New Bio Reveals Former CBS Anchor Walter Cronkite Far More Biased Than Widely Believed
A new biography of legendary CBS Evening News anchor Walter Cronkite reveals some amazing facts about Cronkite's liberal bias and various transgressions of journalistic ethics which expose the falsity of the establishment media's carefully-crafted image of neutrality.
As Jonathan S. Tobin wrote for Commentary, the revelations about Cronkite undermine “the mainstream media’s myth about its own impartiality” before the birth of Fox News. If you believe the self-described mainstream media, it is Fox News which is irredeemably biased and not themselves:
"The days when national news was the dominion of three networks and a few major newspapers is portrayed as Eden before the fall, an era when partisanship of the kind that is now both familiar and expected was unknown. A key element to this fairy tale is the idea that the journalistic icons of the time, like CBS’s Walter Cronkite, were Olympian figures who would never stoop to play favorites or inject ideology into the news," Tobin writes.
"But this view is totally false. As media news analyst Howard Kurtz writes in the Daily Beast, a new biography of Cronkite by Douglas Brinkley spills the beans on the godlike anchorman’s unethical practices, including blatant partisanship that would make the conservative talkers on Fox and the liberals on MSNBC blush. It wasn’t Fox that poisoned the well of journalism, as former New York Times editor Bill Keller recently alleged. Fox and other such outlets were brought into existence in an effort to balance a journalistic establishment that was already tilting heavily to the left. The real sin here is not bias or even partisanship but the pretense of fairness that Cronkite exemplified.”
Tobin notes that the new information about Cronkite “gives the lie to the notion that the pre-Fox era was one in which non-partisan fairness ruled the airwaves,” adding that, according to Brinkley's book, “Cronkite’s partisanship against Republicans (especially Barry Goldwater and Richard Nixon) and in favor of liberal Democrats was so open that it must now seem shocking that he was rarely called out about it."
According to the book, during the time he was anchoring the CBS Evening News, Cronkite secretly begged liberal senator Bobby Kennedy to run for president and then later interviewed Kennedy about his plans, never disclosing his private pleadings. That's not all, however, Cronkite planted recording devices inside the Republican Party's convention in 1952 and then later had the audacity to go after president Richard Nixon for Watergate.
In 2009, it was revealed that Cronkite, who was open about his bias against U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War, was even willing to provide, free-of-charge, a helicopter to ferry Vietnam War critic Edmund Muskie to an anti-war rally.
Of course, Cronkite's bias was not a complete secret even back when he was on the air. People who were paying attention could see it. My colleagues here at the Media Research Center even wrote a book, published in 1990 when Cronkite was still working as an analyst for CBS, called And That's the Way It Isn't lampooning Cronkite's smug nightly signoff for his newscast.
People close to Cronkite knew he was liberal, and knew about his ethical lapses. But they covered for him – and were successful in doing so because there was no alternative to the corporate liberal mass media back when Cronkite ruled the airwaves.
Even liberal Democrats, though they likely wouldn't have admitted it publicly, realized that Cronkite was a liberal. They even considered nominating him to be the running mate of disastrously liberal presidential candidate George McGovern. The anchor apparently was not asked during the campaign, however, on the fear that he might say no. Asked later if he'd have refused, however, Cronkite said “I'd have accepted in a minute; anything to help end that dreadful war.”
That's the real news in the new Cronkite biography, a story showing how today's media landscape is a vast improvement over the days when three TV networks and a few elite newspapers controlled the news.
Given the facts revealed in Brinkley's book, Cronkite's career simply would not survive today under the scrutiny and withering criticism he would no doubt receive from countless grassroots new-media news outlets and independent bloggers.
He would have been done in by an army of citizen journalists exposing his biases and ethical lapses through a painstaking vetting of Cronkite's work and liberal connections. The results of those investigations would then spread via social media as countless outraged Americans used Facebook posts and Twitter hashtag games to spread the news that the #TheMostTrustedManInAmerica was just another liberal media deception.
No wonder so many of Cronkite's liberal successors in the legacy media long for the days when a liberal shill as biased as Cronkite wasn't ever widely held to account.
For more reference on some of the outrageous liberal statements said by Cronkite over the years, click here.
