CBS's Hill to Bachmann: House GOP 'Risks Looking Like The Grinch'
CBS's Erica Hill invoked an infamous Christmas season villain on Wednesday's Early Show, stating that "[House] Republicans...risk looking like the Grinch here four days before Christmas" for their refusal to sign onto the Senate's proposed two-month extension of the payroll tax holiday. Hill made that claim during an interview of Rep. Michele Bachmann, and pressed her about the payroll tax issue.
The anchor brought on Rep. Bachmann to discuss her presidential campaign's swing through Iowa during the lead-up to that state's caucuses at the beginning of January. However, Hill devoted the first half of the segment to the dispute over extending the tax holiday, and led with a question that included her "Grinch" label:
HILL: There is a lot of talk, of course, about what's happening in Washington. We'll get to Iowa in just a minute. But as a congresswoman, I want to get your take on this. The op-ed page of The Wall Street Journal this morning saying, basically, Republicans should cut their losses, figure out a way to extend this payroll holiday, or, essentially, risk looking like the Grinch here four days before Christmas. Can that happen?
When the Republican presidential candidate answered, in part, that the Senate's proposal was a "poison pill...Harry Reid, essentially, threw a bomb over into the House," and that "this is one more temporary gimmick," the CBS journalist followed up by asking, "Congresswoman, this is incredibly important to 160 million Americans. As you point out, people on the trail are asking you, why things can't get done in Congress? Why then, Congresswoman, did you choose not to vote yesterday?"
In reply, Bachmann repeated her "bomb" talking point about Senator Reid. Seemingly not satisfied by her guest's answer, Hill pressed ahead with the issue and raised how most of the Senate Republicans had voted for the two-month extension: "In the Senate, they were able to work out a bipartisan deal. Just a handful of Senate Republicans not going along with that. So if there could some sort of bipartisan compromise in at least one chamber, why not go back and try to work to make something happen?"
The Minnesota Republican answered that the Senate proposal was a "very bad option," and went on the attack against President Obama for "failing to cut the spending." Hill then repeated her point about the apparent importance of the tax holiday to Americans: "So you're saying you wouldn't have let this happen, but, at least, a two-month extension for 160 million Americans- they may have preferred that to nothing January 1, Congresswoman."
Exactly a month earlier, on November 21, the CBS anchor tried to get Americans for Tax Reform president Grover Norquist to press congressional Republicans to consider raising taxes: "There's still not a lot getting done in Washington, even with some of the compromise. So why not push those people to maybe do a little bit more?" During her previous interview with Rep. Bachmann on November 16, Hill wondered why the candidate was attacking Newt Gingrich for appearing in a climate change commercial with Nancy Pelosi: "Why is that a bad thing, to try to work across the aisle?"
Back in September, the journalist lobbied the Minnesota representative to allow children of illegal immigrants to receive in-state college tuition: "Why not, though, give them a tuition break now, rather then, perhaps, down the line, having to hand over unemployment, or even welfare?"
The full transcript of Erica Hill's interview of Rep. Michele Bachmann on Wednesday's Early Show:
ERICA HILL: On Tuesday, an influential Christian group, The Family Leader, decided not to endorse any candidate in the Iowa caucuses. Its president, however, did announce he is backing Rick Santorum.
Joining us this morning from Davenport, Iowa is someone who is counting on support from social conservatives- GOP candidate Congresswoman Michele Bachmann, who's also currently on a bus tour to visit every county in that state. Congresswoman, nice to have you with us this morning. There is a-
REP. MICHELE BACHMANN, (R), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: Good morning, Erin [sic]- a pleasure to be with you.
HILL: There is a lot of talk, of course, about what's happening in Washington. We'll get to Iowa in just a minute. But as a congresswoman, I want to get your take on this. The op-ed page of The Wall Street Journal this morning saying, basically, Republicans should cut their losses, figure out a way to extend this payroll holiday, or, essentially, risk looking like the Grinch here four days before Christmas. Can that happen?
[CBS News Graphic: "The Payroll Tax Cut: Bachmann On Tuesday's Rejected Bill"]
BACHMANN: Well, the Republicans in the House are presented with a poison pill because Harry Reid, essentially, threw a bomb over into the House, and then, the Democrats left town. Unfortunately, President Obama has been AWOL in the entire process. And so, the real losers in all of this, Erin [sic], are the American people, and I'm talking to people on the ground every day here in Iowa, and they are just disgusted. They're shaking their heads and they're saying, what's wrong with Congress? Why can't they give us permanent solutions? This is one more temporary gimmick, and what they're looking for are permanent solutions, so they can hire people and get people back to work.
HILL: Congresswoman, this is incredibly important to 160 million Americans. As you point out, people on the trail are asking you, why things can't get done in Congress? Why then, Congresswoman, did you choose not to vote yesterday?
