
Boxing enthusiasts saw quite a barnburner Tuesday evening when conservative author Ann Coulter took on liberal media member Alan Colmes on Fox News's "Hannity and Colmes."
As this was the first time the pair met since Coulter's now famous "Jews need to be perfected" comment, it was a metaphysical certitude this issue would surface.
Not surprisingly, Colmes did not disappoint, as irrespective of any other pressing matters facing the nation, this was the first topic he raised with his guest, and in so doing, set off quite a firestorm when he said Coulter was using "the classic language of anti-Semitism."
As this is just too marvelous to interrupt with needless commentary, what follows is a partial transcript of this delicious battle between right and left with a video available here for your added entertainment pleasure (h/t Hot Air):
ALAN COMES, HOST: I hate to break up this hate fest against people on the left, Ann, but before we get to the election...
ANN COULTER: I love you, Alan.
COLMES: Thanks so much. I hate to break this up, but I haven't spoken to you since you made your infamous comment saying that people like me need to be "perfected." And so I wanted to give you an opportunity here, because as my good friend, the conservative rabbi Shmuley Boteach points out, Jesus was the faith practiced -- or Judaism, the faith practiced by Jesus for most of his life, his entire life, actually. And he declared in Matthew that, whoever goes against the smallest of the laws of Moses, teaching men to do the same will be named least in the kingdom of Heaven, but he who keeps the law of Moses, teaching others to keep them, will be named great in the kingdom of Heaven.
COULTER: Right.
COLMES: So, as Jesus said, the meek, not the rude and arrogant, will inherit the Earth. So how about embracing one of the great Christian virtues, as Jesus discussed, humility, and apologizing to all those people you offended by that comment?
COULTER: For one thing, I guess I'm once again responding to the headlines you've read about me as opposed to what I actually said because what you just quoted is precisely what I said, that Christians believe all of the Old Testament, that we consider our testament the continuation, the messiah you are anticipating in your testament.
And if you're going to go around citing all the people I have offended, Alan, I have 1,000 orthodox rabbis supporting me. It appears to be the same people who hate Dennis Prager, who were upset about my remarks. All of these organizations based on, you know, being Jewish, being Muslim, being a woman, they represent Jews the way the National Organization for Women represents women.
COLMES: I'm up against a break here, but I'm going to challenge your assertion about how much of the Jewish community actually supports you when we get back, which I'm sure you'd like to waive that and say that that's what's going on.
COULTER: Religious Jewish community.
COLMES: We'll pick it up in a moment. More with Ann Coulter right after the break.
(21:21)
COLMES: We're back with Ann Coulter.
You claim 1,000 orthodox rabbis support you. I don't know who they are, but I can tell you, you know the Anti-Defamation League, the American Jewish Congress, and many others have condemned you for that. Do you care?
COULTER: Yeah, the Anti-Defamation League condemns Dennis Prager. I wear it as a badge of honor. It's like citing the National Organization of Women to tell me how all women feel. The point is, this is the same old fight we see all the time with the irreligious trying to stir up trouble with the religious.
Yes, godless liberals are upset that other people believe in God. This is the exact same thing we saw with George Bush speaking at Bob Jones University. And suddenly the "New York Times" was offended on behalf of Catholics, because of some untoward remarks the original Bob Jones had made about the Catholic Church, not as bad as what the "New York Times" had said about the Catholic Church, I might add, and religious people just don't fall for it. We know the real enemy are secularists.
COLMES: So all the Jews offended, upset and hurt by what you said, because words do hurt and they do sting, all those Jews, the ADL, the...
(CROSSTALK)
COULTER: You don't even know what words I've said, since...
(CROSSTALK)
COLMES: They lack religion, right, Ann? They lack religion, all those people?
COULTER: No, I'm saying what this fight is about. You don't even know what words I said, based on what you apparently thought was contrary to something I had said.
COLMES: Ann, I know exactly what you said. You don't want to own up to it.
COULTER: I recommend...
COLMES: You don't want to acknowledge the reaction to it.
