MRC's Noyes Discusses Chris Matthews's Bias on FNC's 'Big Story'

  • Bookmark and Share

MRC Research Director and NewsBusters senior editor Rich Noyes appeared on Friday's "The Big Story with John Gibson" on the Fox News Channel to discuss how MSNBC anchor Chris Matthews declared that the administration has “been caught in their criminality” just days before he was scheduled to co-moderate a GOP presidential debate on CNBC.

Video (4:38): Real (3.58 MB) and Windows (2.98 MB), plus MP3 audio (2.22 MB)

Here’s an excerpt:

JOHN GIBSON: The man who will co-moderate the Republican presidential debate next week in Michigan thinks our President is a criminal. It's outrageous and there is more. NBC anchor Chris Matthews took to the microphone at a public event last night with high ranking NBC executives in the audience. After thanking his colleagues for hard work, Matthews thanked God Vice President Cheney wasn't in office during the Cuban missile crisis. He then accused the administration of, quote, "trying to silence him" over the years. And then there was this: The Bush White House has, quote, "finally been caught in their criminality."

Ladies and gentlemen, this is a man who's been chosen by NBC to front their election coverage, and he just called our President a criminal. How in the world can NBC put on a fair debate with a moderator like Matthews? With me now, Rich Noyes, Director of Research for the Media Research Center. So, Rich, Matthews says that, an NBC News anchor says, Bush is criminal. Is the peacock showing its bias?

RICH NOYES: Oh, I think quite transparently, and they've been showing it for a very long time. I mean, a couple weeks ago Chris Matthews suggested that we put Exxon and Mobil signs over Arlington National Cemetery because this is a war for oil. He suggested after anchoring coverage of the President's speech on Iraq -- he asked Senator Joe Biden whether or not the President really believed this stuff or was just selling it -- you know, to him it was all delusional fantasies. He has been very, very outspoken in his opinions. They've been vehemently anti-administration, anti Iraq war.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

After floundering around

After floundering around for almost a decade, the executives as MSNBC made a smart business decision to try and carve out a liberal/left audience. Niche-marketing works if you can find the right audience and match them with the right product.

But it's not a smart decision - or an ethical one - to continue to claim that Keith Olbermann is a news anchor or that Chris Matthews can somehow be an objective moderator of a Republican debate.

If Olbermann and Matthews want to be advocates for liberal positions, fine. But they have no business anchoring the news desk after a debate or moderating one either.

BTW, I understand that O'Reilly will be addressing Matthews' remarks re the "criminality" of the White House this evening.

SMG

This was very informative,

This was very informative, especially for those middle of the roaders who watch Fox and may not know any of this.

For me I just hope the candidates are listening to all of this and get a real clue!

I am begging you guys to stand up to Matthews if you must go on....

Great job by Gibson and Noyes...great job.

NBC executives are brain dead as far as I am concerned....the likes of Matthews and Olbermann being moderators is out of this world...but that is where NBC and their ratings are going too... 

It's Beyond Comprehensible

How executives at NBC their parent GE, can sit by and watch this stuff occurr and not step in and insist on some ground rules.  For any corporate entity to sit silent while one of their on-air show boats suggests the administration is criminal (without so much as a inkling of proof) is astounding.  It's almost amusing to have witnessed MSNBC's mishandling of the Imus fiasco, and then see them mute on the likes of Matthews and Olbermann.  I guess we can all take a deep breath that GE/NBC has nothing to do w/Rush, or he'd be suspended.

That is why centralist come

That is why centralist come here.Where the information is put out there for you to decide.The videos arent doctor ala Media Manupulation or taken out of content.If republicans go they should be prepare for a hostile crowd and left wing moderator.Hopefully they are tapeing it to show what inacurracies will come out after.Also to put it up against tapes when the Dems candidates had their debate.Just show the difference in the questions asked.NBC/MSNBC is bias and need to be called on it.

Propaganda

It is appalling that Msnbc still call themselves a news network. Credibility = 0

Dissing Chris

I'm hoping one of the GOP hopefuls takes a page from Jon Stewart; not over the top like Robin Williams in "Man of the Year" or too pugnacious like Zell in '04. I'l hope they've checked his book and when Chris asks some snarky, unworthy question they zap him in the forehead for the cynical, partisan hack he is.

