Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 21, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Noel Sheppard's blog
  • After Terrible Storm, ABC Devotes 10 Minutes to Crime, Botox and Entertainment, Skimps on IRS
  • ABC and CBS Ignore Obama Administration Investigating FNC's James Rosen
  • NBC's Gregory Scolds GOP for Comparing Obama to Nixon
  • CBS Highlights Ex-IRS Staffer Who Declares There Were No Politics at Cincinnati Office
  • Monday's Amnesia: CNN Covers Powerball Jackpot Winner as Much as IRS, AP, Benghazi Scandals
  • The Obama Scandal the Big Three Networks Aren't Telling You About
  • WashPost 'Express' Tabloid Cover Laments: How Can Obama 'Break from the Storm' of Scandals?
  • It Gets Worse: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News

Chris Matthews: Chamber of Commerce Causing Unemployment, Hurting Economy

By Noel Sheppard | October 13, 2010 | 22:56

A  A
Noel Sheppard's picture

The White House thinks its got a great campaign issue in falsely accusing the U.S. Chamber of Commerce of funneling foreign dollars to Republicans, and MSNBC's Chris Matthews is making it clear he's willing to assist the administration in making its case.

Who cares that there's absolutely no factual basis in what President Obama and the "Hardball" host are saying?

So hell-bent on making this a serious election issue is Matthews that on Wednesday he accused the Chamber of intentionally increasing unemployment in this nation while harming the economy (video follows with transcript and commentary):

CHRIS MATTHEWS, HOST: Let me finish tonight by addressing the challenge Bob Schieffer of CBS News issued to the White House this Sunday. Is that the best that you can do?

Bob was challenging David Axelrod on the White House charge that the U.S. Chamber of Commerce was using money it raises from overseas to finance Republican political campaigns.

So, why is it so darn important to the average voter out there, that multinational corporations, some of them based outside of the United States, have their fingers in this election?

How about this -- it`s the central economic issue of our times. Look at how the giant corporations get their profit margins up these days. Are they out there selling hot, new products every consumer wants to get their hands on? Or are they doing the job by cost-cutting, cutting down the number of employees for whom they have to pay those tiresome health packages, those costly pensions and 401 plans? Are they doing it through those highly celebrated productivity gains by substituting robotics for people, by outsourcing the cheaper vendors overseas, over where the price of labor is dirt cheap?

No wonder the multinationals want to gift candidates who love to deregulate, love so-called free markets, love tax structures that lead them as free as possible to continue doing what they`re doing -- the kind of free-willing, cost-cutting that meets the quarterly bottom line.

No wonder the U.S. Chamber`s such a popular lobbying body for the multinational operation, in whatever country, it happens to currently find the best haven.

So, the right answer, is this is best that we can do is, is: is this the best America can do? It`s about jobs, and if all of the American people can talk about this election season as this, I say, keep on talking. You`ve finally got your finger on the pulse of this country. It`s about the economy.

So let's get this straight: the country's largest business federation, representing over 3 million companies whose dues its dependent on, is assisting in the elimination of American jobs.

This is the level of insanity Matthews has reached as the midterm elections near and his beloved Democrat Party is about to get routed.

Never mind the number of left-leaning publications that have said these accusations are total nonsense - Matthews sees this as "the central economic issue of our times."

So focused on trying to create some issue - ANY issue - that could help his Party, Matthews is missing the underlying fallacy in his argument irrespective of its lack of factual basis: if all the jobs were shipped overseas, the Chamber would cease to exist.

Its goal is - and always has been - to assist American companies to grow their businesses. If they all contract to zero employees in the United States, the Chamber of Commerce would become extinct.

Unfortunately, Matthews is so fixated on helping the White House and his Party that he can't possibly understand this.

Makes you wonder if he's looking at Keith Olbermann's ratings and coming to the conclusion that vacuous hyperbole sell much better than facts on MSNBC.

About the Author

Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Click here to follow Noel Sheppard on Twitter.
  • Campaign Financing
  • 2010 Congressional
  • 2010 Governors
  • Unemployment
  • Economy
  • Hardball
  • MSNBC
  • Noel Sheppard's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

Follow the money

Submitted by Perry Waters on Wed, 10/13/2010 - 11:10pm.

