Olbermann Promotes Liberal Group's Attack On Bill O'Reilly

Photo of Noel Sheppard.
  • Bookmark and Share

UPDATE at end of post: ATT and Ford complain about attack campaign!

In today's Tonya Harding Moment, just a week after complaining about Brit Hume's admission that he often used Media Research Center material when prepping for "Special Report" broadcasts, MSNBC's Keith Olbermann actually promoted an anti-Bill O'Reilly campaign started by the George Soros-funded ultra-liberal group ThinkProgress.

It appears that since Olbermann's "Countdown" continues to get trounced in the ratings night after night by "The O'Reilly Factor," his new strategy is: If you can't beat 'em, support an organization that is trying to get your competition's advertisers to end their sponsorship.

Amusingly, Olbermann even seemed proud of himself as he announced during Friday's "Worst Person" segment what most men would be ashamed of (video embedded below the fold):

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Our winner, Billo the sad clown who just lost an advertiser. You could have just left it alone. You could have just said nothing when you got called out for addressing a rape victims' support fundraiser after at least twice blaming rape victims one of whom was murdered. But no, you had to go send your stalker producer to hunt down the managing editor of ThinkProgess.org Amanda Terkel to follow her for two hours while she was on vacation as she checked into a hotel on vacation, to ambush her. Tonight begins the comeuppance.

ThinkProgress.org contacted the sponsors of O’Reilly’s TV program, asking — not if they support his right-wing stances, his hypocrisy, his racism, his misogyny, his fact-optional approach — but if they could stomach him time after time stalking people who had dared to criticize him in print or online. And tonight, UPS has said enough. Its e-mail to ThinkProgress: "Thank you for sending an e-mail expressing concern about UPS advertising during the Bill O'Reilly show on Fox News. We do consider such comments as we consider ad placement decisions which involve a variety of news, entertainment and sports programming. At this time we have no plans to continue advertising during this show."

To paraphrase the famous phrase from church, Bill, here begineth the lesson. Bill "What can Brown do for you" O'Reilly, today's worst person in the world!

Wow! Tonya Harding would be so proud of you, Keith!

On the other hand, in a tough economy, what Olbermann accomplished Friday evening might be job security, for he certainly has positioned himself nicely as a "View" co-host once there's an opening.

Sure did look comfy sitting around that table back in November, didn't he?

Of course, this would only happen if he was replacing Elizabeth, for Keith typically refuses to be on stage with a conservative no matter how they're outnumbered!

Who cares...you go girl! 

*****Update: As Olbermann disgracefully patted himself on the back concerning UPS's response to this campaign, other companies have expressed disgust...for the campaign!!! Emphasis added:

AT&T

AT&T continually evaluates our advertising efforts to make certain that we are reaching consumers in effective and meaningful ways. We also make every effort to ensure that the content of the programming on the stations and outlets on which we advertise is in keeping with our corporate values and philosophy.

– spokesman Michael Coe, 3/25/09

UPDATE: Mr. Coe from AT&T called on 3/25/09 to complain about our automated email campaign, saying it is “harassment.” [...]

Ford

Thanks for the heads up. And while I agree with you about the rantings of the hopelessly pig-headed Mr. O’Reilly, recognize that I am just an innocent bystander in this email letter silliness. I work at Ford and support Ford, but have no idea how the decisions are made on where we advertise. Frankly, as a mainstream company, we advertise everywhere there are good ratings. That is not an endorsement of the show — that is recognition that people are watching the show. Don’t know why they watch that mindless ranting. But they watch in droves. Welcome to America, I guess.

Anyhow, the email campaign is just goofy. The 500 or so notes I am getting an hour are automatically deleted thanks to a simple program in Microsoft Outlook. Form letters are just annoying and easy to get rid of. So no real harm.

I saw the tapes of O’Reilly ambushing Hertzberg of the New Yorker a few month back. It demonstrated how moronic O’Reilly really is. I still read Hertzberg weekly in the New Yorker. And I never, ever watch Bill O’Reilly. Don’t know when he is on. Don’t care. And that’s how you get rid of a show, stop watching. When the ratings dive, the advertisers will leave. The network will kill it off. If we pull our advertising, others will simply pick up the empty spots, and happily so. The show will go on. Sadly.

I might suggest you consider another tactic though. The silly form letters are just annoying and easy to delete.

Best of luck. If I had more time, I’d visit ThinkProgress.org. Too busy trying to get Ford back on its feet though. That is important. What Bill O’Reilly does or says is not important.

– spokesman Mark Schirmer, 3/25/09, speaking for himself and not on behalf of the Ford Motor Company

I'm sure Olbermann will be informing his viewers about how others are responding to TP's pathetic strategy...not!

—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Follow him at Facebook and Twitter.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

One of these things doesn't belong here

Elizabeth Hasselbeck.

Olbermann seems to be a sandwich or two short of . . .

. . .a picnic basket.

The megalomaniac has become pathologically consumed with O'Reilly.

It's as if he's hurt because O'Reilly has spurned him or outshined him, and he's now professionally stalking O'Reilly.

Olbermann's creepy, in a scary way.

And he's too dumb to understand that were it not for O'Reilly, against whom he's got this professional erection, he'd have no show.

You wonder: Who watches this man? And why?

He's still stewing

He's still stewing that O'Reilly's Obama interview generated over twice the viewership than his did (and three times for the first part of that O'Reilly interview!). 6.6 million for the first interview and 4.6 million for O'Reilly's second interview, versus 1.9 million for Olbermann's, according to Nielsen.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus.
The US Supreme Court

Textbook Case

Breakdown with Keith Olbermann is Psycho Journalism at its best.

Or worst.

Olbermann will self-destruct in 5..4..3..2..

The megalomaniac has become

The megalomaniac has become pathologically consumed with O'Reilly.

Actually, that's only part of the story.  O'Reilly has been waging a relentless, monomaniacal smear campaign against MSNBC, its parent network, its parent company GE, NBC Division executives, etc. for years--long before Olbermann developed any retaliatory fixation on BOR.  Furthermore, O'Reilly has for many months engaged in a thinly-veiled effort to talk down and depress the stock price of General Electric.  His fierce hatred of the network has escalated into a disturbing pathology.  Olbermann's counterpunching may be imprudent, feckless, even counterproductive, but it's understandable.

Jer

 

'LONG BEFORE" ?

The only thing you got right is O'reilly attacking MSNBC and it's branches.KO started the attack about 6 years ago.O'reilly smartly ignored this clown because he wanted ratings.The" disturbing pathology" comes from KO.He attacks him almost every night.His total is in the hundreds.O'reilly may have attacked MSNBC a few dozen times.You make it sound like KO is just answering back because of O'reilly's constant attacks when in reality, since KO  is obsessed and O'reilly does not want to mention him,he has since gone after his bosses.He figures they are letting him do it.As a matter of fact there was a story on TV Newser about Murdoch or Ailes telling the heads of MSNBC that O'reilly would stop once KO quit his crap.It's pretty common knowlege that O'reilly attacks MSNBC only because of KO.

