CNN Lets NOW Say Why They Want Limbaugh Fired -- But Never Held Ed Schultz, Bill Maher to Similar Scrutiny
In the wake of Rush Limbaugh calling a Georgetown law student a "slut," CNN hosted the president of the liberal National Organization for Women who called for Limbaugh to be fired, on Monday morning's 10 a.m. hour of Newsroom. They did not give such a voice to supporters of conservative women last year when those women were under attack from liberals.
When liberal radio host Ed Schultz called Laura Ingraham a slut last May, CNN did not host the president of NOW to call for his termination at MSNBC. In fact, the network covered the outrage over Limbaugh's smear of Sandra Fluke far more than Ed Schultz's rant last May. A Nexis search revealed 35 hits for CNN's coverage of Limbaugh's "slut" remark since March 1, versus just four reports on Schultz in the week following his comment. [Video below the break.]
And amidst the Schultz coverage, CNN's female news anchor Randi Kaye even questioned the virulence of Schultz's smear, saying that there are "mixed interpretations" of the word "slut."
Last year when comedian Bill Maher used an obscene term to describe Sarah Palin, he was a welcome guest four days later on CNN's prime-time show In the Arena to bash the Tea Party. Host Eliot Spitzer even lauded Maher's HBO program as "brilliant."
Costello's interview with NOW president Terry O'Neill was largely soft. She even began by telling O'Toole "we rarely hear Rush Limbaugh apologize for anything," and admitted later that "maybe Rush Limbaugh is waging a war against women."
Costello did offer two half-hearted questions in defense of conservatives, arguing that Limbaugh is an "entertainer" and doesn't get politicians elected. But she also teed up O'Toole by flatly asking her "do you still want the guy fired?"
"Sure. Yes. Yes," the NOW head answered in the affirmative.
A transcript of the segment, which aired on March 5 on Newsroom at 10:19 a.m. EST, is as follows:
CAROL COSTELLO: Seven advertisers have now bailed on Rush Limbaugh's radio show, and the National Organization for Women or NOW – they want him fired. This all started last week when the conservative talk show host called a Georgetown law student, Sandra Fluke, a slut because she told Congress insurance companies should cover birth control. Listen.
(...)
COSTELLO: So many people were mad, including those seven advertisers. Limbaugh released a written apology over the weekend. Here is part of it.
(...)
COSTELLO: But that is not enough for NOW. Its President Terry O'Neill joins me. Welcome.
TERRY O'NEILL, president, National Organization for Women: Hi, Carol.
COSTELLO: I mean, we rarely hear Rush Limbaugh apologize for anything.
O'NEILL: (Laughter) That is a first. You know, taking Rush Limbaugh off the air, I'm under no illusions. It's not going to end the war against women, but he went so far over the line in attacking an individual, ordinary citizen who all she did wrong was to testify before Congress about the importance of birth control to women's basic health.
And the way he attacked her personally was so far over the line that really, he doesn't belong in part of this conversation. And meanwhile, we are trying to stop the overall war against women, and taking him off the air will abate a little part of that, but certainly not all of it.
COSTELLO: Well, maybe Rush Limbaugh is waging a war against women, but you know, other conservatives and – who talk about this birth control issue say it is a religious liber – and they have a point, right? But you're focusing –
O'NEILL: No.
COSTELLO: Well – they would say they have a point.
O'NEILL: I do hear where they are coming from. The problem is that the First Amendment both says that there shall be no abridgement of the freedom of religion, but it also says there shall be no establishment of religion.
And, what's going on with this whole religious conversation about putting birth control in ordinary health insurance plans is this. The Catholic bishops and the fundamentalist Evangelicals have not succeeded in convincing women not to use birth control. They have a First Amendment right to rail against birth control.
COSTELLO: Right.
O'NEILL: They don't have a right to use government to do what they can't do. Which is to take birth control away from women.
COSTELLO: Right. But it's a conversation that we should be having intelligently in this country, right? So going back to Rush Limbaugh, do you still want the guy fired?