The problem here is that there is no way to prove one way or the other whether foreign interests are paying for political advertisement. So the dems can make the claim, and there's no way to disprove it except through full disclosure of the source of the funding.

I'm all for free speech. But when it comes to our political process, I would prefer to know who's paying for it.

Hmmm...... somehow it doesn't seem like we should call it free speech if you have to pay for it.

  • Login to post comments

In the name of altruism, let the Democrats make . . .

Submitted by Galvanic on Thu, 10/14/2010 - 3:04pm.

. . . the first move.

The DNC should make full disclosures of all the campaign contributions they have received and their sources.

And they can start with the 2008 contributions to Obama's own campaign.  Despite an agreement to reveal all contributors under $250 (the law didn't require it, but McCain and Obama said they would), Obama stopped reporting them.

If the Dems do it and challenge the GOP to reciprocate, and the GOP declines, the Dems ought to get a lot of political mileage out of it.

But they won't, because the Sierra Club, SEIU, and the AFL-CIO will have to reveal their foreign contributors.

  • Login to post comments

Nice socialist rant.

Submitted by NeoKong on Wed, 10/13/2010 - 11:16pm.

From the multi- millionaire celebrity.  The next time CNN  needs to trim it's staff to save money I'm sure that Chris Matthews will offer to take a pay cut to save those jobs.

Follow me on Twitter
  • Login to post comments

Not a Socialist,

Submitted by Mestilf on Wed, 10/13/2010 - 11:21pm.

Just a moron. Mathew's is one of those people who just needs to go away already.
 

  • Login to post comments

You wouldn't know a socialist if one stole your blow-up doll...

Submitted by Dave. on Wed, 10/13/2010 - 11:51pm.

...right out from under you. As for Prissy Tingles, he ran past being a mere socialist a long time ago, and is now flirting with outright communism. -Dave

Vote for the American in November

  • Login to post comments

Haha

Submitted by Mestilf on Wed, 10/13/2010 - 11:59pm.

Maybe I'm old fashioned but I like words to actually mean something. I don't just throw around words like Socialist, Communist, or Fascists like Jonah Goldberg to look cool in front of all my friends.

  • Login to post comments

scorecard

Submitted by Free Stinker on Thu, 10/14/2010 - 12:03am.

Dave: 2

Troll: 0

 

   /// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 ///    خال

  • Login to post comments

That presupposes that you

Submitted by fitzfong on Thu, 10/14/2010 - 12:08am.

That presupposes that you could ever look cool or have friends...you can't and you don't.

"I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered."  -George Best

  • Login to post comments

That's because you went to government school...

Submitted by Dave. on Thu, 10/14/2010 - 12:43am.

...and were never taught what those words actually mean. If you had been, you wouldn't have posted the comment I just responded to. -Dave

Vote for the American in November

  • Login to post comments

Except...

Submitted by Mestilf on Wed, 10/13/2010 - 11:20pm.

That the CoC has had over 885k donated from foreign businesses, to the same 501(c)(6) that it uses to run attack ads against the democrats.

http://thinkprogress.org/2010/10/13/chamber-foreign-funded-media/

Personally I think the citizens united ruling was one of the dumbest rulings in recent memory. Why do corporations deserve freedom of speech to donate anonymously to whoever they want with 0 disclosure? Corporations aren't people, they're borg.

  • Login to post comments

Posting ThinkRegress.dum BS on this site isn't going to win you

Submitted by Dave. on Wed, 10/13/2010 - 11:42pm.

...very many friends here. And you had better hope - no, make that PRAY that the repubs don't get control of the House come January, as there are going to be all kinds of inquiries into just how much foreign cash helped put this former community pisser-offer into the most powerful elected office on Earth. -Dave

Vote for the American in November

  • Login to post comments

Check it out

Submitted by Mestilf on Wed, 10/13/2010 - 11:50pm.

I'm not here to make friends, and regardless of what you think of thinkprogress you might want to check out the link. They source all their information from the CoC itself. They've recieved almost 900k from foreign busniesses directly into the same arm they use to throw their attack ads. Granted this is the same organization that sent a letter to Obama saying the best way to create jobs is to open our national parks to resource mining and logging and to take off any taxes on outsourced jobs.