How long have you watched O'Reilly,

How long have you watched O'Reilly, karris?  Do you watch The Factor at all?  If so, you haven't been paying close attention.  O'Reilly has a long and sordid history of gratuitously attacking and demeaning his "competition".  He started it long ago--against CNN, Ted Turner, Connie Chung, Larry King...then he started in on MSNBC, NBC, and GE.  [The only distinction is that his mode of assault on MSNBC was largely network and corporate oriented--as opposed to isolating specific personalities.]  He won't stop unless Murdoch or Ailes fires him, and that ain't gonna happen.

Jer

No, how long have you watched Olbergoof?

About 6 years.I told you O'reilly attacks Msnbc because of KO I have noticed attacks on MSNBC the last few years.First,why would O'reilly hate and start an attack on MSNBC? O'reilly has been king of cable news for over 8 years.MSNBC was getting crushed by Fox and O'reilly was winning his slot almost 5 to 1.Why would he want to give them any credence?It would seem to me he would love them.KO has called O'reilly everything from a pervert to a nazi.He has attacked him hundreds of times.If you bring Fox into it.The attacks go way over a thousand.Since O'reilly wont give KO what he wants (ratings) he attacks his superiors.Which scenario makes more sense?Also Ted Turner was just on the O'reilly Factor few months ago.You made it sound like O'reilly has been attacking MSNBC for years non-stop and is unstable,while KO was being noble and just defending his network.I dont know if O'reilly attacked CNN and Chung long ago but I can probably guess it was not a constant and vitriolic attack that KO does almost every night.Also,I would bet if you put all of O'reillys attacks on MSNBC vs KO's on Fox.They would be Ko at least 10-1.And if you want to question that I will make it my business to find out exactly how many more attacks Ko has made than O'reilly.What galls me is your obvious Lib tactic of using a little bit of truth,to change the subject first,and then make your guy the good guy.When he is nothing but a cowardly smear merchant.

How long have I watched Olbergoof?

How long have I watched Olbergoof?  I don't watch him.  I can't stand the bastard.  But I have seen enough clips, transcript segments, and read and heard enough to know that a.) I don't like him and b.) that he constantly takes shots at the pathetic lying fraud O'Reilly.

On the other hand, until the last few months when I have slacked off considerably, I had watched O'Reilly regularly for nearly ten years.  So, I think I am fairly well qualified to comment on his methods and tactics.

BOR spreads around his vitriol--the "insects","vermin", and "assassins" at the far-left loon websites, the "most dangerous man in the world" (George Soros), the "most dangerous organization in the world" (the ACLU), the NYT, anything relating to San Francisco, liberal pundits such as Bill Moyers, Michael Kinsley, E.J. Dionne,  PBS, CNN, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, the list goes on and on and on.  Maybe Olbermann's fire is more concentrated on O'Reilly--I would have to see the numbers--but I would be shocked if presented credible evidence Olbermann initiated the warfare.

I am virtually certain O'Reilly was lampooning and lying about MSNBC before Olbermann's show first aired.  O'Reilly lied by saying that MSNBC didn't have a single conservative voice even though Tucker Carlson and Joe Scarborough hosted their own shows.  [He's also lied by claiming the Atlanta Journal Constitution did not have one conservative columnist.   He's also lied by claiming he doesn't endorse political candidates, when in fact he's explicitly endorsed four of whom I know--all Republicans of course.]

Now, about my "obvious Lib tactic of using a little bit of truth, changing the subject first, and making my guy the good guy."..what exactly are you talking about?  Neither of these clowns is one of my guys.  However, it does appear that one is definitely yours.

Just say I hate O'reilly

Your first post implied O'reilly has been attacking MSNBC long before KO.and Ko was just retaliating,  but it was understandable.You paint O'reilly as the unstable one and KO as just playing defense.That's crap.KO attacks almost nightly from left wing blogs to get attentionThats why I thought you were an Olby fan.Fine,you dont like him you should have just left him out and confess you despise O'reilly. I told you I agree BOR has attacked MSNBC But he is the one playing defense.It is because of KO. You think otherwise ? If so, tell me what it is and why.You then list some attacks BOR has made."far-left loon websites,George Soros,ACLU,N.Y.T.some lefty pundits.And thats a bad thing? I hate them all.You also say he lied about no conservatives on MSNBC.Ask Andrea Mitchell  about that.He had her on and asked her to name one.She could'nt

I would say I hate

I would say I hate him, but it doesn't even begin to express the level of contempt I feel for this pathetic fraud.

Olbermann's behavior is a major component of the issue.  How could I just leave him out of the analysis?

I saw the Mitchell interview.  (Remember, I was a regular viewer for nearly ten years.)  She was flustered.  She wasn't there to talk about political inclinations.  The fact is conservative Joe Scarborough had his own show on MSNBC [and still does]; conservative Tucker Carlson had his own show [no longer, but he is a frequent guest contributor, as is Pat Buchanan, Peggy Noonan, etc.]

What is O'Reilly's motivation for starting the attacks?  The same as it was when he started attacking CNN and others:  To build onto his predominantly conservative audience by painting his competitors as liberal hacks while he is Mr. No Spin, Fair and Balanced O'Reilly.  He's been running that scam since The Factor first aired.

O'Reilly is a liar and a fraud--that is why I dislike him.  (I don't actually hate him.)

Jer

Jer, I abhor O'Douchey

The blow-hard is NOT a conservative...he's a 'self-servative'...big dif. His ego enters the room before he does. Remember his phone-sex-tape-answering-machine scandal? LOL! Whatta douchebag.

Mother...

Remember?  I read the entire transcript.  It was hard to forget...especially when showering.  :-)

See ya,

Jer

I'm 100% sure O'Reilly was set up.

Who records a private sexual conversation, aside from swinging couples and webcam teens?

I'd like to know how much she encouraged him on the tapes...but I don't care enough to wade through that trash.

Andrea Mackris had previously worked for CNN before returning to O'Reilly's show without explanation.

Did CNN put Mackris up to this to embarrass him and Fox News? Remember, we're talking about CNN here.

Almost certainly an extortion plot.

NOLI PUGNARE ME OCCIDERE

Yes, phone sex being the

Yes, phone sex being the most horrible crime a personal can commit. That 'scandal' was years ago. He made a mistake and moved on. As for the ego and blow hard comments, why is he a blow hard? Because he speaks the truth and has the nerve to call people on the carpet instead of letting them speak their drivel? And the ego attack is truly inane, O'Reillys ego is no bigger than anyone elses, in fact it is dwarfed by liberal types like Keith Looneyman and Oblamma. If he starts calling himself the "lizard king" and demands worship, than you can make the tired straw man, "big ego" claims.