O'NEILL: Sure. Yes. Yes. Because having that conversation about – about women's health care and the importance of birth control to ordinary health care is not advanced. It is not – we are not able to have a civilized conversation when one of the leading commentators for the conservative Republican Party, right, is out there using this vicious language against an ordinary young woman who simply wanted to testify before Congress. That goes so far beyond the pale that it prevents us from having that intelligent and thoughtful conversation, you know, that we need to have about these issues.
COSTELLO: I know that this isn't the first sexist comment that Rush Limbaugh has made because I've been a victim of Rush Limbaugh myself in that instance. But I figure he's an entertainer and of course, he might be a voice of the conservative Republican Party in this country, but he doesn't get political figures elected, he's an entertainer. Who cares?
O'NEILL: You know Carol, a lot of people say he does get political figures elected. There are a lot of people who believe he wields an enormous amount of power. And now his so called apology where he says, basically, oh I was just joking, that's all. That's really not what he was doing. In fact, when I – I first read his comments before I actually heard them and I read them and I thought, I haven't seen that kind of language since I was in seventh grade.
It seemed very juvenile and not that big a deal, but when a grown man is saying those things about this law student, really had a very ominous impact, to tell you the truth.
COSTELLO: Just a last question for you, because Rush Limbaugh's listeners say that the left isn't being very fair because when MSNBC's Ed Schultz called the radio talk show host Laura Ingram a slut, nobody said fire Ed Schultz.
O'NEILL: Oh there was a big flap about that. I mean, that's really not true. In fact, one of the things that puzzled me when Rush Limbaugh first came out and said what he said, was where are the conservative commentators? Now they have come out. George Will has come out and George Will has questioned some politicians, some very conservative politicians, for not coming out strongly against Rush Limbaugh. So I think we do come out sometimes.
Sometimes it's a little slow for both sides accuse each other of that. But, yeah, no, Ed Schultz got in a lot of trouble for doing that and appropriately so. My organization has repeatedly come – we have repeatedly criticized those who use inappropriate language against Sarah Palin, against Michele Bachmann, as much as against Hillary Clinton or Michelle Obama. So the tone really matters.
- Matt Hadro's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
I agree, the EIB network
Submitted by optimist on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 6:03pm.
I agree, the EIB network needs to fire Rush immediately. I think we should call EIB's CEO, anyone know who that is? /sarc
Well, since Rush has called
Submitted by killa37 on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 6:11pm.
Well, since Rush has called these NOW women the NAGS for years, Ii guess they have a lot of pent up anger and resentment.
Of course, we never see them going after any guy who makes obscene comments about Republican or conservative women.
NO(Liberal)W to the rescue once again
Submitted by lesterwink23 on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 6:20pm.
I was wondering how long it would take this group of hags to chime in on the Rush situation. They're not fooling anyone anymore; their purely partisan and ideologically inspired activism was exposed a long time ago. Hard-core feminists only need apply; conservative women are the enemy as far as NOW is concerned
NOW has spoken, so I guess
Submitted by spallatial on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 6:31pm.
NOW has spoken, so I guess Gloria Allred will be crawling out from under her rock with a new client shortly...
where was NOW when Bachman
Submitted by sometimesright on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 6:31pm.
where was NOW when Bachman and Palin(and other conservative women) were getting evicerated by the left and still are? they have selective "righteous" indignation. silent as the grave when a conservative woman gets lambasted but they can't shut up when a liberal woman so much as gets offended.
Not NOW, Not Ever...
Submitted by bigdaddy on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 7:02pm.
...Sorry but they sold out their credibility a while back when they drew the line on which women they would protect...
These
Submitted by bobsmom on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 8:15pm.
gals, who wouldn't have a job (think about it!) if it weren't for conservative men (the ones who own companies) and conservative women (who are the real powerhouses in the workplace), should henceforth be called "noun" because that is what they are. Real women who live the life are the verbs. And I'm one of them. I made my choices, I am VERY successful, and I really did it all on my own, by force of personality, and education (which I paid for on my own, contraceptives included). I do have it all. A great job, a beautiful home, a wonderful husband. And I didn't sacrifice ANYTHING. Do I have children? No, I don't, but that's a choice I made, because I wasn't sure I'd make a good parent. I didn't f(*k around and "erase" it later. I just made sure I didn't have kids that were an "experiment". Those are lives we're messing with.
Compared to Michelle
Submitted by DontFeedTheTrolls on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 8:21pm.
What names did our liberal friends call Condi Rice???
NOW should be
Submitted by nolefan2 on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 8:36pm.
changed to NOLW. They do not now and never have given any support to conservative women. Of course they want Rush fired. They have no clue about EIB. He would have to fire himself. Let these advertisers go their way. There will be others standing in line to advertise on his show. I am boycotting every single one of them that left his show.
Perspective: NOW Supports The Murder Of Baby Girls
Submitted by Blue Collar Todd on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 8:53pm.
Yeah, feminism makes sense. Name calling is worse than murder. I think the President of NOW should be fired.
http://bluecollarphilosophy.com/2012/03/now-president-wants-limbaugh-fir...
It has come to be pathetic
Submitted by brerol on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:45pm.
It has come to be pathetic listening to so many people discussing the latest about Limbaugh who have no clue whatsoever about some the language liberals have thrown at conservative ladies.
Ed vs Rush
Submitted by alvin on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 10:54pm.
Ed
(A) said this only once,
(B) apologized to her quickly, and
(C) was suspended.
Rush , on the other hand
(1) engaged in a heinous, multi-day onslaught that is well-documented now,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1oOjKQflN0&feature=player_embedded
(2) he hasn't apologized and
(3) he's certainly NOT suspended..
alvin vs. reality
Submitted by Trix Rabbit on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 11:05pm.
(A) Alvin the Chipmunk is a garden variety troll.
(B) Rush DID apologize. Just because Rush didn't do it in sackcloth and ashes doesn't make it less of an apology.
(C) The only group or persons that can "suspend" Rush are his advertisers - not the government, not congress, and sure as hell not Alvin the Chipmunk.
(D) It's way past Alvin's bedtime, but if he promises to be a good boy I will give him a cookie.
For the MSM: In your pomp and all your glory, you're a poorer man than me. As you lick the boots of death born out of fear.
Ian Anderson "Wind up"
And after alvin has finished his cookie, I will give him a ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 11:48pm.
big magnifying glass so that he may engage in an in-depth search for his teeny tiny testicles.
I say this in an eleemosynary way, so that alvin may, at some future point in time, make a post and actually stick around and defend it like a
manliberal who is sure of his stance, rather than emulating the eponymous rodent he is named for by scurrying away.MD
ALLLLLLLLLLLL-VIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Submitted by killa37 on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 2:20am.
ALLLLLLLLLLLL-VIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN!!!!!! So - what's your point??? Should Rush suspend or fire himself??? If he's got to answer to anyone - it's his sponsers, and a bunch of them pulled out - like the candy-ass queebies that they are. But I'm sure he has a LOT more waiting in the wings. And he apologized - although I'm not real happy about it, given what we know about the rebuked kook puke Fluke...........who's just another lib operative working for Soros and the REGIME.
On the other hand, the Fargo Fatass is a small-time player who is employed by a left-wing cable network, so maybe he had to 'cave' a little bit for his comment. Why isn't Donkeyface off the air?? Or any of these other loud and foul-mouthed lib gum-flappers??? If you combine them ALL, they still can't come close to matching Rush's audience or business model.
Hard to Warch
Submitted by cobokat on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 7:08am.
I can barely watch TV or read the web anymore. The hypocrisy is stunning and liberal media will have its way and they will do what it takes to re-elect this administration...a very sad day for this country.
Isn't it ironic that the lone
Submitted by NCfairandbalanced on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 11:01am.
Isn't it ironic that the lone dissenter can't even get his facts straight! Now, he may, and probably does think Rush's apology is lame. So say THAT! Don't say "he didn't apologize"!
The double standard here is so much stronger in this scenario than almost any other to come down the pike. Hence the call even by some libs themselves saying that double standard does exist here.
NOW to Rush... Fire, ahh, yourself!
Submitted by CobraMan on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 2:03pm.
NOW's message to Rush, your network employes a man, yourself, who has violated the boundaries of human decency. You should take responsibility, and fire yourself!
And they wonder why most people never take them seriously?
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.