On Saturday, NewsBusters asked:
Did you ever in your wildest dreams imagine seeing an article at the liberal website the Huffington Post that not only refuted the anthropogenic global warming myth, but also asked Nobel Laureate Al Gore to apologize for the climate hysteria he's caused?
Apparently, neither could the website's founder, as Arianna Huffington has now gone on the record as saying, "It was an error in judgment" publishing Harold Ambler's "Mr. Gore: Apology Accepted." "I would not have posted it."
So reported the environmental blog Grist Wednesday:
Now, via email, Arianna Huffington clarifies:
Harold Ambler reached out to me about posting a critical piece on Al Gore and the environment. We are always open to posts that present opinions contrary to HuffPost's editorial view -- and have welcomed many conservative voices, such as David Frum, Tony Blankley, Michael Smerconish, Bob Barr, Joe Scarborough, Jim Talent, etc., to the site. We have featured also countless posts from the leading lights of the Green movement, including Robert Redford, Laurie David, Carl Pope, Van Jones, David Roberts, and many others -- and I myself have written extensively about the global warming crisis, and have been highly critical of those who refuse to acknowledge the overwhelming scientific evidence.
When Ambler sent his post, I forwarded it to one of our associate blog editors to evaluate, not having read it. I get literally hundreds of posts a week submitted like this and obviously can't read them all -- which is why we have an editorial process in place. The associate blog editor published the post. It was an error in judgment. I would not have posted it. Although HuffPost welcomes a vigorous debate on many subjects, I am a firm believer that there are not two sides to every issue, and that on some issues the jury is no longer out. The climate crisis is one of these issues.
Wow. So there AREN'T two sides to every issue.
That sure is a fine concept to be held by a journalist, dontcha think?
Alas, this isn't really a surprise, is it?
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Follow him at Facebook and Twitter.
Editor at Large
Comments Policy
→ She's not stupid
January 8, 2009 - 13:49 ET by Cool ArrowArianna isn't stupid, not totally.
She just had a moment of lucidity, then put her head back in the sewer.
Poor Gore
January 8, 2009 - 13:57 ET by 10ksnookerIf the current solar trends continue, it will soon be so cold, the snow piled so high, the ice frozen so deep, that everyone but Al Gore will know Al Gore is the village idiot.
HuffPuff will be amongst the last.
That's
January 8, 2009 - 15:02 ET by heldmyw...Al Gore the GLOBAL Village Idiot...
Why don't you post-off, Huffington
January 8, 2009 - 13:58 ET by Jack BauerThis is why the woman who tuned her husband gay is such a mendacious slimeball.
Apart from Blankley these are McCainiacs, aren't they? And didn't Barr just run for President as the LIBERTARIAN candidate?
Libertarians vs. Conservatives
January 8, 2009 - 20:51 ET by PopularTechPeople confuse them all the time, usually because they share similar fiscal policy.
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is Not Pollution
The Emperor
January 8, 2009 - 14:15 ET by Doc_NavyNoel,
I've said it before on another thread, liberals are NEVER, EVER, E V E R wrong. At least in their own minds.
Unfortunately, when it comes to AGW this goes triple. AGW is their ticket to power, money, and control. They wil never let this one go willingly.
Fortunately, you can only call the sky Green for so long before someone shows you it's Blue. The Earth hasn't cooperated with the Alarmists/Warmalists and even the MSM is starting to see that the Emperor has no clothes.
Doc
2008: The year that the great LIE died.
How we know that they know that they are Lying.
Friedrich Nietzsche summed up how I feel about the MSM in this quote:
"I'm not upset that you lied to me, I'm upset that from now on I can't believe you."
huff is a piece of work
January 8, 2009 - 14:01 ET by bubbatech01I am an engineer, went through one of the toughest schools in the nation, did extremely well and consider myself a person that knows just a little bit about science. I dont believe in global warming, think the underlying data is suspect, think that the assumptions made to calculate temps are suspect and think that recent news regarding how the earth is actually cooling places global warming in doubt.
And that b--- knows enough about science that she can sit there and be critical of me.
EDIT: I dont mean to imply that I know everything, but isnt that the point of this whole mess? Only the alarmists seem to believe that they do.