OLBY

"Olbermann's behavior is a major component of the issue.  How could I just leave him out of the analysis"? Then you should have analyzed it fairly. KO attacks for the same reason O'reilly does.Only much,much,more. I hate KO like you hate BOR.Just be honest.

Be honest?  Sure, I have

Be honest?  Sure, I have been all along, but just for you:  I strongly dislike KO and Bill O'Reilly.  However, I rarely watch Olbermann except via recorded clips, reading transcript splurbs, etc., and, in doing so, have encountered some truly outrageous and inexcusable utterances by KO.  On the other hand, as I have noted repeatedly, I was a regular viewer of O'Reilly for nearly ten years.  In my opinion, he is a self-absorbed charlatan, a disgrace to journalism, and an overbearing, loud-mouthed buffoon.  But I don't "hate" either one. 

Jer

Andrea Mitchell

"I saw the Mitchell interview.  (Remember, I was a regular viewer for nearly ten years.)  She was flustered. " Maybe. But it was'nt a tough question and she is not some rookie. And you act as if it was some huge lie that would be tough to disprove.  

Wrong...I acted as if it

Wrong...I acted as if it were a lie which could be easily exposed.  And it was.

Jer

Motivation

"What is O'Reilly's motivation for starting the attacks?  The same as it was when he started attacking CNN and others:  To build onto his predominantly conservative audience by painting his competitors as liberal hacks while he is Mr. No Spin, Fair and Balanced O'Reilly." Again, maybe.  But most are true and it's not personal, whereas KO  is 10 times worse,mostly personal,and mostly false.

Right, and Oblie doesn't

Right, and Oblie doesn't sprout his conspiracy theories and anti-conservative vitoriol to build on his mostly liberal audience and present himself as some sort of savior while his competitors are evil men.

By the way, O'Reilly is a pundit opinion show as he has pointed out time and again, not a hard news program. And CNN and MSNBC *are* liberal hacks, and they claim to be objective hard news programs too. This site has proven that lie over and over again.

Liberal Hacks

"What is O'Reilly's motivation for starting the attacks?  The same as it was when he started attacking CNN and others:  To build onto his predominantly conservative audience by painting his competitors as liberal hacks" What other competittors? MSNBC  and the N.Y.T.You think he's lying when he calls them liberal? It seems the blog we are on right now agree with Mr.O'reilly. He makes money off of it.Good for him. 

Yeah, God forbid someone

Yeah, God forbid someone make a living out of something they like doing and believe in. Typical socialist smear.

Does O'Reilly lie when he

Does O'Reilly lie when he calls them liberal?  Of course not...he lies when he states blatant falsehoods.  It was a lie when he said there were was not a single conservative on MSNBC.  It was a lie when he said there was not a single conservative columnist at the AJC.  It was a lie when he said he doesn't endorse political candidates.  And it is a laughable misrepresentation when he claims he is ideologically neutral.

Jer

Those are your big lies?

Those are your big lies? To me,even if true, are petty.Especially compared to KO.And thats what this is all about to me.If you would have just wrote in your first post that KO is a jerk,whatever, but BOR is no angel or whatever,I would care less. I would think Ko is much worse but would not waste my time to comment.You have your opinion of BOR and am not going to change it.But,you write KO is just fighting back and even tho his attacks are weak it is understandable.Personal,petty,and attacks in the hundreds are not understandable.Just take this story you commented on and how it started. .BOR was going to speak at a function for rape victims.KO launched a campaign to stop him.Because he thinks it's bad? NO! He could care less. His hate for BOR and his ego is why..All he hurt were the victims.You think BOR is bad? Fine. But KO is far worse.And dont write you agree you dont like him either.I got it.Read your first post and tell me if you dont make KO look sane and BOR  unstable.

Read what I have been posting for months about KO.

Read what I have been posting for months about KO.  I've been completely consistent in my negative criticisms of him.

Since I don't watch Olbermann, give me a couple of quick examples of lies he has told.  I'm not doubting you...just trying to determine your definition of lies which aren't petty.

Jer

 

olby

I told you. I got how you dont like him but not in your first post.You make him seem like a victim. Whatever you say you made him look like it was not a bad guy and sure made him look a lot better than BOR.

Let's see 1)Olby claimed he

Let's see 1)Olby claimed he does not go after the children of public figures but made Steve Doocy's son of Fox "worst person'.2)Olbermann Falsely Accuses Palin of Cutting Special Olympics Funds .3)Keith Olbermann thinks McCain wants to stay (win) in Iraq because of defense contracts.Yes, Mr. Olbermann, I'm sure Cindy McCain plans to sell a lot of beer .4) He called Michael Medved a "racist and a "bigot" for his article on slavery even tho Medved condemned slavery He challenged Olby to a debate and  he cowered out.5) Olbermann claimed that Bill O'Reilly "defended the Nazis from World War II on three separate occasions", BOR made an error he later corrected but KO playing dumb on Leno acted as if he could'nt understand why O'reilly would stick up for the nazis.He also used a nazi salute and BOR mask at an event he was later asked to apologize for from a jewish group.

Olby lies

6)Olbermann claims Brit Hume referred to yesterday's protests as a "repellent spectacle". Unfortunately, the quote Mr Olbermann is referencing was not about yesterday's protests. It couldn't have been: it was spoken on April 2nd! When Olby adds, "Hey pal, I've seen your newscasts", he compounds an already embarrassing lie. (Not to mention the fact that this wasn't said on one of Mr Hume's newscasts at all, but part of a panel discussion on another program.) Perhaps if Keith Olbermann had seen Mr Hume's newscasts, he would have known that Hume said nothing of the sort about yesterday's protests.7)Keith Olbermann lies, says Sarah Palin is a socialist and described Alaska that way."In this case, Sarah Palin is accusing Barack Obama of advocating socialism when she literally used that word to describe the collective wealth sharing in her home state of Alaska."However, the quote in question is actually from the New Yorker writer (Philip Gourevitch), not Palin.8)KO said "an ABC employee's email was leaked to Drudge by the White House". Olby got this information from his favorite wellspring: he pulled it out of his ass. It turned out the leak came not from the White House.

Another Olby lie

Last night on Countdown, Olbermann led off his show claiming the President has resorted to citing anonymous Iraqi bloggers in a speech at a hotel near Capitol Hill. He went on to claim that the President had "descended" into a defense of the entire war by quoting two dentists.

Fortunately, for those seeking the truth, the White House publishes all of Bush's speeches on the White House web site and the one cited by Olbermann is no different.

If Keith had bothered to read the speech he would have known that the speech was well over 5,000 words, lasting three-quarters of an hour and contained precisely two sentences from the bloggers delivered in just 70 words.

I want to share with you how two Iraqi bloggers -- they have bloggers in Baghdad, just like we've got here -- (laughter) -- "Displaced families are returning home, marketplaces are seeing more activity, stores that were long shuttered are now reopening. We feel safer about moving in the city now. Our people want to see this effort succeed. We hope the governments in Baghdad and America do not lose their resolve.

