For years, NewsBusters has contended that Nobel Laureate Al Gore is spreading global warming hysteria to benefit his own wallet.
On Wednesday, despite claims by one of Gore's representatives two months ago, it was revealed that his Generation Investment Management private equity fund has taken a 9.5 percent stake in a company that has one of the largest carbon credit portfolios in the world.
Yet, on April 6, NewsBusters' Matthew Vadum reported that in response to his The Media Ignore Al Gore's Planned Global Warming Profiteering article, a GIM spokesman called his piece a "nonsense story" while claiming that neither Gore nor any other members of GIM’s board have the slightest financial vested interest in the expansion of carbon trading.
According to Thomson Financial, that's now changed (emphasis added):
Generation Investment Management, the private equity fund chaired by former U.S. vice president Al Gore, has acquired a 9.5 percent stake in Camco International Ltd, a carbon asset developer.
Generation, set up in 2004 by Gore and David Blood, former chief of Goldman Sachs's asset management arm, now holds 16 million Camco shares, Camco said in a statement.
Camco, which has one of the world's largest carbon credit portfolios, works with companies to identify and develop projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and then arranges the sale and delivery of carbon credits.
Yet, on April 2, the Chronicle of Philanthropy reported the following concerning Vadum's allegations about Gore's global warming profiteering (emphasis added):
Richard Campbell, a spokesman for Generation Investment Management, called the suggestions a “nonsense story.”
In an e-mail message to The Chronicle, he writes that neither Mr. Gore nor any other members of the investment company’s board will make money from the expansion of carbon trading.
“To suggest then that they are somehow benefiting from the growth of this industry betrays a complete lack of knowledge of the carbon offset industry,” he writes.
That's not true anymore, is it Richard?
Of course, this is truly a fascinating development coming the very week Congress started debating a global warming bill which includes a carbon cap and trade scheme that would radically expand carbon trading and the use of carbon credits in this country.
Also interesting was Gore's support of this bill posted at the Senate's Environment & Public Works website Monday:
"I want to commend Senator Boxer for her leadership of the Environment and Public Works Committee. Thanks to her vision and dedication, we have the first global warming bill in history that is comprehensive, bipartisan and that enjoys support across the country--from labor and agriculture to the business and the environmental communities. Of course the bill needs to be stronger, but it's vital that Congress begin to act. While it's important that people change their light bulbs, it's even more important that we change the laws."
Add it all up, and Gore's investment company now definitely DOES have a stake in carbon trading, and, therefore, additional financial incentive for the Nobel Laureate to spread global warming alarmism which results in government enacted legislation to counter it.
I'm sure every media outlet will be all over this development in the next 24 hours...not!
*****Update: Reuters has now reported this, although conveniently ignoring the phrase "carbon credit." Regardless, now that a major wire service has addressed it, there's no excuse for other media not to. Stay tuned.
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Follow him at Facebook and Twitter.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Carbon Trading?
June 4, 2008 - 09:41 ET by MeanderingOf course he has stake in this, why else would someone push so hard on something that's not even proven to be true? It all comes back to money!
Now being somewhat ignorant on this whole green thing, I have no idea what a carbon trading company does. Would someone like to enlighten me? Thanks.
They do all that work for free
June 4, 2008 - 09:53 ET by buzzbeeOnly big oil companies and large corporations have a profit motive.
C'mon!
Drill here, Drill Now!
Al Gore's History of Global Warming Profiteering
June 4, 2008 - 18:40 ET by PopularTechAl Gore Gets Rich ($100 Million) After White House (ABC News)
Al Gore is criticised for lining his own pockets after £3,300 ($6,757) per-minute green speech (Daily Mail, UK)
Al Gore, Maurice Strong: Creators of carbon credit scheme cashing in on it (Canada Free Press)
Gore's 'carbon offsets' paid to firm he owns (WorldNetDaily)
Gore Cashing in on $6 Trillion Energy Business (NewsMax)
Gore makes sustainable investment his business (The Age, Australia)
Gore to Rake in IPO Millions (NewsMax)
Gore Warns on 'Subprime Carbon' Industry (NewsMax)
Global Warming, Inc. (The Wall Street Journal)
Green firm Camco gets Blood and Gore investment (Reuters)
The Money and Connections Behind Al Gore’s Carbon Crusade (Human Events)
The Anti 'Man-Made' Global Warming Resource
"...why else would someone
June 4, 2008 - 09:57 ET by mattm"...why else would someone push so hard on something that's not even proven to be true?" Because it's a dogmatic belief system. There is a social-engineering and ideological aspect to this which is far more important than actual scientific fact or even what is actually beneficial to the most people.
