Schultz's Class-Warfare 'Lean Forward': Why Are We Letting Top 2% Win Over Other 98?
In August, Ed Schultz reportedly erupted in the MSNBC newsroom over being excluded from the network's election night promos. According to the NY Post, network honchos threatened to fire Schultz if he pulled a similar stunt again.
Could there be some kiss-and-make-up going on at 30 Rock? Of all the MSNBC personages, the network apparently selected Schultz first to have his own spot in the "Lean Forward" series of network promos. It aired this afternoon during Chris Matthews "Hardball" . . . and the theme was pure class warfare.
Scolded Schultz: "Why are we letting the top 2% of the population win over the other 98?" View video after jump.
In Schultz's mind, there is a war out there. The top 2% can only "win" by defeating the others. The pie is only so big. The fat cats can only get rich by impoverishing their fellow citizens.
In fairness, Ed might be on to something. During the promo, he also asks "why can't America find solutions to its problems?" And there's little doubt that if the redistributionist "solutions" Schultz has in mind were ever adopted, the pie would indeed shrink, and government would determine all winners and losers.
Consider the chilling "all your money is belong to us" implications of Schultz's use of "letting" . . .
- Mark Finkelstein's blog
- Login to post comments
Comments
Please, I just had lunch. No more closeup photos of...
Submitted by jawebster1 on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 7:04pm.
that guy, OK?
Wow, the Fat Slob was walking. They usually roll him around.
Submitted by SickofLibs on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 7:07pm.
Heh.
Like Limbaugh
Submitted by Bretner on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 9:56pm.
Like Limbaugh
You must be familiar with that mode of transport
Submitted by Boudin on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:00pm.
You sound,,,,, offended.
Offended that Limbaugh is a
Submitted by Bretner on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:11pm.
Offended that Limbaugh is a fat pig? Not at all, I think it's hilarious.
The only pig I see here
Submitted by Blonde on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:14pm.
Is you.
Of course, I never make judgements about a person's appearance.....however....your behaviour leaves quite a bit to be desired, trollster.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Too late Dude
Submitted by Boudin on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:18pm.
But when the best you got is old stale cracks, what you going to do?
Really they pay you for this. We have had free trolls that were 10x more clever then you?
Join us in the present--Rush has lost a lot of weight
Submitted by nkviking75 on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 12:13am.
Have you seen a recent photo of Rush? He's dropped quite a bit of weight. Of course, the media uses photos of him at his heaviest whenever possible.
“Always love your country — but never trust your government!" -- Bob Novak (1931-2009)
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
Why not.
Submitted by theduck6 on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 7:39am.
They pay more than 50% of the taxes..
Special Ed has made some ridiculous rants and moronic statements. Rush is bombastic and opinionated but he backs up his opinion with facts and , even though I don't expect you won't admit it, is correct far more often than not. Special Ed is so frantic beccause he wants to be Limbaugh so badly he can taste it. He isn't and never will be but he refuses to see that. It isn't all he can't and won't see but that is a story for another day.
.........and poor , poor ,
Submitted by Barack_must_go..... on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 7:09pm.
.........and poor , poor , pitiful Ed finished up with........well they drove the bus into the ditch...you know........................now they want the keys back. Sad.....so very , very sad how this once proud metro-sexual man has , in such a relatively short period of time , slip so far down into the Obama abyss.
Barack_Must_Go.....
Schultz is a moron
Submitted by PeterStone on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 7:10pm.
...and the top 2% account for all the private sector jobs in the USA including his.
small business creates job,
Submitted by Bretner on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 9:57pm.
small business creates job, but they get ignored by your corporately owned party.
corporately owned party.
Submitted by Boudin on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:02pm.
You mean the guys Obama just gave over a trillion dollars too?
Are you going to be this pathetic all night, or do you have an original thought?
I remember Bush giving 700
Submitted by Bretner on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:09pm.
I remember Bush giving 700 billion to wall street, after 3 tax cuts.
Is that what you're talking about sweetie?
Which corporate buddy?
Submitted by cajun2 on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:24pm.
Do you mean the ONE who has given a pass to 10 of the largest coporations on meeting the new Health Care regulations? We have memories as well sto' bought. We remember the ONE talking trash about those evil companies of Wall St who are now his best buds getting exemptions, and waivers.
You need to up date your cue cards sto' bought.
Oh what to do with the uninformed
Submitted by Boudin on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:25pm.
Sorry dud, Bush was only allowed by the dimwits to spend 300bil of TARP. In witch he only spent 267bil. He was finished, he felt there was no more reason to spend the rest.
But of course your dimwits had other ideas.
Boudin...Obama's corporate recipients
Submitted by Jer on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 11:32pm.
Will you please identify the corporations which have received in the aggregate in excess of a trillion dollars from Obama, and the amounts each received? A relevant link will suffice.
Thanks...
Jer
Are you trying to make a point there Jer?
Submitted by Boudin on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 7:47am.
Or are you just asking questions that have no answers for the heck of it?
Maybe not corporations, but
Submitted by Newsbubba on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 10:50am.
would you settle for SEIU and maybe ACORN, along with other various and sundry union retirement funds that ended up with a ton of the stimulus even if it was filtered through corporations like, say, GM?
Jer
Submitted by bassndude on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 11:07am.
Try Fanny, Freddy and AIG...well over a trillion there. Fanny alone recived over a trillion in 4 seperate give aways.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal/troll!!
hey richard cranium....i know facts are likely lost on you
Submitted by porpoiseboy on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:31pm.
but most uber rich are libs. check out who donate to whom. small business are the most hurt by lib policies. big biz just passes the costs on. big biz has the ability to absorb and they know that taxes and regulation ruin small biz...their competitors. does it hurt to think? so you don't? sorry to hear that, i feel for you. folks ...... mental cripples are nothing to make fun of. BRAIN CRAMP!!!
