In a week of surprising polls, Gallup has just released another that will raise some eyebrows given legislation just passed in the House last Saturday:
[T]his year marks the first time in the history of this trend that less than half of Americans say ensuring healthcare coverage for all is the federal government's responsibility...The current poll results indicate that, with the renewed healthcare debate since Obama took office, Americans have become less convinced that it is an appropriate goal for the federal government to take on the responsibility of ensuring that all Americans have healthcare coverage.
That's an eye catcher.
And given the ObamaCare baton just having been passed to the Senate, one would think an honest, impartial media would give these results ample attention in the coming days (h/t Hot Air):
More Americans now say it is not the federal government's responsibility to make sure all Americans have healthcare coverage (50%) than say it is (47%). This is a first since Gallup began tracking this question, and a significant shift from as recently as three years ago, when two-thirds said ensuring healthcare coverage was the government's responsibility.
Gallup has asked this question each November since 2001 as part of the Gallup Poll Social Series, and most recently in its Nov. 5-8 Health and Healthcare survey. There have been some fluctuations from year to year, but this year marks the first time in the history of this trend that less than half of Americans say ensuring healthcare coverage for all is the federal government's responsibility.
The high point for the "government responsibility" viewpoint occurred in 2006, when 69% of Americans agreed. In 2008, this percentage fell to 54%, its previous low reading. This year, in the midst of robust debate on a potentially imminent healthcare reform law, the percentage of Americans agreeing that it is the government's responsibility to make sure everyone has health insurance has fallen even further, by seven points, to 47%. Half of Americans now say this is not the government's responsibility.
Interesting. So, the more America learns about this matter, the less they believe government is responsible to insure people.
I guess that explains why the Democrats don't want to make the bills public before they're voted on.
Maybe more telling is how this trend is bipartisan:
A look at the trends on this question shows that both Republicans and Democrats since 2006 have become less likely to choose the "government responsibility" option, though Democrats' views have remained steady over the past year while Republicans' support has declined further.
The percentage of Republicans choosing the "government responsibility" option fell 20 percentage points between 2006 and the current survey, compared to a 13-point drop among Democrats. From a longer-range perspective, however, Democrats' views today reflect essentially a return to the sentiment seen early in the decade, while Republicans now express significantly lower support.
Quite a shift since 2006. Gallup's conclusion?
The current poll results indicate that, with the renewed healthcare debate since Obama took office, Americans have become less convinced that it is an appropriate goal for the federal government to take on the responsibility of ensuring that all Americans have healthcare coverage. It is possible that the current debate has increased the average American's awareness as to the nuances of the various roles the government could play in the healthcare system, helping make the generic "make sure all Americans have healthcare coverage" sound less appealing. Plus, the current debate may have produced more skepticism among Americans that the government's role in healthcare could or should be this broad.
Most polling shows that Americans tend to favor a "public option" in which the government would provide a healthcare plan that would not be mandatory but one of several options for those seeking healthcare insurance. Americans apparently do not equate this with government's guaranteeing that all Americans have healthcare coverage.
Finally, the current data confirm the basic premise that all in all, Americans do not support the idea of a government-run system as a full replacement for the current system based on private insurance.
Wow!
Will this get much coverage by Obama-loving media in the coming days, and if so, how will it get reported?
Will this raise questions as to why Congress should move forward with this legislation if less than half of the electorate thinks this is government's responsiblity?
Will political leaders such as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid be asked if these results should alter the rush to push this legislation through without any bipartisan support?
And given Gallup's conclusion that the more Americans learn on this subject, the less inclined they are to believe it's government's responsibility, will so-called journalists put pressure on Democrats to give the public ample time to review whatever comes out of the Senate BEFORE it's voted on?
Stay tuned.
Readers are encouraged to review the other surprising Gallup poll this week concerning Republicans now leading Democrats in generic voter preference heading into the 2010 Congressional elections.
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Follow him at Facebook and Twitter.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Not the govt's responsibility - and we don't want ObamaCare!
November 13, 2009 - 11:46 ET by Gary HallNo.
..well, if it gets coverage - they're already woking on the spin.
Noel. Seems the public is cleary together in the opposition here. It's clear that they are opposed to more government involvement, in the broadest sense - as you have well addressed here. They had previously made it well known - also not covered by the press - that they are strongly opposed to the healthcare reform bills in front of congress.
I posted this summary of many of them last week:
I believe that the media sees a part of it's job here, once again, is to hide those numbers from the public, so that they can be more effective in their 24/7 effort to more easily shape the public's opinion in their own vision.
