UPDATE -- SHUSTER APOLOGIZES: At 6:44 PM EDT, MSNBC broke into the Tucker Carlson show to air a terse apology from Shuster. See "My Take" below.
View video of Shuster apology here.
Here follows the text of Shuster apology.
DAVID SHUSTER: On Monday evening while guest-hosting the 6 p.m. evening hour, I conducted an interview with Tennessee Republican Marsha Blackburn. The congresswoman spoke at length about a newspaper ad that criticized General Petraeus. In what I believed was an effort to examine Representative Blackburn's priorities, I then asked her to name the last soldier from her congressional district killed in Iraq.
She responded "the name of the last soldier killed in Iraq from my district, I do not know." After that response, I identified who I believed to be that fallen soldier, a Tennessean killed in Iraq last month. But according to Pentagon documents, that young man came from a town inside a neighboring congressional district, not from Representative Blackburn's, and for that, I apologize for that mistake.
Read past the jump for the rest of the story..
A couple days ago, describing here the way MSNBC's David Shuster used a fallen soldier to play a tasteless "gotcha" game with Rep. Marsha Blackburn, (R-Tenn.), I surmised that things couldn't "get much lower."
I was wrong. They just did.
As it turns out, Pvt. Jeremy Bohannon -- the soldier whose name Shuster attacked Blackburn for not knowing -- had not, contrary to the MSNBC reporter's claim, lived in her district.
By way of background for those who hadn't read the earlier item, Blackburn had been invited onto "Tucker" ostensibly to discuss MoveOn.org's "General Betray Us" ad. But Shuster, serving as substitute host for Carlson, suddenly sandbagged Blackburn with this "gotcha" question.
SHUSTER: Let's talk about the public trust. You represent of course a district in western Tennessee. What was the name of the last soldier from your district who was killed in Iraq?
MARSHA BLACKBURN: The name of the last soldier killed in Iraq from my district? I do not know.
SHUSTER: OK, his name was Jeremy Bohannon. He was killed August the ninth, 2007. How come you didn't know the name?
Even after Blackburn expressed her appreciation for our soldiers' sacrifice, and detailed the extensive outreach she and her office does to military families in her district, Shuster continued to attack her for not knowing Private Bohannon's name.
SHUSTER: Well, you weren't appreciative enough to know the name of this young man . . . I still think it's a little bit surprising that you didn't know the name of this last soldier killed in Iraq who's only 18 years old yet you do know so much about the MoveOn.org ad and the tactics you didn't like.
It now turns out that Army Private Jeremy Bohannon had not, contrary to Shuster's claim, lived in Rep. Blackburn's congressional district. As blogger Conservative Belle brought to NB's attention, and as she has written about at her site, Private Bohannon lived in Bon Acqua, TN. Checking his nine-digit zip code reveals that he in fact lived in Tennessee District 8, represented by John Tanner, a Democrat.
I have now spoken with an aide in Rep. Blackburn's office, who confirmed that Pvt. Bohannon had not lived in the congresswoman's district.
A voicemail message left for Shuster inviting his comment had not been returned as of the time of posting this item.
A source informs me that MSNBC might be issuing a statement later today acknowledging its mistake. If so, we'll bring it to our readers ASAP.
Next time David Shuster wants to play this ugly kind of game, he should at least get his facts straight. In the meantime, Shuster owes an apology to Rep. Blackburn, and above all to the family of Private Bohannon, whose memory Shuster exploited for his partisan purposes.
My take on Shuster apology: Whether it was MSNBC that wanted to shield Tucker Carlson's show from the taint of Shuster's mistake, or a Tucker Carlson angry that his show had been undermined by Shuster, the way in which the apology was aired was very telling. Tucker made no reference to the fact that the apology was upcoming. Instead, the show came back from a commercial break, and suddenly, there was Shuster in a separate studio making his statement.
Note also that Shuster claimed that he had made his false accusation while "guest-hosting the 6 p.m. evening hour." But he wasn't hosting a generic MSNBC news hour, he was guest-hosting Tucker's show, as is clear from the graphic in the screencap above of Shuster with Rep. Blackburn. Again, looks like an attempt to shield Tucker from the fallout from this fiasco. Don't look for Shuster to be guest hosting "Tucker" again any time soon.
