Weather Channel Founder Discusses Global Warming Myth With Beck

Photo of Noel Sheppard.
  • Bookmark and Share

As NewsBusters reported last Wednesday, The Weather Channel founder John Coleman published an op-ed at ICECAP in which he called "global warming the greatest scam in history."

Although this was prominently featured at the Drudge Report for almost 36 hours, the major television news media completely ignored Coleman's words with the exception of CNN and Fox News.

Really taking the lead on this matter was CNN Headline News's Glenn Beck who invited Coleman on his program Monday evening to discuss what led him to write this article, and to elaborate on the global warming myth.

Amongst other things, Coleman told Beck (absolutely must-see video availabe here):

Story Continues Below Ad ↓
  • [On why so many scientists are afraid to voice skepticism about global warming] Glenn, you`ve got to make a living, first of all. So you spent 10 years becoming a PhD in meteorology, you got a research job. And you decide you`re going to research the effect of human activity on global climate. And if you were to put out a research report that said not much and it doesn`t seem too bad, you`ve probably wasted all your 10 years.
  • [W]hen I looked at the hockey stick graph that was produced in Mann’s original report and it showed a steady line temperature through the millenniums and then a sudden rise global, I knew that that was incorrect. I knew it couldn`t possibly be.

    And I started asking experts about it and I started digging into how that was produced, and I found out it was bogus science. It wasn`t real. The numbers had been massaged.

    The whole thing had been created. What bothered me was that the other scientists had accepted it. Well, why did they possibly do that? And I think the real answer to that question is that they all have an agenda, an environmental and political agenda that says let`s pile on here, we`re all going to make a lot of money, we`re going to get research grants, we`re going to get awards, we`re going to become famous. And I guess that`s what happened.

  • But in 20 years, we`ll have the last laugh. But of course, billions of dollars will have been spent. Policy will have been changed worldwide. People will have been scared. We will have reacted to a myth.

    But nonetheless, eventually we`ll realize that there is no global warming of significance and we`ll have the last laugh. Now, there are scientists speaking out. There are hundreds of them speaking out. There are thousands who signed a petition, 19,000 on a petition against global warming. There are many scientists speaking out.

    But the mainstream press is totally ignoring them. The mainstream press has totally climbed the board and is marching along.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Amazing stuff, wouldn't agree? Any questions as to why none of the broadcast networks have interviewed Coleman concerning his views on this matter, not even "Good Morning America" which he used to be on?

That said, kudos go out to CNN Headline News and Beck for continuing to have the courage to lead on this issue. In fact, readers should be advised that Glenn will be focusing on global warming all week in what he calls"An Inconvenient Segment."

What follows is a partial transcript of this segment:

GLENN BECK, HOST: Well, full disclosure, this is a shameless plug here. I`ve got a new book coming out next week called "An Inconvenient Book: Real Solutions to the World`s Biggest Problems."

And today I`m going to give you a preview of chapter one, called "Global Warming: Storming and Conforming." I wrote this chapter basically as kryptonite for you to use against your Gore-worshiping psycho friends.

The next time they tell you how global warming causes all sorts of massive natural disasters, you say, really? That`s interesting because I heard somewhere, I`m trying to remember, that deaths per year from extreme weather are down 95 percent since the 1920s. Sure, you`ll be unhip and friendless, but at least you`ll be accurate.

Anyway, as I put the chapter together, the thing that struck me -- the thing that was more amazing to me than the facts that I was finding was the fact that no one wanted to talk about those facts.

If a scientist says that temperatures are up .01 degree, lead story around the country in every newspaper. But when somebody with decades of experience comes out and says global warming is a manufactured crisis, no one cares and you can hear a pin drop.

How do I know? Because that is exactly what happened last week when the founder of the Weather Channel wrote an article that began, and I quote, "It is the greatest scam in history. I`m amazed, appalled, and highly offended by it. Global warming; it is a scam."