Long live the liberal elite.
The average earth
January 8, 2009 - 14:18 ET by celatorThe average earth temperatures (a screwy notion to begin with) does rise and fall (as I am sure you know) cyclically. It's the "man made global warming we are all going to die" variety which drives us crazy. ;+}
For liberal Democrats and the MSM, everything is crisis, chaos and catastrophe. And only the government has the solution.
In the AGW belief
January 8, 2009 - 14:26 ET by ApacheIn the AGW belief system, consensus can be declared if you have 60 scientists you can spin as being 2500 plus a majority of Hollywood high school dropouts and media pinheads. So says Gore, so it shall be done. If the UN is involved, well then that's just orgasmic to these folks. Good thing they are getting a long cold shower.
The Global Warming Experts
January 8, 2009 - 20:54 ET by PopularTechAl Sharpton, College Dropout
Alanis Morissette, High School Diploma
Alicia Keys, College Dropout
Alicia Silverstone, High School Dropout
Art Bell, College Dropout
Ben Affleck, College Dropout
Ben Stiller, College Dropout
Billy Jean King, College Dropout
Bono (Paul Hewson), High School Diploma
Brad Pitt, College Dropout
Britney Spears, High School Dropout
Bruce Springsteen, College Dropout
Cameron Diaz, High School Dropout
Christie Brinkley, High School Diploma
Cindy Crawford, College Dropout
Diane Keaton, College Dropout
Drew Barrymore, High School Dropout
Ed Begley Jr., High School Diploma
George Clooney, College Dropout
Gwyneth Paltrow, College Dropout
Jackson Browne, High School Diploma
Jason Biggs, College Dropout
Jennifer Connelly, College Dropout
Jessica Simpson, High School Dropout
Jon Bon Jovi (John Bongiovi), High School Diploma
John Travolta, High School Dropout
Joshua Jackson, High School Dropout
Julia Louis-Dreyfus, College Dropout
Julia Roberts, College Dropout
Kanye West, College Dropout
Keanu Reeves, High School Dropout
Kevin Bacon, High School Dropout
Kiefer Sutherland, High School Dropout
Leonardo DiCaprio, High School Dropout
Lindsay Lohan, High School Dropout
Ludacris (Christopher Bridges), College Dropout
Madonna (Madonna Ciccone), College Dropout
Matt Damon, College Dropout
Matthew Modine, College Dropout
Michael Moore, College Dropout
Nicole Richie, College Dropout
Neve Campbell, High School Dropout
Olivia Newton-John, High School Dropout
Orlando Bloom, High School Dropout
Paris Hilton, High School Dropout
Pierce Brosnan. High School Dropout
Queen Latifah (Dana Elaine Owens), College Dropout
Richard Branson, High School Dropout
Robert Redford, College Dropout
Rosie O'Donnell, College Dropout
Sarah Silverman, College Dropout
Sean Penn, College Dropout
Sienna Miller, High School Diploma
Ted Turner, College Dropout
Terri Hatcher, College Dropout
Tommy Lee (Thomas Lee Bass), High School Dropout
Uma Thurman, High School Dropout
Willie Nelson, High School Dropout
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is Not Pollution
Looking at your list. The
January 9, 2009 - 08:31 ET by danboLooking at your list. The number of college dropouts. Maybe things have changed since back during the Dark Ages when I was an undergraduate.
But it seemed most of my fellow class mates who dropped out did so during their first and second year. Especially the 1st year. It seems most of us who got to the third year finished.
During my first two years I was basically taking introductory courses. It wasn't till my third year that we started studying in depth.
I don't think I even found out about the professional abstracts, the micro films, the documents room or rare books room till my 3rd year.
I suspect. Your list of college drop outs are those who only took introductory and general courses. And perhaps few of those.
Limited Disclosure: I used to belong to the Sierra Club untill they went crazier. Worse of all, I was bribed by Exxon with free New Orleans Saints glasses with fill ups in the 70's.
I have had friends...
January 8, 2009 - 14:56 ET by danhat...ask, "Well, How do you know NewsBusters - or whatever site- is telling the truth?"