COULTER: I said that the New Testament is the continuation of the Old Testament, that Christians believe that Jews who practice the Old Testament go to Heaven. Our testament is the fast track, because we have the messiah that is the anticipated throughout the Old Testament.
And as someone said -- I heard it was Menachem Begin, I don't know if it is -- someone asked him, if you meet the messiah on Earth, what would you say to him? And he said, "I'd say, 'Is this your first?'" That's what the whole Old Testament is anticipating. Some messiah. They think we got the wrong guy. I gave a beautiful description of the Old Testament and the New Testament, but it's very frightening to secularists.
COLMES: You used the classic language of anti-Semitism. However, let me move on here, because there's lots of other things to talk about.
COULTER: What, like "good evening"?
COLMES: Let's get back to Nancy Pelosi. No, it's the classic language of anti-Semitism. You said in the past that women should be armed...
COULTER: How about eating soup? Is that a classic food of anti- Semites?
COLMES: That's lovely, Ann. I'm going to move on in spite of yourself and maybe save you from saying something else that's ridiculous. You said that women should be...
COULTER: No, you're being ridiculous, Alan.
COLMES: ... but not be allowed to...
COULTER: No, you can't just come out and say, "Oh, the classic" -- well, what is the classic language of an anti-Semite? To describe the New Testament, Alan? Is that what you're saying?
COLMES: No, to say that...
COULTER: Are you saying that to be a Christian is anti-Semitic?
COLMES: No, absolutely not.
COULTER: Because I think that's a little offensive. If we're going to play who's offended here, I think I'm offended by that, Alan.
COLMES: Well, maybe not at -- so good, I'm glad you know what it feels like to be offended.
COULTER: What's the classic language of anti-Semitism? What are you saying?
COLMES: I'm glad you know what it feels like.
COULTER: What are you saying?
COLMES: To say that your religion is somehow superior, that you have to be "perfected" in order to be of the right religion, that somehow those who do not believe what you believe are somehow lesser than you, that's the implication. And that is classic anti-Semitism.
COULTER: No, I'm saying what anyone who actually believes a religion, rather than, oh, you're last president, Bill Clinton, walking into the church carrying his 10-pound Bible, people who actually believe their religion believe it. That's part of being a Christian, that you actually believe Christianity is true.
I think anyone who actually believes a religion rather than faking it for the voters and then getting, you know, which testament the book of Job is in wrong would have to say that.
Brava, Ann! If more folks on the right would stand up to ignoramuses in the media like Colmes, maybe the American people would be significantly more informed about current events and matters impacting the nation.
In the end, it is his kind of bullying tactics, shared by many in the televised press, which keeps the citizenry in the dark about the most-pressing issues before us.
As such, once again, Ann, Brava!
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters.
















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
"You used the classic
October 31, 2007 - 13:30 ET by Chris Norman"You used the classic language of anti-Semitism. However, let me move on here, because there's lots of other things to talk about."
Classic Colmes maneuver. Throw the bomb and then quickly change the subject before your guest can respond. Oh, by the way, JasonC, I don't like Hannity either.
Amazing, a Jew quoting
October 31, 2007 - 14:41 ET by Col SmokeAmazing, a Jew quoting Jewish rabbis to explain Christianity to a Christian. They should deal with their own issues like outright support of abortion on demand (must be in their Torah, huh?) and gay marriage (in Deuteronomy, right?) before explaining the New Testament to a Christian.
Do they teach "conservative" rabbis New Testament at seminary?
Ann, she's my hero...second
October 31, 2007 - 13:51 ET by vrwc13Ann, she's my hero...second only too The Man Himself, of course.
v
...did she nail his ass or
October 31, 2007 - 14:39 ET by TruthMonger...did she nail his ass or what? Biblically speaking of course:)...
This is also what Mel Gibson had to suffer with the Passion - the New Testament is "the classic language of anti-Semitism?"
