Breaking News? CNN Listens to Sandra Fluke Explain Why She's Voting for Obama
Breaking news! Liberal activist Sandra Fluke will be voting for President Obama! CNN thought this announcement not only worthy of a CNN.com op-ed, but hosted Fluke in person for an interview during the 9 a.m. hour of Newsroom on Thursday.
Fluke was welcomed on cable news after she was publicly defamed by Rush Limbaugh -- and was published on CNN.com -- and on Thursday CNN's Carol Costello hailed her as the "woman who became the face of the fight over whether insurance plans should cover contraceptives." So the religious organizations who were affected by the HHS birth control mandate were not also the faces of the debate?
As she began the interview, Costello had to tee Fluke up one more time about the Rush Limbauh controversy, playing the "slut" remark. "So, when you hear that stuff from Rush Limbaugh today, what goes through your mind?" she asked the liberal activist.
In her special to CNN.com that Costello twice mentioned, Fluke sounds the alarm about how "rights that generations of women fought so hard to achieve could be rolled back easily," and hits Romney for offering "only frightening promises to send us backward."
Costello did press her guest over the youth unemployment rate under Obama – before referring to her CNN.com article one more time. "But when you look at the unemployment figures for young people, they are pretty abysmal. Why should young people, the millennial generation, enthusiastically support this president?"
A transcript of the segment, which aired on June 14 on CNN Newsroom at 9:15 a.m. EDT, is as follows:
CAROL COSTELLO: So when you hear that stuff from Rush Limbaugh today, what goes through your mind?
SANDRA FLUKE, activist endorsing Obama: The same thing that went through my mind when I heard it earlier. Just that it's an attempt to silence women, to take them out of the conversation. But, you know, as you introduced, I'm here today to talk about the President and why I'm voting for him for re-election. And why his policies are so important to young women like me.
COSTELLO: You were a Georgetown student. Now you're a full-blown political activist. And, like you said, you wrote this op-ed for CNN.com. You endorsed the President. Do you think people will take your endorsement seriously?
FLUKE: Well, I think that they can take it for what it's worth. I have looked very closely at these policies. And I take very seriously anything that I take a position on. That's actually why I waited until now to endorse anyone in this presidential election. I felt that a lot of people were looking to me for my opinion, following these controversies. And I wanted to remain nonpartisan and to just specifically look at which policies I could support.
But I have just concluded that Governor Romney must not be looking for the vote of people like me because he's not taking a stand on issues that are really important to me. Issues like the Paycheck Fairness Act or, you know, so many other things that I'm concerned about.
COSTELLO: Well, by the same token, Mitt Romney's favorability rating among women is rising. And if he doesn't care about these things that you're talking about, why do you suppose that is?
FLUKE: I think that he's recently been selected as the Republican nominee. And there's inevitably a consolidation around a nominee when that occurs, and that's what we're seeing. That said, for months now we have seen the President having a considerable lead among women. And that's because they know that he is a strong leader for the policies that we care about. Policies like affordable access to education, in terms of student loan rates. And policies like the Paycheck Fairness Act, the Violence Against Women Act.
COSTELLO: But when you look at the unemployment figures for young people, they are pretty abysmal. Why should young people, the millennial generation, enthusiastically support this President?
FLUKE: Actually, I saw something on ABC recently that things are increasingly – that this is the best time for employment opportunities for young college graduates since this recession started. And I think that the difference between Governor Romney and President Obama is that both of them are very focused on improving the economy for all of us, but President Obama is focused on improving it for all of us, not just for a select, wealthy few, and he's focused on making sure that we have the rights and protections that we need in those jobs and in that workplace.
COSTELLO: I'm not sure that many college students who have just graduated would agree that the employment picture is looking any brighter.
FLUKE: The ones I have spoken to do, actually.
COSTELLO: Really, what do they say? Are they finding jobs? Because the college students that we talk with are having a difficult time.
FLUKE: Well, I have talked with lots of folks who I graduated with, in terms of law school graduates. This is the first year that things are looking up for them at increasing rates. And I am hearing that from graduates across the country.
