Cronkite Pushed RFK to Run for President; Would've Accepted McGovern's VP Spot

Photo of Brent Baker.
  • Bookmark and Share

Belying the image of Walter Cronkite as an journalist without any political motives, while anchor of the CBS Evening News in 1967 he secretly “pleaded” with Senator Robert Kennedy to run as an anti-Vietnam war candidate for President and he later acknowledged that, if offered, he would have accepted the slot as George McGovern's VP in 1972. Frank Mankiewicz, who worked for both Kennedy and McGovern before serving as President of NPR from 1977 to 1983, revealed the liberal Democratic political activism of Cronkite, who passed away on July 17, in a Saturday Washington Post op-ed, “Vice President Walter Cronkite.”

Mankiewicz, who would have the duty of making the public announcement of Kennedy's assassination, offered this insider account:

In the late 1960s, just after he returned from a long visit to Vietnam, Cronkite had sought a meeting with Sen. Robert Kennedy. I sat in as Kennedy's press secretary. The meeting was understood to be off the record, and no one else was present.

Cronkite began with an acknowledgement of Kennedy's desire not to run for president but pleaded with RFK to change his mind and to announce his intention to seek the White House right away, even though the election was more than a year off. You must announce your intention to run against Johnson, Cronkite urged, to show people there will be a way out of this terrible war.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓
(George McGovern has recently told audiences about how Cronkite informed him he would have taken the VP job, but I believe Mankiewicz's information about Cronkite's secret meeting with Kennedy is new.)  

A few years later, as the McGovern campaign's political director, Mankiewicz recalled: “Armed with a poll showing Walter Cronkite to be the most trusted man in America, I proposed that the senator put forward Walter Cronkite for vice president.” The idea was rejected, but:

Decades later, at a meeting of a corporate board on which they both served, George McGovern mentioned to Walter Cronkite that his name had been proposed as the vice presidential nominee at that stage of the campaign but was rejected because we were certain he would have turned us down. “On the contrary, George,” the senator told me Cronkite replied, “I'd have accepted in a minute; anything to help end that dreadful war.” At a later board meeting, Cronkite told a larger group that he would gladly have accepted the invitation to run with McGovern.

Mankiewicz saw only good things if the offer had been extended:

My suspicion is that if the ticket had been McGovern-Cronkite instead of McGovern-Eagleton, McGovern might well have won that 1972 election, or at least have made it close. Had the latter happened, after the forced resignation of Richard Nixon in 1974, McGovern probably would have been triumphantly renominated -- and elected -- president in 1976, with the most trusted man in America at his side.

Well, at least that would have saved us from Jimmy Carter.

For a collection of Cronkite's left-wing pronouncements, check: “Walter Cronkite Review: 'Gawd Almighty,' Shout 'the Truths' of Liberalism.”

—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Frank's Fantasy

I read that article yesterday. The guy's living in a fantasy world. McGovern still would have lost 49 states. Heck, he lost his home state of South Dakota 54% - 46%. Plus, the election was five months after the Watergate break in. That the voters knew about Watergate and still elected Nixon in a landslide just shows what a bad candidate McGovern really was.

Did Cronkite kill the war effort?

Remember that Nixon won promising to end the war.  Based on what happened at the Tet offensive, and General Giap's memoirs, I believe that Cronkite used his broadcast influence to get the US legislators to withdraw funding from the war, causing over 1 million people in that area to be butchered by dictators and no repatriation of our MIAs.  Thank you, Walter.  For screwing our MIAs and the people of Vietnam and Cambodia.

"What experience and history teach is
this - that people and governments never have learned anything from history,
or acted on principles deduced from it."


G. W. F. Hegel

             So

             So Cronkite was the man that got Kennedy killed?

I think you should ask

Oliver Stone might have the answer to that question. 

"I've sentenced boys younger then you to the gas chamber.  Didn't want to do it, but I felt I owed it to them."  Judge Smails 

please respect the deceased.

he was a liberal to be sure, but i'd much prefer to remember cronkite bringing us neil armstrong's "it's one small step for man...one giant leap for mankind."

i'll also remember him tearing up telling us that apollo 13's 'chutes had deployed successfully and our lads had splashed down safely.

he was johny carson, red barber, or laurence welk - someone who you knew would always be there for 22 minutes every evening to let you know what happened that day.  i know he was a liberal.  i just don't care.

swing hard in case you hit it.

Plenty of deceased mr. puredmashie

  Libraries filled with books on deceased people. We are allowed to say he was rapacious in his liberality.

  Please don't put Johnny Carson in the same breath as Cronkite. Johnny Carson was respected and we are still hard put to know what is political leaning was today. He had class.

Sincerely,

a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.

This is a major problem in

This is a major problem in society.

People who read notes about the heroic deeds of others are treated as if THEY were somehow involved.

People who read notes about tragi events are treated as if THEY were somehow heroic.

THE MAN READ THE NEWS. Big deal.

Ever notice how people who believe complex conspiracy theories, usually think the intricate universe and humans are merely an accidental product of random events. 

i was a kid.

cut me some slack, geez.

one liberal i didn't respect was archie bunker.  "dinner a 6:00, cronkite at 6:30!"

 

swing hard in case you hit it.

Relax -- I'm not blaming you

Relax -- I'm not blaming you personally for all of society's idiocy. Just look at the lunacy over Princess Di!

Ever notice how people who believe complex conspiracy theories, usually think the intricate universe and humans are merely an accidental product of random events. 

Challenge Cronkite's "sainthood"

No doubt Cronkite was a powerful man, and yes, we should show respect for the dead (more than many conservatives get after they pass on).  But he's being canonized by the MSM, and his saintly image should be challenged with facts.  This supposedly straight-down-the-middle example of fair journalism had no small influence on the news.  That's not what reporters are for. 

