Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

February 12, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS
Home » Blogs » Matthew Balan's blog
  • Evan Thomas and Chris Matthews: Jackie and Serial Adulterer JFK Had a 'Good' and 'Full' Marriage
  • Bozell Column: Another Fleeting Failure for NBC
  • Martin Bashir Implies GOP Too Racist to Have Marco Rubio as VP Candidate
  • Barbara Walters, Shameless Hypocrite: Hits Kennedy Mistress for Greed, Tells Her She Should Have Stayed Quiet
  • NY Times Writers Rush to Obama's Defense Like It's Their Job
  • Rachel Maddow Trumpets Inane 'Amish Bus Driver' Analogy for Obama Contraception Rule
  • MRC's Bozell Scolds Media's Reluctance to Cover HHS Birth Control Mandate
  • Chris Matthews Excoriates: Rick Santorum Is a 'Theocrat' and Franklin Graham Is a 'Disgrace'

CNN Portrays ‘The Da Vinci Code’ Movie as Sin ‘Too Grave to be Forgiven’

By Matthew Balan | June 19, 2008 | 14:05

Change font size:  A |  A
Matthew Balan's picture

Jennifer Eccleston, CNN | Screencap from CNN on June 18, 2008 | NewsBusters.orgCNN, following in the footsteps of ABCNews.com’s overblown take on the subject, couldn’t help but to insert snotty language into its report on the Catholic Diocese of Rome’s denial to the filming of the movie adaptation of Dan Brown’s "Angels and Demons." CNN international correspondent Jennifer Eccleston, closing her report on Thursday’s "American Morning," labeled the Church’s refusal, based on "The Da Vinci Code" book and movie’s bashing of the Catholic faith, "a big problem in Rome, where some sins are just too grave to be forgiven -- even if they're for art's sake."

"Sins" that are "just too grave to be forgiven" calls to mind Matthew 12:32, where Jesus Christ refers to blasphemy against the Holy Ghost as a sin that won’t be forgiven "neither in this world, nor in the world to come." It isn’t certain that Eccleston had this scriptural quotation in mind, but she certainly gave the impression that the Church is being "un-Christian" for not letting Ron Howard and Tom Hanks film there.

Eccleston also played a clip of movie critic Tom O’Neil of "In Touch Weekly," who was more overt about the Church acting in an un-Christian manner. "The Church could have just turned the other cheek and quietly said no, you can't use our churches. Instead, they have vehemently denounced this movie publicly as an offense against God, as poison of the faith.... Wow, those don't sounds like typically Christian words."

O’Neil might not have heard that the Church had been quiet about it (not to mention Ron Howard and those involved with the filming). As the aforementioned ABCNews.com story put it, the Diocese of Rome refused permission in 2007, but the news didn’t leak until Monday, when the spokesman for the Diocese mentioned it in an interview.

Even with this, the portrayal of the Catholic Church as not "turning the other cheek" and using words that aren’t "typically Christian" leads one to conclude that CNN thinks the Church should have just taken it lying down. Would they have reacted the same way if the Martin Luther King’s Southern Christian Leadership Conference denied a racist film maker access to its facilities to make a film smearing the civil rights leader?

NewsBusters.org - Media Research CenterOn the other hand, Eccleston did run extensive clips of Father John Wauck denouncing the film, so there is equal time in terms of the sound bites she ran. However, right before she ran the first clip of Fr. Wauck, Eccleston ran file footage of men burning a copy of the Italian edition of "The Da Vinci Code,"giving an even stronger impression that Catholics are reacting to Brown’s works in an un-Christian manner.

The full transcript of Jennifer Eccleston’s report, which aired 51 minutes into the 6 am Eastern hour of Thursday’s "American Morning:"

JOHN ROBERTS: Calling all the angels and maybe a few demons as well -- live pictures this morning from Rome where there's a controversy brewing between Tom Hanks and Ron Howard and the Catholic Church. The stars are filming the prequel to the blockbuster movie 'The Da Vinci Code.' It's called 'Angels and Demons.' But the Church has banned them from filming inside the Vatican and any church in Rome for that matter. We sent our Jennifer Eccleston out to capture the story for you.

JENNIFER ECCLESTON (voice-over): From the ancient to the avant-garde, from the humble to the heavenly. They're all off-limits to some of the biggest names in Hollywood, at least while Tom Hanks and Ron Howard are on the job, filming 'Angels and Demons,' the prequel to Dan Brown's novel and monster hit, 'The Da Vinci Code.'

IAN MCKELLEN (as "LEIGH TEABING") : Witness the biggest cover-up in human history.

TOM HANKS (as "ROBERT LANGDON"): Da Vinci.

ECCLESTON: The blockbuster film's premise? Jesus Christ married Mary Magdalene and fathered children. Many Catholics found it offensive, the Vatican called it a potpourri of lies.

FATHER JOHN WAUCK, HOLY CROSS UNIVERSITY, ROME: It's a little surprising that the same people would be coming now to Rome, looking for permission to film inside churches, and to film a movie that is, itself, also, a caricature of the Catholic Church.

ECCLESTON (on-camera): 'Angels and Demons' features similar church intrigue, evil cults, and the murder of Catholic clergy. But unlike 'The Da Vinci Code,' it is almost entirely set in Rome, and filming here was a must.

ECCLESTON (voice-over): Street scenes and ancient piazzas no problem, but the producers also wanted to shoot in the Vatican and in two historic Rome churches, where in the book, two cardinals are murdered. The Vatican said no, with one official telling an Italian paper it would be an 'offense against God.' To one movie critic, that's an overreaction.

TOM O'NEIL, IN TOUCH WEEKLY: The Church could have just turned the other cheek and quietly said no, you can't use our churches. Instead, they have vehemently denounced this movie publicly as an offense against God, as poison of the faith.... Wow, those don't sounds like typically Christian words.

ECCLESTON: Father John Wauck says artistic license is one thing, but in this case, 'punto e basta,' enough already.

WAUCK: Sometimes when you're interested in making money, it's necessary to do things that are somewhat sleazy, like caricature another person's religious faith, and apparently, from Hollywood's perspective, that's not a big problem.

ECCLESTON: But it is a big problem in Rome, where some sins are just too grave to be forgiven -- even if they're for art's sake. Jennifer Eccleston, CNN, Rome.

Share this

About the Author

Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Matthew Balan on Twitter.
  • Anti-Religious Bias
  • Christianity
  • Culture/Society
  • Religion
  • Dan Brown
  • Jennifer Eccleston
  • Ron Howard
  • Tom Hanks
  • Tom O'Neil
  • American Morning
  • CNN
  • Matthew Balan's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB

 

 

 

  • Idea of the Democrats better than the reality (Wisc. State Journal)
  • The cynical and self-contradictory Gospel of Obama (Krauthammer)
  • Video: Protesters at CPAC admit they're being paid to protest (Daily Caller)
  • Does the drug 'ella' cause abortions? (Weekly Standard)
  • Does income inequality cause global warming? (Power Line)
  • Jay Carney gets snippy about Super PACs (Verum Serum)

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Recent comments

  • Not a bad idea, Jer, but ---
    37 min 42 sec ago
  • Ran off the road by her entourage, in Kiholo bay
    41 min 56 sec ago
  • Catholic Employers
    49 min 38 sec ago
  • What's next?
    57 min 53 sec ago
  • Way to go Cool!
    1 hour 9 min ago
More >

Try a Sweater Vest, Mitt
more cartoons
  • Weekend General and Sports Open Thread
  • Mitt Romney's Full Address to CPAC
  • Daily Kos Week in Review: Confusing Ground for Religious Haters
  • Newt Gingrich's Full Address to CPAC
  • Newt Gingrich: As President I'll Repudiate 40% of Obama's Government on Inauguration Day
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Editorial Associate
Aubrey Vaughan

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.