99% of the speech had nothing to do with bloggers except on Countdown where bloggers made up 100% of what Keith aired.

What about that "anonymous" part?

The two bloggers, Mohammed Fadhil and Omar Fadhil, are hardly anonymous. They are easily the two most famous Iraqi bloggers in the world. They have been feted here in the states by American bloggers, foremost among them the well-known American blogger Jeff Jarvis. They have given numerous media interviews and even visited with President Bush at the White House. There names and email addresses are on the home page of their blogs. Their blog, Iraq the Model, was one of the earliest and most well known blogs from Iraq.

About the only thing Olbermann got right was that the speech was given at the Holiday Inn near Capitol Hill.

But Keith is not done - not by a long shot.

He continues:

The Internet mavens at Google recently reported that the average blog is read by an average of exactly one person. Tonight, somewhere in Baghdad, two bloggers are boasting, We found our reader.

Amusing. And entirely irrelevant. While it may true that of the 100,000,000 blogs cited by Google the AVERAGE is one reader a day per blog, Iraq the Model is one of the most widely read blogs in the world. Got that? Not out of Iraqi blogs but of out of ALL blogs in the entire world.

According to Sitemeter, Iraq the Model gets about 5,500 readers a day. There are over eleven hundred blogs that link to Iraq the Model. In the TTLB Ecosystem rankings they are currently ranked #51 worldwide. Technorati lists them among the Top 1000 most influential blogs in the world.

So much for applying the Google survey data to the Iraq the Model blog.

Is Olbermann done? Nope.

Keith goes on to argue that the President quoting these two bloggers is an indication that he is getting out of touch with reality or in denial or maybe it's something clinical, something that might be like Nixon talking to the paintings. For Olbermann, the President quoting these two "anonymous" bloggers with "one reader" is a form of insanity.

After mocking the President through several segments, Olbermann gets around to discussing the President's speech with Rajiv Chandrasekaran from the Washington Post and, for the first time all night, reveals something kinda important. He has known all along who the two blogger are but withheld that information for almost half the show while playing up the "President is so desperate he's taken to quoting random, anonymous bloggers to make his case" angle. But to fully appreciate the artful blend of ignorance, arrogance and deception that defines Keith Olbermann look at the way he tees up his question about the bloggers to Chandrasekaran:

I must ask you about the blog that the president cited today. It's now been identified. It's IraqTheModel.com. There's a pair of dentists who've generally been sympathetic to the American mission. They met with the president in the Oval Office three years ago...

It would be to fail to appreciation the subtlety of Olbermann's mastery of deception, to note simply that Keith is here admitting that he has known the identity of the bloggers all along. Nor that he even knew that the President met with the pair in the White House. It's better (or worse) than that. Notice how Keith says "it's now been identified".

Like all of Keith Olbermann's best lies this one works at multiple levels. First, he conveys the sense that either the President was intentionally withholding this information or that perhaps the President did not know who he was quoting, that maybe he just picked a couple of random bloggers off the web who happened to say something that supported his case for the war. Either way he gets across his point (Bush=idiot) to his blissfully gullible readers. More to the point, by claiming that the blog has "now been identified" Keith R. Olbermann can suggest that he (or his pals in the MSM) ferreted out this information after diligently working the phones or otherwise acting like real reporters.

Of course this is Keith Olbermann whose idea of journalism, famously, is making up catch phrases for when a basketball player makes a shot from beyond the three point line. He can't even get the name right. While the URL "iraqthemodel.com" does redirect to the site, the blog is called simply "Iraq the Model" not "Iraq the Model dot com", the URL is iraqthemodel.blogspot.com.

When he says "now been identified" does he mean that he is reporting breaking news? Recall that at the top of the show he claimed to know nothing at all about the two "anonymous" bloggers. Now he knows that three years ago they visited with the President in the Oval Office. Did something just comes across the wire? Hardly. Keith knew full well who these bloggers were before he ever went on the air. But the President briefly quoting the two most well-known Iraqi bloggers (the truth) did not have the entertainment value of asserting that the President of the United States was so desperate for good news from Iraq that he had taken to poking around in the blogosphere (the lie).

In the world of comedy this is known as a "callback" and God knows Keith is far more concerned with finding a good callback that he can work into the show than actually reporting the news so when the news does not work comedically Keith makes it work through the most reliable of journalistic techniques - making shit up.

For the uninitiated, callbacks are a staple of stand-up comedy. Anyone who stays up past 11 PM has seen Jay Leno or David Letterman use a punch line from a previous joke and apply it to a later joke in the set. Often a comic will use a callback with a joke that bombed and keep circling back to it, creating a sense of intimacy with the audience, as if they are the comedian's friend. Done right it is a very powerful comedic tool.

By the time Keith gets around to letting the audience in on the gag (that's he's been bullshitting them for the entire show) they no longer care - they got their fill of "Bush as idiot" for the day - and after all what's a few hundred lies between friends.

But I digress.

Keith continues his questioning of Chandrasekaran:

We're down to the president quoting a couple of dentists to prove that the surge is working?

Dang! Keith still can't seem to get it quite right now can he? While the President was quoting Mohammed Fadhil and Omar Fadhil and they are bloggers from Iraq the Model, President Bush was not quoting from their blog. It is ironic that Keith cited a study by those "Internet mavens" at Google (is that what they are? mavens?). Keith cited Google just the other day in his Special Comment on Tom Delay. Maybe Keith should spend less time Googling for porn and more time using it to prepare for his show. Had he bothered to type in the quote he ran from President Bush at the top of the hour he might have found this:

Notes From Baghdad
Open liquor stores and other signs of the surge's success.
OpinionJournal.com
BY MOHAMMED FADHIL AND OMAR FADHIL
Wednesday, March 7, 2007

Whoops! Turns out the President was not quoting from some random, anonymous blog. He was actually quoting from a Wall Street Journal Op-Ed written by the two most famous Iraqi journalists in the world. Two men who have been reporting from the trenches, literally, since the days when Saddam was still on the loose in Iraq.

Like most Olbermann efforts, he labors to arrive at the big moment and when the time comes he disappoints.

After thirty minutes of hype the best he can do is unload on Chandrasekaran with...

on the same blog, they said...the administration, quote, "needs to revise the way it's been handling and planning for this critical war."

Imagine that? Bush is actually quoting someone who does not agree with him on every point - and even invited them to the White House. No surprise that Olbermann is flabbergasted to hear of something like that. Scary!

Anxious to please and determined to be "great thanksed" by Olby, Chandrasekaran laps up Keith's nonsense with an eager smile.

Well, you know, there are dozens of Iraqi bloggers. And I dare say IraqTheModel is one of very, very few to be as rosy as it is, just notwithstanding some of their own skepticism about things and some of their own critical comments. I mean, those guys aren't idiots. But, you know, if we do a more representative sample of what Iraqis are writing in their blogs, and I read a lot of them, you won't find as optimistic of a portrait as IraqTheModel portrays.

