network of local groups. There is no national Tea Party, and their only common national platform is responsible, constutionally limited government. I've been to several local Tea Party events and never once heard any mention of race.
As for nationalism, if Mr. Gregory wishes to imply that the Tea Party is a fringe group with fascist leanings, he should remember that it's the Democrats that have nationalized large parts of major industries and the US economy.
After Nov. 2nd, there will be more election victories by Tea Party supported candidates than by Democrats. Will Mr. Gregory then consider the Democrat party to be a minority fringe element?
The late Senator Byrd's"klan
Submitted by Jer on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 1:27am.
The late Senator Byrd's"klan involvement" ended well over a half century ago--an association for which he profusely apologized for the rest of his life.
Jer
Senator Robert "The Porkster" Byrd---
Submitted by matthewdean on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 2:27am.
was a hump when he joined the KKK, a hump while he was a member of the KKK, and will remain a hump if he spends the rest of eternity apologizing for his actions.
Even if there were ineradicable proof that his "profuse" apologies were anything more than a case of political expediency, some stains just do not wash out of white sheets.
MD
What the hell is a "hump"?
Submitted by Jer on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 3:10am.
What the hell is a "hump"? Whatever....I'm sure it isn't a eulogistic laurel. Nice rhetorical work with the ineffably stained sheets though. I suppose that's why Byrd burned them long ago.
True, in this world of human fraility, there will always be sheets, symbolic or real, against which the ennobled critics can sling their mud. But now he wears a different robe, thank God.
Jer
Hey, man.
Submitted by NewtypeConservative on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 11:28am.
You can apologize for Sheets all you want, the fact remain: You don't join up with the KKK for political benefit. It is not something you do. It is seriously, simply a thing that no sane human being would even consider. Seriously. I wouldn't do it, you wouldn't do it. And if you do join up with the KKK for political gain, and harbor no racist sentiment at all, absolutely none, not a single damn iota of "racistness" taints your soul; you're even worse than the people who are racist, because you're associating yourself with monsters and murderers in order to further your own career which is a really terrible thing to do. It shows that you are willing to throw entire groups of people under the bus, just so you can have an easier time getting elected mayor, state senator or whatever. That's ultra bad, man.
Oh, and if you think Sheets' apologies were sincere, then how do you feel about Hanoi Jane's (fake) apologies?
(Also, he's only wearing a new robe because the Klan gave him a new one to be buried in. Heheheh.)
Sheets didn't just 'join' the Klan, he recruited 150 guys to
Submitted by SickofLibs on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 11:35am.
form a new chapter.
And that took some doing in the "hills and hollers of West Virginny", where there were maybe 5 people per square mile in the 40's.
The statute of limitations on indiscretions
Submitted by Galvanic on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 11:27am.
Byrd apoligized for his membership and leadership in the KKK, and as he gained seniority in the Senate, the Democratic Party granted him 'waivers" on his resistance to the Civil Rights Act in the '60s. Even when he when he told an interviewer on camera that there are white niggers, the Dems and the MSM were mostly mum, even going so far as to apologize for him like he was the crazy old uncle at the dinner table.
It would be difficult to say that Byrd was a racist in his later years, but his frank comments suggest that he still possessed some non-PC views on race, and the Dems and MSM let it go at that.
Yet, a Republican who writes a college term paper about women (Gov. McDonnell, Virginia) is hammered from the Left, even though his own daughters had careers (one was a lieutenant in the US Army serving in Iraq).
Clarence Thomas was slammed by accusations of sexual harassment in the workplace, while the sexual harassment by Ted Kennedy, Bill Clinton, and others get a pass even from NOW.
It's obvious that there is an unwritten statute of limitations for the Left -- starting at 'yesterday' -- and the Right, which extends back to the age of 18 and earlier.
David on Today show
Submitted by CoolShades on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 5:07am.
Stop it. Stop it. I can't take it anymore. Everytime I see or hear David Gregory, I see him dancing like a girl on the Today Show:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8FYfo2-Xmc
Yep. He dances just like
Submitted by HockeyKid on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 9:19am.
Yep. He dances just like Obysmal:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsWpvkLCvu4
"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me
Wow
Submitted by CoolShades on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 4:11pm.
Wow. You're right.
Good Video By secularstupidest
Submitted by im41 on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 11:28am.
Here is a good video about this charge by the NAACP
No, the line is...
Submitted by JanineC on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 4:03pm.
The line is "When did you stop beating your wife?"
What is irritating about the left is they constantly try to make people prove negatives (which cannot be done). That is why they actually believe in guilty until proven innocent. Just like when Axelrod was questioned about the WH claiming that foreign money was going into Republican campaigns. When the anchor said, where is the proof? Axelrod said "disprove it". You can't disprove something!! That is ridiculous...but that is how those lawyers think. They are all manipulators. You cannot prove a negative and they know it. But they are hoping we are too dumb to know better. Same goes for the fake racism charges.
Tea Party Racism
Submitted by robtjonz on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 11:25am.
My wife, who, like Barack Obama, has a white mother and a black father (my wife has an actual birth certificiate), is the one who drags me, a retired military NCO who thinks that Limbaugh and Hannity are liberals, er, uh, I mean, progressives, to Tea Party gatherings. I've never seen one instance of racism, of pandering to people who aren't white, or being condescending to people who aren't white. What I've seen is an acceptance of mutual philosophies and ideas about how this government was handed over to a bunch of left-wing socialists and how We, The People, need to correct that mistake. Or else.