 

 

First, kill all the lawyers.

-Wlm Shakespear

Chris Matthews? Wouldn't

Chris Matthews? Wouldn't that be like Savage and Coulter moderating the Democrats' debates?

kg.... Wouldn't that be

kg....

Wouldn't that be delicious?

They couldn't handle it....Hill wouldn't be able to use that witchy cackle to control her anger either....lol. 

Not quite...I know Matthews

Not quite...I know Matthews has expressed his admiration for McCain and Guiliani.  Which Democratic candidates have Coulter and Savage expressed similar sentiments?

Jer

Jer... I would hope

Jer...

I would hope nada.

bt...I think you can rest

bt...I think you can rest easy.

Jer

Why would 2 Conservatives admire a group of communists

Respectfully Jer, the Democratic field are all mainline socialists or out of the closet communists bent on isolationism like FDR, but loaded with nuclear response if another Pearl Harbor comes.

No Conservative would admire any of these Democrats as Zell Miller closed the club house door when he left the plantation. There are no Hubert Humphries in the DNC any more........in fact if any were in there they would be ridiculed and silenced by Democrats.

Sincerely, you have to understand you just asked Coulter and Savage to admire Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Ho as this is what Democrats are advocating, "Workers working for state benefits and the state taking care of them.......that is called communism."

 

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

LC...On the contrary, I'm

LC...On the contrary, I'm not asking Coulter and Savage to admire any of the Dems.  In fact, if they were to, I think we both would be concerned, but for different reasons.

Jer

Jer, I don't much listen to Coulter or Savage

The best I can do is a semi-positive article about Biden being the only adult on the Democrat side of the race from Reason. I'm more interested in people's comments on what looks to me (see comment below) like a racial double standard between Smiley (biased so RINOs'll boycott & try to use lame-assed "schedule" excuse) vs Matthews (biased but RINOs are ok with the bias enough to attend).
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.

}}---> we disagree sarc

As I just stated in another response.  There's no good that can come of it.

~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~

COULTER...

Coulter would ask questions & demand answers, Matthews asks questions guests & then does'nt allow them to answer. Mathews has the attention span of a flea, & it shows.

"Some of us are wise, some of us are otherwise"  Mark Levin

interesting

I agree that a news organization with an obvious partisan bias shouldn't host a debate with the party that they show bias toward. That is why the dems decided not to participate in the Fox debate.

BM.... How do you know

BM....

How do you know that?

The dem's didn't even have the guts to show up for one...therefore you cannot say that with any credibility IMO.

Btw...I almost guarantee you Brit Hume or say Wallace for example... would of been more than fair. 

Might as well go for the

Might as well go for the gold and let Code Pink moderate.

Wouldn't be much of a debate, but it would show them up for the single issue fools they are and totally discredit them beyond their current level.

To me the debates won't really start until the fields at least get cut in half, unless they are willing to spend multiple hours at debates now to get anything beyond a rehearsed soundbite.

Discrediting CodePink is an impossible task..

Right2thePoint

CodePink has NO creditability now.

Elephants don't fear the Peacock but the Jackasses fear the Fox!

The Republican candidates appear before a rabid Matthews but the Democratics are afraid of Fox.  What does that say about a future Commander-in-Chief?

Amen

Amen

Republicans need to handle Matthews

The Republicans in this debate need to put themselves ALL UNITED on the  SAME reservation and simply say anytime Chris Matthews opens his mouth,

Co chair, we do not recognize the biased Mr. Matthews, so is there something you would care to lead in this debate?

Even Ron Paul could probably be GOP long enough not to have a Jeff Rense meltdown and start saying he agreed with Matthews.

This is a perfect opportunity to drive the debate, show liberal bias in what the GOP is up against and how literally looney tunes the left is as well as MSNBC in what it considers "fair".

Stop playing their game GOP and get on the same team in making the opposition THE THING YOU ARE RUNNING AGAINST instead of bashing each other......that is how you win this as Reagan said, "I PAID FOR THIS MICROPHONE!"

 

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

Bunghole Matthews!

Why would any Republican candidate want to legitimize a bunghole like Matthews?  I would rather spit on him!