BACHMANN: Well, because there was no deal. We all knew there would be no deal, because President Obama, Harry Reid, decided not to work with the House Republicans. Like I said, they threw a bomb over into the House, something- a bill that was completely unacceptable, that wouldn't help people get back to work, that wouldn't help the American economy to recover. And so, there was no other choice. If there was a deal, of course, I would be there. There is no deal.
HILL: In the Senate, they were able to work out a bipartisan deal. Just a handful of Senate Republicans not going along with that. So if there could some sort of bipartisan compromise in at least one chamber, why not go back and try to work to make something happen?
BACHMANN: Well, because this was a very bad option. A two-month extension? No one's going to hire, based on two months. We need a one-year extension, if that's what the deal will be.
The main problem in Washington right now is that President Obama is failing to cut the spending. People are sick of this overspending. He is overspending by a factor of 10 over what his predecessor, George Bush, overspent. So President Obama is being entirely irresponsible, and he's failing to lead. That's what I intend to do as president of the United States: I'm only going to submit balanced budgets and sign balanced budgets. I'm not willing to spend one dime more than what we take in.
HILL: So you're saying you wouldn't have let this happen, but, at least, a two-month extension for 160 million Americans- they may have preferred that to nothing January 1, Congresswoman.
BACHMANN: Well, this isn't going to help anything. This is a temporary gimmick, and we're going to have another big crisis within two months. Stop it! We need to stop, Erica, these crises and really grapple with the problem. That's what I said last summer; that's what we should do.
HILL: You are, of course, in Iowa ahead of the Iowa caucuses. I know this is, sort of, hometown territory for you in many ways. You put a lot of focus here. There's been some talk that Bob Vander Plaats [CEO of The Family Leader] actually called you over the weekend, and asked you to step aside, and to throw your support behind Rick Santorum. Did that call actually happen?
BACHMANN: Yes, there was a call that was made, but it didn't make sense, because my numbers have always been above Senator Santorum's. So it makes no sense for me to drop out. What we're seeing on the ground is a tremendous shift. In our last debate last Thursday, people saw how I took it to Ron Paul on foreign policy. There's an article that came out this morning on Huffington Post that said of all of the candidates in the race, I'm the only one that will be able to debate Barack Obama on the stage and defeat him. And I think it's very important that we have a candidate that can go toe-to-toe with Barack Obama. I have already in Washington. He knows me. I've taken him on ObamaCare and Dodd-Frank, because I know what to do to put the economy back on the right foot. I'm a former federal tax lawyer- I'm a job creator myself- I know what to do to turn the economy around.
[CBS News Graphic: "Race For 2012: Bachmann Losing Social Conservative Endorsements"]
HILL: Your support, though, is low. In the latest CBS News poll out yesterday, 3% of voters think you have the best chance of beating President Obama next November. Four percent would vote for you. There's some concern, too, among social conservatives, including Chuck Hurley from The Family Leader, who said, at this point, we think the conservatives should get together, talk amongst themselves, and figure out who could be the best for every job, because not everybody can be president. Are you concerned at all about splintering that conservative vote?
[CBS News Graphic: "CBS News Poll, Among Republican Primary Voters: 2012 Republican Nomination For President: Gingrich, 20%; Romney, 20%; Paul, 10%; Perry, 6%; Bachmann, 4%; Margin Of Error: +/- 6 Pts."]
BACHMANN: Well, I have the most support here in Iowa among the evangelical community. It's a very strong base and level of support. I have the former head of The Family Leader, who's endorsed me- (coughs) excuse me- as well other leaders here in Iowa. I have over a hundred pastors that have come out and said they support me. And last week, we had a caravan traveling across Iowa of faith leaders- evangelicals- saying that I am the best candidate who represents the evangelical community. I have a huge level of support. We're not looking at the national polls. We're looking here in Iowa, and here in Iowa, the tide has turned, an electric light switch gone off, and there- we have tremendous momentum here in Iowa.
HILL: Congresswoman Michele Bachmann, thanks for your time this morning.
BACHMANN: Thank you.
- Matthew Balan's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
So Republicans pass a
Submitted by MrSnuggles on Wed, 12/21/2011 - 1:56pm.
So Republicans pass a bipartisan bill in the house, send it to the senate, and the demorats say "sorry, that bill is DOA" and the media says nothing about compromise or stonewalling or obstructionism.
Then the senate passes a bipartisan, unworkable bill which the house says is DOA and then the media pulls out all the stops and slander to blame Republicans?n
Reality
Submitted by ahusser on Wed, 12/21/2011 - 5:06pm.
Whatever the merits or demerits of the Payroll Tax bill and honestly I don't understand exactly what was at stake, promised or un-promised nuts and bolts in the bill. The Republicans are again not being smart. The media and Dems have made it look as if the Republicans want to raise taxes and dear leader wants to lower them. Now isn't that a switch. Can anyone in the GOP make it look as if they are not just a bunch of obstructionist dumb ass boobs. Can anyone in the GOP leadership get their heads out of their you know what and start to out strategize and out think the Dems politically. The Dems, with media connivance, are playing the GOP like a Stradivarius outplaying and out thinking them at every turn. Being right and being smart are two different things. The soundbite and perception is king. We are losing again. We may even lose the House again if we don't get smart fast. We definitely won't win the Senate or Presidency with this lack of political savvy and strategy.
"Somehow, I told you so, just doesn't quite say it." Will Smith in 'I, Robot.'
Reagan's dead
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Thu, 12/22/2011 - 3:48am.
He ain't walking through the door. He could manipulate the media like nobody's business. He was an actor, and that helped.
Nothing the right says will be portrayed accurately by the media. Lies will be sold as truth. As bad as it was in Reagan's day, it is much, much worse now. The media will define the terms, and will determine what is truth and what is not...no matter the truth of the matter.
It just ain't easy getting the truth out past the media filter.
I agree Restless 1
Submitted by ahusser on Thu, 12/22/2011 - 11:26am.
I was listening to a conservative talking heads show this morning. The Rep. congressman (caught the end don't know his name) stated that what was going on can't really be explained in a 10 second sound bite and that the Payroll Tax issue was complex. This is true but we have to try to get the message down to a 10 second sound bite, try to gain the high ground out think these guys. We did it enough to win the House last election but we could lose all the good that was done by boneheaded plays.
We had them on the run in '94 and Reagan wasn't really in the picture then and back then it was Newt as speaker of the house. For all his faults he can think on his feet and attack. But he is out of the picture until he becomes the candidate and has some official standing. Meanwhile I think a little patience and rope a dope is in order until we get a candidate, take some hits so we don't lose it all by seeming to be angry and inept.
"Somehow, I told you so, just doesn't quite say it." Will Smith in 'I, Robot.'
This is all so stupid it makes my teeth grow hair
Submitted by StarAZ on Wed, 12/21/2011 - 2:12pm.
This is not a tax increase--it is a return to the old withholding--for people with jobs, be glad you have one! It was stupid to cut it before, stupid now, won't create or "save" jobs, will screw up accounting systems, is just plain dumb. The whole thing. These people need to shut up and be gone.
And yet another Obamaton.
Submitted by DumbCanuck on Wed, 12/21/2011 - 2:12pm.
'nuff said.
"There... Are... Four... Lights!"
Taxes
Submitted by Jersey Girl on Wed, 12/21/2011 - 2:13pm.
Do I remember weeping, wailing and gnashing of teeth when bubba increased taxes on social security, RETROACTIVELY?
Not a peep.
Bachmann seems to have bested Hill
Submitted by TheHistorian on Wed, 12/21/2011 - 4:05pm.
within the soundbite arena. Hill's only mantra was "can't you compromise".while Bachmann appeared to tell how they already had compromised and that Harry and Mitch tried the s**t sandwich approach (she was too nice to call it that, however). The man who should be running for cover right now is Mitch McConnell for not only having compromised on this 2-month stupidity (the average person would get $160, which in Tom Daschle terms is "half a muffler"). All the while it is going on (at huge software preparation costs for the payroll industry), the Dems would continue to hammer the Republicans on the issue, WHILE IT WAS THAT THE REPUBLICANS HAD GIVEN THEM THE YEAR OF REDUCTION TO START WITH!!!
Where is the Republican pushback which should be saying "the Democrats want to raise your mortgage for the next 30 years if you live in CA, NY, even OH and are an average family" in order to give a 60-day reduction to Social Security payments. This is a stealth tax increase on most homeowning families.
Dennis Prager
Just kick in some of that Obama boodle.
Submitted by JLin on Wed, 12/21/2011 - 4:59pm.
The guy just wasted $5 Trillion taxpayer dollars. He can't find a few billion more to pay for political gamesmanship?
We have a Vichy/Quisling media in charge of our news.
Submitted by JLin on Wed, 12/21/2011 - 5:01pm.
This is the only reason the Marxists have gained as much power as they have - and that in turn came through their conquest of the public education system.
Hill is right --- there is a risk
Submitted by Galvanic on Wed, 12/21/2011 - 5:34pm.
A friend told me of an experiment with children, in which each child was told that they could have a candy bar now, or they could wait 30 minutes and have two candy bars. The vast majority of the children opted for the candy bar now.
The point with that story is that most of the public isn't going to listen to the logical explanation offered by Boehner, Bachmann, or anyone else for getting the 12-month extension later. They will take the 2-month extension now rather than wait a few days to get the 12 month extension later.
looks like Newt?
Submitted by oldfart on Wed, 12/21/2011 - 8:56pm.
Would it be better if the House looked like Nacy P?