Ecclesiastes 10:2 The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left
The best social program is a JOB...ronald reagan
better check your facts
Submitted by theduck6 on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 7:42am.
BP, AIG, Progressive Ins, Chinese interests , unions et al are far heavier contributors to the donkeys than the elephants, but then again accuracy doesn't seem to be part of your argument. Sorry I brought it up.
RIP Bretner05. We hardly knew ye.
Submitted by SickofLibs on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 7:51am.
Hopefully the new site has IP-blocking ability.
Although I doubt it, because you still can't even use the arrow keys in the freakin' subject line!
It is called Sturgeon's Law
Submitted by Avitar on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 3:00am.
Sturgeon's Law is roughly that " ninty percent of everything is crap"
In the back rooms where Mathmatics is put to work and politicians never go this has been formalized as a matimatical power law the:"Pareto principle". It is an observation that 80% of results come from 20% of the population. But since it is a power law 80% of the 80% of results is coming from only 20% of the 20% of the population.
Since the ovservation is diminsionless you start following this observation down you find that a very few men and women do change the Earth and their countries.
It is likely that America's founding Fathers were aware of some informal version of Pareto principle since if an inventor like say Ben Franklin can keep more of the money he earns he will produce more developments. This has servfed America well not just in the inverors that we know like Thomas Edison and Allazander Gram Bell but for the people who got rich supplying resources to Tesla and Lockheed's Kelly Johnson. This can all be clasified as the Anti-Obama law of nature.
I'm sorry, every single time
Submitted by Radical1979 on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 7:18pm.
I'm sorry, every single time I hear "Lean Forward" I can only think, "...and grab your ankles".
LOL
Submitted by stunned on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:48pm.
I leaned forward and fell off the chair laughing!
tired of liberal lies
When I hear that stupid lineq
Submitted by hbnolikeee on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 9:29am.
I see lemmings leaning over the edge of the cliff that BO has "drive the car" to while stupidly saying we can't back up we need to continue forward.
I don't get it
Submitted by goldbough on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 7:23pm.
I just don't get it. What have the rich or top 2% done to anyone? Have they robbed people on the street? No, they've worked and invested smartly. Quit with this war on the rich.
...and do the hiring, pay the
Submitted by bigtimer on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 7:28pm.
...and do the hiring, pay the taxes that support all the whiner cradle to grave leftist lovin lemmings in this country...it has to stop, soon!
'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart
Correct, Bigtime.
Submitted by Newsbubba on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 10:55am.
I'm curious. Has anyone on this thread EVER worked for or been hired by a "poor" person?
I never have, and wouldn't want to. I like rich people! To paraphrase Willy Sutton; Why do you work for rich people? They're the ones who have the money!
They're wealth doesn't give
Submitted by Bretner on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:04pm.
They're wealth doesn't give them the right to control the country and our government.
In the last decade, CEO pay has skyrocketed while manufacturing jobs were shipped away by the millions, and wages have become stagnant.
Some they get rich off American consumption, creating cheap products by slave laborers that got that job from a laid off american, while others make money off of speculation and betting against the housing bubble they helped create, thus not creating anything but foreclosures.
Then there are those 2% that have made their money the honest way through free but fair capitalism, not crony capitalism
Bretner, you magnificently ignorant troll
Submitted by Blonde on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:08pm.
Ha ha ha, little edmucated trollboy.
"They're" instead of their? Plus the rest of that incoherent copy/paste diatribe? LOLOLOL.
After you slung around smarmy innuendos and lies about me earlier, you DARE to show up here and slink around.
You're not very good for a paid troll.
WE ARE LAUGHING AT YOU!!!!!!!!!
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
I hope you're laughing
Submitted by Bretner on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:15pm.
I hope you're laughing because that makes two of us.
I own your pathetic ass you stupid slut.
You can never refute anything I say just stupid insults that aren't even clever.
all you can do is name call. it's hilarious. How about this...
You're a retarded clown, Blonde. It's so obvious you do not know anything.
Sorry, but it's true
Now piss off
Really?
Submitted by Blonde on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:22pm.
Wow. Who knew?
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Oh Bretner
Submitted by Blonde on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:29pm.
You own nothing.
Not even a log on to this site, hmmm.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
And I was having so much fun
Submitted by Boudin on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:34pm.
With the new toy, dang.
Boy, that was messy
Blonde, Too funny. I was
Submitted by hydrodynDM on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:34pm.
Blonde,
Too funny.
I was about to type "Bye Bretner" knowing full well what was about to come.
I figured Baththub Boy Bretner---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 12:44am.
would flame out eventually, but he turned sour and went south in record time.
Whether because of frustration with the fact that Obamas mojo is gone forever, or just in being frustrated at every turn by fact producing NBers, what a great vision to behold:
-Access Denied-
to another sto' bought troll (h/t cajun2).
Kudos as well to our own cool, calm, and collected, Blonde; troll taunter and thumper extraordinaire!
MD
Yet another lib is jettisoned..
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 2:38am.
The way it's going pretty soon it will just be ME ALONE against the entire NB world.
Finally...a fair fight.
Jer
That wasn't a lib Jer
Submitted by Denny Crane on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 2:43am.
That was a troll
(Jer check your inbox, NB doesn't notify you if you get PM's)
We Are The 53%
toney...Got PM
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 3:01am.
Got PM...watched video...Wow!!
Jer
Yes Jer, you are our pet lib
Submitted by dscott on Mon, 11/01/2010 - 1:33am.
Yes Jer, you are our pet lib (with claws and fangs.)
Here kitty, kitty...
There can be only one favorite pet. Now don't eat Shawn otherwise you will be alone.
Bretner
Submitted by gfrrman on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 12:54am.
let me start out by saying that your comments on this post reveal the true nature of being a total jerk(I'd use stronger language but I don't want to lower my standards to a 13 year old). If name calling is all you have, then you have revealed yourself to be the true whiney LIBERAL DEMOCRAT!.....THAT is the BIGGEST insult I can pin on anyone. Next, the class warfare of the LIBERAL DEMOCRATS is so 1950's and has never ended. Fact,... the top 50% of income earners in this country pay 97% of all federal income taxes, while the top 25% of earners pay 89% , while the top 1% pay 39%. Is that "FAIR" enough for you "PROGRESSIVES"? Take your tripe somewhere else, like the next prom dance, and talk to your other MYRMIDONS about how life ain't fair. Ever gotten a job from a poor person....I didn't think so..SHUT IT!!!
"Socialists eventually run out of other peoples' money"...Margaret Thatcher
I hope this is not
Submitted by theduck6 on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 7:44am.
an example of your debate skills.
theduck6
Submitted by gfrrman on Wed, 10/20/2010 - 2:20am.
maybe you should check the GAO.org on the Facts of progressive taxes. It might hurt.
gfrrman
Submitted by Denny Crane on Wed, 10/20/2010 - 3:12am.
I think Ducky was replying to the banned one, not you.
We Are The 53%
Sorry Toneyuki
Submitted by gfrrman on Wed, 10/20/2010 - 3:23am.
how the heck does one "see" that one has been banned? I've been on this site forever and haven't figured it out. Thanks for the info though, my bad.
G
gfrrman
Submitted by Denny Crane on Wed, 10/20/2010 - 3:29am.
click on their SN (view user profile)
If it says access denied then they have been banned.
He was probably banned for what he said higher up this thread to blonde.
"I own your pathetic a** you stupid ****"
"Lib free or die"
We Are The 53%
so i'm racking my brain going "bretner, bretner, bretner...
Submitted by porpoiseboy on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:21pm.
where do i know it from???? then it dawned on me...."YOU'RE RICHARD CRANIUM"!! or should i say "YOUR RICHARD CRANIUM"!! or should i say "YER RICHARD CRANIUM"!! you know, the one from the trojan commercials.
they're, their, there, thar', themses, AMAZING how many ways there,their, they're are to spell nitwit.
Ecclesiastes 10:2 The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left
The best social program is a JOB...ronald reagan
Go-ahead continue stealing/regulating/demonizing them
Submitted by Boudin on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:11pm.
I am positive that will fix it.
So why did Obama give them so much of the peoples money? Does he hate the children, the old, the poor?
You dimwits are a broken record.
why did Bush give tax payer
Submitted by Bretner on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:17pm.
why did Bush give tax payer money to Wall street?
You Rethugs are all the same.
Naughty, Bretner
Submitted by Blonde on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:21pm.
"ReThugs" "Bush".....
Seriously, you are way out of date with your talking points.
Better run back to HuffPo.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Bretner
Submitted by Phryj1 on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:38pm.
Another talking-point spewing, whiny, sniveling, liberal lemming. I'm really starting to believe the liberals are some kind of hive mind, because I don't think I've ever heard a single original (or sane, for that matter) thought from any of them. Go on HuffPo, Kos, Salon, or anywhere else libs are given a free soapbox and sheltered from dissenting views, and you will hear the same things over and over again. Actually, if you value your sanity at all, don't go there. The complete lack of individual thought is creepy beyond belief. The only explanation I can come up with is that liberals are part of a hive mind and thus are incapable of thinking for themselves.
Progressives seem to be completely averse to facts and logic. Apparently, reality has a conservative bias.
Obviously you don't browse
Submitted by Jer on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 11:25pm.
Obviously you don't browse HuffPo or Salon very often or with more than just a brief skim. Dissenting views are welcomed and plentiful at both sites, especially HuffPo.
Jer
Really, Jer?
Submitted by Blonde on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 11:32pm.
How are they about allowing that lovely little bit of name-calling nastiness?
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Blonde...
Submitted by Jer on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 11:55pm.
There is absolutely zero name-calling. HuffPo's comments are fully moderated, and if there is an abusive remark which gets posted, it is removed ASAP.
I haven't checked Salon lately, so I shouldn't make any representations about the tone of the comments until I do so. My recollection is that there was some pretty aggressive dialogue from both directions.
Jer
Fair 'Nuff, Jer
Submitted by Blonde on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 12:23am.
I'll take your word for that. Which I'm happy to do.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Thanks, Blonde...
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 12:38am.
Let me add that it's not all garden club gentility--it can get fairly aggressive--but the over-the-top/nasty stuff either never gets posted or is quickly taken down.
You'll likely find more objectionable material in the articles than in the comments.
Jer
Keep popping him, Blonde.
Submitted by Newsbubba on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 11:08am.
I'm just not "feeling the love" from Jer today. Are you, Blonde?
He may have to ad the "k" back on the end of his name if he doesn't calm down soon.
Oh, the "ad" above was so you can bitch about the spelling, Jer. Are all the punctuation marks OK?
I love you, man!
Newsbubba...You've been here long enough
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 2:30pm.
You've been here long enough to know I never 'bitch' about spelling or grammar unless someone has first resorted to name-calling or personal insults--which, if you would take a moment to review the thread, is precisely what gfrrman did.
Love you too, man.
Jer
that is
Submitted by Iron Tigers Vet on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 6:19am.
a LIE! I visit that POS of a blog site and yes, they do name call and yes, they do make accusations that are as inflamatory as you could imagine.
I even posted one the other day that was really just about as low as you could get. Make sure you get those facts correct before posting them here.
Okay CCsteelcity...prove I'm lying.
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 3:08pm.
Let's see: Obama has been variously referred to here as a "jug-eared" "cocks*cker" "a$$hole" "not worth the pig sh!t on the bottom of a farmer's boot" [and dozens of other like descriptions]
Please provide some examples of similarly inflammatory, abusive, and vulgar language about a Republican politician posted in the comment section of that "POS" website.
Now, I haven't read but a few of the comments there recently, and, I have seen the occasional "moron" or "stupid" appear in comments--but nothing on the level of what I described above.
But, if you can prove me wrong, I will of course retract the claim and apologize.
Jer
Dissenting views.
Submitted by Phryj1 on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 12:16am.
They may be welcomed, but I wouldn't say plentiful, and I've read enough articles at both sites to know that.
Also, I'd like to state that I don't think ALL liberals are part of a hive mind, just the far-left whack jobs. I will admit I get carried away and overgeneralize, and I am sorry about that.
Progressives seem to be completely averse to facts and logic. Apparently, reality has a conservative bias.
Phryj1
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 12:29am.
I think most of us have a tendency to do that [i.e. overgeneralize]--particularly in political website forums and comment sections--so certainly no apologies are necessary for that.
As far as "plentiful" dissenters at HuffPo, it's admittedly a very relative term. I just know that I have been surprised by the seemingly large numbers of contrarian views--from the "right"--on those occasions where I've waded through lengthy comment strings.
Jer
Trust Jer
Submitted by Denny Crane on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 1:38am.
To come running to the defence of Huff n Puff!
"Lib free or die"
We Are The 53%
Yes, toney...
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 1:50am.
And don't forget "Morning Joe"...my other pet project.
Jer
Jer and Reed
Submitted by Denny Crane on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 1:59am.
love to say "my pet"
;-)
"Lib free or die"
We Are The 53%
Dirtbreath
Submitted by NL207 on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 12:36am.
Yes you. Dirtbreath.
Why did Obama not only pour money into Wall Street, but also sieze control of GM and Chrysler, overthrowing 200 years of bankruptcy law in the process?
Why did Obama and his Democrat friends in the Congress usurp the authority to decide which firms shall be allowed to fail and which shall be propped up at taxpayer expense?
Why did Obama and his Democrat friends in the Congress set in motion what will become a governmenttakeover of all medicine in America if it is not repealed?
Why did Obama extort $20B out of BP, ostensibly for damages caused by an oil spill. completely bypassing US law on the subject and the courts?
I could ask endless questions like this. The answer to them all is the same : Obama is a tyrant and the Democrats are overthrowing the Constitution and implementing tyranny.
Oh gawd...
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 1:01am.
Don't tell me you clawed your way out of your hole just to kick the same horse that you've already beaten half to death over the past few months.
Not only could you ask endless questions like those, you have asked them...endlessly. And, as usual, you answer them yourself with your stock reply--"tyranny"--which is the only explanation which satisfies you or will ever satisfy you. So why should I bother with even trying to chip away at an obviously fossilized conclusion?
Jer
You won't bother because
Submitted by NL207 on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 1:27am.
You won't bother because you've had your ass handed to you whenever you've tried.
This from a guy who with a
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 1:37am.
This from a guy who with a perfectly straight face claimed all of the commie/lib SC Justices--or is it just most of them?--will be impeached and thrown off the court once the constitutionalist conservatives take over.
Back to the circus, clown. You're tracking sawdust all over my nice clean carpet.
Jer
I see you are illiterate as well.
Submitted by NL207 on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 9:52am.
If scrubbing the Federal bench with the power of Congress is so outrageous, then I presume you claim Thomas Jefferson was outrageous as well for having done exactly this in 1801 and 1802?
I said we need to impeach and remove every one of those justices who have admitted to substituting foreign law for the US Constitution in deciding cases before them and in so doing violated their oath of office.
You denied any such had ever occurred as I recall. I proceeded to show you a public admission from one of the perpetrators and told you there were others. In your reply, you CONCEDED my point by naming the others. Do we need to link the thread where this exchange occurred or will you concede yet again?
BTW, that isn't sawdust. It's your ashes. And you didn't bother to debate my points, preferring instead to change the subject. Looks like I own your sorry ass once again.
"You denied any such had ever
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 3:24pm.
"You denied any such had ever occurred as I recall." Well, in that case, your recollection is faulty. Maybe you should start doing some research before you post instead of just pulling nonsense out of your ass. JerJer
Submitted by gfrrman on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 1:47am.
the "ANSWER" to YOUR question is TRUTH, which is an anathema to the liberal mind. TRUTH is stupid to the liberal mind....not able to comprehend the meaning...ever. Not wired that way and never will.
"Socialists eventually run out of other peoples' money"...Margaret Thatcher
Got it..."Truth and
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 1:52am.
Got it..."Truth and Tyranny". Pretty catchy.
Jer
Jer
Submitted by gfrrman on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 2:02am.
you, being stupid, by defintion just proved my point. Enough said....god you libs are soooooooo easy. Selah
"Socialist eventually run ut of other peoples' money"...Margaret Thatcher
Well I guess you showed me.
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 2:19am.
Well I guess you showed me. But, just a small piece of advice: When calling someone "stupid", one should take extra care that the roughly 20-word post containing said assessment doesn't contain any glaring misspellings or typos--unless I'm too stupid to know what a "defintion" is.
Jer
Gee Jer
Submitted by gfrrman on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 2:36am.
you really got me there with ANOTHER mindless bunch of trivial frivolity. I can't type worth a crap. Is that all stupid libs can come back with. Face it, YOU ARE STUPID by DEFINITION..GOT IT. It's imbedded in your genes. You can't fix it! Geez
"Socialists eventually run out of other peoples' money"...Margaret Thatcher
Bring in the first team.
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 2:48am.
You can't even spell "embedded", you blithering idiot.
Take a seat on the bench, rookie. You're not in the Appalachian League any more.
Jer
"Imbedded" is a perfectly acceptable form---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 4:46am.
of embedded.
MD
Seconded
Submitted by ML Stovall on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 10:04am.
Seconded.
Yeah, well the US military
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 3:31pm.
Yeah, well the US military spells it "embedded" [I think] and I support our troops, you commies.
:-)
Jer
Bush bailed them out? Read the Constitution and the record!!!!!
Submitted by TheHistorian on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 5:46am.
Bush may have signed the legislation (he is, after all, NOT a conservative). But if you remember history, the dhimmicrats had to use their legislative majority (since 2006) to pass something which he had to sign. Further, the bill required the Secretary of the Treasury (NOT THE PRESIDENT) to make the decisions on bailouts.
And the great Obama voted FOR it. The only difference is that he lied about it like the rest of the dhimmicrats http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2009/03/13/record-shows-obama-wa...
Further, if you remember, there was the need to vote to release the second half of the funds. Done after Obama became President. Most Republicans voted against. Most Democrats voted for. Here is what a media site had to say. http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2009/01/15/4425172-breaking-down-th...
So next time you open your yap, make sure that you have the things called FACTS at your fingertips. Better to keep your muth shut and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.
Dennis Prager
Whose "yap" are you referring
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 7:44pm.
Whose "yap" are you referring to, Mr. Historian? By the placement of your post, it would appear to be mine, in which case you need to flap your yap about something relevant to my comment.
If directed at Schultz or someone else, please disregard the above and carry on.
Jer
Bretner, a couple of tips for you
Submitted by 26CX on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:15pm.
"They're" is a contracton of "they are"
"Their" is the possessive pronominal adjective you were looking for in that first sentence.
Dude, you are behind on the left's talking points. The big issue now is that conservative women are mean. You need to catch up.
Thank you for pointing out my meanness
Submitted by Blonde on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:19pm.
I was afraid I wasn't making my point. :)
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
You making a point? About
Submitted by Bretner on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:23pm.
You making a point? About anything?
Oh, Blonde, thats so cute, you know you're not capable of that you retarded clown you
past your bed time.
The only point I see here is
Submitted by NL207 on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 12:36am.
The only point I see here is located atthe apex of your skull.
It's posts
Submitted by UpNorth on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:27pm.
(notice the correct use of possessive, Steve05) are becoming more and more disjointed. Perhaps we ought to get Dr. Sam to do a quick analysis, Blonde?
The latest rants from he who claimed to be a libertarian and a conservative? More like a Kos reject, or a DU failure.
Eh... you seem like a waste
Submitted by Bretner on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:20pm.
Eh... you seem like a waste of time.
Never once addressed anything I said. Is that because Hannity's America isn't on and you don't have your talking points?
Nope, not at all
Submitted by 26CX on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:27pm.
It's because most of your comments aren't worth addressing.
Gosh, Bretner. Here I am trying to help you with your grammar and all you can do is tell me I seem like a waste of time. You're not a very nice person, are you? Are you bitter because a successful life has passed you by and you've been relegated to carrying water for the left?
Well 26
Submitted by Boudin on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:30pm.
He longs for the day they pass cap-n-tax, then he can carry air. Water is heavy!
you seem like a waste of time.
Submitted by Boudin on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:28pm.
And I am sure your taking up valuable space at the library
A waste?
Submitted by cajun2 on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:32pm.
You are a waste of money sto' bought. You have stated nothing in any of your posts. Name calling, insults and talking points off your cue cards seem to be all you have. But that is all that we expect from hit and run trolls. Now run!
I know it's Wiki
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 11:36pm.
But the housing bubble was created well before W. There is plenty of blame for both sides.
Much of the mess, while not necessarily beginning with the CRA of 1977, was certainly buoyed by the legislation in the nineties requiring more CRA compliance from lenders. Then Freddie and Fannie were tasked with underwriting these bad loans to risky borrowers.
The only reason this didn't happen sooner is that home values skyrocketed, making it viable for borrowers to sell their homes, and repay the mortgages, avoiding higher level of defaults.
This of course changed when home values fell. Reselling homes didn't garner enough to repay the mortgages, so defaults rose, a lot.
Add to that the fact that wealthy, more sophisticated borrowers defaulted.
This article sums it up pretty well.
4dd8427b-a622-4abf-8e68-2c9b5fb97787 1.03.01I told bretner earlier today,
Submitted by motherbelt on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:31pm.
I told bretner earlier today, if he couldn't keep up, take notes.
Apparently he didn't take my advice.
Poor little guy
Submitted by Boudin on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:38pm.
Must of had his fingers in his ears screaming lalalalala I cant hear you Lalalalal
Cut/ paste. Troll.
Submitted by ML Stovall on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 10:08am.
Cut/ paste. Troll.
When they die, they pass it
Submitted by yutsnark on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 1:18am.
When they die, they pass it on to their heirs, who may have done nothing to earn it. Better it should all be taxed.
You can donate all you want to the Fed
Submitted by Boudin on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 7:36am.
How about you leave the rest of us out of it!
Be nice if someone could earn a living without a bunch of lowlifes sitting around trying to figure out a way to steal it!
Go get a job!
My question is ....why have
Submitted by David-Ford on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 7:29pm.
My question is ....why have we let 20 % of the population that define themselves as liberal set the agenda for the last 40 or so years...Enough...we are a center right country. Let take it back from these progressives
Elections
Submitted by yutsnark on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 1:29am.
Elections
They pay our salaries.
Submitted by CobraMan on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 7:31pm.
"Why are we letting the top 2% of the population win over the other 98?"
What's this "we" crap, you got a mouse in your pocket? Those 98 percent that you seem so worried about get their salaries from those top two percent, for without those "rich" investments, none of us would be employed, yourself included, you twit. Unlike you, most people are smart enough to realist that and we don't fall for you faux class warfare bull-crap
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
Well
Submitted by GregE on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 7:43pm.
He's one of the 2%, so he feels like he's got principles for going "against" his own income level.
The Dem 2%'ers are very
Submitted by Dan Diego on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 8:12pm.
The Dem 2%'ers are very generous with our money not theirs, ask John Teresa Kerry.
As long as their yacht is parked in Rhode Island.
Submitted by samhermanmd on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 8:18pm.
Thurston Howell (strike that--John Kerry) and Lovie (strike that--Teresa Heinz Kerry) never park in just any yacht club.......
Good one, Doc Sam
Submitted by Blonde on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:12pm.
Thurston & Lovie. That was great.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Yeah yeah, they pay our
Submitted by yutsnark on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 1:24am.
Yeah yeah, they pay our salaries, and Mr. Scrooge gives me half a day off for Christmas.
But what if they kept paying our salaries, but gave away, say, 19 of their 21 houses, and took the subway to work. There'd be more to go around, and more opportunity for the rest of us to get rich.
Yutsnark
Submitted by gfrrman on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 1:40am.
NO ONE is holding you back but YOU. Love the, "but gave away.......and There'd be more to go around"...You are where YOU are because of the culminitive decisions that YOU have made in YOUR life.....NO ONE else. My god, wah, wah, wah!!!
"Socialists eventually run out of other peoples' money"...Margaret Thatcher
If they "...gave away, say 19
Submitted by ML Stovall on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 10:22am.
If they "...gave away, say 19 of their 21 houses..."?! Why? I keep what I earn and invest what I keep, Yutsnark. That's we call "capitalism". "Giving it away" is called "charity". "Taking it away" is called "theft", or "socialism" as you probably know it. You cannot be serious with this BS.
Well, let's see.....
Submitted by almostacowboy on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 7:32pm.
....could it be the same reasons my dad gave. 'Cause we earn the money and we're paying the bills, Ed! That's why we're letting the [top] 2% win over the other 98%.
the middle class pay taxes.
Submitted by Bretner on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:06pm.
the middle class pay taxes. They deserve a voice in our government. Not just the wealthiest donors.
so get Soros and the Riady's out of our politics
Submitted by wizardjr on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:52pm.
Large groups of middle class voters always trump rich donors in total contributions. They also do it by joining affinity groups like the NRA and MoveOn.org.
This constant whining about "rich" people is usually the Loser's Lament. It's also a tell for a believer in 'Beggar Thy Neighbor' so that things will be 'fair'. Total BS of course.
Why don't you go earn your own richness if you want it changed?
Eddie crying?
Submitted by GregE on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 7:41pm.
Haven't I seen/heard Eddie making fun of Glenn Beck for getting teary-eyed about our nation, about people who care, about people who stand out? So Eddie was crying about himself? Interesting.
Outnumbered
Submitted by IrateNate on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 7:49pm.
Why is it, Ed, that we have to put up with liberal whining and redistribution, when conservatives outnumber liberals better than two to one in this country?
"Bend Forward" America.
Submitted by GregE on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 7:49pm.
"Bend Forward" America.
Ed, Why don't we take that idea into sports...
Submitted by c5then on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 7:50pm.
How about we rotate the National College Championship around to all the BCS schools instead of having them compete for it. After all, Why are we letting the top 2% of colleges win over the other 98%, right?
Life insn't a 6 year-old soccer organization where all the players get "trophys". Some people will own their own business and employ others, some will invent things and others won't.
Donald Trump has decalred bankruptcy at least 5 times in his life. Bill Gates didn't finish college.
Life isn't fair. The government's job is to make the playing field as level as possible, not try and equalize the results. When you treat people differently because of their income and penalize the high earners to give it to the low earners, you create a disincentive to achieve and create an under-achieving society.
Madison and Jefferson and Franklin built a Republic - Roberts killed it!
I presume this is the first
Submitted by Jack Bauer on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 7:53pm.
I presume this is the first time the words "Lean" and "Ed Shultz" have ever been used in the same sentence?
All of the above Mr Obama? --- How about ALL OF THE BELOW, instead.
I find the whole 'Lean
Submitted by shannon76 on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 7:55pm.
I find the whole 'Lean Forward' campaign extremely annoying. It's strange to watch the TV screen and then periodically this random message appears: Lean Forward. It's bizarre and distracting. It's like something out of Orwell's 1984. These phrases just appear for brief periods of time. They may as well say: "Drink More Coffee" or "Have a Nice Day".
But "Lean Forward" has this strange quality to it. I know what the campaign is all about, but I still end up seeing those words and thinking, 'What do you mean lean forward?? And do what exactly? Change the channel? Fine. Wouldn't be the first time...'
They need to get rid of that campaign. It's a distracting (and therefore laughable) Fail. They may be thinking, 'Hey, they're talking about us', but I for one am laughing at them.
Semi popular tired catch
Submitted by Dan Diego on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 8:18pm.
Semi popular tired catch phase kinda like "tall pole in the tent", although in ED's case the tent is probably taller than the pole...
Ed's done...he just doesn't
Submitted by bigtimer on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 7:55pm.
Ed's done...he just doesn't realize that fork has been in his back for a very long time, about like messnbc...the only place I know of that gives them this excessive attention is NBs...I know you're fighting the liberal bias, but I have wished for years you wouldn't give them the attention you do...not many others care across this land, I feel you're helping them out with all this endless attention, and I've been with you all from just about the start of NB's...so it's just my observation and of course my humble opinion.
'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart
I wonder if it works his way
Submitted by kg on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 7:57pm.
I wonder if it works his way for homosexuality.
"DumbAssity of Dope"
It's going, going, out of the
Submitted by Radical1979 on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 8:00pm.
It's going, going, out of the ballpark kg! Nice one.
Ed: It is 70% winning over
Submitted by Andrew H. on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 8:06pm.
Ed: It is 70% winning over the whining 30... (included in both groups are millionaires, dope).
Still not covering the elections, eh?
The so-called mainstream media is the propaganda arm of the criminal DNC.
Still not covering the elections, eh?
Submitted by Boudin on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 8:27pm.
And now you know why. There aint much brain power over there at mslsd, cant afford to have Ed blow another gasket.
I think it is helpful to
Submitted by Andrew H. on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 9:26pm.
I think it is helpful to remind him. heh.
The so-called mainstream media is the propaganda arm of the criminal DNC.
Or how about, why is it that
Submitted by dscott on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 8:25pm.
Or how about, why is it that the opinion of 22% of the population demands to have their opinion imposed on everyone else?
Mr. Schultz, you are entitled to your own opinion, no matter how wrong it is, However you are not entitled to shove it down our throats.
So Otto asks:
Submitted by hbnolikeee on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:18pm.
""Why are we letting the top 2% of the population win over the other 98?"
Answer to Schotzy: How about cause that top 2% are the same people that pay you and most everyone their wages.
Can you name anyone that you have worked for that rewarded you for pissing on them? That wouldn't in fact try to stop getting pee-ed on?
By the way, it's not the top 2% that thinks things suck, it's 70% of the country. I guess your calculation had some rounding error.
Lean Forward. Cough. Bend
Submitted by Van Halen on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:43pm.
Lean Forward.
Cough. Bend over.
Who the hell thought that was a good slogan?
Barney Franks
Submitted by Boudin on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:46pm.
?
This whole "Lean Forward"
Submitted by motherbelt on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:48pm.
This whole "Lean Forward" thing is just another useless slogan.
You can watch the promo and at the end of it still not have any idea what "Lean Forward" means.
Kinda like
Submitted by Boudin on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:52pm.
Their prime time shows? Guess they think no message is better then thinking of one.
Thinking outside the box, or galaxy, so to speak?
I bet they paid a fortune for
Submitted by Van Halen on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 11:50pm.
I bet they paid a fortune for Lean Forward because it's so... esoteric and smart. Only a truly intelligent Leftist would understand. Gag. Barf.
Every time I see that Lean Forward mentioned here, I have to snicker because I always picture the doctor putting on that white glove and hear the snap of the latex...
Who in their right mind thought Lean Forward was a good idea?
Great link MB
Submitted by Denny Crane on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 1:57am.
Interesting how they come right out and say.
Cable news network msnbc said Tuesday it is launching a two-year, multimillion-dollar marketing campaign, embracing its politically progressive identity with the new tagline “Lean Forward.”
We Are The 53%
Top 2% of IQ perhaps?
Submitted by wizardjr on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 10:56pm.
Maybe Ed is referring to the fact that perhaps MENSA has decided to get vocal about how the lunacy of Marxist redistributionist policy. But then again, you don't have to have a MENSA level IQ to figure that out.
Although there must be some cutoff, as proven by bretner.
Is Special Ed's mother on Death Row?
Submitted by Galvanic on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 11:20pm.
If not, she sure ought to be.
digg
Submitted by im41 on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 11:26pm.
One place we are still loosing is digg
We have pretty much taken over Facebook and Twitter, but we have neglected digg, and the liberals have taken advantage of it.
Digg has been Liberal for
Submitted by Van Halen on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 11:48pm.
Digg has been Liberal for years. I left there years ago. I can't remember the last time I clicked on thier site. Another one is Slashdot, which was a great tech site until the Libs took it over and started screaming about how Bush was spying and using technology to watch people. Of course, now that Obama has outdone Bush on every kind of secret wiretap or secret tribunals or executive order being used to assassinate Americans overseas, Slashdot's people have nothing to say. Stupid hypocrites.
After you Libs are done
Submitted by Van Halen on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 11:45pm.
After you Libs are done bending over or bending forward or leaning Left or whatever it is you do over there, you may want to report on the 10.0 percent unemployment Gallup has up on their site.
Great going, Libs!
(No subject)
Submitted by yutsnark on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 1:42am.
Favrorite Bertrand Russell Quotation
Submitted by yutsnark on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 1:41am.
Work is of two kinds: first, altering the position of matter at or near the earth's surface relatively to other such matter; second, telling other people to do so. The first kind is unpleasant and ill paid; the second is pleasant and highly paid. The second kind is capable of indefinite extension: there are not only those who give orders, but those who give advice as to what orders should be given. Usually two opposite kinds of advice are given simultaneously by two organized bodies of men; this is called politics. The skill required for this kind of work is not knowledge of the subjects as to which advice is given, but knowledge of the art of persuasive speaking and writing, i.e. of advertising.
Throughout Europe, though not in America, there is a third class of men, more respected than either of the classes of workers. There are men who, through ownership of land, are able to make others pay for the privilege of being allowed to exist and to work. These landowners are idle, and I might therefore be expected to praise them. Unfortunately, their idleness is only rendered possible by the industry of others; indeed their desire for comfortable idleness is historically the source of the whole gospel of work. The last thing they have ever wished is that others should follow their example.
Favorite Quotations
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 2:06am.
Not bad, but I started nodding off after the first hundred words or so. I generally prefer something a bit more succint and straight to the point, like..."Loose lips sink ships"...that sorta thing.
Jer
OK Jer, here's a shorter
Submitted by yutsnark on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 2:59pm.
OK Jer, here's a shorter quotation:
"Liberals feel unworthy of their possessions. Conservatives feel they deserve everything they've stolen."
-- Mort Sahl
yutsnark...
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 3:36pm.
I like that one.
Jer
[By the way, in my previous post...make that "succinct" before matthewdean spots it.] :-)
Those Hyper Evil Rich People
Submitted by Unsane on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 11:56pm.
Leftists feel guilty for having possession, so their solution is to use the power of the state to steal from everybody. That's much better.
I can tell from the few posts I have seen here that you harbor intense, possionate, overwhelming hatred for every single human being that as much as earns a single penny over per capita income. Maybe you and your new buddy Jer here would feel better if the government passed a law ordering the immediate extermination of everyone in the country who, again,earned as much as a single dime above per capita income?
I'd in fact argue you are so full of hate for them that the only way you can attain an orgasm is if you were to walk down the street one day and see that every lamppost and telephone pole in the land had some Hyper-Evil Rich Bastard hanging from it.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Those Hyper Evil Rich People
Submitted by yutsnark on Wed, 10/20/2010 - 10:25pm.
Oh my. I love it when you talk dirty.
How about Sturgeon's Law Proves Obama is a Failure?
Submitted by Avitar on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 3:14am.
There is a matnematic power Law derived from Sturgeon's Law that proves that Obama's world is as impossible as an antygravity carpet.
I KNOW NAZZING!
Submitted by PrimalElements on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 7:17am.
First, he is in the 2%
He forgot the second half of "Lean Forward",
which is "And Grab Your Ankles."
Lean forward...
Submitted by Model850 on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 9:25am.
... in order to give us easier access to your wallet in your back pocket.
Ed would be more effective....
Submitted by notinstl on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 9:39am.
...if he wore one of those flesh colored helmets when he speaks.....
ChickaBOOMer| MSNBC's Ed Schultz: Alive and More Than Kicking
Submitted by StewartIII on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 10:48am.
MSNBC's Ed Schultz: Alive and More Than Kicking
http://chickaboomer.blogspot.com/2010/10/msnbcs-ed-schultz-alive-and-more-than.html
Sharing HIS wealth???
Submitted by Pilgrim1949 on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 11:11am.
So....I'm sure this overpaid (and over-fill-in-the-blank) yapping gum-flapper is more than willing to part with a considerable chunk of his hefty salary to help out the majority of the populace that does not make anywhere close to his hefty (there's that word again) paycheck.
It's only fair that folks in his minority-population, highly-paid profession share their wealth with the rest of the great unwashed hoi poloi.
I'm more than willing to be so blessed by his eager benevoloence. I am sure that his hefty(!) compassionate heart will be willing to empty his hefty purse of that aweful, white-liberal-guilt-laden, hefty lucre burden to absolve his hefty soul of its obvious torment.
Waiting for His Heftiness' largesse to be dispensed... any minute now, I'm sure.... here it comes.....
*crickets chirping*
"Ye canne change the laws of physics....." but some politicians believe that with the right legislation you can pretend they don't really apply to your own pet projects...
Schultz failed at mathematics
Submitted by Beukeboom on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 11:50am.
Schultz failed at mathematics AND statistics.
Libtards demonize the "top"
Submitted by mattm on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 12:04pm.
Libtards demonize the "top" 2% while advocating increased taxes (directly or through scams like cap-and-trade) on anyone lucky enough to have a job or be an employer.
What would happen if the media started ripping on the bottom-feeding freeloaders who sit on their rear-ends all day waiting for a government handout?
The bigger question is...
Submitted by stage9 on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 1:47pm.
why are we allowing the bottom 2% dictate the direction of our country to the upper 98%?
"If God is dead, somebody is going to have to take his place. It will be megalomania or erotomania, the drive for power or the drive for pleasure, the clenched fist or the phallus, Hitler or Hugh Hefner." — Malcolm Muggeridge
Defense of Fat Ed
Submitted by Jerry Mack on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 4:51pm.
Fat Ed is as liberal as the others and on many occassions has a bigger audience than Tingles. I am in favor of him being in the promos and on the tube on election night. It will be a chance for America to see why a network is one circle from going down the toilet. I will not watch because I know that Sheffield or Baker will make someone watch. Then the next day we can see the low lights.
A better question would be ...
Submitted by NL207 on Thu, 11/04/2010 - 8:29pm.
Why do we want a power hungry elite to misuse government authority to steal the private poroperty of 2% of our population in oder to bribe 51% of the population for their political support?