(;~/ gary
Gary
November 13, 2009 - 12:08 ET by BlondeWe got a charming (!) little PR e-mail from our Democrat Critter, pounding his chest about his wondrous health care vote. To which we replied:
Next time I'm going to send it snail mail, with a photo copy of my check. And there will be another check. And one for Marco Rubio, too (hmmm....may have to send a copy of THAT to Charley Crist).
Maybe seeing the $$$ will finally get their attention, because they are surely ignoring our protests (whether they're protests, e-mails, letters, calls, polls).
I hope he fails, too.
J and B
November 13, 2009 - 12:35 ET by Gary HallI like that! If I had $2 million to throw at it.. I'd do the same thing with Boxer and Pelosi.. and a $1/2 mil against Diane Watson. I could move a few blocks one way and be in Maxine Waters district, or, I could move a few blocks the other way and be in Henry Waxman's district. Living in hell, they say.
(;~/ gary
Well, it WAS fun!
November 13, 2009 - 13:01 ET by BlondeOuch, I thought my critters were bad. They have you surrounded, fella.
But hey, isn't Carly Fiorino running against Boxer? That would be sweet.
Personally, I'm hoping Tim Tebow's NFL career doesn't pan out so well, and he runs against Bill Nelson. No way he'd lose. (Just kidding Timmy).
I hope he fails, too.
Blonde
November 13, 2009 - 14:26 ET by Gary HallYea - Fiorino is throwing her hat in the ring -- here's what's going to happen. Fiorino is recovering from Breast Cancer and Chemo/Radiation therapy. While the MSM would, if she were a liberal, tout her experience as character building and use it to help promote her - since she is a conservative, they will find a way to paint her health as fragile.. and sad that they just don't think a sickly candidate is best for the state now. However, with healthcare reform so much in the air, I'm expecting to see one of them ole -- but does she care that others can't receive the excellent care that she was able to buy because of her wealth..... ?
Yup.
Right now the state run media is trying to figure out how to recover from their nightmare of SF Mayor Gavin Newsom pulling out of the Gov's race, and how to sell the campaign of Jerry Brown. They are already hard at work in trying to destroy former eBay CEO Meg Whitman's character.
Yup.
(;~/ gary
Thanks for posting this
November 13, 2009 - 11:53 ET by ekslibNice!
Irrelevant
November 13, 2009 - 11:54 ET by cvgbuckeyeIt makes no difference at all to Comrade Obama or the Marxists controlled legislature OR the Socialist News Media. They don't care and their intent is to destroy democracy in America.
The choices boil down to only two:
1. Suddenly, 50% of Americans wake up and 2010 elections reverse the House and Senate power in Washington, followed by throwing the Marxists out of the White house in 2012.
2. There will be a revolution in this country that will make the Civil War really look like a legitimate "Tea Party".
The die is cast. My Christianity, Pride in my country and my service to my country in The United States Marine Corp, cry out in pain to hear these words uttered from me but I fear that the time is nearing.
I have taken a pledge to defend the United States of America against ALL enemies, both foreign and domestic. I recognize the call and I will not ignore it.
"All that is neccessary for evil to succeed, is for enough good men and women to remain silent".
How do you like them apples Eric Holder? You are right in the center of this and we know that you are monitoring things like this. I ain't alone cowboy, and I never will be.
Buckeye, those are my sentiments ...
November 13, 2009 - 12:49 ET by SentryDanBuckeye, those are my sentiments exactly. I dare say that obama's actions and those of his followers border on treason as he continues to give aid and comfort to our enemies. (Oh, and Buckeye, although we were in different branches of the US Military, we took the same oath. Semper Fi, Marine.)
Our Constitution doesn't provide for giving our enemies the same rights as our citizens. We are dealing with enemy combatants. They are terrorists not criminals. These people should be tried in a military court.
Remember folks, Freedom isn't Free. It was bought with the blood and sacrifice of the men and women who are serving and who have served in the U.S. Armed Forces.
For those who fought for it, Freedom has a flavor that the protected will never know.
Also remember folks, that the way to SUPPORT THE TROOPS is to support their mission. Anyone who says that they support the troops but don't support their mission is lying about supporting the troops. And if you want to know, yes I do have a dog in the fight, he is a United States Marine.
This poll is not something to be happy about
November 13, 2009 - 13:19 ET by R D HelmIt should have been 90% against from the very beginning.
Sad how far we have sunk as a nation.
-Dave
Our elected representatives have failed us.