"Semites" include more than just Jews by the way - they include non-Jewish Arabs and others...
I feel embarassed for astoundingly ignorant liberals who feel they must stoop to this level
Partner with Islam and the NB respect police:)
I feel embarassed for astoundingly ignorant liberals....
October 31, 2007 - 15:25 ET by vrwc13Ignorant alright. Many of them have bunches of letters after their names, but few of them have any common sense.
v
Common sense isn't very common anymore.
Yep, she did
October 31, 2007 - 19:05 ET by celatorYep, Ann sees Colmes for the leftist moutpiece he is. He can't even effectively read the questions they write for him, for crying out loud.
He can't even effectively
October 31, 2007 - 19:08 ET by balboaHe can't even effectively read the questions they write for him, for crying out loud.
What does that have to do with anything?
Because he should be more
October 31, 2007 - 20:46 ET by bretzysdudeBecause he should be more experienced. Otherwise, there's no reason for him to appear on TV. Anyone with a degree in Broadcast Journalism should tell you that.
agreed.
October 31, 2007 - 21:12 ET by bktwhy should a TV personality, paid to engage in dialogue, discussion, and even debate, be expected to have the ability to READ a question... let alone express a logical, cogent thought.
*sigh*
We love Ann
October 31, 2007 - 13:57 ET by charlietexasThat exchange was great. Ann was right on top of Alan. We just love
Ann, she's our hero too. Liberals always try saying things like
Alan did under his breath and Ann didn't let him get away with
it. Way to go ANN.....Charlie & Julie in liberal Austin, Tx.
Are you sure you wanted to
October 31, 2007 - 14:43 ET by Dan The Man 2Are you sure you wanted to says this" Ann was right on top of Alan". He only wishes it were so.
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.
No apologies
October 31, 2007 - 13:58 ET by greenfairieNever try to get Ann Coulter to apologize for anything because she won't do it. This is why rank-and-file conservatives love her...we wish more on the right would have spines of steel instead of spaghetti.
Alan Colmes's arguments are usually so dumb, you often wonder if he really believes them.
Colmes the cartoon character
October 31, 2007 - 15:19 ET by Army Brat"Alan Colmes' arguments are usually so dumb, you often wonder if he really believes them."
This is exactly what I've been thinking and wondering. I find it difficult to believe that anyone could say and then defend saying the things that this punk spews. Ka-ching! I guess, like Rosie, the more outrageous and idiotic his rants, the more (someone thinks) people will watch him to see what new stupidity/inanity he'll utter.
Happy Trails...
" Alan Colmes's arguments
October 31, 2007 - 15:46 ET by Gothampc"
Alan Colmes's arguments are usually so dumb, you often wonder if he really believes them"
In this instance I don't think so. I had heard that his wife is Catholic and that he attends Mass with her. He knows what Christians believe and he knows the point Ann was trying to make. In this case, I think he's just trying to argue so that he can get some attention.
Goth, I think Colmes
October 31, 2007 - 16:12 ET by Chris NormanGoth,
I think Colmes thinks it's his job to automatically voice opposition to whatever the conservative/Republican position is, without thinking about it at all. He's like a parrot.
Ann didn't say anything she
October 31, 2007 - 18:25 ET by charlietexasAnn didn't say anything she needed to apologize for. or to anyone. dont just read the "headlines".....like Alan.
Ka-ching
October 31, 2007 - 14:06 ET by mvfreemanI wonder how many more books she sold with this particular remark. Inflammatory rhetoric is the gift that keeps on giving.
Inflammatory rhetoric?
October 31, 2007 - 15:21 ET by Army BratWhat she said was not inflammatory...the lefties chose to spin it that way...twit.
Happy Trails...
And when imams say we need
October 31, 2007 - 16:08 ET by mvfreemanAnd when imams say we need to be "perfected" by being converted to islam that's not inflammatory either. It's just spin.
"Deutsch asked, "It would be better if we were all Christian?" Coulter replied "yes," and reitereated her declaration again later in the interview"
Way to go Ann. I guess it's implausible that anyone other than a christian can be conservative. But when christians are your targeted demographic you play to the crowd.