- Matthew Sheffield's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
It will be interesting to see the MSM refute Brinkley's research
Submitted by Galvanic on Tue, 05/22/2012 - 2:55pm.
The MSM puppies of today long for a return to that golden age of TV network news when the journalistic integrity of anchors like Cronkite was never questioned. Presenting somebody's talking points as news is not only lazy journalism; it's a sham.
Cronkite planted recording
Submitted by cristo on Tue, 05/22/2012 - 2:55pm.
Cronkite planted recording devices inside the Republican Party's convention in 1952. Think that's where old Rupert down at FOX got the idea?
Old Uncle Walt blindsided us
Submitted by Kenny Bunkport on Tue, 05/22/2012 - 3:09pm.
Old Uncle Walt blindsided us in our naivete. His name should be Wormtongue because his words seemed fair but they were poison.
No scorn is more vicious than the scorn of one who was deceived. I have nothing good to say about this lying conniver. He was given a special trust (unwisely) by the American people and he abused and misused that trust to his own ends. He must of thought he was some kind of prophet.
Well, I hope the bastard is burning in hell with Goebbels, Marx, and all the other rotten propagandists of history. No telling how many lives were lost due to his slanted reporting.
We knew.
Submitted by Janey on Tue, 05/22/2012 - 3:10pm.
When I was a kid (in the sixties) my father called Cronkite "that pinko", lol. Conservatives weren't fooled. Everyone knew the news media were liberal, even back then. Correction...everyone except liberals knew.
I wouldn't say that
Submitted by Matthew Sheffield on Tue, 05/22/2012 - 3:21pm.
People were much more trusting of mass media back in those days. A lot of people had no idea what Cronkite and friends were up to.
It was Vietnam
Submitted by misterbee241 on Tue, 05/22/2012 - 4:09pm.
that destroyed the people's trust in media AND government. And it was Watergate that delivered the coup de gras to that trust.
No offense intended, but
Submitted by Janey on Tue, 05/22/2012 - 4:23pm.
how old are you?
My father was a "regular Joe" and he had no illusions about Walter Cronkite and the news media. He knew they were liberals and I don't doubt other conservatives knew as well.
Many conservatives were aware
Submitted by Matthew Sheffield on Tue, 05/22/2012 - 4:56pm.
But actually a lot did not know. I've had this conversation with a number of people who were adults during this time. They weren't as politically aware.
Certainly a ignorant moderate during that time wouldn't have suspected Cronkite's bias either.
Many conservatives were able to see the bias, that's why the Media Research Center exists. It was founded in 1987.
I think if as many people were aware of bias in the news back then as they are now, it's unlikely the left-wing monopoly on mass media would exist today.
We all knew Uncle Walter was an old Liberal
Submitted by Chris Norman on Tue, 05/22/2012 - 7:55pm.
I think you're both right. Back in the ol' days, maybe moderates, liberals and casual viewers weren't sensitive to the biases of the media, but a lot of conservatives sensed it. I remember getting mad at the political coverage way back in the early Seventies. Still, their bias was far more subtle - the difference use of language to describe Republican views: "Republicans claim" while "Democrats say" - the number and placement of quotes: far more Democrats would be quoted in a report and inevitably they would get the last quote placement for the viewers to take away - the tone of voice - the raised eyebrow. The bias back then may have been more insidious and effective than the blatant, in our face, sledgehammer liberal media partisanship that we see now.
I was around ten years old
Submitted by Kenny Bunkport on Tue, 05/22/2012 - 3:23pm.
I was around ten years old and both my parents were card-carrying Democrats when I thought Uncle Walter was the mouthpiece of truth. There was no one in my life to tell me otherwise (certainly not my teachers).
I was about 20 before I started questioning the media. I guess I still have anger and resentment issues from the great deceiving and brainwashing that I was too young to detect.
Cronkhite lied to the
Submitted by robert108 on Tue, 05/22/2012 - 3:39pm.
Cronkite lied to the American public about the outcome of the Tet Offensive, turning public opinion against the war, and indirectly contributing to the deaths of many American soldiers.
He should be reviled.