And there you have it. Olbermann has spent half his show implying the President is insane because he spent a few seconds in a 40 minute speech quoting from an Op-Ed in the Wall Street Journal. And Bush's "crime" in this case? Among the "dozens" of relatively unknown Iraqi bloggers his guest says he reads, the two bloggers Bush quoted are not sufficiently pessimistic to suit the tastes of a reporter from the Washington Post.

Another scoop for the Edward R. Murrow of our time.

One more

9)KO "The new law means "you" can be arrested and held forever without seeing a judge. Just on his whim, "Mister" Bush can "put you in jail and throw away the key". The law "does away with habeas corpus". The truth? No US citizen's habeas corpus rights have been done away with, lessened, or changed in any way. It's in the law. Tell a lie. Tell it big. Tell it again.

Is that enough?

There are many,many,more.Most have him doctoring quotes and omitting key phrases.KO has no equals when it comes to lies.you may be right about BOR.I dont care.But compared to this guy he's a saint. 

Thank you for the research.

 Obviously there's a site on Olbermann which keeps count of his lies, distortions and evasions.

I found this site, http://www.olbermannwatch.com/archives/2007/03/olbermann_the_m.php ,which I suspect may be your source. It has quite a bit of information on this guy.

NOLI PUGNARE ME OCCIDERE

Some of my sources

The Doocy,Medved,and O'reilly "nazi" stories i saw myself.Three, were from other sources and four were from Olbywatch altho they probably have all of them. It was no copy and paste job.It took me an hour and makes me feel foolish for wasting my time on this creep, KO.Olbywatch is bias no doubt but if anyone can disprove them be my guest.

karris... This proves to

karris...

This proves to me that KO spews the same type of nonsense that O'Reilly has been doing for the past decade--only the names and ideology have been changed.  Years ago, I actually started keeping a notebook filled with BOR's distortions, spinning, misstatements, smears, etc.  I ran out of space very quickly.

To repeat what I posted several days ago:  A pox on both their houses.

Jer

 

PROVES?

You have shown no proof.Show me five.Half of what I showed.And also tell me how many attacks BOR has made on all of MSNBC compared to the hundreds KO has made on Fox.Or an estimate.I also want to see what you consider an attack.Show me one that comes close to calling a fellow american a Nazi.

And we see the last resort of a cornered liberal...

  ...moral equivalency.

This usually manifests itself in phrases like "Well, all politicians are crooked", or, "Everyone does it".

And it's usually not true. 

O'Reilly, at worst, is a crackpot.

Olbermann, however, is a vicious, cold and calculating liar who takes his marching orders straight from a website known for industrial strength spin, selective quotations and outright lies. 

NOLI PUGNARE ME OCCIDERE

Well, he has been watching

Well, he has been watching BOR for years and has a notebook of so many smears he cant  hold anymore.So he should give me some "real smears" very soon.But he still has not answered why in his first post he says the attacks KO made were "understandable". Even tho he hates KO just as much.

→ Bill's on Letterman now

Bill's interview with Letterman is just starting.


LYDSEXICS UNTIE!

Meh,

Bill's being Bill. He's making some good points, but mainly he's just kinda yukkin' it up with dave, and engaging in some self promotion. 

I would like to see ole dave show some real balls, and invite Limbaugh or Beck, or even Bush. I doubt the pebbles hold enough testosterone for that though.

"This
liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about
basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008

Not morally equivalent,

Not morally equivalent, TG...

BOR is worse.  He is a complete and continuing fraud.  Now, admittedly KO did make an asinine comment once upon a time about being "independent".  But his deceptions have been nowhere near the level of O'Reilly's transparent mendacity with his long-standing, laughably absurd claims of ideological neutrality.

Jer

Give it up Smalley err, Jer

You hate O'reilly.We got it.You show a few petty lies and I show you "real smears" and now you say BOR is worse. First ,KO is 'understandable" then he's the same and now he's not as bad. Whatever.

Nah...not until you at

Nah...not until you at least get your facts straight, karris.  I said KO's counterpunching (in this particular case), though imprudent, feckless, and perhaps counterproductive, was understandable [inasmuch as it was in retaliation to BOR's continued taunting and belittling of MSNBC, NBC, and GE].

Jer

And Jer, burdened by the weight of the evidence against KO.....

...soldiers valiantly on.

You're starting to look a bit foolish here.

Look at the many examples posted above.

Dishonest, deceptive and misleading don't begin to describe Keith Olbermann and his puppetmaster Media Matters.

Does MSNBC flavor their Koolaid more to your taste, Jer?

'Cause you are sure as hell full of it.

NOLI PUGNARE ME OCCIDERE

Sorry Jer

but I believe that karris here has busted you for speaking out of both sides of your mouth. Amazingly, you are wrong from both sides as well. Only a liberal could pull that off. :)

"This
liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about
basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008

Hasn't lain a glove on me,

Hasn't lain a glove on me, Restless.  Do you honestly believe it wouldn't be possible to inundate these threads with BOR outrages [that would even dwarf Pop Tech's complete body of work on Palin and global warming]?

The only point truly disputed is whether O'Reilly's attacks against MSNBC preceded KO's against Bill.  I say they did.  Karris and others disagree.

Jer

→ Jer

You didn't lose a bundle on GE did you?


LYDSEXICS UNTIE!

Cool...

Yep...but let the record show I disliked BOR long before GE's stock started tanking. 

Jer

→ Sorry

Must be the clairvoyant in me.  Guess it's something I pulled out of thin air, huh?

Heck, Jer.  If I'd lost a bundle because the Company I invested in got exposed for aiding in the deaths of American soldiers, I might want to shoot the messenger, but eventually I'd lay the blame on GE, not BOR.


LYDSEXICS UNTIE!

Jer

I don't even care about the chick fight between BOR and KO. You said the BOR is worse, after saying they were the same.

I am of the opinion, and we all have our biases, that KO is much worse than BOR, and the ratings agree with me. KO has said vile thing about our former CIC. His mocking "SIR" sir is enough to drive me BS crazy. I'm still waiting for such mockery of the 0 by ko.

"This liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008

Restless...Maybe this helps:

Restless...

I said they spew the same type of nonsense.  What bothers me is that O'Reilly has, since the inception of The Factor and continuing to this day, repeatedly claimed on his show that he is ideologically neutral, doesn't have a dog in the fight, is just as tough on Republicans as Democrats, etc.--and those representations are patently and absurdly fraudulent.

KO, aside from an off-the-cuff comment while being interviewed several years ago on another program in which he claimed to be an independent--and which is also a ridiculous assertion--doesn't, as far as I know, persist in hiding behind that facade of impartiality as does O'Reilly.  [If he does continue to do so, then that would change my opinion about their moral equivalency.]

That is my primary beef with O'Reilly.  Ratings have nothing to do with the issue.  Fox has captured the overwhelming majority of the conservative and right-leaning viewing audience.  The liberal and left-leaning audience is split among other networks.

