As NewsBusters has been reporting, climate alarmists in the press have been getting very nervous about this sudden cooling trend that first became apparent in the Southern Hemisphere last year, and is showing up in the Northern Hemisphere with this extremely harsh winter.
One of the truly hysterical aspects of media's obvious discomforture are the press proclamations that seasonal temperatures are not an indicator of climate trends.
Comically, this is exactly what climate realists counter every time press representatives point to a heatwave or a hurricane as proof of anthropogenic global warming.
As was marvelously mentioned at the EPW Blog Tuesday, when it comes to climate, what's good for the goose definitely is not good for the gander:
Here at the Inhofe EPW Press Blog we have been reading – with great interest, and to be honest, a little amusement – the media’s coverage of our blog post from last week. The blog post was simply a round-up of several articles/blog posts reporting on the news that temperatures this past winter have been lower in temperature. Yet this blog, with that title, was enough for the New York Times and Las Vegas Sun to use for a lead in a story and the Las Vegas paper to write an editorial.
From the tone of their pieces, we think they will be a little surprised to learn that we applaud and congratulate them on getting the story right: seasonal temperatures are no indicator of climate trends.
Of course, we wish they would have better understood our position. One only needs to look at last year’s media coverage of a warmer winter versus this year’s coverage to understand our point. When newspapers were writing about a “warmer winter” in 2007, where was the New York Times and Las Vegas Sun slamming the use of warmer seasonal temperatures as proof of global warming?
The posting then offered readers some recent examples of press panic concerning their bogeyman that are sure to bring a smile to the faces of climate realists across the globe. My favorite is this October 2007 article from Science Daily deliciously entitled Warm Winter Predicted For United States (emphasis added):
ScienceDaily (Oct. 11, 2007) — NOAA forecasters are calling for above-average temperatures over most of the country and a continuation of drier-than-average conditions across already drought-stricken parts of the Southwest and Southeast in its winter outlook for the United States, announced at the 2007-2008 Winter Fuels Outlook Conference in Washington, D.C October 9, 2007.
“La Niña is here, with a weak-to-moderate event likely to persist through the winter,” said Michael Halpert, head of forecast operations and acting deputy director of NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center. “The big concern this winter may be the persistence of drought across large parts of the already parched South. And while December through February is likely to be another milder-than-average winter for much of the country, people should still expect some bouts of winter weather.”
Hmmm. These guys can't accurately predict climate conditions two months out, but we should radically alter our economy based on their forecasts decades into the future?
Now That's Entertainment!
—Noel Sheppard is an economist, business owner, and Associate Editor of NewsBusters.



ScienceDaily (Oct. 11, 2007) — NOAA forecasters are calling for above-average temperatures over most of the country and a continuation of drier-than-average conditions across already drought-stricken parts of the Southwest and Southeast in its winter outlook for the United States, announced at the 2007-2008 Winter Fuels Outlook Conference in Washington, D.C October 9, 2007. 












Editor at Large
Comments Policy
cynic
March 6, 2008 - 11:41 ET by iveseenitallMost people in this nation are now cynics. Because of all the lies, the hidden agendas, the politics, etc., I believe about 1% of what I read anywhere or see and hear in the electronic media. I don't think I'm alone in my cynicism, not by a long shot.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
I am looking for the 1%. Oh
March 6, 2008 - 12:13 ET by EdhenryI am looking for the 1%. Oh yeah, obits and box scores.
Advertisments are the only pieces to be relied upon in newspapers. Thomas Jefferson
Don't count box scores.
March 6, 2008 - 13:35 ET by Conservative BluesDon't count box scores. Those are full of "lies" because we don't know who's on steroids, or which college kids are ineligible because of gifts from boosters.
Ecclesiastes 10:2 - "The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left."
Noel...
March 6, 2008 - 11:47 ET by LionKingThe Irony and the Hypocrisy are well...delicious!!!
shocked
March 6, 2008 - 11:53 ET by mom_roxI'm shocked that the media has blinders on concerning man-made global warming/that there's gambling in Rick's casino. Shocked, I tell you.
A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.
- George Bernard Shaw, 1944
Nothing a little more CO2
March 6, 2008 - 11:56 ET by FreakyBoyNothing a little more CO2 can't solve.
Noel. To compare their
March 6, 2008 - 11:57 ET by danboNoel. To compare their prediction to what happened. They won't allow me a direct link. Go here. Down. Opt Element, mean temp, year 2008, period, winter Dec-feb.