The answer is "I dont mean to imply that I know everything."
It is the attitude and willingness to admit we do not know everything. But I see it plenty from the lefties.
Change the "I" to "We," and you have one of the principals of being convervative.; a willingness to admit when we are wrong and a willingness to always be open to the truth.
http://www.reasonand...
...thought matters
++++++++++++++++
Normally I don't root for the disease. But in your case I am willing to make and exception.
Two sides?
January 8, 2009 - 14:00 ET by Agrarian-DecentralistSpeaking of "two sides to every issue," Mr. Sheppard neglected to note that Huffington Post also published a piece by Grist staff writer David Roberts, co-written with climate scientist Andrew Dessler, calling attention to "gross factual errors about the science of climate change" in Harold Ambler's essay:
http://www.huffingto...
Roberts and Dessler observe that Ambler's piece is "getting skeptics all twitterpated (again). These folks can't find a scientific journal with two hands and a flashlight, but nothing escapes their RSS feeds."
What a "disgraceful" thing to say, right Noel?
Nice drive-by posting.
January 8, 2009 - 14:59 ET by Mike BrattonBecause, of course, the "science is settled," right?
In what arena other than the fantasy of anthropogenic global warming would such blinkered thinking apply?
The end of the article you referenced, AD, perpetuated the narcissism that "humans are now in the climatic drivers' seat, with the pedal to the metal. Maybe it's time we put our hands on the wheel."
The disgrace is in such reckless, myopic displays of intellectual hubris, cracking wise with all sorts of conclusions yet ignoring the bottom-line influence of (gasp!) the sun on our planet's temperature.
And the same lack-of-thought process that produces AGW effendi and their cult has given us Obama and his cult. Often, their members enjoy dual citizenship.
--Mike
www.thebrattonreport...
The Usual
January 8, 2009 - 15:26 ET by dboThe usual garbage from the usual suspects. You don't have to go past the fourth word in the link provided by Noel to read Roberts and Dessler's drivel. Andrew Dessler makes the same laughable arguments that the alarmists and apologists continously embarrass themselves with, complete with contradictions and all. Of course, contradictions, hypocrisy and speaking out of both sides of your mouth are nothing new to Dessler.
http://scienceandpub...
Yep. Limited Disclosure:
January 8, 2009 - 15:49 ET by danboYep.
Limited Disclosure: I used to belong to the Sierra Club untill they went crazier. Worse of all, I was bribed by Exxon with free New Orleans Saints glasses with fill ups in the 70's.
There was a time when
January 8, 2009 - 15:52 ET by ApacheThere was a time when science involved testing a theory by making a prediction about future data and then observing the actual real world data to see how well it matched. The warmers have failed at this time and again. Yet those who made predictions based on a competing theory have seen the data match their theory nicely. Yet Alarmists call these people "deniers". Thus Alarmists can't be real scientists. Some of them might have managed to get a degree so they can use the title but they obviously don't practice it.
Roberts and Dessler Debunked
January 8, 2009 - 22:05 ET by PopularTech"These folks can't find a scientific journal with two hands and a flashlight"
I used two hands but on my keyboard not with a flash light.
A comparison of tropical temperature trends with model predictions
(International Journal of Climatology, 5 Dec 2007)
- David H. Douglass, John R. Christy, Benjamin D. Pearson, S. Fred Singer
Climate Change Re-examined
(Journal of Scientific Exploration, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 723–749, 2007)
- Joel M. Kauffman
Environmental Effects of Increased Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide
(Climate Research, Vol. 13, Pg. 149–164, October 26 1999)
- Arthur B. Robinson, Zachary W. Robinson, Willie Soon, Sallie L. Baliunas
"The claim that the CO2 rise begins after the temperature rise is correct but misleading. The cause of the ice ages is well known: slight shifts in the Earth's orbit. Those shifts, however, are too weak to explain the full temperature swings seen during ice ages. That's where carbon dioxide comes in. It acts as a feedback, taking the small effects of orbital changes and turbocharging them into the enormous temperature swings observed in the historical record."
No orbital shifts and axis shifts are enough to explain the ice ages.