" the idea that Judaism needs to be replaced with Christianity and that each individual Jew is somehow deficient and needs to be "perfected," is rank Christian supersessionism and has been rejected by the Catholic Church and the vast majority of mainstream Christian denominations".
Never heard an Iman say
October 31, 2007 - 16:15 ET by PeskyDaneNever heard an Iman say that.
Also, I didn't know that Paul's epistles have been "rejected" by any Christian denomination.
http://www.iranian.ws/cgi-bi
October 31, 2007 - 17:54 ET by mvfreemanhttp://www.iranian.ws/cgi-bin/iran_news/exec/view.cgi/9/15640
"Perhaps Iran's new presidential letter to President Bush follows the same strategy where he challenges him and the people of the United States to renounce the Christian faith and attain salvation by embracing Islam. "Will you not accept this invitation?" asks President Ahmadinejad in the letter. "
I'm sure more than a few people found that to be inflammatory.
It pretty much is
October 31, 2007 - 16:48 ET by Col SmokeIt pretty much is implausible that anyone other than a Christian can be conservative. What's your point? Let's time I checked, non-Christians spout ideas antithetical to Christianity: let's see Moslems are in favor of beheadings and Jews are in favor of abortions.
The only "churches" that have rejected Christ's teachings on salvation are the wishy-washy liberal ones like the Episcopalians, Methodists and Presbyterians. To those of us who are Orthodox, Catholic or Evangelical, neither of these three "churches" is truly Christian anymore.
Really??
October 31, 2007 - 17:06 ET by mvfreemanThe so called "christian right" is part of the conservative movement but does not constitute it in its entirety. You know the whole "fiscal conservatives" versus "social conservatives" thing.
It's funny that the leading republican presidential candidate is not entirely for over turning Roe v Wade. Which means that they are trying to be a little bit more inclusive in order to be electable in a general election.
inclusive yes - we welcome
October 31, 2007 - 21:05 ET by TruthMongerinclusive yes - we welcome killers of innocent children to the RNC now:)!
I may have to leave at that point...
Partner with Islam and the NB respect police:)
Which presbyterians?
November 1, 2007 - 08:03 ET by rpkinmdRather than Presbyterians you should say the Presbyterian Church USA. There are several evangelical and reformed denominations that are Presbyterian, the largest being Presbyterian Church in America.
All the conservative Presbyterians would adhere to the belief that Jesus is the Messiah and that Jews who receive Him as Messiah would be completed Jews I would use the term completed rather than perfected as Ann does but it is true that rebirth is a processes of perfection.
Seems like you
October 31, 2007 - 20:23 ET by Cape Conservativehave a twisted version of Ann's statement, too. In no way was she putting down the faithful Jews.
And...if imans go according to what they repeatedly preach, we won't have to worry about what will happen if we decide not to convert...we'll just have our heads chopped off!
Don't see any comparison with Ann's words there!
And when imams say we need
October 31, 2007 - 22:06 ET by motherbeltAnd when imams say we need to be "perfected" by being converted to islam that's not inflammatory either. It's just spin. mvfreeman
They don't say it to be inflammatory; it's their belief. The problem comes in when they kill people who refuse to be "perfected."
That's the difference.
Re: knowing what it's like to be offended.
October 31, 2007 - 14:08 ET by mattmI'd like to see Colmes go speak at a conservative college somewhere. I doubt that he'd be attacked by pie-wielding right-wingers, or be uninvited by the administration because a few closed-minded rabble-rousers made a stink.
What does he know about being offended? And he has the chutzpah to imply that she is arrogant? What a blind fool!
I've never had the - er -
October 31, 2007 - 14:22 ET by Chris NormanI've never had the - er - chance to listen to Colmes on radio. Can he speak on his own, or is he limited to just arguing the opposite of whatever the conservative guest says - no matter what it is?