Personal Responsiblity

Gee, here's a perfect opportunity to force a liberal sleazebag off the air. All the Republican candidates have to do is REFUSE TO BE MODERATED BY MATTHEWS. Sound too much like common sense? The stink that this would make would then allow Republicans to PLASTER THE INTERNET and EVERY INTERVIEW THEY GIVE, with some biased stupid liberal remark that Matthews made. In a week he'll be FIRED because the wealth of information would be just too much. This is how the democrats are going after YOU! As Sean Connery asked Kevin Costner in "The Untouchables", "WHAT ARE YE PREPARED TO DO?"'

Save you breath, I'll answer.. The feckless, useless, fake Christian ( Guiliani, McCain, Romney), cult belonging to( Romney), abortion supporting (Romney, Guiliani), HOMOSEXUAL PROTECTING ( Romney, Guiliani), will SAY NOTHING and DO NOTHING and show up like the stupid morons they are. When they FAIL to TAKE THIS MATTHEWS TURD OUT...You will understand why I resigned from the Republican Party and became an independant, after "Dubai" and Grandma Meyers.

Don't get your hopes up and have a nice day.

Let me see if I've got this straight...

Chris Matthews makes multiple, WAAAY more-biased anti-Republican statements than Smiley's ONE stupid & over-the-top statement about Bush & the death penalty application-rate in Texas, but: RINOs boycotting Smiley's debate was a good idea and at the same time RINOs boycotting Matthews' upcoming debate will be a bad idea. And blacks are supposed to believe all of this is somehow a single standard, and have faith that it all has nothing at all to do with Matthews' & Smiley's respective skin colors.

Yeah. Riiiiight. Got it... Can you see why some blacks might not trust Republicans when RINOs talk about "schedules" being tight, then use Smiley-bias as an all-purpose excuse, and THEN essentially ignore what's arguably much-greater bias on the part of Chris Matthews? If not, well, please, explain just how I'm missing something elephant-sized in this particular ideological room...Traditional RINOs may want to try to treat them as if they were, but black people are NOT stupid, ok??
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.

}}---> Trust is mutual

One action by one man (Barry Goldwater) started a mass desertion of the Republican party.

The use of the word "trust" only applies when there is some measure of mutual respect.

It's just a game of "Gotcha" now.

All kinds of finger pointing when Repubs decline, but all Dems have to do is check their hip pocket to make sure they've still got the Black vote and sneak past the Black Caucus sponsored debate on their way to DKOS.

It's battered minority syndrome.  "I know the Democrat Party does me wrong and slaps me around, and makes me walk the streets carrying placards when times get rough, but I still love him.

It's pathetic, it's sick, and it's the kind of abuse even the stout hearted can't stand to watch, but I know exactly what happens if the Repubs try to step in on that little domestic squabble.

You tell me what good comes of stepping in.

 

~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~

Desertion??

Before we get to disagreement on today, we need to go over Republican history 101. There would not have ever been a President Reagan without a Barry Goldwater first to pave the intellectual way, and it's not Barry Goldwater's fault that the Republicans are being deserted right now by fiscal conservatives, blacks, and various others, ok? If you can cite your proposition about Goldwater, do it, but otherwise consider learning some recent Republican history.

And I'm not defending the Democrats' treatment of blacks, either, so you need to focus on what the Republicans are trying to get blacks to believe. Schedule-bs for the black dude, and grudging attendance for the EVEN MORE BIASED white dude looks a hell of a lot like racial discrimination, no "battered minority" excuses required. And until the recent Republican cowardice/BS, Democrats had no excuse for skippin' the Fox debate. Now they do have a "they did it too" excuse, and that's 100% the RINOs' fault, period, end of story.

No good comes if you're dishonest enough to only step into half the debates. Good comes when Republicans are honest for a change -- and apparently, so does money. Look, right now overall Republican fund raising numbers are nothing short of pathetic. This isn't the only reason for that, but can you understand why, given what I've written above regarding this Republican double standard, blacks might tell you "don't piss on my back and tell me 'it's raining'!"?
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.

}}---> 101

Barry Goldwater's campaign decided they could win the election without the Black vote.  They said so.  Before this decision, Blacks were a Republican voting monolith (party of Lincoln).  This is the only desertion I referred to.