Milankovitch Cycles and the Ice Ages (NASA)
Milankovitch Cycles (Video) (3min)
Antarctic Seafloor Core Suggests Earth's Orbital Oscillations May Be The Key To What Controlled Ice Ages (Science Daily)
Changing Orbit Explains Ice Ages, Scientist Says (Space.com)
Earth's Orbit Creates More Than A Leap Year: Orbital Behaviors Also Drive Climate Changes, Ice Ages (Science Daily)
The temperature - CO2 lag is well documented in those journals I found again, unlike the nonsensical "turbocharging".
Ice core records of atmospheric CO2 around the last three glacial terminations
(Science, Vol. 283. no. 5408, pp. 1712 - 1714, 12 March 1999)
- Hubertus Fischer, Martin Wahlen, Jesse Smith, Derek Mastroianni, Bruce Deck
High-resolution records from Antarctic ice cores show that carbon
dioxide concentrations increased by 80 to 100 parts per million by
volume 600 ± 400 years after the warming of the last three
deglaciations.
Southern Hemisphere and Deep-Sea Warming Led Deglacial Atmospheric CO2 Rise and Tropical Warming
(Science, September 27, 2007)
- Lowell Stott, Axel Timmermann, Robert Thunell
Deep sea temperatures warmed by ~2C between 19 and 17 ka B.P.
(thousand years before present), leading the rise in atmospheric CO2
and tropical surface ocean warming by ~1000 years.
The phase relations among atmospheric CO2 content, temperature and global ice volume over the past 420 ka
(Quaternary Science Reviews, Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 583-589, February 2001)
- Manfred Mudelsee
Over the full 420 ka of the Vostok record, CO2 variations lag behind
atmospheric temperature changes in the Southern Hemisphere by 1.3±1.0 ka
Timing of Atmospheric CO2 and Antarctic Temperature Changes Across Termination III
(Science 14, Vol. 299. no. 5613, March 2003)
- Nicolas Caillon, Jeffrey P. Severinghaus, Jean Jouzel, Jean-Marc Barnola, Jiancheng Kang, Volodya Y. Lipenkov
The sequence of events during Termination III suggests that the CO2
increase lagged Antarctic deglacial warming by 800 ± 200 years and
preceded the Northern Hemisphere deglaciation.
"Check out this plot of the Mauna Loa carbon dioxide record and tell me if you see any effect of ocean temperature in 1993 or 1998:"
How about telling me if you see any remote positive temperature trend coorelation: Atmospheric CO2 Concentration Mauna Loa
"While individual spectral lines do indeed saturate, adding more carbon dioxide pushes the level of saturation higher in the atmosphere -- leading to additional heating of the surface."
That makes no sense. If a wave length is absorbed at lower levels, it does not exist to be absorbed at higher levels.
"Evidence of this can be found on Venus, which has a surface temperature of 450°C -- hot enough to melt lead; hotter even than Mercury, which is closer to the sun. Why so hot? Venus has a thick, carbon-dioxide-rich atmosphere, which Mercury does not. If, as Mr. Ambler claims, carbon dioxide saturates, Venus' temperature ought to be lower than Earth's, owing to the thick sulfuric acid clouds that shroud the planet and reflect sunlight. It's not; Mr. Ambler does not know what he's talking about."
Based on this logic Mars should be hotter than Earth but it's not.
- Carbon Dioxide is 95.3% of the atmosphere of Mars (NASA)
- Average Temperature on Mars is -80°F (NASA)
- Carbon Dioxide is 0.038% of the atmosphere of Earth (NASA)
- Average Temperature on Earth is 57°F (NASA)
"To give Mr. Ambler some credit, this was the subject of legitimate scientific uncertainty ... in the first half of the twentieth century. However, careful spectroscopic measurements settled it about 50 years ago. There is indeed some overlap, but enough lines do not overlap that carbon dioxide is indeed an important greenhouse gas."
Atmospheric Absorption Bands
Yeah CO2 is a greenhouse gas over powered by water vapor across the board.
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is Not Pollution
Posting News
January 8, 2009 - 14:05 ET by AvitarLiberal pundits like the NYT or the Huffing ton Post have to be ready to abandon ever principle when the facts come in and discredits their current fiction.
