CNN Praises Persistence of Wall St. Protests, 'Unignorable'
Citing a poll showing that 51 percent of Americans have heard of the Wall Street protests, CNN's American Morning co-hosts lobbed some compliments toward the protesters on Tuesday. Co-host Christine Romans made sure to emphasize that "the movement is really resonating."
This is the same network that has been following the protests for weeks and speculating if they will become the liberal version of the Tea Party. In contrast, CNN featured some controversial coverage of the original Tea Parties back in 2009, and anchor Anderson Cooper even employed an obscene term to describe them. [Video below the break. Click here for audio.]
Toward the end of Tuesday's 7 a.m. hour, CNN's Ali Velshi praised the persistence of the "Occupy Wall Street" crowd and credited them for making their protests "unignorable." Romans followed by touting their influence.
"I thought it was very interesting that more people know about 'Occupy Wall Street' than the Fed chief. You know?" Romans posed to her colleagues. "I mean, it just shows you how the movement is really resonating."
In the next hour, Velshi gave a soft interview to one of the "occupiers," where he thanked the protester at the end for "articulating your cause so well."
"I think that's – that's a great description of some of the frustration that people are feeling," he told protestor Priscilla Grim, co-editor of the "We Are the 99 Percent" blog, after quoting from the blog. Velshi asked her what she thought of the criticisms of the movement and of its coverage by the mainstream media.
A transcript of the segment, which aired on October 11 at 7:53 a.m. EDT, is as follows:
[7:53]
CHRISTINE ROMANS: This morning's "Roman's Numeral," the number in the news today. The number is 49 percent.
CAROL COSTELLO: Um. Um. The number of men in the world.
(Laughter)
ALI VELSHI: That's good. That's a good guess.
ROMANS: Actually, it's a lot of different things. But it's actually, today it's the percentage of people who say they have never heard of the "Occupy Wall Street" movement. Right? That's according to the ORC International poll, which means 51 percent have. Right? More than half have. If you're wondering how this compares to other things, say, the Federal Reserve chairman, Ben Bernanke, a poll last month found that 42 percent knew of him, had an opinion of the Fed chief. So more people know –
VELSHI: – of "Occupy Wall Street?"
ROMANS: So more people know of the Fed chief.
VELSHI: And the Occupy Wall Street people will tell you that the only reason 49 percent of people know it is because they feel that a lot of mainstream media has avoided the issue.
ROMANS: They've been after you a little bit about that, haven't they?
VELSHI: Yes. We haven't avoided the issue. And I got a tweet three minutes ago saying why aren't you covering the arrest in Boston. And I felt like saying, well why don't you watch our TV show because we actually are. So a lot of people just tweet that they hate the mainstream media, even though the mainstream media is covering this quite effectively.
And credit to the "Occupy Wall Street" folks, they've been going on so long about this, that it's unignorable.
COSTELLO: I thought it was very interesting that more people know about "Occupy Wall Street" than the Fed chief. You know? I mean, it just shows you how the movement is really resonating.
- Matt Hadro's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
Revolutionaries Without A Clue
Submitted by HardRightTurn on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 6:04pm.
Occupation is illegal.
To more fully comprehend the Left, one must read “Leftism As Psychopathy” by John Ray, M.A., Ph.D. Caution, it might scare you a little bit.
http://jonjayray.tripod.com/psycho.html
So what? More people have
Submitted by Jack Bauer on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 6:05pm.
So what?
More people have heard of Hitler. Doesn't improve their opinion of the murdering basterd.
All of the above Mr Obama? --- How about ALL OF THE BELOW, instead.
49 is the loneliest number
Submitted by Jack Bauer on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 6:11pm.
How about the Democrats Mormonophobia?
Oddly enough, in the latest Fox poll ....49% of Democrats actually say they would NOT vote for a Mormon to be President.
Talk about bigoted.
All of the above Mr Obama? --- How about ALL OF THE BELOW, instead.
and the tea-party was so
Submitted by sometimesright on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 6:15pm.
and the tea-party was so forgettable? at least they had a purpose, a goal. they've influenced elections. obtained permits to protest and when done quietly returned to their jobs and homes.
this rabble blocks traffic and bridges(permits be damned), obstructs businesses, picks fights with law-enforcement, public nudity and rampant sexual escapades, don't get me started on the verified public drug usage.
there can be no comparison between the two movements though one of them DESERVES to be forgotten.
I think the financing for the
Submitted by Hunter12 on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 9:52pm.
I think the financing for the Occupados will probably run out soon. After all, we haven't passed L'il Stimulus II yet. How can the DNC and the rest of the left keep funneling money to the "spontaneous" protesters, if their own funding is drying up?
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." - Sir Winston Churchill
So we are coming up on a
Submitted by Antisocial-ism on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 6:34pm.
So we are coming up on a month of these diseased freaks protesting and barely half the country knows these protests are happening. If I were these guys on CNN I wouldn't interpret that as a positive. It only shows how the MSM's influence is seriously in decline and no pays very much attention to you anymore.
No need to watch the media,
Submitted by Hunter12 on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 10:25pm.
No need to watch the media, you knew exactly what they were going to say and print as soon as these protests started:
"The GOP better pay attention now!"
"Here's a movement with teeth and they've sunk them in the truth!"
"Interview them from the upwind side, they really stink."
"Pass me that fatty."
I think the ones who were paid to start this and were not in the leadership will probably be heading for home once it starts to get cold. The leaders probably sneak into heated tents or off to quiet hotels after the daily media coverage departs. The gullible who will fall into any movement if a "poor, down-trodden" soul can be saved will probably attempt to stay the winter and cost the city they're camped out in thousands in medical and emergency care to save them from freezing to death. And the MSM will cry over their brave attempts.
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." - Sir Winston Churchill
People are ignoring the stinking hippies because it isn't 1969.
Submitted by drsamherman on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 6:47pm.
Not to mention there are more important issues voters are dealing with, say a runaway deficit and spending, an incompetent president and his corrupt administration, to name a few.
Oh dear
Submitted by Mister Orange on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 7:00pm.
I love this incessant hippie-blaming nonsense, as if 1) there is a hippie movement and 2) nothing has visually documented the diversity of the crowds. The more attention these protesters receive, the more the right will fight to devalue the movement. Fear is growing, this is only the beginning.
Have you watched the livestream?
Submitted by kata on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 7:04pm.
Read the meeting minutes? This stuff seriously writes itself.
Mister Funny strikes again
Submitted by Radical1979 on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 7:09pm.
Have you looked at the crowds? They look pretty much like hippies to me. You know, long hair, unwashed, and now, old.
But hey, what is the value of the movement? Because they are having such a hard time defining it maybe you can let us in on it.
Pending
Submitted by Mister Orange on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 7:11pm.
Ever figure out the opposite of "theist?"
Ever answer the question: DID YOU SERVE?
Submitted by drsamherman on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 7:16pm.
Did you?
Nope
Submitted by Mister Orange on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 7:32pm.
What's your point?
perhaps -
Submitted by kata on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 7:35pm.
it's that you have expectation that everyone have an answer to your questions, yet don't bother to extend the same courtesy.
I'll answer any reasonable questions directed to me
Submitted by Mister Orange on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 7:38pm.
Try me.
I did. Maybe you just missed it among the low hanging fruit.
Submitted by kata on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 7:42pm.
.
Anyone with a thousand usernames is not---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 7:44pm.
reasonable; in any way, shape, or form.
Add the fact that he sends filth through PM's - the word reasonable being typed on his keyboard is nothing short of a joke.
MD
How much are you paid for
Submitted by LAM SON 719 on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 11:34pm.
How much are you paid for each post? What free government benefits are yo demanding?
Did Angry Dead Black Irish Buttery Zippers serve?
Submitted by SickofLibs on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 11:09pm.
Sure. He serves up truckloads of trollsh*t here seven days a week.
Nice dodge Ted
Submitted by Rukus on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 7:19pm.
Again...
Pending= have absolutely no clue. As usual.
Only difference, Agent Orange---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 7:19pm.
between you and a ONE Trick Pony is that you have many, numerous, multiple, lotsa - usernames.
And despite the variegated roll call of same, your inane BS relegates all of them to being gnomobiotic.
MD
Mister Funny
Submitted by Radical1979 on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 7:27pm.
Ever figure out what you admitted to? That atheism IS a religion. Your words, not mine.
By the way, the "value" of the protests? Besides not letting Civil Rights icons speak because they are only as equal as everyone else.
Still no honesty, eh?
Submitted by Mister Orange on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 7:30pm.
Fine. I'll take what you have to say with a grain of salt.
"Still no honesty, eh?" ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 7:38pm.
this from the man of a thousand usernames - who generally plays dumb until cinched down.
The phrase 'dripping with irony' jumps to mind in place of 'dripping with sarcasm'.
MD
No honesty?
Submitted by Radical1979 on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 7:49pm.
OMG you are funny. From the guy who keeps denying what he said...
OMG!
Submitted by Mister Orange on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 7:55pm.
From the gal who's even more reading comprehension disabled than Mr RCD himself.
Here's a thought - why don't you go back to the proper thread and prove something. Anything. Then look up the definition of atheism.