I don't think he lied about the outcome of the Tet Offensive
Submitted by Galvanic on Tue, 05/22/2012 - 4:57pm.
What he did was raise doubts about the reported progress of the war.
Westmoreland and friends had been talking in terms of "the light at the end of the tunnel" as recently as November 1967 following the successes against NVA regulars in the Central Highlands (Dak To, Pleiku, Kontum, etc.).
Cronkite had little strategic sense of what was actually happening during Tet beyond the scale of a major countrywide Communist offensive that couldn't possibly be executed by an army reported to be in decline. As the US and ARVN recovered from the shock, they systematically rolled back the Communist forces.
So Cronkite's message was one of lost faith and distrust of Washington/Pentagon claims, and its impact was to aid anxiety back in the US regarding the war itself.
In actuality, Noirth Vietnam's Giap had shot the bolt once again (he lost a similar conventional campaign to the French in the Red River area of North Vietnam back in 1952), weakening many of his NVA divisions and decimating the Viet Cong, thus making the Communists considerable weaker than prior to Tet. The VC never really recovered from Tet.
But the "loss of Cronkite" (to paraphrase LBJ) back in the US added to the strategic impact of Tet, and more and more media cued off of him.
The key is Cronkite was not
Submitted by BD on Tue, 05/22/2012 - 5:41pm.
The key is Cronkite was not smart enough or have enough sense to realize what was actually happening in TET. When the senior leadership in the months before had openly stated that they would love nothing better than for the VC/NVA to come out into the open and stand their ground - why couldn't Walter accept the fact that the situation had changed for the better for the US/ARVN?
You are correct about the VC never recovering. They were strategically meaningless post-Tet.
In the end it required an NVA assault that looked more like a Warsaw Pact effort than anything else to finish off the South in 1975.
Cronkite is a lier and a traitor
Submitted by johnnyatlanta on Wed, 05/23/2012 - 1:43pm.
I blame Cronkite for my brother's death. His intentional lies about our Tet victory destroy America's moral and it reinvigorated a defeated enemy. It is certain the vietnamese commies would have resumed peace negotiations if not for Cronkite's treacherous act. Thanks to Cronkite, the war continued, my brother along with many more young American men died needlessly, and the spreed of communism continued. Cronkite's name should be synonymous with Benedict Arnold, Hanoi Jane and Joseph Stalin. I hope he rots in hell!
One night back in the 70s
Submitted by misterbee241 on Tue, 05/22/2012 - 3:54pm.
while watching All In The Family, Archie referred to Cronkite as Pinko Cronkite. Little did I know Archie was a prophet. Norman Lear, while mocking conservatives actually outed an old Bolshevik.
And today Newsbusters and Breitbart et al would have ripped Cronkite a new one.
Here's the quote
Submitted by TempusFugit on Tue, 05/22/2012 - 8:24pm.
Edith: Channel 2, Archie. The one we don't watch 'cause you always say Walter Cronkite is a Communist.
Walter Cronkite
Submitted by Edward Cropper on Tue, 05/22/2012 - 3:57pm.
You would have to have been deaf, dumb, and blind not to have seen this counterfeit for what he was.
He was arrogant, and snide as well as condescending. He and Eric Sevareid thought they were the Creator's gift to the News Industry. He once falsely stated that Barry Goldwater was in Chicago for political reasons but wouldn't talk to reporters. Then had to craw fish when it was shown Barry was their for his Mother in Law's funeral.
He was Chris Matthews with a mustache
Well then most the country wasand is deaf and dumb
Submitted by johnnyatlanta on Wed, 05/23/2012 - 1:47pm.
Cronkite had more viewers than the other two network news anchors COMBINED.
No wonder the MSM long for the good old days
Submitted by ohio granny on Tue, 05/22/2012 - 5:39pm.
The good old days when everyone had to depend on them for news. Now their bias' are out there for the world to see. None too soon. Thank God for the alternative media.
Cronkite admitted that the "far right" was correct
Submitted by lrgon on Tue, 05/22/2012 - 11:09pm.
"World Governance Award- recipient Mr. Walter Cronkite hated US sovereignty and depised everything associated with US independence. His ideal world was one run by his friends: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BaS6bLQixkM