But since that opinion doesn`t fit nicely into the mouth of the media beast, hello NBC, you probably didn`t hear a word about it. Well, now you will. John Coleman is the founder of the Weather Channel. He was also the first weatherman ever on "Good Morning America." And he is currently weather man at KUSI News in San Diego. John, your head about exploded with the NBC thing this week. Is that -- that was the breaking point for you?

JOHN COLEMAN, FOUNDER, WEATHER CHANNEL: Well, I`d been listening to all the global warming talk for a long time and posting material about global warming on our Web site.

But finally, the crescendo of global warming myth, nonsense, exploded in my head and I had to write a real rant. And that`s the one that got noticed. I put it on our Web site. It was picked up by icecap.us, picked up by Drudge. First thing you knew it was all over the newspapers, all over the radio, all over the TV sets. And I`d created a bit of a stir. And all I was doing was telling you the truth as best I know it.

BECK: Why is it that the scientists are all in on this? I mean, so many people are in on the global warming is real and we`ve got to stop it right now.

COLEMAN: Glenn, you`ve got to make a living, first of all. So you spent 10 years becoming a PhD in meteorology, you got a research job. And you decide you`re going to research the effect of human activity on global climate. And if you were to put out a research report that said not much and it doesn`t seem too bad, you`ve probably wasted all your 10 years.

BECK: John, what was the turning point for you? Because I know you that said that you went in to look for an honest answer, you thought maybe it`s real. What was the thing that stood out and you went, this is absolutely bogus?

COLEMAN: Well, when I looked at the hockey stick graph that was produced in Mann's original report and it showed a steady line temperature through the millenniums and then a sudden rise global, I knew that that was incorrect. I knew it couldn`t possibly be.

And I started asking experts about it and I started digging into how that was produced, and I found out it was bogus science. It wasn`t real. The numbers had been massaged.

The whole thing had been created. What bothered me was that the other scientists had accepted it. Well, why did they possibly do that? And I think the real answer to that question is that they all have an agenda, an environmental and political agenda that says let`s pile on here, we`re all going to make a lot of money, we`re going to get research grants, we`re going to get awards, we`re going to become famous. And I guess that`s what happened.

BECK: John, do you think we`re at the point of no return yet? Are we at the point where no scientist will come out -- you`ve said to me on my radio program today that people are afraid in your business to speak out. Can we turn this around, or are we destined for global socialism?

COLEMAN: I think that the ship may have left the dock. But in 20 years, we`ll have the last laugh. But of course, billions of dollars will have been spent. Policy will have been changed worldwide. People will have been scared. We will have reacted to a myth.

But nonetheless, eventually we`ll realize that there is no global warming of significance and we`ll have the last laugh. Now, there are scientists speaking out. There are hundreds of them speaking out. There are thousands who signed a petition, 19,000 on a petition against global warming. There are many scientists speaking out.

But the mainstream press is totally ignoring them. The mainstream press has totally climbed the board and is marching along. And of course the former vice president got himself an Emmy and an Oscar and --

BECK: I believe that.

COLEMAN: -- A Nobel Peace Prize.

BECK: A Grammy as well. John, thank you very much. Thanks for your courage.

—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Follow him at Facebook and Twitter.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

"But nonetheless,

"But nonetheless, eventually we`ll realize that there is no global warming of significance and we`ll have the last laugh."

A very bitter laugh, after all the money has been spent, new taxes and fees created, national sovereignty handed over...

Dittos Chris

...And ironically, Algore will be laughing the loudest as he touts how he fixed the "problem."

I just wonder if in twenty years our biased media will still exist that will then get on that Algore-fixed-it bandwagon for CYA if nothing else?

In the meanwhile, definitely kudos to Beck and CNN.

"A very bitter laugh, after

"A very bitter laugh, after all the money has been spent, new taxes and fees created, national sovereignty handed over..."

None of which will go away once the jig is up.

a couple of really inconvenient truths..