COSTELLO: Although I must say graduating from Georgetown might have a certain bit of cache and maybe you can find a job easier because you went to such a great school. But students who went to public universities or community colleges, they are having a terrible time.
FLUKE: I have actually talked to students from across the country. So, I'm not just referring to Georgetown.
COSTELLO: Okay. Thank you so much –
FLUKE: But I think – what your point is, is how important the investment in education is for folks to be able to find employment when they graduate, and that's why the President's policies around student loans are so critical. He increased Pell Grants, our investment. He doubled that. And he is fighting to keep interest rates low. So for students who are going to any university or college, that's critical for them.
COSTELLO: Okay. So your op-ed appears on CNN.com.
FLUKE: It does.
COSTELLO: Okay. Thank you so much. Sandra Fluke joining us live this morning.
FLUKE: Thank you.
- Matt Hadro's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
I declare myself an expert!
Submitted by CobraMan on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 4:37pm.
"I have looked very closely at these policies. And I take very seriously anything that I take a position on."
Well, I'm the same way, which is why I can reasonably, accurately, and unbiasedly report that you're an Idiot.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
"I'm the bitch, I can bitch, oh the bitch is back...."...
Submitted by nonncom on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 5:15pm.
LOL.....the broad who needs 3 grand a year to pay for contraceptives....too funny....let's see, she'd have to screw 9 times a day, at a buck a rubber, 365 days a year to spend the 9 bucks a day to spend 3 grand a year....and that's considering that the guy bears no responsibility.....where were these broads when I was younger....LOL....oh, forgot to mention, at 9 times a day.....how does she walk?....
I think this is a shake down
Submitted by needle on Fri, 06/15/2012 - 7:59am.
Sandra Fluke is threatening to conceive, and she wants us to pay her off to not conceive.
- Looking forward to the self-annihilation of the Manipulated Stories Machine.
I will chip in for that!
Submitted by Free Stinker on Fri, 06/15/2012 - 8:04am.
I will chip in for that!
/// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 /// خال
LOL. She is still going to
Submitted by kg on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 9:15pm.
LOL. She is still going to school at 30. Someday she may even look for a job and be productive for once in her life....maybe.
"DumbAssity of Dope"
Moonbats don't reach puberty until 23 or so...
Submitted by SickofLibs on Fri, 06/15/2012 - 8:54am.
so still being a student at 30 is understandable.
Nope
Submitted by chiefpayne on Fri, 06/15/2012 - 11:41am.
Given her lack of intellectable capacity, I seriously doubt she will find a job...UNLESS she is willing to do for PAY what she apparently does a lot NOW for recreation.
A Great Romney Commercial
Submitted by libBuster on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 4:39pm.
Sandra Fluke and her ilk are walking advertisements Romney. A woman who claims to spend thousands a year on contraception. One can see through that like used neutrogena. .
Why is it important that I
Submitted by rbosque on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 4:42pm.
Why is it important that I know how this slut votes? Like we don't know already? What a stupid self-absorded ass!
Correction: she always was an activist
Submitted by JeffC... on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 4:43pm.
I was on pins and needles, waiting to find whom she would endorse. /sarc
She looked at ObamaCare looking for free goodies. It's not like she's ever going to have to worry about money, with her rich fiancée.
She'll make a great activist lawyer. She'll only demand First Amendment rights for herself and her clients.
National Lawyers Guild
Submitted by libBuster on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 5:02pm.
Do you see Fluke in the "National Lawyers Guild" or running for Congress?
Take Pelosi's seat when she retires
Submitted by JeffC... on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 5:04pm.
Although I don't think most of Pelosi's constituents NEED free contraception.
The Fluke Paradox
Submitted by libBuster on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 5:36pm.
Fluke creates quite a conundrum for the pro-life movement. Who in the movement would urge Sandra Fluke not to have an abortion? The term Senator Moynihan used for such situations was, "benign neglect".
Now that you ask, yes I do. The National Lawyers Guild,
Submitted by UpNorth on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 7:12pm.
that is. I can actually see her in court, extolling the virtues of the Cleveland 5, telling all who will listen that they were just protesting the evil Ryan budget, Romney, and anyone who doesn't think like her.
Delusional Fluke
Submitted by crimsonspark on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 4:45pm.
I felt that a lot of people were looking to me for my opinion, following these controversies. Umm, not really. This twit really thinks highly of herself doesn't she. Weren't her fifteen minutes up loooong ago?
Sandra Fluke, a real fluke
Submitted by CharlieSargent on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 4:46pm.
Any one who worked with Anita Dunn, an avowed admirer of Mao Tse Tung, is a pathetic individual and who cares about her sex life?
If CNN thinks this is big
Submitted by motherbelt on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 4:56pm.
If CNN thinks this is big news, they are even more stupid than I thought.
What's next: a full-hour report on how she came to this agonizing decision?
Sandra is a true American hero!
Submitted by Newsbubba on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 5:01pm.
We should name an all-girls school after her; Fluke U.
Don't EVEN want to know what the school mascot ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 5:49pm.
would be.
Or what name the athletic teams would go by.
MD
That's a tough one.
Submitted by Newsbubba on Fri, 06/15/2012 - 2:06pm.
Crimson Tide is already taken.
Maybe just call them the Ups?
So who's watching?
Submitted by tincan53 on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 5:27pm.
If Ms. Fluke is being interviewed on CNN, then who's left to watch? No one!
aren't her 15 minutes up yet?
Submitted by caveman1313 on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 5:28pm.
as i predicted, they will just keep digging this gal out of the dustbin of history and dusting her off and presenting her to the world as still being relevant (if she ever was relevant)
Fluke is a flake
Submitted by ohio granny on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 5:35pm.
Fluke is a flake. Or other not so nice words.
This changes everything
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 5:36pm.
Sandra Fluke voting for Obama?
Sure glad CNN got us up to speed on this juicy bit of news.
In other news, Amber Lee Ettinger is making the circuit with a tease that she's not quite as excited about the Preezy as she was in 08.
Could we see an October Surprise with her finally endorsing Obama again? Stay tuned!
SHEEEESH!
She uses 'folks' just like her lord Obama.
Submitted by ant on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 5:42pm.
"...I talk to a lot of the folks that I graduated with." Wait a minute!...she graduated? So why in the hell was she whining 'victim' that her birth control wouldn't be covered by the school she was presumably attending because it's Christian?
graduated...
Submitted by Orpheus75 on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 5:45pm.
Goes to show that a degree doesn't mean you're smart or intelligent, just "educated"
uh....
Submitted by Orpheus75 on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 5:44pm.
the "Paycheck Fairness Act"???? Seriously????? I feel like I've stepped into Bizarro world!
Fluke you
Submitted by 125 grain on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 5:47pm.
Absurd "journalism".
In the interest of fairness have Rush on explaining why he will be voting for Romney...? At least you'd get a taste of truth but then again your head would probably explode.
-Wal-mart $5 Ms. Fluke
An 11
Submitted by spallatial on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 6:06pm.
on the BS meter
Liserable Miberal Chicks
Submitted by Teufel Hund on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 6:09pm.
What does this miserable twit need contraceptive for? The closest shes been to a pecker is Ellen Degeneres strap-on dong.
Devil Dog ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 7:46pm.
You offer some good comments in your posts - but you might consider that on occasion some of your phrasing is a bit rough.
Don't mean to sound prudish, as my language is not always commendable, nor do I mean to come across as a wise-guy; just asking that you try and be a tad more considerate towards our conservative lady posters.
As far as lib trolls, now; kick their ass.
MD
Really, matthew???
Submitted by motherbelt on Fri, 06/15/2012 - 8:29am.
You offer some good comments in your posts
It apparently doesn't take much to impress you.
The guy has posted 4 comments including this one , two of which I wouldn't repeat here, one that was "You live by our rules now" and another that said "Activist churches we're coming for you too"
And you think he has something to offer?
Sheesh.
Well excuuuuuuuse me, motherbelt, for ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Fri, 06/15/2012 - 5:41pm.
not offering up a post that was in lockstep with your preferences.
I figured the username Teufel Hund probably indicated time spent in the military, and was trying to achieve a bit of balance and just remind the guy to tone it down.