If you are old, enough you remember Global Cooling in the 1970's. It does not matter what the current climate is doing it will be used as an argument for new measures for Control of the Hoi Poloi. (That is you and I for those not familiar with the term.) Before cooling, it was the Ozone due to the Super Sonic Transport, SST plane.
Yep. No doubt we are living
January 8, 2009 - 14:15 ET by celatorYep. No doubt we are living in a perpetual state of doom. Save us, Obama, please turn your smile toward our pain... ;+}
For liberal Democrats and the MSM, everything is crisis, chaos and catastrophe. And only the government has the solution.
LOL-Yeah, and somewhere in
January 8, 2009 - 15:12 ET by R D HelmLOL-Yeah, and somewhere in that mix of global starvation (from the next ice age) and death by excessive radiation from the sun, the "killer bees" were going to swarm up and kill us all by the year 2000.
Funny how all the life-as-we-know-it-ending calamities of the '60s and 70s were all going to take place by the year 2000.
-Dave
“Them that’s going get on the wagon. Them that ain’t get out of the way.” -Because enough is enough.
Twisted
January 8, 2009 - 14:09 ET by rammingspeedArianna Huffington is a malignant narcissist who goes wherever she can get the most attention. Be a republican? Sure, until people catch on that she's a flake and they reject her. Be a radical leftist? Sure, because people there like flakes; they are flakes and you need to be flake to fit in.
So Arianna has made millions off Huffington Post and has her stupid face splashed all over the MSM. Doesn't care about a couple of 180s in her life, doesn't care who she misleads and hurts.
What else matters to the drama-queen-diva-poser with no conscience, no morality? She is a sick human being.
You forgot one adjective.
January 8, 2009 - 14:46 ET by Mike BrattonHuffington is a "rich" drama-queen-diva-poser with no conscience and no morality.
Wealth, in the mind of liberals, is a qualification trump card, as we're learning yet again with the coronation, er, vetting of Caroline Kennedy.
--Mike
www.thebrattonreport...
i am a denier from day one regarding agw, however
January 8, 2009 - 14:11 ET by larry on LIhis net worth has increased considerably since he started his scam.the adage proves true "a good line of bullshit is worth two sets of tools".
Love these global warming alarmists
January 8, 2009 - 14:14 ET by bubbatech01From David Robert's blog in response to Huff posting an honest piece [EMPHASIS MINE]:
The claim that the CO2 rise begins after the temperature rise is correct but misleading. [THANKS FOR NOTING THAT GORE WAS FULL OF CRAP IN HIS EXPLANATION OF THE INFAMOUS HOCKEY STICK GRAPH]
The cause of the ice ages is well known [NOPE: SOME BELIEVE ASTEROID, SOME BELIEVE VOLCANO ASH]: slight shifts in the Earth's orbit [A GUESS]. Those shifts, however, are too weak to explain the full temperature swings seen during ice ages [IF IT WAS WELL KNOWN, WHY DOESNT IT EXPLAIN EVERYTHING]. That's where carbon dioxide comes in [OH, SO YOU COULDNT EXPLAIN IT YET IT BEING "WELL KNOWN" AND NOW YOU GUESS THAT CO2 EXPLAINS IT]. It acts as a feedback [PROBABLY ONE OF THE MOST IDIOTIC STATEMENTS], taking the small effects of orbital changes and turbocharging them into the enormous temperature swings observed in the historical record [NOPE and and IDIOTIC STATEMENT].
That's funny.....
January 8, 2009 - 14:45 ET by connman"I am a firm believer that there are not two sides to every issue, and that on some issues the jury is no longer out." ...
#1 Liberal = Firm believer in above statement.
#2 I didn't know a jury ever existed!
"A word to the wise ain't necessary. It's the stupid ones who need the advice." --Bill Cosby
as a 62 year old male, i
January 8, 2009 - 15:05 ET by JIMMY1660as a 62 year old male, i have only seen 248 changes in the seasons.not really enough time to truly form a solid opinion about global warming. Other than thinking"who the hell do we think we are, assuming we can influence Mother Earth and her growing pains." After 4500 years i do know we have learned to be better stewards of Earth, more aware, not to pollute.