Finally, Shuster's on-air apology, which had all the spontaneity of a hostage video, differed from what he had said in a presumably more candid email earlier today. As noted at National Review's Media Log, Shuster had replied to criticism from a reader by emailing this:
the story was about blackburn's hypocrisy... it wouldn't matter whether the soldier's name was David shuster or Crazy Water [the email name of the reader]. she didn't know the name, period.
Regards,
D
Translation: Who cares about the soldier? I just want to make my point.
Update 9/28, 07:35 | Mark Finkelstein. The story is getting considerable media attention. Brit Hume featured it in last night's "Grapevine" segment of "Special Report." View video here.
A number of commentators have also weighed in with criticism of Shuster's lamentable "gotcha" game, including Mike Gallaher, Investors Business Daily and, notably, Rich Galen, who observes:
This is journalist crapola. Anyone can find a fact - important or not - which the subject of an interview is not likely to know and then beat him or her over the head with it.
Do you think al-Anbar province is important to the stabilization of Iraq? You do? Name the current provincial leader. Can't do it? HYPOCRITE!
You voted against raising the minimum wage. What's the average hourly wage in your district? Don't know? IGNORAMOUS!
See what I mean?
. . .
I will not impugn Shuster's motives because I don't know what they were - although I am willing to speculate that the words "Guest host for Keith Olbermann" enter into it.
What I will do, though, is suggest most strongly that Shuster is guilty of practicing faux journalism at its worst. This isn't "gotchya" journalism. This is on the level of a grossly unprofessional and ugly Three-Stooges-Whoop-Whoop-Nyuk-Nyuk fraternity prank.
. . .
As it happens, Shuster was wrong. The Newsbusters.[org] website found out that the soldier Shuster named had not lived in Blackburn's district after all.
Here's what NBC should do: Suspend Shuster until he agrees to take his parents (if they are still alive) with him to the home of the soldier's parents and apologize to them, not for some staffer having mis-read a ZIP code map, but for having abused their son's memory to perpetrate a despicable on-air stunt.
What if someone on the Fox News Channel had done this to a Democrat who had been defending the MoveOn.org ad? The Popular Press would demand the offending "journalist" be removed from his or her job. And rightly so.
We're waiiiiitttttting.
Update 17:20 | Mark Finkelstein. Here is a link to the Department of the Army's "Casualty Announcement for Governors and Members of Congress" announcing Pvt. Bohannon's death, indicating that it was sent to Rep. Tanner and not to Rep. Blackburn.
Update 15:52 | Matthew Sheffield. This was hardly the first time that Shuster has played fast and loose with the facts to suit his liberal viewpoint. Some of his biggest blunders:
- Last month, he called the Larry Craig scandal a "moral insult" to Hurricane Katrina victims.
- Shuster collaborated with left-wing fabulist Jason Leopold to spread false stories about the Bush admin.
- Giving play to wild accusations of "voter intimidation" in the 2006 elections (in case GOP won them)
- Relying on skewed, left-wing sources, Shuster falsely predicted that Bush aide Karl Rove would be indicted in the Valerie Plame investigation.
For more of NB's coverage of Shuster's shenanigan's, click here.
—Mark Finkelstein is a NewsBusters contributing editor and host of Right Angle. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net.





SHUSTER: Let's talk about the public trust. You represent of course a district in western Tennessee. What was the name of the last soldier from your district who was killed in Iraq?















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
I doubt that Shuster will be
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 14:18 ET by NortonalecI doubt that Shuster will be man enough to apologize, and if he did, the nuts that watch him will probably believe Bush made him say he was sorry!
Nortonalec
Starts with an "A"
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 14:19 ET by mattmThere is a certain bodily orifice in posterior of the abdomen which is a perfect description for this particular member of the mainstream-democrat media.
Maybe he should change his name to Shyster...
Another "fake but accurate"
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 15:18 ET by motherbeltAnother "fake but accurate" grenade lobbed by the drive-by media.