Yes, a Smiley debate is a mistake unless you beforehand decide you aren't going to pander.  There is no trust from either side that an honest debate will break out, and you may believe Ron Paul could benefit, but not in a venue that has an even stronger sense of what happens when you start  touting the Constitution.

It's the biggest twisted soundbite opportunity you can imagine for the MSM.

~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~

I think it's more-complex than that...

Barry Goldwater sensed (rightly) that policies like "affirmative action" (racial preferences) would corrode race relations in this country, so he refused to pander to blacks. For some reason, pandering has worked politically for a while, but I think it's failing now. And yes, Ron Paul's usual honesty once-again did him good in front of blacks -- that's why they cheered so much when he talked about the unfairness of the judicial system & the abject failure of the tax and spend drugwar.

Anyway, we're off subject on Barry Goldwater history and black politics from decades-ago (weird factoid -- did you know the local Indians in Arizona made Barry an actual Indian Chief in a ceremony, something they DON'T do lightly even for fellow Indians, much less a white guy?).

Let's focus on what I asked originally about this time's debates. How come boycotting Smiley's debate (one biased statement) is defensible (even if the boycott excuse is admittedly BS, nobody believes "scheduling") but none of the RINOs wants to boycott Matthews (FAR MORE THAN one biased statement)? Can you come up with a coherent reason that doesn't involve the 2 mens' races? I sure as hell can't...I doubt black voters can, either.
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.

}}---> Boycott both

You've obviously never watched Smiley's annual conference on C-span (they last about 4 hours, but are a must see).  He's totally unfair to the Conservative viewpoint, the causes of illiteracy, illigitimacy, drug addiction, affirmative action.

All these problems he lays at the feet of White American Republicans and doesn't lower his head a bit until one of the reverends says something about accountability.

Smiley is a hatemonger.  Any alliance with Republicans erodes his position.  He can't chance an honest debate.

Here's the difference.  And I think you know it.  Yes, race is a factor.  You can insult Democrats and Chris Matthews all day and all you'll get is little Chrissy reporting how mean Republicans are.

Get into the most innocent conversation about race with Tavis Smiley, and you'll have "Plantation Master" tattooed across your forehead faster than you can say Bill O'Reilly.

~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~

I suspect we're agreeing here...

I just think both should have been attended, not boycotted, and that boycotting one and attending the other hurts the Republican party -- or at least, the RINO faction -- in the eyes of some blacks who are far more fair and honest than Mr. Smiley & Mr. Matthews put-together. And you're right, I don't watch him on C-Span when he's on talking about race.
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.

}}---> The format

It's just that the format is the message (Marshal McLuhan will forgive me)

It doesn't seem to be contrasting candidates, but that stupid moment of gotcha that ends up in the news the next morning.

Let the candidates get up in each others' faces and leave the ballerinas like Matthews and Smiley out of it.

~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~

Oh, we DEFINITELY agree on that...

Lincoln and Douglass debated for HOURS in un-air-conditioned tents and with minimal restroom facilities (at best...). These days, attention spans are literally corroded by the TV commercial cycle. The idea of holding a single thought for more than 15 minutes is apparently anathema, as is the idea of a debate with focus on the candidates rather than on media talking heads. But I still think we should treat all media talking heads equally as a party, and that here the RINOs apparently-aren't.
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.

}}---> A donnybook

All else is 20 minute makeup sessions between one minute rounds.

we need a donnybook among the candidates, not a pageant.

Thompson and Paul, neither one could win the thong competition.  Rudy and Romney could.  But what does that prove?

~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~

 Smiley's ONE stupid &

 Smiley's ONE stupid & over-the-top statement about Bush & the death penalty application-rate in Texas,

Whoa, Mr. Smiley has made dozens of ugly statements about Bush and the GOP. It's not just one comment.

Just do the googling.

SMG 

 

 

looks like sarky has gone off the deep end again....

"...and have faith that it all has nothing at all to do with Matthews' & Smiley's respective skin colors."

Tsk, tsk....nasty, racist Republicans...

After reading this I

After reading this I initially thought that maybe the GOP should pull out of this debate like the Democrats did Fox News, but that would just appear cowardly.  What would be better at the debate next week is for every candidate to use a few minutes of their time to call Chris Matthews out for what he is.  I think they ought to really turn the heat on him.  It would be so funny to watch him squirm.