Jer

Lie # 8 ending

Not from the White House but a digruntled ABC reporter.

I happen to believe that O'Reilly's somewhat of a 'loose cannon'

 ...especially when he kept harping on 'Big Oil' and pushing for them to nearly eliminate profits to lower gas prices.

But if O's a 'loose cannon', Olberbrat's the entire armored division. 

NOLI PUGNARE ME OCCIDERE

O'reilly and GE

The reason that O'reilly continues to talk down the stock at GE is they have dealt with Iran, Syria, Libya, and Saddam Hussein. They have done this despite embargos and even during conflict.

The Big O takes on the little o at msnbc only when provoked. His attacks against msnbc only come when their actions are beyond outrageous. As it turns out, that is becoming more frequent!

General,

don't confuse Jer with facts re: GE and it's business with Iran, Iraq, Libya and the other members of the bad guys club.  He's fixated on BOR, same as Olberdork.  Or, to put a different spin on things, like Reagan said, "you can tell a liberal, but you can't tell them much". 

Thanks for reminding about that quote from Reagan.

Just another one of his true gems.

You know, we should tread more softly with liberals and leftists and pity them.

They lack the intellecutal horsepower to process a lot at once.

And, just guessing, they have negative physical and emotional reactions when confronted with simple concepts such as truth, morality, fairness and -- dare I say it? -- courtesy.

We should really try to avoid confusing them with facts, you know?

They're incapable of processing that in their Alice-in-Wonderlandness reality.

If you believe that's the

If you believe that's the reason O'Reilly has gone after GE, I have some beachfront property in Nevada I think you might be interested in.

Jer

Right, because being

Right, because being concerned about on of our biggest companies dealing with our enemies is so totally out of line.

delete

excuse please

 

"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg

Jer----

Poor man--don't you know there is no beach front in Nevada. Did you buy it from Harry Reid??? I am afraid you are stuck with it. How much did you pay for it?? Many of us who read this are sorry that you were victimized, but , not to be callous, you should have simply posted your opportunity to buy that beach front here on NB. There are many here who obviously are more alert and less confused about life in America that could have , gladly, helped you.

PS

BOR angers me when I watch two or three time a week. Yes, he is all aglow in his measurable success. Yes, he does talk over his guests and occasionally goes a little berserk in some cases. In spite of that, he has accomplished far more good than bad in America. Before you spend any more time denouncing him, simply ask yourself what great legislation or common good Olbermann has accomplished. I confess that I believe I would crow a litle bit about my success were I BOR. I have given up trying to watch most other newscasters as most of them lie.

PPS

You might try advertising your beach front proeperty in a liberal Obama newspaper,. There are, obviously, a great deal more gullible people that subscribe to them than come here.

Have a nice day.

Well, misterbill...If you

Well, misterbill...If you are in a plane high enough over the property in western Nevada, I think you can just barely see the Pacific beaches on the California coast.

Jer

With all due respect, General,

With all due respect, General, your post is absurd.  You and UpNorth need to spend several hundred hours reviewing the videos and transcripts of BOR's past shows.  The GE/Iran connection is a laughably transparent attempt by O'Reilly to "justify" his vendetta against MSNBC and its parent company, GE.

Jer

Spend several

hundred hours watching TV?  My god Jer, I have a life!!!!  I'd much rather spend 15-30 minutes conversing/posting with people I find amenable, than to poison my mind by watching more than a nano-second on Olberdork.  And I think the truth about that feud would be found there, not at BOR.  And I notice that you didn't refute anything said about GE/Iran. Or Syria, Libya, or pre-OIF Iraq. 

You have a life, UpNorth? 

You have a life, UpNorth?  Good, that makes us even.  I didn't ask you to watch a nano-second of Olberdork.  I don't watch him either.  Just saying that if you were going to make representations or denials about the lying fraud O'Reilly, you really need to have actually watched his show for a significant period of time.

Because...if you had you would know very well the reason BOR singled out GE--and it had nothing to do with any Iranian connections, despite whatever protestations he might make to the contrary.  Do you think GE was the only American company doing business in that part of the world?  C'mon, even Rumsfeld and Cheney were pals of the murdering thug Saddam Hussein at one time.

Jer

I didn't make representations,

and I confined myself to the issue of O'Reilly and GE.  And, I never heard GE refute anything BOR said about their ties to Iran.  I did hear some "everybody does it" tripe from one of their spokespersons.  

UpNorth... If it were the

UpNorth...

If it were the sole motivation for BOR's attacks on GE, I wouldn't find it objectionable.  But it's not.  It's just a cover for his jihad against MSNBC.

Jer

Oh, please, get a life.

Whatever O'Reilly's done, and he's done it because GE and NBC warrant his attacks, given the advesary/advocacy media suffers from HUTA disease, it is NOT understandable that Olbermann behaves so.

Clearly, you're as blind as he is.

And, as Olbermann's surrogate and apologist, maybe just as jealous?

BTW: While O'Reilly has a big ego, it ain't megalomaniacal, ace.

I have a nice life, Thank you very much.

I didn't say "megalomaniacal", jack...put your reading glasses on.  Or are you as blind as O'Reilly?

Jer

Good evening Jer

It's not a smear when you speak thr truth.

Jesus Loves You so much He died for you

Jer

Jer,

I think you're very mixed up concerning this issue. BOR is the number one personality on cable. You think he's going after MSNBC because he perceives them as competition? Hardly.

Whether or not you agree with his position concerning GE/NBC/MSNBC, it is indeed a principled one on his part, and has NOTHING to do with his concern that MSNBC is competition.

By contrast, most people in the news industry believe that Olbermann's ratings began improving when he started attacking BOR.  JMHO.  ns

No, Noel... I'm right on

No, Noel...

I'm right on the money.  BOR has been #1 for years, and he still has contiually attacked his competition--and anyone who would dare criticize him--during all that time.  It is the nature of a self-absorbed egomaniac.  He has been unmercifully attacking Al Franken for years because Franken wrote the satirical anti-Fox book and Franken claimed O'Reilly had misrepresented his past.  [Btw, I think Franken was out of line.  But O'Reilly has made it a personal vendetta ever since.  The night before the Minnesota senate election, he growled that Franken, whom he will only refer to as "Stuart Smalley", was simply a "baaad" man].

If his position on GE/NBC/MSNBC were in fact principled, I would cut him some slack.  But it is not principled.  He simply wants to bury them.  It's entirely personal.  [Please note, I'm not defending Olbermann,  I really don't like the guy.]

Jer

Franken

I dont get your point here.You say Franken was out of line but BOR should have layed off after awhile.Some people hold grudges, especially when lied about.But you forgot to mention or maybe did not know that Al was the big draw for Air America. Him and his co-horts layed into Fox and O'reilly for a few pitiful years.And every news outlet covered the Minnesota elections.Should O'reilly have kept quiet? He hates the man as he has admitted just about every time he mentions him.Calling him a" baaaad" man was over the top?