In the other thread on this, I said I wished Rep. Blackburn had said to Shuster: "No, I don't, and neither would you, if you hadn't planned this little ambush. Which one of your staffers researched that for you?"
Now I really wish she had said it; it would have made this even more delicious. I guess we'll never know which staffer gests fired for screwing up and embarrassing Shuster (NOT for embarrassing Rep. Blackburn; they don't care about that).
SHUSTERS A TOOL BUT SO IS BUSH
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 18:01 ET by KeithI want to make it clear that the idea of ambushing this woman with this stupid stunt is reprehensible. It is base, it is of the gutter, it is also NO SUPRISE. As for your assertion that there was some "embarrasment" to David Shuster because of his inaccurate "journalism", I beg to differ. Liberals are ELEVATED by failure as long as their failure was in an effort to HARM YOU! Buy a vowel and get a clue dude! This will not embarrass David Shuster! In order to be embarrassed your actions must be held up to ridicule by someone. Who's going to do it? Chris Matthews, ha! The worst he'll get is what Dan Rather got, a clucking of the teeth and an over the shoulder whisper to do a better hatchet job next time !
That said, it is INEXCUSABLE for an American City to be still in ruins while we are building up half of Iraq for a bunch of Christian killing Muslims, or have you seen a bunch Churches springing up in Iraq that I missed?
Bush is a FAILURE both at the war and at home. Doesn't the fact that the weapons didn't exist matter to you people? And the DIDN'T EXIST they weren't "moved to Syria", "Submerged in the Tigris" or any other stupid neocon excuse, according to Colin Powell on his most recent MTP interview! Jeez, what a monumental F-UP!
Putting the weapons screw up aside, how stupid would you have to be to FORGET EVERY SINGLE LESSON FROM VIETNAM as you prosecute a new war, yet unbelievably that's what these idiots did. I mean, it WAS the lesson from Vietnam that said that no matter how bad YOU perceive someone elses government to be, there are PLENTY of people living there who are just pleased as punch with it! And they will RESIST your efforts to CHANGE their LIVES, IDIOTS! How danged Pollyanna can you be, to think everybody in a foreign country is gonna swallow your "democracy is great" pill when half the people in your own danged country, HATE EVERYTHING your country "stands" for?! Jeez Louise!
Bush in IMO is so stupid that he let an idiot like Don Rumsfeld change America's WAR DOCTRINE of OVERWHELMING FORCE, which was a proven winner, to a "smaller, sleeker, fighting force" which had already failed in VIETNAM! These idiots actually said that they didn't "anticipate an insurgency". HUH? Why the bullfart not? What other lesson would you glean from Vietnam, if not that an insurgency is sure to occur when you try to occupy someone elses country?????
Bush didn't give a kitty about Katrina and the fact that the city lies in ruins TWO YEARS after the hurricane, in the "greatest country on God's green earth", is to his undying SHAME.
Keith, suppose you
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 18:04 ET by bassndudeKeith, suppose you enlighten us with your vast military experience and let us in on the lessons we learned in Vietnam and forgot. You call a million man army a smaller force in vietnam? You have no idea what your talking about. You have been lied to by a bunch of left wing draft dodging teachers, sounds to me like.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
You missed my point entirely.
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 18:44 ET by KeithThe Vietnam war was fought in many different ways at many different times. Some places got surges some places got special forces and attack teams to deal with guerillas and such. I realize that the total call up was in fact HUGE so, my bad, for stating it poorly. On the occasions that the smaller attack forces were used( when raiding villages for instance) , they usually failed because they didn't include the participation of the villagers in their calculations. Which resulted in lots of dead soldiers killed by farmers! In the beginning that is. Of course they adapted and discarded the ideas that didn't work, like most people would! I was making a very narrow point on that and I apologize for the confusion.