Even better, let's discuss your religion on that other thread. Then you can get back to bashing the Wall St protestors.
Teddy,
Submitted by Radical1979 on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 7:58pm.
You're pretty hostile to me these days, what happened? And you dearie, were the one who brought up atheism on this thread, not me.
As far as giving me permission to bashing Wall Street Protesters AFTER I prove something (that's right out there in the open on the thread), nah. You're a ticking time bomb on these boards. You've outed yourself as a banned poster (again), and soon enough you'll tick the wrong person off (again) and it'll bye bye till you activate another sleeper account.
Hostile? Hardly.
Submitted by Mister Orange on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 8:10pm.
I can give and take like the rest. And unless I'm mistaken, my name has never been Teddy. Drop it.
I sense you completely missed WHY I instructed you to visit the other thread. I structured my sentences the same way I did with Bratton...We can discuss this subject, and then move on to that. You understood that as "ATHEISM IS A RELIGION!!!"
Get it? I'm as kind as the kindness others have shown me. You feel I'm not treating you as well as you'd like? I'm not handing out badges of respect until I see a little. I'm not holding my breath.
Class dismissed
Submitted by CobraMan on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 8:23pm.
So, now you take it upon yourself to 'instruct' others as to which threads to visit? Hay, who appointed you Headmistress?
And, as for your "badge of respect," who cares? This may come as a surprise to you, but most, if not all, of the people here don't need, nor do they seek, your approval and/or admiration. You're just not that important.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
Drop it, you say, Teddy---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 8:58pm.
ooh, ooh, I just love it when someone gives orders through a keyboard.
Especially when that someone considers himself the smartest someone, evah.
Well, ok - the smartest someone in the room.
It is to laugh.
MD
Let's play the "I'm not Ted Deddy" game boys and girls.
Submitted by The Vet on Wed, 10/12/2011 - 12:36pm.
Mister Orange: ...my name has never been Teddy. Drop it.
Mister Orange: I'm pretty certain my name has never been Ted.
Mister Orange: What the f--- is dead zuppers?
Mister Orange: What is dead zippers mean??
Mister Orange: Ted here. I gotta say...
Whoops.
Mister Orange: Ted here. Can you guys stop...
Dang it.
The Vet
Submitted by Radical1979 on Wed, 10/12/2011 - 12:41pm.
When he called me a gal, I knew it was Teddy. Boy I got him riled!
yawn...yawn
Submitted by Mister Orange on Wed, 10/12/2011 - 12:50pm.
Still waiting for an answer.
So am I
Submitted by CobraMan on Wed, 10/12/2011 - 1:05pm.
So am I. Who appointed you Headmistress?
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
poor ADK
Submitted by Radical1979 on Wed, 10/12/2011 - 7:34pm.
Boring yourself as well as the rest of us?
Poor Agent Orange---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 8:02pm.
The only arrows left in your quiver to loose at those who disagree with you are labeled RCD.
Really scraping bottom now, you are.
Liven it up, man - cut loose with your famed PM nastiness and filthy language right here on an open thread, so that by Friday we can all play the "What name is ADK/Ted/Deddy posting under now?"
MD
Easy question
Submitted by CobraMan on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 8:10pm.
"Ever figure out the opposite of "theist?""
Yea, its "antitheist." "Anti," of course, meaning "opposite to." Which, by the way, perfectly describes your opinions about religion. They're opposite to those of most of the world's population. And that brings us to a new word: "antithetical." As in: your thoughts and beliefs are antithetical to just about everyone else's.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
Agent Orange---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 7:08pm.
says 'the fear is growing'.
Fear of what?
Of whom?
How would something of no value be devalued?
MD
"Well, I'm not exactly
Submitted by kata on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 7:21pm.
"Well, I'm not exactly quaking in my stylish yet affordable boots, but there's definitely something unnatural going on here..."
Which defines most---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 7:23pm.
liberal undertakings. :o)
MD
Interesting that the poll
Submitted by Reaver on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 7:41pm.
Interesting that the poll question was have you heard of occupy rather than do you support occupy or agree with occupy.
So Velshi praised the lemmings on Wall Street?
Submitted by UpNorth on Wed, 10/12/2011 - 1:05pm.
He praised the persistence of the demonstrators? It's easy to be persistent, ticks are persistent, so are mosquitos. I would imagine that, with the reports of the goings-on in the "encampments", crabs and STD's will soon be persistent, also, not to mention overdoses.
Let's revisit one of their demands, a "livable" wage, whether they work or not. So, the lemmings just want to be paid to breathe. Yeah, I guess that does make them "unignorable", but not for the reasons they think.