David Axelrod's appearance on Fox News Wednesday apparently wasn't a sign of a truce between the Obama administration and the cable news network as it appears the White House is putting pressure on Democrat consultants to avoid the station at all costs.
For its part, the White House has denied these allegations.
Such was reported Friday by the Los Angeles Times (h/t NBer Gary Hall):
At least one Democratic political strategist has gotten a blunt warning from the White House to never appear on Fox News Channel, an outlet that presidential aides have depicted as not so much a news-gathering operation as a political opponent bent on damaging the Obama administration. [...]The White House is denying this allegation:
One Democratic strategist said that shortly after an appearance on Fox, he got a phone call from a White House official telling him not to be a guest on the show again. The call had an intimidating tone, he said.
The message was, " 'We better not see you on again,' " said the strategist, who spoke on condition of anonymity so as not to run afoul of the White House. An implicit suggestion, he said, was that "clients might stop using you if you continue."
Even some Democrats aren't thrilled with the White House's Fox strategy:White House Communications Director Anita Dunn said Thursday night that she had checked with colleagues who "deal with TV issues" and they had not told people to avoid Fox. On the contrary, they had urged people to appear on the network, Dunn wrote in an e-mail.
But Patrick Caddell, a Fox News contributor and a former pollster for President Carter, said he has spoken to Democratic consultants who have been told by the White House to avoid appearances on Fox. He declined to give their names.
Caddell said he had not gotten that message himself from the White House. "They know better than to tell me anything like that," he said.
Caddell added: "I have heard that they've done that to others in not-too-subtle ways. I find it appalling. When the White House gets in the business of suppressing dissent and comment, particularly from its own party, it hurts itself."
Don Fowler, a former Democratic National Committee chairman, said in an interview: "This approach is out of sync with my conception of what the Obama administration stands for and what they're trying to do. I think they'll think better of it and this will be a passing phase."
Moving forward, it seems clear from Axelrod's appearance after Tuesday's election results the White House Fox strategy depends on how the Administration feels it's doing.
With this in mind, Obama and Company may be more inclined to go on Fox if healthcare reform fails, for if it succeeds they likely won't feel they need more exposure than they're currently getting.
Stay tuned.
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Follow him at Facebook and Twitter.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
This goes to show what a bunch of sheep.....
November 7, 2009 - 14:04 ET by superconthe White House press corp has become. For years we had to listen to the hysterical rantings from lefties and the NYT's and the like about how Bush and Cheney were taking away everyone's freedom to speak or disagree. They talked about it like they just escaped from a gulag. Now that it is actually happening for real no one says a peep. Do you think anyone from the major media outlets would ever dare to question that putz Gibbs over this? Not a chance. It might ruffle his panties.
" if Republicans are able to stop Barack Obama on health care, 'it will be his Waterloo, it will break him...." -Sen. Jim DeMint
Fowler: "This approach is
November 7, 2009 - 14:08 ET by Chris NormanFowler: "This approach is out of sync with my conception of what the Obama administration stands for and what they're trying to do."
On the contrary, this sounds like part and parcel of what the Obama Administration really stands for and is trying to do: marginalize and suppress any media outlet questioning of it's radical policies and turning the rest into propaganda arms of the administration. They do the same thing with private citizens protesting their policies.
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
Exactly, Chris. In terms of
November 7, 2009 - 17:14 ET by ThisnThatExactly, Chris. In terms of transparancy, obama has been very transparant in his motivations and actions. Why the dims can't see this is very puzzling to me. Fowler and his cronies had better wake up quick and see what the rest of the country is seeing. We have a megalomaniac in the white house. Some people think obama is a narcissist, but the fact is -- obama wants to exercise power and rule with an iron fist, and he's spending a lot of personal energy to make his influence known.
__________
"mmm, mmm, mm. Barrack-Hussain-Øbama↓." - The liberals coolaid drinking song
My guess
November 7, 2009 - 14:24 ET by 10ksnookerAxlerod was too transparent, his lies were easily seen right through. Bad for business in the thugocracy.
It's much easier to lie to the lamestreamers.
Those Fox News Must Be Some Bad Hombres
November 7, 2009 - 14:41 ET by Beresford...particularly considering this news headline on Reuters:
"Obama administration would talk to North Korea: aide"
Maybe Fox News should
November 7, 2009 - 17:32 ET by GregEMaybe Fox News should announce that they're developing a nuke.
Noel
November 7, 2009 - 15:00 ET by shawn228That picture is hilarious, where did you find it?
"I think we're kindred spirits."~Mr Shy to Sergeant ROCK
Used it before. Found it via
November 7, 2009 - 15:08 ET by Noel SheppardUsed it before. Found it via Google.
"Stay off of Fox because
November 7, 2009 - 15:03 ET by GregE"Stay off of Fox because they're against us?"
"No, stay off Fox because they're going to ask questions like others should but don't, and we'll be on the spot there. The American people will see us being exposed for who we really are, so stay off of there and in safe harbors instead. We have an agenda, so stay in places that will help us promote it. We'll take this country in the direction we want, and rule it. If you get in the way of that....well, let's just say you better not get in the way of that."
they fell like they don't have to show their faces on Fox
November 7, 2009 - 15:54 ET by mjfitchbecause they bombard it about every 20 minutes with some advertisement, be it morgage or some other leftnut retardation.
Everytime it comes on i change the damn channel, and it's not just Fox, but ESPN, and all the outdoor channels as well.PISSES ME OFF
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." -Winston Churchill
So Who?
November 7, 2009 - 16:42 ET by slickwillie2001I've been racking my brain trying to think who this person or persons might have been. It can't be someone paid for full-time work by Fox News like Powers, it has to be someone that is somewhat freelancing and open for other work. It's not likely that it is someone that has been appearing on Fox News for many years as a strategist vs an employee. It also has to be someone that the White House would be confident would not broadcast the threat.
Can't think of any good possibles though. Ferraro? Naah. Lanny Davis? Maybe. Paul Begala? Maybe. Could be someone that appeared on a morning show which I don't watch. Maybe someone on FBN which I don't get yet.
Bob
November 7, 2009 - 21:23 ET by UpNorthBeckel? Just throwing names out. I pay very little attention to dems when they appear on Fox. That's usually a good time to get rid of the coffee or tune my air guitar.
Karl Rove must be behind this
November 7, 2009 - 17:52 ET by gopcongressEvil republican thug must be making lies about how dems are avoiding fox just to make people think they are doing it on purpose.
I mean, really. The Obama-ites would NEVER publicly diss a major news network. To do so would be giving up Congress to the neanderthal republicans on November 2, 2010 (360 days left!). Therefore, it must be a republican plant, eg. Rove.
______________________
Moderate... Democrat... Liberal... Progressive... Socialist... Communist—The progression is clear as day.
At Least . . . .
November 7, 2009 - 20:56 ET by DoktorFranken. . . . . a phone call is better than a bloody donkey head in the bed.
JMHO, you understand.
If Saul Alinsky owned a news channel it would be MSNBC. ---- Me
They use Fox when they want
November 7, 2009 - 21:37 ET by bigtimerThey use Fox when they want to...like a yo-yo.
'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart