Dylan Ratigan: Tea Party Gutted GOP of 'Political Traction' In Senate
MSNBC anchor Dylan Ratigan believes the recent developments in the GOP – including the rise of the Tea Party – have shredded the party of its "political traction" in the Senate.
When asked by guest-host Peter Morici, an economist and professor of business at the University of Maryland, how much the Tea Party has set the Republicans back in their bid to retake the House and Senate, Ratigan answered that the Tea Party has more than hurt their chances.
The developments in the GOP and the conservative movement in the past two years, Ratigan said, "made it almost impossible for the Republicans to find any political traction in the Senate – and that is something that is largely believed."
Of course, Ratigan forgot to discuss the Tea Party's populist contribution to the Republican Party – or what connection it may have to the GOP's predicted victory despite the party's overall poor ratings.
Appearing as a guest on Thursday morning's "Chris Plante Radio Show," Ratigan sounded off on the GOP's chances to take back the House and Senate and discussed what the Republican strategy would be post-election. Although the party is poised for a gain in both the House and Senate, Ratigan insisted that the American people's approval of Republicans is "abysmal" right now.
"The Republicans are going to accumulate more power at a time when they are still held in a phenomenally low regard," Ratigan opined. "If you look at the view of both parties, as we both know, they're just both abysmal."
Both pundits questioned how the Republicans are going to follow through on their Pledge to America, which promised the American people they would cut government spending, among other things.
"Well they're basically saying we need to spend less money, but they don't say how they're going to accomplish it. I really can't see that they have a basic theme," remarked Morici.
A partial transcript of the segment is as follows:
MORICI: Let me ask you this. Let me change gears a little bit, because I think we've kind of covered this. You have access to fantastic political analysts, being a part of the NBC network, you know, the NBC family. What do they really think is going to be the outcome in the Senate next week? How many seats are the Republicans really going to grab? And how much did the Tea Party actually hurt the Republicans on the Senate side?
RATIGAN: I think the Tea Party made it impossible for – I think the behavior of the Republican (Unintelligible) and then the subsequent campaign and the political development of the conservative movement, including the Tea Party, made it almost impossible for the Republicans to find any political traction in the Senate – and that is something that is largely believed.
At the same time, the ability for the Republicans (...) will be incredibly interesting to watch. The Republicans are going to accumulate more power in this election. Period. I don't know what the math will ultimately be – we'll see. But the Republicans are going to accumulate more power at a time when they are still held in a phenomenally low regard. If you look at the view of both parties, as we both know, they're just both abysmal. And it'll be interesting to see – unlike '94, for instance, when the Republicans had a much broader base of popular support for a basic concept of efficiency that Newt Gingrich was sort of championing – whether it was disingenuous or not, it doesn't matter, right, or how much of it actually happened. But that was the mime. What's the Republican mime in this election? Let me ask you, Peter. So they're going to have more power.
MORICI: Well they're basically saying we need to spend less money, but they don't say how they're going to accomplish it. I really can't see that they have a basic theme.
- Matt Hadro's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
New Republican Party
Submitted by Kingfish17 on Thu, 10/21/2010 - 7:01pm.
Ratigan has a total minscomprehension of what the Tea Party, and people who hold similar views of the Tea Party, is all about. True conservatives do not want a return of "liberal light" with a coalition of Rhinos, Country Club Blue Bloods,and conservative Republicans. We want a total repudiation of what's been going on in Washington DC, and a return of our Constitutional Republic. Power needs to be divested from Washington DC and returned to the people. If states like New York or California want to run a subsidised welfare government, then let them at it. People will flee those communist enclaves and sooner or later they will return to sanity or go broke in the process.
If it can't be acomplished by grabbing control of the old Republican party and forging it into something new, then a third party, and much longer and more painful transition, will be the next alternative.
"You can’t go take a trip to Las Vegas...on the taxpayer’s dime." Barack Obama
I agree
Submitted by Gat New York on Thu, 10/21/2010 - 9:36pm.
Ratigan has it backwards. The reason the GOP will not win a majority in the Senate is their inability to have a seamless message with the Tea Party activiists. They were late in understanding and including the Tea Party.
The other problem is the GOP organization nationally and in certain states. For instance in NYS - even in this pro-GOP year - it is possible that the GOP could have no change or a net loss.
Traction
Submitted by JustAl on Thu, 10/21/2010 - 7:04pm.
For some reason, when I read the title, my first thought was of a famous speach by someone the media of today would surely have hated.
"We're not going to just shoot the sons-of-b_____s, we're going to rip out their living G________d guts and use them to grease the treads of our tanks. We're going to murder those lousy Hun __________ by the bushel-_________-basket! "
Gen. Patton
Traction? We don't need no stinkin' "traction".
"made it almost impossible
Submitted by motherbelt on Thu, 10/21/2010 - 8:53pm.
"made it almost impossible for the Republicans to find any political traction in the Senate – and that is something that is largely believed.""Largely believed"...hmmmm....
Is that that new, updated version of "some say"? Believed by whom, Dylan?
(No subject)
Submitted by motherbelt on Thu, 10/21/2010 - 8:54pm.
OOPS.
Dylan the Transparent.
Submitted by samhermanmd on Thu, 10/21/2010 - 9:31pm.
As my old mathematics professors used to say, "...a proof of any concept requires that it is intuitively obvious to the casual observer...", meaning Dylan is about as original as a DNC talking points memo recycled through the Robert Gibbs. As much as MSNBC loves to label Fox News as the GOP communications department, it is too cowardly to admit it is the publicity wing of the DNC.
the political traction of say
Submitted by Vonu on Fri, 10/22/2010 - 1:06am.
Arlen Spector
whats the point
Yes, he is a rat ...
Submitted by Hippopaulimus on Fri, 10/22/2010 - 7:14am.
Aren't these the same people who were saying the Republican party was dead, just 18 months ago?
Yeah, these lib-tards are sooo concerned about the health of the Republican party....if they're against it, I'm all for it!
White - does not mean racist
Heterosexual - does not mean homophobic
Male - does not mean sexist
Youngsters
Submitted by ozarkian on Fri, 10/22/2010 - 5:41pm.
I recall reading numerous ad hominem attacks on message boards from kids-in-Mom's-basement last year, asking, "How does it feel to go the way of the Whigs?" I did attempt to explain the cyclical nature of politics, but at that age, whatever is Now will always Be.
Notice, too, how these commentators talk about "both parties" having such low ratings. Ahhh, but when you change it to "consevatives" and "liberals," that all changes.