As NewsBusters previously reported, MSNBC's Keith Olbermann accused Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin Tuesday of cutting in half her state's funding for the Special Olympics.
Not only is this categorically false, it appears likely Olbermann got this erroneous information from the far-left website ThinkProgress which NewsBusters has shown in the past to be a source for some of the "Countdown" host's material.
Here's what Olbermann said Tuesday (video and partial transcript follow, h/t Johnny Dollar):
Twice now in two days – in Colorado, then today at Vienna, Ohio – Governor Palin has again invoked – that is the polite term – her status as the mother of a special needs child and the role of advocate she wants to play for special needs kids. Yesterday, she said, "Ever since I took the chief executive’s job up north, I’ve pushed for more funding for students with special needs." Today the quote was, "I sought more funds for students with special needs."Problem: As the chief executive up north, she vetoed $275,000, crossed it out, of the state funding of the Special Olympics. She cut the Special Olympics budget in half and is campaigning as an advocate for special needs kids. That’s pretty sick. Well, at least we do know which charity I should donate that hundred bucks to every time she lies about her record: the Alaska Special Olympics.
Now, here's what ThinkProgress reported Monday (emphasis added):
Campaigning in Colorado today, Gov. Sarah Palin (R-AK) promised renewed attention to kids with special needs. She declared, “Ever since I took the chief executive’s job up North I pushed for more funding for students with special needs,” and cited her own family’s experience with the issue. [...]
It’s a stretch to say she “pushed” for any policy improvements. Though Palin did sign a law increasing special education funding in Alaska, “she had no role whatsoever” in its development, according to the bill’s author, Rep. Mike Hawker (R). Moreover, as governor, Palin vetoed $275,000 in Special Olympics Alaska funds (Page 100, SB 221 with vetoes), slashing the organization’s operating budget in half.
Sadly, what's on display here is either a shocking ignorance concerning budgets, or a willful intent to deceive.
If you click on the link embedded above inside "Palin vetoed $275,000 in Special Olympics Alaska funds," what you find is the 2008 Alaska budget. What ThinkProgress and Olbermann are pointing to is an item on page 100 for "Special Olympics Alaska" with the number "550,000" lined out, and the number "275,000" written above it.
That DOES NOT mean this operating budget was cut in half. Instead, it means what was PROPOSED, or, as we'll see in a moment, what was ASKED for by Special Olympics Alaska at the beginning of the budget process was approved for half the initial request.
Yet, most importantly, the final approval represented an increase from the previous year.
As can be seen from the Alaska state budget for 2007 (PDF for SB 53 here, see page 34), the state spent $250,000 on Special Olympics Alaska that year. If you look at the 2006 budget (PDF for SB 231 here, see page 23), you will find the funds allocated for Special Olympics Alaska was also $250,000 under the previous governor.
As such, in her second year as governor, Sarah Palin increased spending on Special Olympics Alaska by 10 percent RATHER than slashing it the 50 percent Olbermann and Think Progress claimed.
This is supported by Sunday's article from KTUU, Alaska's NBC television affiliate (emphasis added):
While the Special Olympics did not want to make any comments about budget cuts, Channel 2 News looked into the governor's funding of the program.
Records show Palin actually increased their funding by $25,000. However, that amount is only half of what the program asked for.
To be sure, it is no surprise that ThinkProgress got this wrong, for as NewsBusters has chronicled on numerous occasions, this is just a leftwing shill.
However, for Olbermann to simply repeat what came from this propaganda outlet -- or wherever he got this nonsense from! -- without doing any fact-checking whatsover to confirm these allegations is disgraceful, and should act as further evidence to the heads of MSNBC and NBC News that this man has no business anchoring a program on a cable news network.
Beyond this, if either of these entities has any integrity, we should expect expeditious retractions concerning this matter. While we're at it, the New York Times should also issue a retraction for making this same mistake in its September 7 article.
Stay tuned.
*****Update: Warren Throckmorton has screencaps of Alaska's 2008 and 2007 budget pages here.
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Follow him at Facebook and Twitter.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Provenko and Olberman
September 17, 2008 - 16:06 ET by Dr_LibertyIf Nicholas Provenko got his way, Palin wouldn't need to fund Special Olympics at all.