So much for attempting to stick up for the ladies in a measured way; next time I'll just insist that the no good s.o.b. castrate himself with a dull knife.
Thank you, motherbelt, for your incisive and expressive acknowledgement that anyone who posts without a 100% certainty their posts will be completely understood, should be chastised.
Sheesh, indeed.
MD
MD
Submitted by Radical1979 on Fri, 06/15/2012 - 5:55pm.
Thanks for your effort. It really is appreciated when one of the guys asks another guy to tone it down. I'm not one to be looking a gift horse in the mouth (hope you don't mind the analogy).
So thanks again.
sorry matthew*
Submitted by cajun2 on Fri, 06/15/2012 - 5:59pm.
caj misunderstood as well. Didnt know that his post name was some kind of military reference.
I thought it was just Toofull Hand since it went well with his sexual references.
It is often easy to misinterpret or ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Fri, 06/15/2012 - 9:47pm.
misunderstand the intent of a particular post; and as it happens with regularity, it is probably a good thing that it is neither a sin nor a crime to do so. :o(
If I had a question about, or was unsure of a poster's intent, I would hope to always avail myself of an interrogatory tone in a reply - in order to seek clarification - rather than initially using what might be seen as an accusatory tone that might resemble condemnation.
In the greater scheme of things, though, no harm, no foul - and certainly no lasting animosity towards anyone who feels it necessary to call me out - as it is up to me to be clear in the first place.
In dealing with vicious liberal trolls, however, since they are foul, I don't consider the use of vapid, vacuous verbiage, to be virtuous. :o)
MD
matthew, I stand by my
Submitted by motherbelt on Sat, 06/16/2012 - 8:13pm.
matthew, I stand by my original comment.
All I did was rag on you a little for an exaggerated attempt to placate the offender with a compliment when you obviously knew nothing about him.
TH posted 3 comments before this one.
HERE
HERE
HERE
That's what I saw when I clicked on his name.
Now what's that you were saying about his offering some good comments?
motherbelt, you use your choice of words to ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Sat, 06/16/2012 - 8:32pm.
support your contention.
How novel, that.
I said I was trying for a little balance, rather than busting the guy's chops first crack out of the barrel in my first post to him; you choose to say I was placating an offender with an exaggerated attempt.
I most certainly unload on libs and trolls - and have no problem with commenting on posts by anyone whose 'category' I am unsure of.
My "decisions", whether interpreted correctly by you as to what I intended, or not, are mine to make.
You are an intelligent person, but you aren't a mind reader.
You are opinionated, as we all are; but as I do not consider you a doyenne to whom I must kowtow, neither am I required to consider your opinion regarding my posts sacrosanct.
Mistakes in interpretation can be, and are made, by everyone; myself included.
That said, talk to me, rather than at me or down to me, and I will reply in kind.
MD
Sorry, matthew, I thought I
Submitted by motherbelt on Sat, 06/16/2012 - 10:38pm.
Sorry, matthew, I thought I WAS talking TO you.
Of course your decisions are yours to make. And I never said you must kowtow to me, or to anyone else. Lord knows there are a number of people who disagree with me on any given day, on any number of subjects.
We had a disagreement; I was holding up my end of the discussion, giving you my reasons for what I said in the first comment.
I realize you were trying to "soften the blow" so to speak. But if you're going to compliment someone on good points, you might want to check and see what those points are. I'm sure you wouldn't want to give TH the idea that you were impressed with his previous posts, if you had seen them.
What the hell....it's moot; he's a hit and runner who's probably already gone.
Truce?
motherbelt ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Sun, 06/17/2012 - 12:03am.
a post from you that replicates almost exactly the thoughts that have been going through my mind.
The Teufel Hund had said something along the lines of going after activist churches - and I flashed on that crazy bunch that had protested at American military funerals - and agreed with that.
Pretty flimsy, at best, eh?
Disagreements pretty much permeate most of these NB threads; and though we may on occasion disagree, you will always have my respect.
You take a position, explain it, and defend it if necessary.
Can't ask for more than that :o)
My apologies for not being a gentleman and being first to extend the olive branch.
matthew
~Name calling and sexual references
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 8:53pm.