I notice that you neglected to discuss all of the areas in which I found Bush and co, liable. Look dude, I voted for the guy twice just like you did. But my heart is broken. I listened to David Kuo as he told us exactly what Bush and Rove think of "fundamentalist" Christians, as if Jesus would recognize any other kind. When he talked about how they laughed behind Jerry Falwell's back, it really hurt me. I have had MANY disagreements with the late Rev. Falwell, most of them having to to with his understanding of the doctrine, which IMO, wasn't very good, seeing as how the biblical record on things like "Baptism" and Reception of Christ's Spirit, differed from the theology he embraced. That said, I pray to God for his soul because Rev Falwell was a warrior and a TRUE hero, standing in the breach against the forces of ungodliness with few there to back him up! For Bush not to go to his funeral was a slap in the face for conservative Christians everywhere!
Harriet Myers. 'Nuff said. If anything in the last eight years was proof positive that Bush "ain't one of us" and by us I mean CONSERVATIVES, this was it! Every conservative lawyer and jurist, pundit and casual observer, laboring in the vineyards to get someone in there who didn't think that murdering children was a "choice" and he picks GRANDMA from the ADDAMS FAMILY???? This woman wasn't on ANYONE'S long, short, partial, paired down, or anyother bullfartin' LIST! When she gave her answers on a legal questionaire they were LAUGHABLE.
The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ordered Bush to build a friggin' fence. He said he would. WHERE'S THE G' DANGED FENCE????
To date TWENTY MILES out of eight hundred have been completed, that in and of itself is shameful. Bush's justice dept. issued reports on the amount of OTM's (other than mexicans) that have crossed the border, the numbers were staggering, you should google it some time. He is so beholden to the moneyed elite that he has risked the security of this country every day since 9/11. How else do you explain a re-opening of the border? That's right pal, a RE-OPENING. I know for a fact that right after 9/11 there was a paucity of illicit drugs, particularly in the California area. Mexicans were having a hard time bouncing back and forth across the border in the wake of 9/11, then it changed. Things went BACK TO NORMAL. Dopers got their dope and illegals and OTHERS' resumed their caravan.
Arabian proverb. " the dog barks but the caravan moves on".
Keith the Hollyood actor says he voted for Bush
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 19:19 ET by RJ.......TWICE? bwahahahahaha!
Just because I make a low
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 23:45 ET by KeithJust because I make a low level living on the "boards" doesn't mean I don't care about my country. Or recognize the danger posed by Islamic extremism. I was once courted by an Islamic group (not terrorists!) and they exposed me to what's ACTUALLY in the Koran, 'nuff said.
Keith, it's not "just because" you are a Hollywierdo,
Thu, 09/27/2007 - 10:38 ET by RJ...but because your posts have exhibited a pretty clear case of BDS. You've laid out most, if not all, of the left's standard anti-Bush lines, and you've done it with the standard spittle-spewing anger.
There's things about President Bush that I and many others here don't like, but we don't go on the same kind of all-out attack that you have. It's pretty easy to see through transparencies like yours.
Where to begin.... On the
Thu, 09/27/2007 - 09:43 ET by BDWhere to begin....
On the occasions that the smaller attack forces were used( when raiding villages for instance) , they usually failed because they didn't include the participation of the villagers in their calculations. Which resulted in lots of dead soldiers killed by farmers!
That explains why after 1968 the only enemy forces to be found in country were from the PAVN/NVA. The local VC having being totally anihilated following TET. If you read the actual unbiased history of the war, you will have found that the war in the villages was OVER by 1970 and the free forces were the victors. The nonsense of US troops bein gkilled by villagers is a myth.
Keith, I ignored what you
Thu, 09/27/2007 - 09:52 ET by bassndudeKeith, I ignored what you said about Bush, yes, because of your ignorant statements on Vietnam. Raiding villages? We dident raid villages very often, and when we did, we got what we were after. No failures while I was there. And what dead soldiers were killed by farmers? If they were a farmer, they dident kill anyone. Most of the farmers themselves were killed by the VC or the NVA. You havent got a clue what went on over there. You dont know what your talking about when you mention Vietnam.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
wow
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 18:10 ET by the mad poleDon't hold back.., tell me how you really feel about Bush. Select any topic and just jump!