Mother Earths Polar Bears have grown in number from 5,000 to over 25,000. The Arctic ice flow has grown, move about<because it is an ice flow, not attached to anything. and if it moves too far South-IT MELTS. But the Bears deal with it and have enjoyed life, because there are more of them.
a$$holes like Gore, who no longer have the spotlight, must create an issue to gain the light back. and make money along the way.
When there were no humans on the Planet-we had the same weather cycles, scientits have proven that with soil and rock samples.
Lake Erie was a sewer, humans stopped dumping into the Rivers, and we now have sport fishing. Funny!!!!
allow me to Love America
A look at this chart should put global warming fears to bed...
January 8, 2009 - 15:12 ET by jazboOf greatest note:
1) CO2 concentration deltas LAG temperature increase deltas.
2) This stuff is cyclical and we have already started cooling per the very end of the chart.
http://www.wunderground.com/blog/RickyRood/comment.html?entrynum=41&tstamp=200709
Those who believe in nothing will believe anything.
would seem Huffington has aligned herself with
January 8, 2009 - 15:16 ET by Gary HallWould seem Huffington has aligned herself perfectly with the MSM.
gary
I am a firm believer that
January 8, 2009 - 15:21 ET by fitzfongI am a firm believer that there are not two sides to every issue, and that on some issues the jury is no longer out.
I, too, am a firm believer that there are not two sides to every issue and that on some issues the jury is no longer out. For instance, I am a firm believer that Arianna Nuthington is a bimbo opportunist who knowingly married a gay man and acted as his beard in the hopes of getting invited to DC and Westside L.A. parties and raising her public profile in time to take most of his money and become famous. There is no flip side...that's what happened.
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan
fitzfong.blogspot.com
Shocked!!!
January 8, 2009 - 15:23 ET by LionKingShocked! Arianna obviously has her head buried in a snow-drift.
Noel Cease and Desist
January 8, 2009 - 15:44 ET by Carl KolchakNoel, there never was an article at Huffington that questioned Al Gore and Global Warming. We strongly "suggest" that you cease and desist from ever mentioning that false article again.
Signed
The Thought Police
The Other Side to the Global Warming Issue (that does not exist)
January 8, 2009 - 22:12 ET by PopularTech"More informed respondents both feel less personally responsible for global warming, and also show less concern for global warming" - 2008 Texas A&M University Study
Don't Believe the Hype (Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Atmospheric Science, MIT)
I Was On the Global Warming Gravy Train (David Evans, B.Sc. Applied Mathematics and Physics, M.S. Statistics, Ph.D.)
The Case for Skepticism on Global Warming (Michael Crichton, A.B. Anthropology, M.D. Harvard)
Climate chaos? Don't believe it (Christopher Monckton, Mathematician, UK)
Guides:
A Global Warming Primer (PDF) (National Center for Policy Analysis)
A Skeptic’s Guide to Debunking Global Warming Alarmism (PDF) (US Senate Environment & Public Works Committee)
A Skeptical Layman's Guide to Anthropogenic Global Warming (PDF) (Climate Skeptic)
A Skeptic's Guide to An Inconvenient Truth (PDF) (Marlo Lewis Jr. Ph.D.)
Global Warming FAQ (PDF) (Competitive Enterprise Institute)
The Skeptics Handbook (PDF) (Joanne Nova, Ph.D. Meteorology)
Myths:
Fallacies about Global Warming (PDF) (Science & Public Policy Institute)
Five Biggest Myths about Global Warming (The Washington Examiner)
Global Warming Economics: Facts vs. Myths (PDF) (Competitive Enterprise Institute)
Global Warming: Fact and Myth (S. Fred Singer, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus of Environmental Science)
Global Warming: Science vs. Nonsense (PDF) (Executive Intelligence Review)
Global Warming Myths (Friends of Science)
Green Myths On Global Warming - Debunked (The Association of British Drivers, UK)
Heartland President Debunks Global Warming Myths (The Heartland Institute)
Myths and Facts About the Environment (National Center for Public Policy Research)
Myths of Global Warming (National Center for Policy Analysis)
The Global Warming Myth? (John Stossel, ABC News)
Top 10 Climate Myth-Busters for 2007 (Steve Milloy, B.A. Natural Science, M.S. Health Science)
Top 10 Environmental Myths (PDF) (U.S. Chamber of Commerce)
Top 10 'Global-Warming' Myths (Human Events)
Papers:
A Climate of Belief (PDF) (Patrick Frank, Ph.D. Chemistry)
Carbon Dioxide is not the primary cause of global warming (PDF) (Allan M.R. MacRae, B.Sc., M.Eng.)