I can overlook.
Your criminal lack of wit, originality, humor, and savoir faire while doing so, however, is unforgivable.
Bru
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 9:05pm.
I'm thinking we have another plant here, what with the short tenure and language. Time will tell.
cajun is thinking*
Submitted by cajun2 on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 9:27pm.
Sandra Fluke had connections certainly, no other evidence from this woman that she deserves air time at CNN.
Let's imagine a real "ordinary" woman on CNN. We could choose Brunette, Ms Rad, heaven forbid, the Blonde, bobsmom would give them fits but ohhhh, how about motherbelt?
caj, first of all thanks for
Submitted by motherbelt on Fri, 06/15/2012 - 8:33am.
caj, first of all thanks for the compliment....
Her "connection" is that she has a message that CNN wants to spread.
While reading this blog, I was thinking, OK, so all of a sudden Fluke is some kind of "important person" who deserves to be commenting on a cable news show?
~Another example of 'famous for being famous'
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Fri, 06/15/2012 - 9:32am.
and 'famous because s/he furthers the narrative'. Move over, Meghan McCain.
Will anybody call her out on her lies?
Submitted by merly1 on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 6:31pm.
OCP's 9 bucks, no insurance needed, for years--> at Target, Walmart.
How does somebody who misleads so much, get such a forum?
How else can you explain
Submitted by JeffC... on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 7:22pm.
How else can you explain MSNBC?
Apparently CNN has just
Submitted by pgrossjr on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 8:10pm.
Apparently CNN has just thrown in the towel and accepted last place in cable news.
Drat! I just bet someone $100 that
Submitted by nolefan2 on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 8:33pm.
Sandra Fluke You would cast her vote for Romney. What was I thinking??? NOT. CNN must really be hard up for news if they have to put this out. I do not need her to tell me why she's voting for Obama. She's an idiot!!! And as far as Rush trying to silence women.....she needs to listen to his show and she might hear some intelligent women who call in. He is even nice to the occasional obnoxious liberal women who call in and try to set him off. She owes her 15 minutes of fame to Rush. Had it not been for him, most of us wouldn't even know who she is....not that we really care.
What was that line from "Clueless"?
Submitted by drsamherman on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 8:53pm.
Oh that's so five minutes ago! Or something like it.
Sandra Flake. That's so fifteen minute and a world of antipathy ago.
I think she should get her own show:
Submitted by hbnolikeee on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 9:20pm.
Call it something like "Your Bring the Rubbers".
Shocker
Submitted by JANDJ on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 9:50pm.
It's good that CNN is available to provide us all with such earth shattering news. No wonder the network occupies the place it does today...
Rush did not defame her.
Submitted by BBallleaper on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 9:53pm.
The woman is by all measure a whore; a trollop, a ho, a prostitute, a harlot, a kept woman, a slut, a wench, a bitch, and an insufferable bore. Now exactly how is that demeaning her. By the way, she looks a lot like a man. Just saying!
Just another....
Submitted by Hog_Flambe on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 11:34pm.
... example of mental masturbation.
:D
Dear Sandra,
Submitted by BarnicleBill on Fri, 06/15/2012 - 8:07am.
Where can I send my $9.00, so you'll lay down and go away?
Ratings
Submitted by Mike From Canmore on Fri, 06/15/2012 - 9:30am.
CNN's ratings are down. You don't say . . .
"Greens are people who never worried about a grocery bill". Freeman Dyson
birds of a feather
Submitted by rowdygirl on Fri, 06/15/2012 - 1:22pm.
It's pretty easy to see why she love Obama.. she's as big a narcissist as he is. These statements prove it:
"I'm here today to talk about the President and why I'm voting for him".. after all, her opinion is VITAL !
"I felt that a lot of people were looking to me for my opinion, following these controversies" ... she's so smart !
"Issues like the Paycheck Fairness Act or, you know, so many other things that I'm concerned about"... a woman of the people!
me, me, me.. it's all about them and what they want and think.
Tam
feeding frenzy alert!!!!!
Submitted by milootoole on Sat, 06/16/2012 - 11:12pm.
feeding frenzy alert!!!!!