...the guy who knows
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 18:14 ET by TruthMonger...the guy who knows everything! Where has he been all our lives...
the WMD's in Syria are a TOOL
Makes you sick
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 14:27 ET by well99Violence doesnt solve anything but I really would like to meet Shuster.First who the flock is he to bring this soldier into his political bs.Private Bohannon died for this country and this scut Shulster is using the soldier's death for his political purposes.I have met some low rent yutts in my time but this scut takes the cake.This needs to be on Fox or any other media outlet to let people know what a frelling piece of garbage this sob is.I have been to too many boot ceremonies so this really hits home.Those that serve and have lost their lives deserve respect and not to be used this way.
By the way thank you for blogging this.
Well99...
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 16:42 ET by Maverick313I wanted to thank you for the sacrifices you and yours have made in the name of freedom. May you not have any more boot ceremonies to attend. My prayers and thoughts are with you and others like you everyday.
If you don't stand behind our troops; please feel free to stand in front of them!
DITTO!
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 16:47 ET by drillanwrDITTO!
Thank you Maverick313
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 20:14 ET by well99and Drillanwr but this isnt about me.Mark should get the thanks for putting this out.Shuster has no right to use the soldier for his political agenda.Nobody does.I feel for his family.Pvt Bohannon sacrificed for all of us includeing Shuster.Shuster has shown what a cheap opportunist he is.It backfired on him and I really wished this was pushed in the media to show how contemptible Shuster is.
I was going to say that
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 14:28 ET by Rastus03I was going to say that Shuster has always reminded me of a high school newspaper reporter.
This would be unfortunate because it would be an insult to competent high schoolers across the country.
His breathless and wild-eyed reporting is so far beyond juvenile, one hopes that sometime soon he will hyperventilate himself unconscious.
He wants so badly to be important, yet his style has mangled credibility in much the same way OlberMoon has managed to do.
He thinks he is cute the way he ambushes decent people, but as this story shows, the only one taking the big hit is him.
Sad.
This was so disgraceful, I
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 15:24 ET by general companyThis was so disgraceful, I cant believe this guy can sleep at night
rathereasque
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 14:43 ET by the mad poleDan Rather would be proud
FACTS
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 14:44 ET by ricklailSince when did facts ever matter to these people?
A bona fide and certified member of the beer guzzling, NASCAR watching middle class.
David ShYster
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 14:48 ET by Dave RIt's a good thing I de-programmed MSNBC from my cable system last year, because had I seen this I would have gotten upset.
As I see it, about the only way MSNBC could atone for this would be to serve Shuster's head up on a platter to the family of the fallen soldier.
He should be out-right fired for slighting the family of a slain American soldier in such an under-handed and cruel way.
When I'm president, privatization is off the table because it's not the answer to anything.-Hillary Rodham, September 3, 2007 AARP Legislative Conference.
I did the same thing. I
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 14:52 ET by buddycI did the same thing. I only hear about their atrocities on NewsBusters.
That says all you need to
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 14:51 ET by buddycThat says all you need to know about liberals. Why the h311 would they apologize? They don't care if they get the facts right.
At MSNBC to get to the top you have to be the biggest ahole. Shuster is an ahole but nowhere near as big of an ahole as Matthews and Olberman.
Sounds like a Dan Rather research job.
Wake me up when Shuster asks a democrat the name of person in his districut who was last victimized by an undocumented immigrant?
Indeed, Mr. Shuster
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 18:58 ET by Cape Conservativeneeds to be fired immediately - if not sooner! Those drive-bys just can't wait to get their facts straight - gotta git the republicans, no matter if it is true or not.
No one cares...don't hold your breath waiting for any news of this disgusting act in the msm.
This is pathetic
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 14:58 ET by tenthreeleaderI mean, REALLY pathetic. This is the kind of "journalism" that makes me want to break things.
I know exactly how you feel
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 16:11 ET by Richard RomanoI know exactly how you feel TRL, I want to smash this laptop, but it's not worth it -- if only there was something better than virtual reality, Shuster would be toast!
Great catch, Mark!
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 15:00 ET by GalvanicShuster is a schmuck. Like he really cares about the names of Americans killed in action. And then he gets the wrong name to boot?
If this guy ever does call-ins, folks ought to pop these kinds of questions to him.
Mark, I don't know where the
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 15:14 ET by BeowulfMark, I don't know where the spin is here, and I am in no way defending Schuster, but with just a little research (which I did on your first post on this story) Bon Aqua is in Hickman County TN, which is indeed in Blackburn's district. But that's not really the issue (it would be if Bon Aqua wasn't in her purview). First off, it was a low down, dirty, ambush to make another politically biased point from the MSM. Secondly, Pvt Bohannon wasn't killed on Aug 9. He was killed Aug 5. Not that it makes a whit of difference to his family and loved ones, but if Schuster wants to lay such ambushes, the least he can do is to have HIS facts straight. And Secondly, it is absolutely despicable to use a fallen soldier in such a way.
http://blackburn.house.gov/District/
http://www.hometownlocator.com/CountySearch.cfm?County=Hickman&StateCode...
The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers
My understanding is that
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 15:20 ET by Mark FinkelsteinMy understanding is that parts of Bon Acqua are in Blackburn's district and parts are in Rep. Tanner's district. The part of Bon Acqua in which Pvt. Bohannon lived is in Rep. Tanner's district.
Mark is Correct
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 15:30 ET by allanfBon Aqua is a split district. The zip code for the home of Pvt Bohanan is 37025-5122. According to
http://capwiz.com/yo-demo/officials/congress/?state=&lvl=C&azip=37025
the Congressional Representative is Tanner.
Thanks for the clarification
Thu, 09/27/2007 - 10:39 ET by BeowulfThanks for the clarification Mark. The sites I looked at didn't spell that out. I'm glad to see more proof of what a shyster Shuster really is. The more ammo, the better.
Oh, and I just noticed that CC (congress-critter) Tanner is a Dem. Wonder if ol' Shuster transferred his cute little question to Tanner? If not, that goes a long way towards more proof of bias. If Blackburn didn't know Pvt Bohannon's name, and it was such a HUGE issue, then it is just as big if Tanner didn't know it. But I guess we'll never know now, will we?
The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers
Beowulf: Further on this, I
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 15:27 ET by Mark FinkelsteinBeowulf: Further on this, I expect to be updating with information from the Army confirming that Pvt. Bohannon had lived in Rep. Tanner's district.
I'm defending Shuster either....
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 15:50 ET by Missouri Conservative...but this issue of the soldier being in or out of Blackburn's district is like splitting hairs. Based on what I've read, this guy lived 100 yards away from the district line either way. It just doesn't seem right to be bickering over this guy's residence now that he's dead.
But alas, Shuster is disgraceful for exploiting this guy's death for a purely partisan political purpose. Then again, that's what the Iraq war is to these people - it's nothing more than a political issue.
"women and minorities hardest hit"
Correction to above: I'm NOT defending Shuster...
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 15:51 ET by Missouri Conservative...sorry.
"women and minorities hardest hit"
NOTE TO ALL: We have now
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 16:00 ET by Mark FinkelsteinNOTE TO ALL: We have now obtained the official Department of the Army casualty announcement for Pvt. Bohannon, indicating that it was sent to Rep. Tanner, not Rep. Blackburn. We're efforting linking to it now.
And Don't Let It Hit You In The . . .
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 16:12 ET by NoMoreClintonsIf Dan Abrahms had a hair on his gonads he'd show this a-hole the door.
Shuster got his information
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 15:17 ET by AntiMediaShuster got his information from a liberal blog.
Yes.
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 16:41 ET by Missouri ConservativeYou can tell what the stories on Hardball and Countdown will be by checking various left-wing blogs throughout the day. Much on MSNBC's material (save probably Tucker) is lifted directly off of Thinkprogress, DailyKos, Crooks&Liars, etc.
"women and minorities hardest hit"
You Missed One
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 18:50 ET by Del DolemonteShuster is a consumer of the www.truthout.org blog, which assured him and his fellow Kool-Aid drinkers back in May of 2006 that Karl Rove would be indicted in 48 "business hours". Dave immediately ran with the story, which came from alleged journalist Jason Leopold.