  • Login to post comments

It's the confiscatory taxes on domestic jobs that is the reason

Submitted by Dave. on Thu, 10/14/2010 - 12:29am.

...they have gone overseas. And until those taxes are sharply reduced, or better yet, done away with altogether, most all of those jobs will remain overseas. And some won't be returning no matter what, as the dynamics of our economy have changed. -Dave

Vote for the American in November

  • Login to post comments

Corporations aren't people?

Submitted by bkeyser on Wed, 10/13/2010 - 11:43pm.

Wouldn't you say that corporations are every bit the sum of their parts (shareholders) as unions (members)?

  • Login to post comments

No

Submitted by Mestilf on Wed, 10/13/2010 - 11:56pm.

I don't think Frankenstein qualifies as a human, regardless of how efficient it is. And I think the same rules should apply to Unions. NO ONE organization should be able to anonymously dump unlimited amounts of funds into any election they want. It's bad for our democracy. Not to mention corporate money is supposed to be used for investment or paying the shareholders, not supporting political candidates.

  • Login to post comments

Mestilf---

Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 10/14/2010 - 12:19am.

You might want to consider a career in mathematics.

That way you could be sure that adding two minuses together will give you the positive answer you are striving for.

You won't find that approach working well in the field of politics or when debating conservatives who live in the real world as opposed to your castle for rent in the sky.

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

How about,

Submitted by Mestilf on Thu, 10/14/2010 - 12:26am.

Actually discussing the topic instead of acting like a smug douche bag? If I'm so wrong then explain to me why a corporation deserves the exact same speech rights as a human? Why should corporations be using their capital for the whole sale buying of politicians instead of investing in their businesses?

 

Don't get me wrong, Corporations deserve the right to donate to political campaigns and groups, but they shouldn't be able to donate whatever they want without any disclosure what-so-ever.

  • Login to post comments

Mestilf---

Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 10/14/2010 - 12:39am.

I realize how difficult it is for a progressive such as yourself to make any cogent argument about any subject; having been knocked off your high-horse so many times and landing squarely on your pumpkin head.

I will point out, assmunch, that you have proposed discussing nothing, suggested in no way shape or form debating the "subject" you are whining about, and while presenting absolutely nothing more than your progressive opinion in any of your posts, still manage to pretend you have taken  the high road by talking down to people.

You demonstrate only that you are a typical progressive putz.

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

Don't get me wrong,

Submitted by fitzfong on Thu, 10/14/2010 - 12:52pm.

Don't get me wrong, Corporations deserve the right to donate to political campaigns and groups, but they shouldn't be able to donate whatever they want without any disclosure what-so-ever.

Well, at least not until they launder their donations through a series of penniless dishwashers like Soros/Clinton do.

"I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered."  -George Best

  • Login to post comments

Ah, but you posted a TP link

Submitted by bkeyser on Thu, 10/14/2010 - 12:30am.

Ah, but you posted a TP link about the Chamber; you didn't indicate that you're for campaign finance reform that involves... what... in the way of financial contributions?

If unions and corporations are not allowed to contribute to political campaigns, what's the bar? I'm currently running a business as an LLC. I have zero employees, and make considerably less than the "rich" threshold of $200k. Should I be barred from contributing to my local mayoral race simply because I am a business (an apparently not people)?

Should it be that any conglomerate of [former] people -once grouped as a legal entity- are forbidden from contributing to a political campaign or from buying air time on television, radio, or the internet? Like, say, Code Pink for example? I think they contributed to the Obama campaign.

How about public endorsements by newspapers? Periodicals? They're legal entities, aren't they. Isn't an endorsement an attempt to shape the outcome of an election? I'd bet the NYT wouldn't want their freedom of speech infringed upon.

  • Login to post comments

*Sigh*

Submitted by Mestilf on Thu, 10/14/2010 - 12:40am.

I always feel like a douche quoting myself but, "Don't get me wrong, Corporations deserve the right to donate to political campaigns and groups, but they shouldn't be able to donate whatever they want without any disclosure what-so-ever."

