Starting July 1, the Associated Press will begin publishing articles produced by nonprofit organizations, all four of which are left-leaning.
I guess they couldn't find any conservative nonprofits.
As reported by the New York Times Saturday (h/t Paul Chesser):
Four nonprofit groups devoted to investigative journalism will have their work distributed by The Associated Press, The A.P. will announce on Saturday, greatly expanding their potential audience and helping newspapers fill the gap left by their own shrinking resources.
Starting on July 1, the A.P. will deliver work by the Center for Public Integrity, the Investigative Reporting Workshop at American University, the Center for Investigative Reporting, and ProPublica to the 1,500 American newspapers that are A.P. members, which will be free to publish the material.
If that doesn't scare you, this will:
As they sharply reduce their staffs, many newspapers have cut back on investigations or given them up entirely. When there are barely enough reporters to cover the daily news from the local courthouse and the school board, it is harder to justify assigning someone to an in-depth project that might take weeks or months.
At the same time, independent groups doing investigative journalism have grown in number and size, fueled by foundations and wealthy patrons, and are offering their work to newspapers, magazines, television and radio news programs, and news Web sites.
So, as newspapers around the country shrink their staffs, they'll be relying on the work of others. And, with this new alliance, the AP will disseminate articles by four clearly liberal entities.
How liberal? Well, as Matt Sheffield and I reported last September, ProPublica is the brainchild of Herb and Marion Sandler, the former savings and loan moguls that have funded far-left outlets such as MoveOn.org and the Center for American Progress.
As Slate's Jack Shafer asked in October 2007:
What do the Sandlers want for their millions? Perhaps to return us to the days of the partisan press.
Shafer was rather prescient, warning:
The first American press was the partisan press, underwritten and dictated by the political parties. Starting in the 1830s or so, the profit-seeking lords of the commercial press staked their major claim to the news business and established a primacy they have maintained to this day.
The third wave in American journalism—that of the foundation press—may be taking form now thanks to Bay Area billionaires Herbert and Marion Sandler. [...]
If I were a newspaper editor considering ProPublica copy for a future issue, the first thing I'd want is proof of a firewall preventing the Sandlers and other funders from picking—or nixing—the targets of its probes.
Great suggestion, Jack, but apparently the AP didn't take your advice.
As for the other nonprofits the AP chose to begin publishing, even the liberal Wikipedia calls the Center for Public Integrity "left-leaning."
Its founder, former "60 Minutes" producer Charles Lewis, left the Center in 2004 to create another organization of the AP's new contributors list, the Investigatvie Reporting Workshop at American University.
As for the fourth entrant, the Center for Investigative Reporting, its executive director, Robert Rosenthal, used to be the managing editor of the San Francisco Chronicle. Its advisory board includes such media liberals as Seymour Hersh, Judy Woodruff, Bill Moyers, and Mike Wallace.
As such, although the AP should be commended for reaching out to publish the work of nonprofits, couldn't it at least find ONE organization that would offer a conservative view for its readers?
After all, if shrinking newspapers are going to rely upon others -- including the AP -- for content, if their only sources will be liberal, it scarily means their publications will become -- forgive me -- more left-leaning.
Have a nice weekend.
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Follow him at Facebook and Twitter.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Profit???
June 13, 2009 - 11:07 ET by flyingmonkeyAren't most liberal news services nonprofits any more?
No. Believe it or not,
June 13, 2009 - 11:19 ET by dmntd1No. Believe it or not, there's a difference between nonprofits and Broke, Desperate and Stupid. The latter of which clearly counts the AP as a member in good standing.
WE THE PEOPLE of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare,
This was one of my favorite school house rock songs.
June 13, 2009 - 12:20 ET by pahuberPretty good stuff : )
→ Maybe Noel
June 13, 2009 - 11:25 ET by Cool ArrowBut doesn't "nonprofit" sorta' reek of "Government handout"?
I'm trying to think, but I don't know of any conservative groups that rely on the government to keep them going. It's oxyobamic.
The only reason Clarence Thomas is on the Court is because he is black - Joe Biden
AP(Absolutely Pathetic)=crAP
June 13, 2009 - 11:27 ET by HadaAbechehttp://img530.images...
So let's see if I can get
June 13, 2009 - 12:22 ET by gmaniac1So let's see if I can get this straight. This is tough when trying to figure out liberals who have no clue what they even represent. Here goes, the AP is supporting liberal non-profit groups. Hmmm, the AP is liberal right? So how is this surprising? Notable yes, but surprising, no. It's always funny how these liberal organizations won't call themselves liberal. They must not be too proud of what they represent nor should be. Liberalism is oppressive by nature and these mooks know it. They just know it's not accepted outside of the newsroom otherwise they wouldn't keep their liberalism so hidden to the general public.
When the people fear the government it's called tyranny, when the government fears the people it's called liberty!
AP == Acceptable Propaganda
June 13, 2009 - 15:40 ET by m1xramAP == Acceptable Propaganda
Indicates what the coverage is and is an oxymoron. What do you think?
OMG. This
June 13, 2009 - 16:19 ET by bigtimerOMG.
This figures.
Thanks for the update...I'm keeping this blog post for future use.
Not that I'm surprised...just that it makes me ill.
The is just so fair and balanced.
Looks like nothing is going to change for the most part...unless they run themselves into the ground with this constant leftist BS.
Time will tell.
AP
June 13, 2009 - 18:53 ET by jaywlMy local newspaper, the Fredericksburg Free-Lance Star, is an independent outlet that advertises itself as conservative. I called it middle of the road because its editorials and local coverage tend at times to upset me. However, it did endorse McCain, claims the mantle, so I suppose I'll go along. BUT, the paper uses the AP and I find myself looking back to see who wrote an article, if a story was labeled opinion, checking sources or statements for origin and accuracy. Most of the time I take exception is when a story contains the AP byline. I especially wonder why a particular story is published at all. I suppose it comes down to this: if a story is to be covered, and the paper has the AP service, then it will be an AP story that is presented as a non-partisan, unbiased, presentation of the news of the day. I don't think it should be that hard to cover events in a way that doesn't raise doubts about partisanship. Apparently the AP has lost either the will to do so or has lost control over their employees.
As a side note our renowned University of Mary Washington reminds me of our roots with this from an archive of articles from the twenties: "To Search The Free Lance Star 1926-1928 please mash this button." It displays a nice looking button one may "mash".
with this new alliance, the
June 13, 2009 - 21:26 ET by TN Momwith this new alliance, the AP will disseminate articles by four clearly liberal entities.
This is why I purchase blogs like MM & HotAir for my kindle (when I can read for free online), to pushback against the MSM.