Even after the story was proven wrong, truthout's editor, Marc Ash, refused to retract it. Leopold also promised to out his "sources" if the story was wrong, but seems to have forgotten his promise.
What a pure jackass --
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 16:08 ET by Richard RomanoWhat a pure jackass -- trying to play the moral superiority card, only to have it trumped by the truth.
Shuster, you're pure slime sir, pure left wing revisionist slime.
Even if it turned out he
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 17:06 ET by motherbeltEven if it turned out he was right, it was a lousy thing to do, and done for no other reason than to embarrass someone. Someone should ask him if he knows how many soldiers from HIS home town have been killed in Iraq. But of course, he had no reason to have his staff research THAT, now, did he?
Of course, now, if he thinks someone might go that way, he probably has.
Agreed, motherbelt, but just
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 17:09 ET by Mark FinkelsteinAgreed, motherbelt, but just to make very clear: SHUSTER WAS WRONG. As demonstrated by the official Dept. of the Army notification to elected officials that I linked in the update, Pvt. Bohannon lived in Rep. Tanner's district, not Rep. Blackburn's.
I know, Mark. I perhaps
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 18:02 ET by motherbeltI know, Mark. I perhaps worded that badly. I just can't even understand why someone would go to the trouble of looking up a piece of information like that, even if he presented it to the right congressman.
The man should be ashamed of himself. As I said in another comment, I wonder if he himself knows how many soldiers from his own hometown have been killed in Iraq and Afghanistan.
How he faces the man in the mirror in the morning, I don't know. \
Just shameful.
these MSM liberal
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 19:05 ET by TruthMongerthese MSM liberal hacks are so unbelievably petty, partisan, and political even at the expense of our nation's security - absolutely everything in the universe is just a tool for their partisan cheap shots...
I just can't even
Thu, 09/27/2007 - 10:49 ET by BeowulfI just can't even understand why someone would go to the trouble of looking up a piece of information like that, even if he presented it to the right congressman.
Shuster had his people do the same amount of research I did earlier (which took about ten minutes) to come up with the name of a little town in TN from which a soldier was recently killed, a town they thought was in Blackburn's district, for the sole purpose of ambushing a Repub Congress-Critter. But, as it turns out, is it a split district/town and their bow-shot at Blackburn actually wound up hitting a Dem critter. And as I pointed out earlier, they even got the date of Pvt Bohannon's death wrong. This never would have been brought up by Shuster if he knew Bohannon was from Tanner's district.
Clear, blatant, partisan politics in lieu of news. The new MSM...
The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers
I understand that the
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 16:17 ET by SMGalbraithI understand that the producers of these shows have a great deal of influence into the subject matter or topics discussed but do they have any editorial fact checking or sourcing? Any at all?
Apparently, MSNBC in particular gets many of their stories from blogs or websites - it seems mostly liberal ones - and then, again apparently, does no checking or sourcing of the material. No original reporting, no calling of the people being reported on, no tracing of original sources (tapes, transcripts, et cetera).
If this is how the news product is being created, whatever one calls it, it's not journalism. This is gossip mongering (well, there's another term for it but we won't got there today).
Ugh.
Best way to fix this?: overturn Sullivan. Remove the distinction between public and private figures and the quality of journalism will be raised tenfold.
And folks like Olbermann and Shuster will have to find real jobs.
SMG
And these damn people want
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 16:20 ET by drillanwrAnd these damn people want access to the Flag-draped coffins returning home???!!???
NOT ON YOUR WORTHLESS LIVES!
Any Bets...
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 16:25 ET by capavwe'll see this on Media Matters? They monitor the press, right?
<pwaaa-haaa-haaa!!>
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 16:32 ET by drillanwr<pwaaa-haaa-haaa!!>
The Question For MSNBC
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 16:41 ET by PeterDThe question now for MSNBC....
Will David Shuster be named tonight's "Worst Person In The World" by Keith Olbermann?
Again...
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 19:03 ET by Cape Conservativedon't hold your breath!
The end justifies the means
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 17:20 ET by Blogger Guy00001To a committed leftist, you can do anything that you want, provided that the end goal is good. This includes lying and defaming the character of innocent people.