I rarely hear him either,
October 31, 2007 - 14:37 ET by mattmI rarely hear him either, so I could only guess...
Alan Colmes has a radio
October 31, 2007 - 16:31 ET by Lord ElicaniAlan Colmes has a radio show?
Quo usque tandem abutere, Catilina, patientia nostra? Quam diu etiam furor iste tuus nos eludet?
I believe that is true.
October 31, 2007 - 18:27 ET by BuffNBoneI believe that is true. But the real question is, Does he have an audience?
"Fighters are fun but bombers make policy"
This topic is a whole can
October 31, 2007 - 14:26 ET by tracheostomyThis topic is a whole can of worms.
Coulter is actually saying here that there is a difference between "belief" (assent) and "belief" (conviction). You can say you believe in God, Jesus, etcetera, but that isn't really saying anything really. No, not really.
That's certainly a verboten topic in many circles, and even among many individuals on this board. It sets some people off so quick they don't have time to even think about what she's saying.
Thank you Ann, maybe hitting 'em with a verbal shovel does the trick after all.
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
This topic is a whole can of worms. indeed....
October 31, 2007 - 14:31 ET by vrwc13COULTER: No, I'm saying what anyone who actually believes a religion, rather than, oh, you're last president, Bill Clinton, walking into the church carrying his 10-pound Bible, people who actually believe their religion believe it. That's part of being a Christian, that you actually believe Christianity is true.
I think anyone who actually believes a religion rather than faking it for the voters and then getting, you know, which testament the book of Job is in wrong would have to say that.
That's one of the things I like about Ann...
v
Alan oh Alan
October 31, 2007 - 14:33 ET by okiehawk44at the risk of Alan calling me an anti-semite, he seemed to be lost regarding comparative religions like say Christianity -- JESUS CHRIST was the BASIS for CHRISTIANITY Alan. Alan also doesn't appear to have a deep and abiding faith in any religion and like Geraldo and others just bows up whenever they consider their particular "religion" to have been slandered -- same as the drunk at the bar when he just wants to fight but conjures up some perceived slight of his dear ______ (fill in the blank) to justify it -- Alan you're lucky Ann likes you because you are not her equal and you know it.
Ann hit it right on
October 31, 2007 - 14:44 ET by TruthMongerAnn hit it right on the head - the "irreligous" use this just to stir up trouble - talk about anti-Semtism - how diabolical is it for the "news" people to use religion to divide people for petty political reasons? Colmes and company are so "offensive" on so may levels about this it boggles the mind...
Partner with Islam and the NB respect police:)
h & c is pointless
October 31, 2007 - 14:45 ET by johnGi would like to see a real liberal on that show, not that wimp colmes.
and even if a well-spoken liberal was on that show it would still be boring. how much "CROSSTALK" does that show have? i've never finished watching h&c and thought to myself, "wow that was insightful...i learned something."
Sack in the dirt
October 31, 2007 - 14:54 ET by heckrulesI think someone should call into Hannity's show today and ask him what it was like to witness Alan getting his nads stomped into the dirt last night.....it must have been painful....Coulter crushed him!
johnG * TROLL ALERT*
October 31, 2007 - 15:14 ET by Tom in NCDo you mean there are liberals that are not wimps or are there different levels of wimpiness in liberals, and why come here complaining about the show. Does someone strap you down and force you to watch at gunpoint? If I come across a show I don't like I, like most people with common sense turn the channel or simply turn off the TV. Try it sometime.
Tom in NC *GENIUS ALERT*
October 31, 2007 - 16:49 ET by johnGall liberals are wimps who are uneducated, brainwashed morons. do you like that better?
do i watch h&c all the time? no. but i do flip over there now and again to see what they're talking about. can it hurt to hear what issues they're discussing?
watching a wide range of news sources, wow you're so right, i definitely show a lack of common sense.
all liberals are wimps who
October 31, 2007 - 20:50 ET by bretzysdudeall liberals are wimps who are uneducated, brainwashed morons. do you like that better?