 

Right now corporations are basically throwing money into campaigns and we can't tell who's bought and who's not. It's one thing for businesses to donate to people and for us to be aware of who got the money and be able to factor that into our decision on who to vote for. That's completely reasonable. But it's ridiculous to make the argument that any business or corporation can just pump money into an ad campaign without us knowing and then trying to make it look all "grassroots" when it's not.

  • Login to post comments

Mestilf---

Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 10/14/2010 - 12:51am.

Your first paragraph shows you don't like the law governing donations.

You can't argue, with the law on your side, because you don't like the law. 

You can't argue the facts because the fact is the law exists.

You have reverted to the third option, which is banging on the table.

Good thing you are using your head to do the banging.

Hard to damage that kind of bone density.

MD

 

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

MD, I'm starting to get the feeling that the "l" in his SN...

Submitted by Dave. on Thu, 10/14/2010 - 12:55am.

...was a typo. I think it was meant to be another "f." -Dave

Vote for the American in November

  • Login to post comments

Dave---

Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 10/14/2010 - 12:58am.

Indeed.

Mestiff. (twixt ears)

Damned appropriate.

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

MD

Submitted by MrShy on Thu, 10/14/2010 - 12:59am.

For me, Mes-TILF is more like a .... LILF.

Liberal I'd Love to Forget.

- Shylf

Join Mr. Shy and The 1* Percent

 
  • Login to post comments

Shy---

Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 10/14/2010 - 1:03am.

I like it!

How about:

Mestilf = Man elf savoring the idiot liberation front.

MDlf

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

MD

Submitted by MrShy on Thu, 10/14/2010 - 2:27am.

:p

I like MDlf, btw :)

Join Mr. Shy and The 1* Percent

 
  • Login to post comments

Sorry for you re-typing your

Submitted by bkeyser on Thu, 10/14/2010 - 10:22am.

Sorry for you re-typing your response to MD (above). My comment came out after that, but I was in the editor when you posted and didn't see it before my comment went out.

The issue in my view is: What is the line that can't be crossed?

Clearly businesses lobby politicians that are in office and we never know the details about that. I'm not saying I like it, but it is a legal operation. What the SCOTUS did was simply enforce the Constitution; you can't have freedom of speech protected for some and not all. Would you advocate banning a mosque just because some deem it too close to a sacred spot? -Look, blaming the Court is just sour grapes disguised as populist upheaval and used for political gain. If this had happened at a time when Wall Street wasn't being lambasted by the POTUS every time he wants to rile up stronger union support, the decision wouldn't have been nearly as notable.

These businesses are acting within the law. Both sides. Calling out one side when your's is losing is a flawed argument. You want real change? Well, then you shouldn't support a hand puppet with no leadership experience. Change in Washington will NEVER originate from a Harvard Law graduate.

By the way- there's very little "grassroots" about TV ads or minute-long, full-production internet ads. I don't think that a financier of such a message needs to say "This ad was funded by a person or persons with considerable financial means" for the average person to realize that fact.

  • Login to post comments

You had me at "I always feel

Submitted by Ruths husband Ben on Thu, 10/14/2010 - 3:34pm.

You had me at "I always feel like a douche."

“To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical.” - Thomas Jefferson
  • Login to post comments

LEFTISM is stuck on stoopid

Submitted by Blonde on Thu, 10/14/2010 - 3:16pm.

It's bad for our democracy.

Sorry, try again.  It's a constitutional republic.

Not to mention corporate money is supposed to be used for investment or paying the shareholders, not supporting political candidates.

Really?  Where on earth did you learn that?  So you're saying corporations have no self-interest, oh, say, in having input into the regulatory environment in which they operate.  Like that?

Grow up, LEFTISM. You're arguing like a child.  It's not up to you to say what other people, or corporations do. 

Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)

  • Login to post comments

Blonde, I'm wondering how

Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 10/14/2010 - 3:18pm.

Blonde, I'm wondering how this idiot feels about labor unions contributing to political candidates.  That's not their mandate either, but they do a hell of a lot of it.

Proud member of the 53%!
  • Login to post comments

We need some new troll spray, rad.