I thought Franken's

I thought Franken's criticism of O'Reilly (BOR had erroneously claimed receiving a journalism award which he in fact had not, but I gave him the benefit of the doubt and believed it was an inadvertent misstatement).  However, O'Reilly has never been able to let it go and has hammered and demeaned Franken relentlessly ever since. 

So, of course, once again--for at least the fourth time (and every time a Republican)--BOR ignored his promise that he would never endorse a political candidate, and urged a Coleman victory while claiming Franken was simply a "bad" man.

Jer

He also claimed BOR was

He also claimed BOR was lying about where he lived which was proven false by O'reilly.But you have got to be kidding with this."So, of course, once again--for at least the fourth time (and every time a Republican)--BOR ignored his promise that he would never endorse a political candidate, and urged a Coleman victory while claiming Franken was simply a "bad" man".Do you really think  BOR would still have not" urged a Coleman victory " if he were the Dem and Al the Repub? He would have endorsed him for dog catcher over Air Al.

Olberbama doesn't have to go to a UPS store to see 'brown'...

 ...all he has to do is look at the end of his nose.

What a buffoon. This guy is comedy relief for the entire freakin' television industry. 

NOLI PUGNARE ME OCCIDERE

Poor Olbie...he has a case

Poor Olbie...he has a case of the green-eyed monster...even Soros and all his groups/affiliates he has ties with/controls can't get his ratings up...

Some guys have all the rotten luck.

As Billo grins away...

I love the on-going feud myself.

 Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

Ratings..

So does this mean conservatives watch way more television than libs?? What a waste of time.

No, it means when it comes

No, it means when it comes to 8:00 pundit shows, more people watch O'Reilly. You can't infer total viewing habits from just one show, Many people could be watching only that one show or only a few shows. Ratings indicate viewership of just one show at a time, not overall tv viewership. 

Want to know a real waste of time? Making stupid comments like yours.

Orange?

What's up with the orange skin? Or did the makeup girls play a trick on him?

Isn't that gross in HDTV?

Isn't that gross in HDTV? And with all the big screens these days MSNBC still uses head shots. OMG Olbermanns head is 3 feet wide.

 

"DumbAssity of Dope"

Lets tell Brown what it can't do for us

Maybe we should let Brown know what it can no longer do for us?

I thought of that myself.

Time to buy stock in FedEx.

And contact UPS.

If UPS is going to take its

If UPS is going to take its marching orders from a hate filled, inaccurate, speak in half-truths, ultra-Liberal outfit like Thinkprogress.org, IT is time to let UPS know that they are no longer needed. Thinkprogress.org is a disgusting site from the people that run it to the Liberals that post on it. It is full of hateful, crazed out, foaming at the mouth Liberals.

 

I do not believe that UPS wants to start a war with O'Reilly's viewers. I know that they can't afford to lose 3 million customers.

Down with UPS. Do not use their services anymore.

Don't Take It Out On UPS

UPS is union company. They have contracts with the Teamsters, UAW, and Airline Pilots Association. They cannot afford a PR disaster right now as there is litigation in progress for contract violations. They advertise in so many venues that its no big deal to stop during O'reilly. They take short contracts, anyway to give them versatility!

And, in fairness...

Olbermann acts like their reply is more supportive of his cause than it really was.  But I think a shot across UPS' bow isn't a bad idea, lest they get the idea that the libs are the only ones that care.

I'm curious to see how, or if, O'Reilly plays this tomorrow.

dervish

dervish,

Yes, Keith should only gloat if UPS left O'Reilly to sponsor him. 

But, that's not what liberalism is about, for liberals want people to lose possessions so that they can feel better about themselves.

Liberals measure their success by how less-poorly they're doing than others.

As such, Keith knows he can't possibly get the viewers or the sponsorship that O'Reilly has attained. Therefore, he can only win if he gets people to stop watching and supporting his nemesis.

It's really pretty disgusting and parasitic when you think about it, but this is really the heart of liberalism.  ns 

True. I should have said,

"supportive of 'ThinkProgress,'" but I couldn't think of their name at the time.  My point, as made by others here, is that "have no plans to continue" is not the same as "we're pulling our ads,"  even though Olbermann claims otherwise.  He can pretend that his side is winning all he wants.

And interestingly, someone who obviously would like to pull the ads, like the bozo at Ford, knows better than to cut out an audience that big.  I'm guessing the bosses at UPS are at least as smart as Ford's.

Meanwhile, if it really stung O'Reilly, O'Reilly will shoot back.

This Bill O obsession is

This Bill O obsession is getting a little unhealthy....maybe that's why his skin is orange...

Talking about looking

Talking about looking artificial. It looks like if the studio lights get too hot, poor ol Olbey is going to start melting.

 

It's time....

This crew of jackals have crossed the line now.  Who has the list of sponsors for Olberman and Matthews.  Also I just sent a letter to UPS informing that I will never use their services again.  Time to hit this punk where it hurts.

Jack

"If at age 20 you are a conservative then you have no heart.  If at age 30 you are a liberal then you have no brains."   Sir Winston Churchill

He's Gonna Blow!!

His skin must have turned orange after he had a look at this past week's ratings - things aren't looking too good for poor old Keith.

Monday, 3/23          O'Reilly:         3,513.000 viewers

                               Bathtub Boy:  1,239,000 viewers

 

Tuesday, 3/24           O'Reilly:           3,524,000 viewers

                                 Bathtub Boy:   1,658,000 viewers

 

Wednesdsay, 3/25     O'Reilly:           3,489,000 viewers

                                Bathtub Boy:    1,238,000 viewers

 

Thursday, 3/26          O'Reilly:          3,420,000 viewers

                                Bathtub Boy:    1,322,000 viewers

 Next thing we know Olbermann will be accusing the Neilsen Ratings of being a right-wing conspiracy.

northone... One

northone...

One word...

HILARIOUS!

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

Olbermann is obsessed over O'Reilly, how boring

CABLE NEWS RACE
THU., MARCH 26, 2009

FOXNEWS O'REILLY 3,420,000
FOXNEWS HANNITY 2,987,000
FOXNEWS BECK 2,374,000
FOXNEWS GRETA 2,160,000
FOXNEWS BAIER 1,940,000
FOXNEWS SHEP 1,888,000
MSNBC OLBERMANN 1,322,000
CNNHN GRACE 1,300,000
MSNBC MADDOW 1,208,000
CNN KING 1,144,000
CNN COOPER 1,118,000

Olbermann

This guy is a panzy littlle wuss. He couldn't go 3 seconds in the ring with Coulter.

All he does is sit around a stir the pot on stories that are on life-support by the time they get to him, and then he critiques one little 'spec' in the story, and makes it out to be the whole story. 

He is a joke, a has been. I swear I'd love a punching bag with his face on one side and Maddow's on the other. IDIOTS 

MSNBC and CNN are quickly

MSNBC and CNN are quickly becoming irrelevent...deservedly so.