Yes. Yes I do like that better. And that's all I need to hear from you. Goodnight!
Non Wimp Liberal
October 31, 2007 - 15:24 ET by bassndudeThere is no such thing as a liberal that is not a wimp.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
hahaha I think that
November 1, 2007 - 09:55 ET by Binxlyhahaha I think that statement is funny, and fitting for most, but be careful, not ALL liberals are wimps. There's always an exception to the rule, just not enough in this case in my opinion hehe
COLMES: To say that your
October 31, 2007 - 14:53 ET by drillanwrCOLMES: To say that your religion is somehow superior, that you have to be "perfected" in order to be of the right religion, that somehow those who do not believe what you believe are somehow lesser than you, that's the implication. And that is classic anti-Semitism.
Well, Alan, it's NOT the Christians who are lobbing off heads, strapping on bombs and blowing themselves up in order to take out as many "non-believers" as possible, and seeking to nuke all the Jews in Israel ...
Coulter by a KO
October 31, 2007 - 15:26 ET by motherbeltNoel, thanks for finding that video and posting it. I was hoping someone here would.
Man, I haven't seen Ann Coulter actually get angry before. She was amazing!! Colmes expected to get by with his snide "classic language of anti-Semitism" remark. I am so glad she jumped in his mess and made him explain exactly what he meant by that.
Liberals like to talk about "code words" and "racist language". the "classic language of anti-Semitism..but never have to explain what they mean by that. So according to Colmes, anyone who believes Jesus is the Messiah and says so is an anti-Semite.
Everyone believes his/her religion is superior...otherwise why stay with it? Without getting into a whole big thing, Christians believe that Jesus is the promised Messiah, that's why we believe he "perfects" those who were waiting for Him (the Jews). Jews believe the Messiah is yet to come.
If Colmes, were to say "Christians are wrong, Jesus is not the promised Messiah; the Messiah has yet to come" I might disagree with him, as would all Christians, but I don't know any Christians who would be "offended" by it and demand an apology. We simply disagree.
But for people like Colmes, there is no rational discussion; there is only "offending people" if you have a different viewpoint and have the gall to state it openly.
Grow up, for crying out loud.
Well said, Motherbelt
October 31, 2007 - 20:27 ET by Joe4CoulterYou have put this issue in the most simplist form to understand by far. Bravo!
Good Orderly Direction
Liberals are priceless!
October 31, 2007 - 15:30 ET by Old EuropeLiberals are priceless! They love lambasting whoever dares go against their PC lingo. They constantly feign outrage as soon as a certain group is criticized. We are supposed to be living in constant fear about offending people.
But at the same time, they don't deem it offensive to sneer at Christians and their beliefs. It's become fashionable to knock Christianity and Creationism as irrational and sick. Their outrage stops the moment they wanna express their beliefs and opinions about people they dislike. Talk about double-standard.
And the single most offensive religion of all is Islam because Muhammed claimed that Jesus was not the Messiah but some random prophet who had nine wives and eighteen lovers and who died from a cold. But I guess it's ok for Islam to be one big insult to Christianity.Where's the outrage in that? Ann Coulter just meant to say why it makes more sense to believe in the NT and not just the OT. What's wrong with that? Are we to stop criticizing any kind of group from now on? Are we to be palsy-walsy with everybody? This is ridiculous and a great illustration about liberalism that has nothing to do with liberty but only with censorship and propaganda.
Liberals are priceless!
October 31, 2007 - 22:19 ET by motherbeltLiberals are priceless! They love lambasting whoever dares go against
their PC lingo. They constantly feign outrage as soon as a certain
group is criticized. We are supposed to be living in constant fear
about offending people.
Coulter has addressed this too. In one of her previous books she says (paraphrasing)..It's impossible to argue with liberals bacause they are constantly adding to the list of things you are not allowed to say.
Ann is beautiful on the
October 31, 2007 - 15:32 ET by bassndudeAnn is beautiful on the offensive. Combs was KO'ed.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
I agree
October 31, 2007 - 15:36 ET by Tom in NCColmes was cowering in the corner and the fact she went for the jugular caught him completely off guard. It was beautiful to watch.
What is truly confusing is
October 31, 2007 - 16:36 ET by ckc1227What is truly confusing is that Colmes is Jewish and Democrat, yet Democrats(especially far-left KOS types like those pandered to recently by Dem. candidates) despise Jews and Israel. It makes no sense.
"...despise Jews and Israel. It makes no sense."
October 31, 2007 - 16:54 ET by vrwc13The Jewish vote normally is democratic!
"According to CNN, Al Gore won 79 percent of the Jewish vote in 2000, and Bill Clinton garnered between 70 and 80 percent in both of his presidential campaigns. This trend can even be detected all the way back to the beginning of the 20th century."
v
You can't make a blanket
October 31, 2007 - 17:25 ET by balboaYou can't make a blanket statement that "Democrats despise Jews and Israel." That's absolutely ridiculous.
...there "support" for the
October 31, 2007 - 21:01 ET by TruthMonger...there "support" for the state of Isreal is CONSIDERABLY underwhelming - is that better:)?
"Go, Arafat! We're pullin' for ya!"
-Matt "PLO scarf" Lauer, D-GMA
Partner with Islam and the NB respect police:)
Excellent debate
October 31, 2007 - 17:11 ET by bigtimerExcellent debate Ann...excellent.
....POW! You got him good...
Colmes doesn't even know when he gets hit right in the kisser!
BT - how do we know you're
October 31, 2007 - 17:13 ET by Free StinkerBT - how do we know you're not really Ann Coulter under an assumed name?
. . . and no matter how horrific the terrorist attack, it's conducted by losers. Winners don't need to hijack airplanes. Winners have an Air Force. --P.J. O'Rourke
Free, I can guarantee.. I'm
October 31, 2007 - 17:22 ET by MightyMouthFree, I can guarantee.. I'm not Coulter... and I agree with BT completely! Holmes got punched in the kisser (although it's doubtful any woman would actually "kiss" that sniviling leftist loon.) I love the way she doesn't let these idiots get away with the slam-and-move-on tactics.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Of course you're not. BT
October 31, 2007 - 17:30 ET by Free StinkerOf course you're not.
BT is . . . ;-)
SORRY BLONDE
October 31, 2007 - 17:17 ET by tkeefeI'm really sorry Blonde but if I was not already married I'm afraid I might have to pick Ann in a push comes to shove Hun she is outstanding LOL.
But look at the bright side she would not have time for me anyway LOL.
Colmes made Ann's point for
October 31, 2007 - 18:58 ET by tbbaxterColmes made Ann's point for her by accusing her of anti-Semitism. In the New Testament, Jesus said "I am the way, the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father expect through me." (John 14:6) Jews who embrace this fact are called "completed Jews." Ann said nothing anti-Semitic; if anything, I think she made the statement out of a desire for Jews to come to salvation through Christ. She made the statement in love, not in hate. It's unfortunate that people like Alan Colmes can't have the decency to do a little honest research and come to the same conclusion.
Last I heard/read
October 31, 2007 - 20:16 ET by Cape Conservativeimans aren't in the least bit concerned if we "don't" convert to Islam - off with our heads!!!
Groups like the ADL have
October 31, 2007 - 23:06 ET by mostlymoderateGroups like the ADL have been chipping away at Christianity in America for over 50 years. We will be reminded of this with the Christmas season right around the corner. Christmas trees will be taken down at airports, department stores will insist on Happy Holiday's rather than Merry Christmas, etc etc. Remember the fury over "The Passion of Christ"??? Was there any fury over "The Last Temptation of Christ"??? NO! What about the Davinci Code?? NO! I love Jews but there are extremist-Jews just like there are extremist Christian's.
Most of you guys know that Colmes is a shill to make Hannity...
October 31, 2007 - 23:39 ET by timothelook good, right? I actually root for him on occasion because he gets beat up so bad and so often on that show.