<insert witty signature here>
...and the Special Olympics
September 17, 2008 - 16:10 ET by Dr_LibertyHaving donated money to the Special Olympics and having been an observer, I am amazed at how much they come together with the help of average citizen volunteers.
In all honesty, I didn't know that the Special Olympics get government funding. Thinking about it, I could see that there might be some government support -- e.g., providing government-owned facilities (e.g., high school track). However, I view this as a private citizen matter, as it should be.
Volunteer activity and "service" is much more fulfilling when it comes from the heart and not from the government.
<insert witty signature here>
And a half million dollars?
September 17, 2008 - 16:17 ET by Dr_LibertyAnd the proposed budget was $500,000?!
With all due respect, and saying as somebody who donated to Special Olympics, what are they doing with $500,000? I'm guessing that this would be on top of donations -- both private and corporate.
And does anybody know if the United Way (which is rapidly de-funding the Boy Scouts due to pressure from various radical groups) provides funds for the Special Olympics?
<insert witty signature here>
What's that?
September 17, 2008 - 16:11 ET by ontherightWould it be the sound of McCain/Palin supporters holding their collective breath waiting for retractions/corrections/apologies?
Nah, didn't think so...
We can only hope that eventually the lemmings/sheople might understand what the MSM is really all about and demand improvement and not just regurgitated "change".
Excellent work
September 17, 2008 - 16:15 ET by bigtimerExcellent work Noel...
I'm not holding my breath though to wait for corrections from the NYTs or Olbie/NBC/msnbc.
One thing about this though, NBs is doing a great job getting this out there...
I heard NBs get mentioned again today on Fox&Friends...
The more mentioned the more credibility in my opinion for fighting the good fight, slowly but surely we are winning.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
BT
September 17, 2008 - 16:17 ET by Noel SheppardBT,
What did F&F mention us for today? ns
Hey Noel... Just saw your
September 17, 2008 - 18:33 ET by bigtimerHey Noel...
Just saw your question...and I'll be darned if I remember...it was a story they were going to show but they said Newsbusters.org has this or something to that effect...and immediately went on with the story...
Gosh I hate it when you make me think...maybe it will come back to me...maybe I will look down the list of stories you all had on yesterday...I wasn't here, it may jog my pitiful memory.
Sorry I am zilch for help at the moment.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
Olbermann and those other leeches
September 17, 2008 - 16:16 ET by well99They are sick and pathetic little punks.They're pathlogical liars and MSNBC shows their standards by allowing this.
Right back atcha Olberman
September 17, 2008 - 16:19 ET by acumenWell, at least we do know which charity I should donate that hundred bucks to every time she lies about her record: the Alaska Special Olympics.
Well, that is why I take all of the money I used to spend on GE products and donate that money to the McCain/Palin ticket everytime NBC/MSLSD/GE lies.
Olbermann said...
September 17, 2008 - 16:30 ET by gregfahey"Well, at least we do know which charity I should donate that hundred bucks to every time she lies about her record.."
So what will you do when YOU are caught lying?
1) Will you be a man about it and admit your mistake?
2) Or will you make excuses for your behavior as you did here:
http://www.nypost.co...
I'm placing my bets on #2.
Sung to: Hello Muddah. Hello Faddah
September 17, 2008 - 16:30 ET by mattmOlber-manic's... in a panic.
John and Sarah, have him frantic.
If his lies don't help Obama; He'll just have to go home crying to his mama.
(that's all I got - feel free to add to it)
Well, at least we do know
September 17, 2008 - 16:33 ET by motherbeltWell, at least we do know which charity I should donate that hundred
bucks to every time she lies about her record: the Alaska Special
Olympics.
Hey, Olbie...here's an idea! Why not invite her on your show! Then you can make a big deal about giving her a check, on the air for "an extra week of Special Olympics"......you know, like you did with Bill Clinton for his Africa project....Here you go, for another school in Africa!
I think that the point
September 17, 2008 - 16:39 ET by ElyasI think that the point Olbermann was trying to make was that watching his show is like watching the Special Olympics and he wants government funding!