I'll point out something on the chart you have. Near normal "based on 1971-2000". Not the last 10 years. You can get the 10 year trend upper right. Opt national, data type mean temp. period winter. First year 1998 end 2008. Which shows a 2.26 degF/decade decrease.
Today they started leaving out the definition of their base line.
I've written to them pointing this out and suggesting they return it.
"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT
danbo Why Not Contact Inhofe's Office
March 6, 2008 - 13:15 ET by allanfDanbo from, what you wrote it looks like these guys are manipulating the data. I can say that in my area of Florida, it was colder in February 2008 than February 2007 or 2006. I don't need weather station readings for that either.
If you are sure of what's going on, why don't you contact Senator Inhofe's office. They will take an interest in a goverment agency using sleight of hand on climate data.
The manipulation of data to
March 6, 2008 - 13:56 ET by danboThe manipulation of data to present an image of warming is nothing new. That's part of these charts. I'm not the first to point this out.
I'm sure senator Inhofe knows. I believe he's discussed it a number of times.
I'm pointing it out so people who don't know will see it.
BTW That page allows you to get the data for a state as a whole and regions.
"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT
I should say that NOAA
March 6, 2008 - 22:21 ET by danboI should say that NOAA does better than a lot of people. They use a base that's closer to our present period but not quite. Some groups draw up these kinds of maps based on 1950-70 or 80. Which is just a little more revealing than saying it's warmer than the plistocene or little ice age.
"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT
Seems that last fall while
March 6, 2008 - 12:08 ET by danboSeems that last fall while the experts with their models were predicting this to be a hot winter. A number of us who were watching what ws going on in the SH were saying there was a good chance we were in for a cold winter.
I wish there was an easy way to find out how many of us were.
"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT
Double standard
March 6, 2008 - 12:12 ET by dboIf the MSM put Al Gore, James Hansen, Gavin Schmidt, Michael Mann etc. under the same microscope as they put Senator Infoe the debate probably would be over.
The answer's obvious:
March 6, 2008 - 12:28 ET by riff_raffThe answer's obvious: President Bush has solved global warming.
got them there "bouts of winter" did they not?
March 6, 2008 - 14:18 ET by Gary HallI love this one:
Guess they got them there bouts, or was it a bout of extended extreme cold winter onslaught?
Nothing like...
March 6, 2008 - 15:31 ET by ontheright...hedging your guess...er...I mean bet.
Temp. Drop
March 6, 2008 - 15:38 ET by Mike From Canmore"From the tone of their pieces, we think they will be a little surprised to learn that we applaud and congratulate them on getting the story right: seasonal temperatures are no indicator of climate trends."
I am a bit undecided with regards to the above statement. Correct me if I'm wrong. The argument behind AGW is the rate of heat energy transfer is reduced due to CO2 (predominantly). WRT heating, the so called "abnormal" heat gains, (recognizing temp. is a inexact proxie of heat retention) the heat is still there and there are a ton of reasons as to why it might still be there. However, in the event of a significant temp/heat drop, the heat energy is gone. Where did it go? Into space? Into the land? Into the ocean? How is this possible given CO2 is the alleged main driver of temp. and it hasn't dropped? Is weather "noise" just another way of saying, we really don't stinking know? If so, they seem to not know a lot. (I read an article the other day stating at this point in time, we just don't know). Given the specific heat of land and water, I would fathom most of it is gone into space never to return. Especially since according to AGW theory, the heat gets trapped in the troposphere and it would have to be transferred through 10 km of mostly warmer air to get absorbed into the earth's solid and liquid components.
From that perspective, I'm asking myself the question, does a single significant drop in temp. put a hole in the AGW theory where as a single significant rise does not add much credence to the theory. It is how heat is transferred that has me questioning things. I haven't come to a conclusion yet. However, it is much more difficult to err on the cold side than the warm side of the temp. heat proxie. Things that make at least me go hmmmm.
Would love some comments.
There are 2 types of politicians. Those who know AGW is a sham and stupid ones.
The world's average
March 6, 2008 - 18:25 ET by deerjerkydaveThe world's average temperature dropped like a rock this last year. Climate alarmists are saying that it's just a one time anomoly. By making this claim they are having to at least admit that there are forces outside of man which can cause world temperature to change. If we are now truly headed for a multi-decadal period of cooling then their last remaining claim that it was an anomoly will sink forever.
This is a one time anomaly
March 6, 2008 - 19:06 ET by danboThis is a one time anomaly until the next La Nina. Or if this is signaling a shift in the PDO this will be fun.
I thought these flawless models had little things like La nina and the PDO accounted for?
Whoops.
"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT