Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

February 12, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS
Home » Blogs » Noel Sheppard's blog
  • Evan Thomas and Chris Matthews: Jackie and Serial Adulterer JFK Had a 'Good' and 'Full' Marriage
  • Bozell Column: Another Fleeting Failure for NBC
  • Martin Bashir Implies GOP Too Racist to Have Marco Rubio as VP Candidate
  • Barbara Walters, Shameless Hypocrite: Hits Kennedy Mistress for Greed, Tells Her She Should Have Stayed Quiet
  • NY Times Writers Rush to Obama's Defense Like It's Their Job
  • Rachel Maddow Trumpets Inane 'Amish Bus Driver' Analogy for Obama Contraception Rule
  • MRC's Bozell Scolds Media's Reluctance to Cover HHS Birth Control Mandate
  • Chris Matthews Excoriates: Rick Santorum Is a 'Theocrat' and Franklin Graham Is a 'Disgrace'

Will Media Credit Bush If Gustav Doesn't Destroy New Orleans?

By Noel Sheppard | August 30, 2008 | 11:39

Change font size:  A |  A
Noel Sheppard's picture

Unlike three years ago, the good folks of New Orleans are busily preparing for a hurricane days before it is scheduled to arrive.

This includes massive evacuations transpiring even though the storm is not supposed to hit until Monday.

Assuming these preparations are successful, and Gustav powers the same punch as Katrina without causing the same devastation to life and property, will the White House get media's praise?

Consider what the New York Times reported Saturday (emphasis added):

Hurricane Gustav surged to Category Three with winds of 120 miles per hour Saturday morning as it moved over the Caribbean and aimed toward the Gulf of Mexico, prompting thousands of residents of New Orleans to voluntarily leave the area without waiting for evacuation orders.

Officials here, exercising deliberate caution after the disaster of three years ago, could declare a mandatory evacuation of the city by early Sunday morning. Hotels were closing, and the sound of boards being hammered over windows could be heard. Meanwhile state police on Saturday morning reported moderately heavy traffic on a principal highway north, I-55, and a city-organized evacuation plan for the poor, elderly and sick — Hurricane Katrina’s principal victims — was in full swing. An estimated 30,000 could need assistance with evacuation.

Louisiana parishes along the Gulf Coast were also evacuating residents and ordering curfews to take effect tonight.

Now, let's be clear: every sane American (except those on the left hoping for the worst -- like Michael Moore!!!) hopes this storm either weakens or makes a big left turn sparing New Orleans this turmoil.

However, it is very clear that this city is doing a far better job of preparing for this hurricane than it did three years ago. If levees rebuilt and shored up with federal funds hold this time, and New Orleans is spared a similar castrophe as what occurred in 2005, will media give any credit to the White House?

After all, three years ago, the entire devastation was blamed squarely on the Bush adminstration. We here at NewsBusters published story after story concerning the absolutely abysmal coverage of this natural disaster. 

In fact, many have made the case that the atrocious coverage of this event was what effectively destroyed the Bush presidency making him a lame duck only nine months into his second term.

Will press members in the coming days as Gustav approaches point out how much better the advanced preparations and evacuations are going now as compared to three years ago? Will they make clear that these are counter to decisions made at the local level in 2005, and that such preparation then might have signficantly diminished the loss of life and property?

And, if they choose to credit Mayor Ray Nagin for what he's doing today to protect his city and residents, will they point out that if he had done the same three years ago New Orleans might have fared much better when Katrina hit?

Or, will Nagin get all the credit if Gustav doesn't destroy New Orleans, with Bush still remaining responsible for Katrina doing so in 2005?

As an interesting sidebar, the good folks at "Morning Joe" had a discussion either Thursday or Friday about Jeb and George W. Bush. The long and the short of it was how much better and smarter a politician Jeb was as compared to his brother, and that if things had gone differently in the '90s, Jeb would have run for president in 2000.

Also addressed was that if the Bush name was better today, Jeb would have run for president this year easily beating McCain and likely a shoo-in to trounce Obama.

As it pertains to this issue, the panel discussed just how much better Florida under Jeb fared during the many strong hurricanes that pummeled the state in 2004. By contrast, New Orleans did very poorly in 2005 under -- wait for it! -- George W. Bush.

Sadly, no one on the panel chose to address the obvious: George W. Bush wasn't governor of Louisiana in 2005, and that Florida does so well during hurricanes because of the efforts by state and local officials.

It seems a metaphysical certitude this will mysteriously become apparent to all if New Orleans fares better this time.

Share this

About the Author

Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Click here to follow Noel Sheppard on Twitter.
  • Hurricane Katrina
  • New York Times
  • Noel Sheppard's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB

 

 

 

  • Idea of the Democrats better than the reality (Wisc. State Journal)
  • The cynical and self-contradictory Gospel of Obama (Krauthammer)
  • Video: Protesters at CPAC admit they're being paid to protest (Daily Caller)
  • Does the drug 'ella' cause abortions? (Weekly Standard)
  • Does income inequality cause global warming? (Power Line)
  • Jay Carney gets snippy about Super PACs (Verum Serum)

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Recent comments

  • You're probably right,
    52 min 38 sec ago
  • terrified of economy
    1 hour 7 min ago
  • On further reflection, you have a point, killa...
    1 hour 22 min ago
  • Completely terrifies? I have one word...
    1 hour 26 min ago
  • How many decades back?
    1 hour 43 min ago
More >

Try a Sweater Vest, Mitt
more cartoons
  • Weekend General and Sports Open Thread
  • Mitt Romney's Full Address to CPAC
  • Daily Kos Week in Review: Confusing Ground for Religious Haters
  • Newt Gingrich's Full Address to CPAC
  • Newt Gingrich: As President I'll Repudiate 40% of Obama's Government on Inauguration Day
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Editorial Associate
Aubrey Vaughan

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.