All of the networks try to pit ideologies against each other, but it never quite seems to work because the scales are always tipped so badly. (Robert Novak and Paul Begala on Crossfire were the closest to evenly matched that I've seen, unless you count Bill Bennett vs Carville and two other random liberals.)
I think it helps the ratings of H&C to have a character like Colmes on the show. His persona (real or fake) is similar to some of the liberal bloggers I've run across. I don't think Colmes is stupid enough to be as loony left as he is portrayed. To me, H&C is no more or less truthful than the stuff I see in the MSM. I prefer to get my analysis in a more straight-forward venue.
Colmes' Huge Error
November 1, 2007 - 01:20 ET by BeukeboomColmes' major "jump the shark" moment was where he tried to slip in "You [Coulter] used the classic language of anti-Semitism" and then quickly tried to change topics. Typical "bait and switch." However Coulter wasn't about to let him slide with that one and pushed him for specifics which he was unable to provide most likely because he intended the comment to be offensive on its own knowing he had no specific examples of what constitutes "classic language of anti-Semitism." Colmes was intentionally using provocation for the sake of attempting to get a rise out of Coulter while slipping away from retaliation. However he wasn't slick enough and Coulter pinned him to the mat, so to speak, on his not-so-subtle accusation. Whether you like Coulter or not, you have to respect her sharp wit and intellect especially if you choose to engage her in any form of debate. In this instance, the saying "never try to defend yourself with a knife in a gun fight" describes what happened to Colmes.
There is nothing better
November 1, 2007 - 01:41 ET by Airforce_5_OThere is nothing better than watching Alan Combs getting Pimp slapped on TV by Ann.
<sigh> I wonder if she will marry me?
The only thing you should feel when shooting insurgents is the rifle recoil.
Thanks for keeping us up to date on "the most-pressing issues"
November 1, 2007 - 04:43 ET by BlindSightI had always thought that Fox had Colmes on that show because he's a relative mouse, but now I can see that he is truly a bully, and that his kind of bullying tactics, shared by many in the televised press - but not on the RIGHT of course - keeps the citizenry in the dark about the most-pressing issues before us.
It was also interesting that Coulter chose not only to mirror Colmes' "victimization" role but also to imply that she was more of an actual true believer than Colmes and others who took (pretend?) offense at her remarks. Do true Christians behave as she, or is she just making political hay by selling cultural wars?
Coulter's behavior is a bit puzzling, since it does seem to strike somewhat at the neocon alliance.
Pres. Bush: "Our guiding principle is clear. We must lead the world to produce fewer greenhouse gas emissions and we must do it in a way that does not undermine economic growth or prevent nations from delivering greater prosperity for their people."
"Do true Christians behave
November 1, 2007 - 12:31 ET by MightyMouth"Do true Christians behave as she..."
Sure they do. I think there is a misconception about "true" Christians. Most people believe Christians to be religious. That's wrong as "religion" is a man made institution. Christian salvation, on the other hand, is a God made "institution". Therefore Christians want all men to be Christians whereas "religious" men believe you can choose any religion and they are all equally valid. "True" Christians are pretty closed minded in this regard.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Well said MM...
November 1, 2007 - 12:38 ET by vrwc13" I think there is a misconception about "true" Christians. Most people believe Christians to be religious. That's wrong as "religion" is a man made institution. Christian salvation, on the other hand, is a God made "institution". Therefore Christians want all men to be Christians whereas "religious" men believe you can choose any religion and they are all equally valid. "True" Christians are pretty closed minded in this regard." - MightyMouth
I will be saving that for future use...giving you credit of course.
v
Thanks, I think Ann has
November 1, 2007 - 12:47 ET by MightyMouthThanks, I think Ann has been very consistent in this regard. When people like Colmes attack her for taking a dogmatic stance on her belief system they show themselves for what the really are: man made religious types. It's almost as if they equate religion and politics. There is a BIG difference about what your opinion is about political ideaology vs your belief about your own mortality. BIG diff!!
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...