Yeah Right

Olby-wan-kanobody talking about Bill:

ThinkProgress.org contacted the sponsors of O’Reilly’s TV program, asking — not if they support his right-wing stances, his hypocrisy, his racism, his misogyny...

Hypocrisy: Olby agrees with Howard Dean never to call a sitting pres a fascist.

Racism: Olby says a Black NFL players runs like he's heading for Roscoe's House of Chicken 'n Waffles and Bill Richardson should pass the guacamole.

Misogyny: Olby on Hillary, "Somebody who can take her into a room and only he comes out."

You would Stink Progress would go after him instead.

I wrote UPS too.

 

I wrote about the same topic at the American Spectator blog.

I wrote about the same topic at the American Spectator blog.

Matthew Vadum is Editor of Organization Trends and Foundation Watch, two monthly newsletters published by Capital Research Center

UPS Not To Advertise?

As a former employee of this company, I am deeply surprised! I believed their answer has a hidden message with the "no plans to continue advertising" statement. Most people know that ObyGynyman is an extortionist, including the executives at UPS. Rather than become involved in a public relations nightmare, they probably decided to appease the Cornell girly-man with this statement!

UPS email sent

I told UPS, very nicely, that Liberals and their groups, "vote" with their mouths, while conservatives "vote" with their dollars. My dollar "votes" are now with Fed Ex.

UPS THAT!

"Thank you for sending an e-mail expressing concern about UPS advertising during the Bill O'Reilly show on Fox News. We do consider such comments as we consider ad placement decisions which involve a variety of news, entertainment and sports programming. At this time we have no plans to continue advertising during this show."

Seriously, this is a meaningless non-response from one Susan Rosenberg. It's a standard "please go away Mr Nutjob" response. I know. I've written them for clients.

1. "At this time we have NO plans..."  Oh, she means at 09.00 EST on March 27, UPS has no plans. But tomorrow? Well, who knows. But she told the truth and that's no contradiction.

2.  "We do consider such comment" Err, maybe, but not so much.

What THEY DO consider a great deal more is the potential audience of the ad placement, it's cost and its effectiveness.

Hey, I'm not a big fan of Bill (he's waaaay to liberal for me), I haven't watched his show in months. But fans might consider this...

E-Mail Ms Rosenberg with YOUR comments on her comment. And tell them that you have NO PLANS to continue using UPS until they make rational ad decisions NOT based on some email from a loon with a TV show and a very small... peck... I mean audience. 

Obama Amends The Constitution
Check out the poster @ Hollycrud checker-outers

Thanks for the link --

I missed that show.  O'Reilly's stalking shtick does smack of bullying sometimes, but in this case it did exactly what it should: exposed a blogger as being completely ignorant of the subject of her blogging.  QED.

UPS

 I e-mailed UPS and told them I would no longer use their services.

 

I stick my neck out for nobody.

Change the letter

I don't know if the changes I made went out but I thought I'd give it a try. I went to the ThinkProgress site and changed the text in the letter to O'Reilly's sponsors and made it a support letter instead.

The first talking A$$HOLE

Olbermann says; "ThinkProgress.org contacted the sponsors of O’Reilly’s TV program,
asking — not if they support his right-wing stances, his hypocrisy, his
racism, his misogyny, his fact-optional approach — but if they could
stomach him time after time stalking people who had dared to criticize
him in print or online".

This coming from a man that closes his show NIGHTLY calling people some of the most degrading things, all because HE doesn't agree with them! Not to mention that it is hard to be hypocritical when you have your nose so far up the a$$ of the White House that they can do no wrong. But the best is his "fact optional" line; again, this coming from a man and network that gets the majority of it's talking points from the Daily Kos or the Huffington Post for petes sake. They just sit back and throw stuff out there hoping to cause a stir. Kind of like the President is doing at this point.   

 

 

President Obama is nothing more than a empty suit; a Hollywood
style special effects smoke and mirrors show that has shown itself to
be a total fraud.
 

WAKE UP AMERICA! SAVE OUR CONSTITUTION! 

UPS off

I've just seen the O'Reilly segment to which this unhinged Marxist/leftist hate is directed.

It really is DISGUSTING, as it refers to a young lady who was raped and now heads a charity to help rape victims.

That's right OLBERWOMANN uses a survivor of rape who, with her mom and dad, has spent the past 8 years helping others.

It's vile leftist stuff headed by an alien believing loon called Podesta. These people are crazy. But don't take my word, see the segment yourself... where hs producer respectfully confronts the leftist blogger.

http://olbermannwatch.com/ 

I started out being fairly relaxed about UPS's response, see my post below. But now I'm pretty riled up. BOYCOTT UPS UNTIL THEY SHOW SOME RESPECT FOR PEOPLE HELPING RAPE VICTIMS.

And that include O'Reilly. What the FRACK has Olberwomann ever done to help anybody? 

Anyone know of any genuine chairity he sponsors? 

Obama Amends The Constitution
Check out the poster @ Hollycrud checker-outers

Olbermann

The man is an idiot who couldn't hold a candle to O'Reilly - or anyone else with more than a single brain cell.  He never has anyone on to challenge him or to debate him as he is too scared or too insecure in his beliefs, and his show is nothing but an hour of unadulterated stupidity and hate.  But that's the model for MSNBC - hate and stupidity.  That's why I never watch (P)MSNBC.

O’Reilly should be thrilled

Have you noticed Keith's worst person award always goes to someone with class, dignity and morals - something people on the left like him can't stand, because they have none? I don't always agree with O'reilly but respect his honesty and think Michelle Malkin is a fantastic columnist who exhibits all the finest personality traits. It is a real honor to be mentioned by moron Olberman.

Olber-ham

This guy is very, very disturbed, in fact -"He is the most disturbed person in the World!"

“Monomaniac – is an obsessive preoccupation that has an obsessive interest in a single thing, or a preoccupation with a single idea or thought.”

Keith needs some help quickly or he is going to snap, ok, snap more then he already has.  

 

"Tonya Harding Moment"

Okay...that 'Tonya Harding' reference had me rolling! ROTFL!

I hear Keith is thinking....

of changing his last name to Olbambaermann. He REALLY loves B.O.

 

President Obama is nothing more than a empty suit; a Hollywood
style special effects smoke and mirrors show that has shown itself to
be a total fraud.
 

WAKE UP AMERICA! SAVE OUR CONSTITUTION! 

It's Rough on Bathtub Boy

I mean, look at it from his perspective. He's a piece of crap TV guy and his audience is even more crappy. Where has he got to go from there? Why, in the crapper, of course.

I say what's good for the goose

tastes just as good with gander soup, too.  Boycotts should be a tool everyone uses.  Form letters are useless (as shown above) I say be creative so you can get over the heads of nimrods like Mr Schirmer.

Poor Keith.  I'd say this is his last gasp.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.