Submitted by Blonde on Thu, 10/14/2010 - 3:24pm.

We've become infested again, lately.

The parade of idiots continues, unabated here.

Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)

  • Login to post comments

is that you, brettard?

Submitted by ckc1227 on Thu, 10/14/2010 - 12:24am.

It's hard to tell. You all look alike to me.


  • Login to post comments

We are watching the death of

Submitted by d1carter on Wed, 10/13/2010 - 11:56pm.

We are watching the death of elite media before our very eyes...God Speed.

  • Login to post comments

So now I know where the 30 grand went...

Submitted by upcountrywater on Thu, 10/14/2010 - 1:37am.

Walter E. Williams
Michelle Malkin   Kathryn Jean Lopez   Emmett Tyrre...   All 1 week and 2 days..   Hummm   oh and a 5 year and a 12 week  guy...   Brent Bozell     Sarc/   Glad you all are here...   EDIT: Dang wrong thread...

You Didn't Build That.

  • Login to post comments

UCW

Submitted by MrShy on Thu, 10/14/2010 - 1:40am.

I think we'll all have our "30 Grand Conspiracies".... :)

- Shy Vibes

Join Mr. Shy and The 1* Percent

 
  • Login to post comments

Shy, LOL - So just how much of the 30 grand went for beer?

Submitted by Dave. on Thu, 10/14/2010 - 1:47am.

:-^) -Dave

Vote for the American in November

  • Login to post comments

I stand corrected. Looks like some that money went into tracking

Submitted by upcountrywater on Mon, 11/01/2010 - 5:59pm.

Wooha, some hot keys remain ( I didn't want to post this post just yet)

Press Del. in the subject line ( when it's overlapping and touching a thumbnail photo..., press it  twice your post,posts?

You Didn't Build That.

  • Login to post comments

Dave

Submitted by MrShy on Thu, 10/14/2010 - 1:52am.

Oh, haha.... I got 0 of that 30,000 .... and I don't drink beer, anyway. I'm a snooty, martini-drinking Manhattanite, keep in mind.

:)

- Shy Vodka

EDIT: The 30K was for all the post-redesign stuff, btw (whatever that "stuff" was :))

Join Mr. Shy and The 1* Percent

 
  • Login to post comments

Shy, My bad

Submitted by Dave. on Thu, 10/14/2010 - 1:54am.

LOL - I should have said "adult beverages." -Dave

Vote for the American in November

  • Login to post comments

Chris Matthews -- clueless,

Submitted by Beukeboom on Thu, 10/14/2010 - 8:44am.

Chris Matthews -- clueless, classless AND a liar.

I am beginning to think that Matthews is now try to show himself to be a great Obama shill once the Obama regime finally gets rid of "Baghdad Bob" Gibbs.

  • Login to post comments

@ Mestlif comment 9

Submitted by dmaley1714 on Thu, 10/14/2010 - 8:59am.

Corporations get freedom from the 1st  amendment, The right to assembly.  I am a shareholder in numerous corporations as way to gain wealth.I trust the management to look after my concerns . Who are you to take away my voice of me and my like minded citizens?

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Study: Christians who tithe have better finances than those who don't (TGC)
  • The media are willing accomplices to Obama (PolitiChicks)
  • FBI has suspects in mind in Benghazi; Obama prefers to try them in court (AP)
  • The folly of 'do something' liberalism (Patriot Update)
  • DOJ targeted more Fox News reporters than Rosen (Twitchy)
  • WashPost vs. WashPost on IRS probe (Ed Morrissey)
  • Media too prone to fall sway to Obama's referrent power (Salena Zito)
  • Five reasons to keep government out of Internet governance (Eli Dourado)
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • NYT Gets Sen. Cruz's Opposition to Marketplace Fairness Act Dead Wrong
  • Oops! CNN Commentator Falsely Accuses Okla. State Rep While Trying to Score Liberal Points on Tornado
  • Sen. Whitehouse Blames GOP For Okla. Tornado, Storms, Rising Seas, Etc.
  • On Leno: Kids Ask Obama the Darndest Questions
  • Morning Joe Meteorologist: Tornado Averted 'By The Grace of Whatever'
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use