The Panic Pimps just keep moving from one end-of-the-world scenario to another. Their current hobby horse is AGW. So, as Rush says, "If it doesn't move the story line forward, it doesn't get printed." Then, after many years when the PP's are on another horse, people 'discover' that facts that were there all along. The classic PP rejoinder to this discovery the reverses the old wisdom is "Well, that's old news. It's no longer relevant."

The RCC Had Their Indulgences, Al Gore Has His Carbon Credits

Just as the Roman Catholic Church sold indulgences to absolve people of their sins during the Dark Ages, so Al Gore sells his carbon credits to absolve companies of their environmental "sins" today.

But, as it is written ...

1 Timothy 6:9-10
9 But they that will be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful lusts, which drown men in destruction and perdition.
10 For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.

And ...

1 Timothy 6:20-21
20 O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding the worldly wisdom and intellectual stupidity of vain men [like Al Gore], and oppositions of science falsely so called:
21 Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen.

Pope Al Gore the First ... high priest of Global Warmingism and founder of Globalwarmingtology.

The Goracle...

...Has made the break with Leftard-land, telling the Kos Kidz to buzz off and quit promoting a run for president.

http://www.dailykos....

Guess it just doesn't "play well" in the boardroom to be hooked up with online loonies.

And yet again, America dodges the bullet!

You need to do some homework

*SIGH*  The ignorance of what indulgences are is mind boggling.

Indulgences simply involve penances taken on for the remittance of temporal (non-eternal) consequences of sin that has *already* been forgiven.  And no, they were never sold.  

Anyone who wants to use the term should be required to read the following two articles first:
http://www.catholic.com/library/Myths_About_Indulgences.asp

http://www.catholic.com/library/Primer_on_Indulgences.asp

Indulgences Were Indeed Sold

Are you an idiot?!

If you gave money to the Catholic priests they would absolve you of your sins. THAT is the selling of indulgences.

Grow a backbone and own up to the corruption that existed in the Roman Catholic Church.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indulgences

In 1517, Pope Leo X offered indulgences for those who gave alms to rebuild St. Peter's Basilica in Rome. The aggressive marketing practices of Johann Tetzel in promoting this cause provoked Martin Luther to write his 95 theses, protesting what he saw as the purchase and sale of salvation. In thesis 28 Luther objected to a saying attributed to Tetzel: "As soon as a coin in the coffer rings, a soul from purgatory springs". The 95 Theses not only denounced such transactions as worldly but denied the pope's right to grant pardons on God's behalf in the first place: the only thing indulgences guaranteed, Luther said, was an increase in profit and greed, because the pardon of the Church was in God's power alone.

While Luther did not deny the pope’s right to grant pardons for penance imposed by the Church, he made it clear that preachers who claimed indulgences absolved buyers from all punishments and granted them salvation were in error. From this controversy the Protestant Reformation was launched.

NBF

from your link: 

Myth 6: A person can buy indulgences.

The Council of Trent instituted severe reforms in the practice of granting indulgences, and, because of prior abuses, "in 1567 Pope Pius V canceled all grants of indulgences involving any fees or other financial transactions" (Catholic Encyclopedia). This act proved the Church’s seriousness about removing abuses from indulgences.

note the term 'can' present tense; also note 'removing abuses' according to the Church they were sold!  Which is why Pope Pius V corrected the error.

 “The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.”   -Chief Justice John Roberts

 ".....television news

 ".....television news media completely ignored Coleman's words with the exception of CNN and Fox News."

I saw the CNN report on this story. It was all of about 30 seconds, it only touched on a few things Mr. Coleman said and it was reported with obvious skepticism from the news anchor, Kiran Chetry. I had sent an e-mail to CNN when I first heard of this report from Coleman and "dared" CNN to cover this. Well they did, but with a nod and a wink, because they obviously didn't believe what they were reporting.

Didn't see what he thought

Didn't see what he thought of Heidi Cullen.(sic?)

Posted in wrong location

Posted in wrong location (see below).