The money is just ancillary, and can easily be justified by virtue of how vital the issue is. If Algore gets rich while establishing a Utopia controlled by an elite ruling class, his sheeplike followers say "more power to him."
Gaia be praised. Al
June 4, 2008 - 10:21 ET by BurgherGaia be praised.
Al Gore is stealing from the collection plate.
Shouldn't our Indulgences be going to planting trees or giving money to the poor in Africa, and not in Big Als pockets?
Now being somewhat ignorant
June 4, 2008 - 11:09 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsNow being somewhat ignorant on this whole green thing, I have no idea what a carbon trading company does. Would someone like to enlighten me? Thanks.
Well, they take your money and give you a certificate that says you can keep doing business as usual. Wikipedia terms them 'schemes' but I think a better term would be 'scam'.
D
Keep the ILLEGALS out, join NumbersUSA to send free faxes to your reps.
Meandering
June 4, 2008 - 12:08 ET by Noel SheppardMeandering,
Here's the company's website: http://www.camcoglob... ns
Where can ..........
June 4, 2008 - 09:59 ET by zoro7957.........I get some of these carbin credits? I've been searching on E Bay and even find any listed.
" The Stanford scholars
June 4, 2008 - 10:04 ET by danbo" The Stanford scholars opened a can of worms. They say that “Much of the market does not reflect actual reductions in emissions, and that trend is poised to get worse.” They researched more than 3,000 projects that had been applying/granted for up to $10bn of credits for the next four years and said that most of the applications should be rejected."
Where I come from; it's called stealing.
Here.
I case you missed the Cold Irony? Funny.
"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT
Really cold irony
June 4, 2008 - 10:28 ET by dboHere's some more cold irony.
http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/uah_may_08.png
Bitter Irony
June 4, 2008 - 10:31 ET by dboBut of course it doesn't matter how many times the believers read this story, they'll never see the contradiction with their "skeptics are in the pockets of big oil" stories.
Bitter
June 4, 2008 - 10:52 ET by kilrodBitter Irony?? Did you say "BIG OIL"?? Whups, i'm so sorry i used the "B" word twice, ugh, 40 lashes with a wet noodle, ouch!!
Gore's Oil Money
(GRINS) kilrod
Remeber, only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you, Jesus Christ and the American Soldier
Don't forget about Elk
June 4, 2008 - 13:12 ET by danboDon't forget about Elk Hills. A oil reserve set asside for the navy in case of a protracted war. It was sold to Occidental under Al Gore's reinventing government program.
"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT
Well, at least Gore is being
June 4, 2008 - 10:42 ET by Chris NormanWell, at least Gore is being a consistent liberal. Liberals have told us for years we should "invest" in government. Now, he's invested in a company that, also, produces absolutely nothing. It's the kind of company only a liberal would appreciate...
Owl Pal
June 4, 2008 - 10:44 ET by kilrodHow about ole Owl Pals oil interest?? OXY
Gore's Oil Money
(GRINS) kilrod
Remeber, only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you, Jesus Christ and the American Soldier
Owl Pad
June 4, 2008 - 11:50 ET by merlin61Kilrod----hypocrits, hypocrites, Clintons, Gores,
\etc.etc. Read your Gore's Oil Money. This
carbon credit scam is going to be the biggest
source of black market dealing this country will
ever know. Its just a perfect scam waiting for
suckers to cheat them out of money and
livelihood. Gore is the biggest phony I have
ever seen, (next to the Clintons ).
Dear Merlin:
June 4, 2008 - 14:36 ET by kilrodI reckon on the list of phonies, Owl Pal and Slick bil & hil have been moved down a notch or 2 by a crowhopper named bac-rac O-dumma, supported by the equaly phony cs-msm. This carbon credit scam is just one of the mechanisms to be used by the socialist dimocrats to control the U.S.A. if they get this O-dumma dummy elected you best keep yore eyes peeled and yore powder dry cause they are gonna be after a lot more stuff than yore carbon hoofprints. Maybe yall don't remember, but durnin the last clinton term, citizen miltias were formin all over the country, and it looked like their might be blood in the streets. Well i reckon it could get worse this time if them socialist get they're way.
(GRINS) kilrod
Remeber, only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you, Jesus Christ and the American Soldier
MSM needs to jump on Carbon fraud
June 4, 2008 - 10:42 ET by MaximusBraveheartMSM or a movie needs to jump on the Carbon fraud story. It has all the aspects of an unbelievable fraud story pulled off right out in public. Would these people support limiting OXYGEN because it may change the climate by a degree? How many degrees does your local climate change each day? If it were one degree higher or lower would you survive? Need to ban High & Low pressure zones & day & night. Just too much change! Living PLANTS need to PROTEST against all this bad mouthing of CO2! lol... That is truely how they feel if they had a voice.
I'm still shocked they
June 4, 2008 - 10:59 ET by taterI'm still shocked they haven't tried to ban or regulate H2O...it's still the strongest greenhouse gas out there...and causes flooding, drought, mudslides, blizzards, thunderstorms, and hurricanes.
www.theholyrosary.org
"There is no problem, I tell you, no matter how difficult it is, that we can not resolve by the prayer of the Holy Rosary." -Sister Lucia
Ban WATER!
June 4, 2008 - 11:05 ET by MaximusBraveheartI love it; LOL! And so true! Same but truely worse is that water! To analyze that shows how truely dumb and short sighted it is to reduce carbon dioxide. IT IS GOOD!
Sign the petition
June 4, 2008 - 11:35 ET by BurgherThis stuff is in our lakes and streams we need to do somthing about it for our childrens future
http://www.petitiononline.com/BanDHM/petition-sign.html
oxygen di-hydride please
June 4, 2008 - 13:58 ET by wizardjrYou must use the proper terms: ODH, or oxygen di-hydride. It is a really nasty molecule. It gets into everything. (snark)
Someone actually got a bunch of college idiots parading around to ban ODH. It was hilarious when someone finally enlightened the dips. I think the alternate name was hydrogen monoxyide or some such. What a stitch.
You beat me to
June 4, 2008 - 17:59 ET by red_dragon311You beat me to it
I should have read a little further down
A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have.
-Gerald Ford
You must be talking
June 4, 2008 - 17:58 ET by red_dragon311You must be talking about the evil chemical Dyhydro Monoxcide
and yes it it used by Oil companies, used in pesticides, nuclear power plants use it, Auto makers use, it causes erosion, it has added tto the reduction land, causes eccess urination, diaria, if you breath it in and even if a little gets into your lungs it will kill you.
and the worst part is this awful stuff can be found in the food you eat, the things you drink.
A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have.
-Gerald Ford
Gore Profiteering
June 4, 2008 - 11:33 ET by okiehawk44Al Gore has profited from all sorts of things while denouncing those same things;
1. Al Gore has received royalty income from a hugely polluting mine on his family's farm in Tennessee since he was a boy while denouncing mining and polution.
2. Al Gore and his parents received most of their income from their "interestingly" profitable investments in Occidental Petroleum -- Gore actually brags about this -- while this company was the oil company of choice of the Libyans and the Soviets.
Al Gore is a liar, a thief, a mentally ill POS -- and many Americans buy his entire schtick.
Ban Water??
June 4, 2008 - 11:39 ET by SDSThe goal is not to ban it, just control/regulate it. You can't profit off a product that doesn't exist. Same with oil, cigarettes, etc..
I want to know...
June 4, 2008 - 12:15 ET by ontheright..."who knew what, and when they knew it"...
Camco Group
June 4, 2008 - 12:24 ET by BurgherThe investment was in Camco
http://www.camcoglobal.com/#
Front men for carbon credit trade and named the official Carbon Advisor to the Democratic National Convention.
How much are they paying the DNC for the endorsement and and how much is being kicked back to Algore
Carbon Credits
June 4, 2008 - 12:44 ET by bsmarjI just don't understand. If it is so critical to save the planet wouldn't it make more sense to be saying no profits should be made? It is to important for any one to profit from this! Scarifice is the only way we can do it.
All should be selfless enough to pass up profit for the common good. Right?