When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.

Not to get too far off topic.

  But I believe Archie Bunker was a propaganda tool to present someone from the right as a cartoonish racist buffoon.

  That way the 2 supposed smart liberals, Gloria and Meathead, could be presented in a good light. 

Sincerely,

a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.

Propaganda

I completely agree, JWF.  All In The Family was political propaganda and a big step toward the coarsening of TV. 

When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.

You are correct nkv! All

You are correct nkv!

All In The Family was based on a British sitcom called Till Death Us Do Part, created by Johnny Speight. A big time socialist.

The Archie Bunker character was originated as Alf Garnett. But it backfired because people loved Alf.

Ever notice how people who believe complex conspiracy theories, usually think the intricate universe and humans are merely an accidental product of random events. 

AITF Propaganda Tool - Yes

That was the conclusion I came to as I got older.  When AITF came on in the 70's I was in my 20's and didnt get the conservative-as-racist-buffoon joke.  It was only as I got older and saw Norman Lear for the liberal/leftist that he is that I came to the conclusion that Archie Bunker was a slap in the face to every consersative.  I cant and dont watch the reruns anymore.

But Archie did say something I do agree with - He called Uncle Walter "Ol' Pinko Cronkite."  That much I'm in agreement with.

And Meathead is still a Meathead.

"I dont need to read a newspaper to know the world's been shaved by a drunken barber."

Walter Brennan, The Colonel, Meet John Doe, 1941

Archie Bunker = Peter

Archie Bunker = Peter Griffin

Cronkite as vice president

OK, compare that to the statement started below, and watch what goes through your head!

If Sarah Palin isn't qualified to be president ...

On the one hand, Sarah Palin was (until today) a state governor. Walter Cronkite was a news reporter. If you're a liberal, chances are you think that Cronkite was so much more qualified to be vice president. But why? Because he is so much better "informed?" Even though he never held elective office, and never ran a business, and never haggled over a budget?

Don't get me wrong. Cronkite reminds me of Russert. They were  two dedicated liberals who managed, nevertheless, to remain much more politically neutral on-air than their contemporaries. I don't know whether that says more about them than any of their contemporaries, but if I had to choose a newsman, Cronkite and Russert would still be at the top of the list.

That having been said, I reject the idea that a newsman is anywhere close to being as qualified as any governor ... except Blagojevich, but he's in a different category.

"Because he (Cronkite) is

"Because he (Cronkite) is so much better "informed?"

Sure, the guy was so un-informed he actually claimed the Viet Cong/NVA won the Tet Offensive.

In fact, the US military smashed the commies to a humiliating defeat, from which even they admit they were almost ready to pack in as they couldn't go on militarily.

Until along came Uncle Walt to surrender first.

Ever notice how people who believe complex conspiracy theories, usually think the intricate universe and humans are merely an accidental product of random events. 

That was our Walter:

That was our Walter: snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

He wanted us out of Viet Nam, and fought for that the only way he had.

Where was Uncle Walter when millions were being slaughtered?

Surprised

I'm really surprised too, since when Cronkite denounced the war as lost it was still LBJ's war.  The media didnt go full bore against it until it became Nixon's war.  And Kissinger was already doing his best to lose it for us.

"I dont need to read a newspaper to know the world's been shaved by a drunken barber."

Walter Brennan, The Colonel, Meet John Doe, 1941

Here is a good summary of

Here is a good summary of the Tet Offensive from the book "Battle 100" by Michael Lee Lanning.  One other thing that gets overlooked from the Tet Offensive is that the Communists thought that was the right time to launch an offensive, because they were convinced the S. Vietnamese would rise up against their government and join the Communist cause.  The S. Vietnamese didn't rise up against their government during the Tet Offensive and many of them were massacred at Hue.  The Che shirt wearers who build themselves up as great human rights activists and talk about My Lai all the time, don't ever seem to care about the Communists killing S. Vietnamese civilians at Hue.

Here is a link to the book.

http://books.google.com/books?id=uCIQ3zTaTuUC&pg=PA174&lpg=PA174&dq=bATTLE+100+tET+mICHAEL+lEE+lANNING&source=bl&ots=VNVP4oPVtZ&sig=LtM1MFu5dPzblYuqJ-6JmfRekLU&hl=en&ei=SP9tSveXL4qulAf5q4C2Ag&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1

 

Here is a link on Hue.

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,839103,00.html

 

Here is an excerpt  from a "Wall Street Journal" article with a former NVA officer in regards to the Tet Offensive.  From the link below.

 

 

"Q: What was the purpose of the 1968 Tet Offensive?A: To relieve the pressure Gen. Westmoreland was putting on us in late 1966 and 1967 and to weaken American resolve during a presidential election year.
Q: What about the results?

A: Our losses were staggering and a complete surprise;. Giap later told me that Tet had been a military defeat, though we had gained the planned political advantages when Johnson agreed to negotiate and did not run for re-election. The second and third waves in May and September were, in retrospect, mistakes. Our forces in the South were nearly wiped out by all the fighting in 1968. It took us until 1971 to re-establish our presence, but we had to use North Vietnamese troops as local guerrillas. If the American forces had not begun to withdraw under Nixon in 1969, they could have punished us severely. We suffered badly in 1969 and 1970 as it was."

http://www.grunt.com/scuttlebutt/corps-stories/vietnam/north.asp

 

 

Okay, Cronkite is officially in the ground now...

...is it all right to go back to referring to him as Walter Crankcase?

-Dave

Wow...what a shock. One

Wow...what a shock.

One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).