Carbon Emissions Don’t Cause Global Warming (PDF) (David Evans, B.Sc. Applied Mathematics and Physics, M.S. Statistics, Ph.D.)
Climate Change is Nothing New (PDF) (Lance Endersbee, Professor Emeritus of Engineering)
Climate Change Re-examined (PDF) (Joel M. Kauffman, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus of Chemistry)
Climate Science: Climate Change and Its Impacts (PDF) (David R. Legates, Ph.D. Professor of Climatology)
Climate Sensitivity Reconsidered (Christopher Monckton, Mathematician, UK)
CO2: The Greatest Scientific Scandal of Our Time (PDF) (Zbigniew Jaworowski, M.D. Ph.D. D.Sc. Natural Sciences)
Environmental Effects of Increased Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide (PDF) (Arthur B. Robinson, Ph.D. Professor of Chemistry)
Global Warming and Nature's Thermostat (Roy Spencer, Ph.D. Meteorology)
Global Warming: Experts’ Opinions versus Scientific Forecasts (PDF) (Kesten C. Green, Ph.D. Management Science, J. Scott Armstrong, Ph.D. MIT)
Global Warming - Is Carbon Dioxide Getting a Bad Rep? (PDF) (Joseph D’Aleo, M.S. Meteorology, CCM, AMS Fellow)
Governments and Climate Change Issues: The case for rethinking (PDF) (David R. Henderson, Ph.D. Professor of Economics)
Is the Climate Really Changing Abnormally? (PDF) (Ross McKitrick, Ph.D. Professor of Environmental Economics)
Is the Earth still recovering from the "Little Ice Age"? (PDF) (Syun-Ichi Akasofu, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus of Geophysics)
Is the Sky Really Falling? A Review of Recent Global Warming Scare Stories (PDF) (Patrick J. Michaels, Ph.D. Ecological Climatology)
Is There a Basis for Global Warming Alarm? (Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Atmospheric Science, MIT)
Low climate sensitivity and other inconvenient truths (PDF) (Luboš Motl, Ph.D. Theoretical Physics)
Pseudoscientific elements in climate change research (PDF) (Arthur Rörsch, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus of Molecular Genetics)
The Acquittal of Carbon Dioxide (Jeffrey A. Glassman, Ph.D. Applied Physicist and Engineer)
The Global Warming Scam (PDF) (Vincent R. Gray, Ph.D. Physical Chemistry)
The Increase in Global Temperature: What it Does and Does Not Tell Us (PDF) (Robert C. Balling Jr., Ph.D. Professor of Climatology)
The Lynching of Carbon Dioxide - The Innocent Source of Life (PDF) (Martin Hertzberg, Ph.D. Physical Chemistry)
The Myth of Dangerous Human Caused Climate Change (PDF) (Robert M. Carter, Ph.D. Professor of Environmental and Earth Science)
The IPCC's dubious evidence for a human influence on climate (PDF) (John McLean, Climate Data Analyst)
The Science Isn't Settled - The Limitations of Global Climate Models (PDF) (Tim F. Ball, Ph.D. Historical Climatology)
Reports:
Civil Society Report on Climate Change (PDF) (Civil Society Coalition on Climate Change)
Global Warming Censored (PDF) (Business & Media Institute)
Independent Summary for Policymakers: IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (PDF) (The Fraser Institute)
NIPCC: Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate (PDF) (S. Fred Singer, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus of Environmental Science)
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is Not Pollution
Operaton HAL is still in effect
January 8, 2009 - 22:19 ET by Free StinkerReminder: Operaton HAL is still in effect