Thomas Jefferson once said, 'We should never judge a president by his age, only by his works.' And ever since he told me that, I stopped worrying. - Ronald Reagan
The democrats are in pure lie mode now
September 17, 2008 - 16:44 ET by c5thenNothing that they say or print is to be believed. The MSM are perpetuating the pure lies and worse, they know it and are doing it on purpose.
They have nothing else. Every time they try and talk about the issues, they have to lie to make their ideas look even sane. Everytime they try and talk about values, they have to lie to make it look like they have any at all. Every time they try and talk about experience, they have to lie to make it look like they have any that is applicable.
Doesn't FoxNews pull topics from this site?!?
September 17, 2008 - 16:44 ET byJust a thought...
Übercon
uhhhh, no. Fox sometimes
September 17, 2008 - 16:53 ET by bassndudeuhhhh, no. Fox sometimes looks at and mentions this site, but I am pretty sure they have a staff and reporters that decide what topics they address.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
It's not that you can't use
September 17, 2008 - 16:59 ET by ElyasIt's not that you can't use a site for information.
But you need ot make sure that that site actually researched and validated the information that they present.
Thomas Jefferson once said, 'We should never judge a president by his age, only by his works.' And ever since he told me that, I stopped worrying. - Ronald Reagan
What was I thinking?!?
September 17, 2008 - 17:11 ET byKnowing full well this is the site to go to for the truth in media reporting. My apologies. Why even bother worrying about the leftwing idiots as if people believe what they say or actually watch them. We know of no problems with the McCain/Palin ticket, so therefore why worry about the election. We're going to win by a landslide anyway...right...?
Carry on...
Übercon
Ubercon
September 17, 2008 - 20:19 ET by Noel SheppardU,
You consider that a thought? Well, here's what I consider a thought: you do some research and find an instance when Fox News pulled an article from this website, reported it without attribution, and it turned out what was reported was wrong.
If you can't do that, then I suggest you either apologize to me and all here, or stop sharing your "thoughts."
Fair enough? ns
9 minutes and 9 seconds...
September 17, 2008 - 21:41 ET by Karma..have long passed, Noel.
The record can only be verified by your response.
Good Article Noel!
September 17, 2008 - 16:48 ET by IamTinmanEvery time an entity doesn't get everything it asks for from the government in its' budget request, it screams that its funding was cut. It doesn't matter if it is payroll, equipment, or training, the budget for the ensuing year is raised 10% figuring they'll get 5% and then claiming they got the program cut to ensure that next years allotment will be larger. This is the nature of government budgets but for the media to report the Special Olympics and not any of the other agencies, illustrates once again the panic the left is in.
Poor KO
September 17, 2008 - 16:48 ET by rick007First dude is gonna get him. ROLFMAO
Drag him accros Alaska behind his snow machine.
KO
September 17, 2008 - 16:53 ET by rick007KO's a piece of (I"ll be nice) crap.
"without doing any
September 17, 2008 - 17:00 ET by Chris Norman"without doing any fact-checking whatsover"
An assassin doesn't inspect the individual bullets before he shoots. Apparently, neither does a character assassin.
McNotObama '08
Sadly, Noel. I'm not to sure..
September 17, 2008 - 17:04 ET by Gary HallSadly, Noel. I'm not to sure... what the words, "either" / "or" are doing in here:
Replacement with "and" is all that is required.
(;~> gary
Olberman = Liar
September 17, 2008 - 18:13 ET by Captain KirockNo doubt. This was not some honest mistake, it was a deliberate fabrication on Olberman's part. He has a long history of lies and distortions. He has no credibility. Anyone who believes anything this man says has to have their heads examined.
What in the world is Keith
September 17, 2008 - 18:55 ET by Clear thinkerWhat in the world is Keith doing to keep his job? I'm serious, any other supposed legitimate media outlet would have had security toss him out in the back alley a long time ago.
Oh, that's right, he speaks for the left. Nuff said!
Sarah Palin Should Have Aborted
Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/
How in the world does this
September 17, 2008 - 21:34 ET by Dukkha ManHow in the world does this man keep his job?
Not did he have the facts wrong, he condemned her based on this errant information. I have always loathed Olbermann, but this one put me over the top.
Yet, I am confused. I didn't think an inherently "decent" person would do something like this.
“Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other
views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are
other views.” - William F. Buckley