Sue MSNBC and David Shuster
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 17:21 ET by Lame CherryI could care less about politicians or talking heads dumb enough to be on a program like this, but I do care for Pvt. Bohannon's family and all the dead being dug up and used as whores in a necrophile ghoul game.
Mental Cruelty and Emotional Distress are wonderful lawsuit filings for attorneys. There are all those peacenik posters using dead Americans, Ted Koppel's whorecall of the dead to this current ghoulfest by Shuster which are ALL in the public domain and ripe for multi million dollar settlements from wonderful redlands juries just looking for a way to stick it to these leftists.
As this site has many lurkers of power, please take it upon yourselves to contact these families and represent them as most are poor, patriots and have had a horrid loss. Their dead loved ones do not need to be whored by liberals and putting a few million into their pockets will end this BS once and for all.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
Now that's an
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 19:05 ET by Cape Conservativeidea I'll second! How dare he use another's name in vain. The family should definitely pursue this matter. Their son/brother should have been allowed to rest in peace after giving his life for our country.
That's the saddest part, he gave his life for OUR country to allow jerks like Shuster to defame his honor!
Old News
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 17:26 ET by Del DolemonteWe've know for over a year that Davis Shuster is an honors graduate of the Jason Leopold School of Journalism. His faculty advisor was Marc Ash...
Shameless
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 17:39 ET by nkviking75If there were a way to quantify it, David Shuster might well be the points leader in shamelessness. The creep.
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
Shuster must have read up
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 18:01 ET by bassndudeShuster must have read up on your blog Mark. He is a real idiot tho. And it wont take long for him to stick his foot in it again. I am suprised he apologized, very suprised.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
And what a snarky apology!
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 18:35 ET by motherbeltAnd what a snarky apology! He only apologized for getting the district wrong. He should be apologizing for his ambush tactics.
In the liberal mind, the
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 19:40 ET by gueinIn the liberal mind, the ends justify the means. I'm surprised he apologized at all.
The right answer
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 18:41 ET by woolI would really like to know what his reponse would have been had Marsha known the answer. He was clearly setting her up so I'm sure that he would have used even the right name to attempt to cast her in a bad light.
BTW- I am a Tennessean and very proud of the work that Marsha does.
Blogger Conservative Belle,
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 19:12 ET by Mark FinkelsteinBlogger Conservative Belle, who did the legwork that exposed Shuster's mistake, has commented on Shuster's apology:
Bravo, Conservative Belle!
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 19:28 ET by motherbeltBravo, Conservative Belle! Well said!!
If Schuster wasn't KO’s
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 19:19 ET by mlongIf Schuster wasn't KO’s lapdog he'd probably be getting an WPITW award,By the way has that indictment for Rove came in yet?..Schuster assured us it was coming.
"If the mothers ruled the world there would be no god**** wars in the first place." Sally Fields
Yea Mothers like Susan Smith and Andrea Yates.
David Shuster
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 20:09 ET by MRNHow does he still have a job? If a kid at Burger King kept burning fries and giving people the wrong order .... he wouldn't have a job anymore.
I wouldn't trust David Shuster to even make a hamburger. If I ordered a whopper I'd get a fish sandwich and a false report about Karl Rove being indicted.
David Shuster
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 20:09 ET by MRNHow does he still have a job? If a kid at Burger King kept burning fries and giving people the wrong order .... he wouldn't have a job anymore.
I wouldn't trust David Shuster to even make a hamburger. If I ordered a whopper I'd get a fish sandwich and a false report about Karl Rove being indicted.
Couldn't have said it better
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 21:37 ET by fitzfongCouldn't have said it better myself.
}}---> Sliming for fun
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 20:28 ET by Cool ArrowMSNBC isn't engaging in journalism.
They sit around and think of gotcha questions with their analysis prewritten.
Hoping to have a "who's the president of Latvia" moment, they failed to even form the question correctly.
They're nothing more than water cooler clock punchers trying to anticipate where the Grey's Anatomy plot is going.
~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~
Not even close
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 21:04 ET by LighthouseJThat was hardly adequate. It sounded like he merely recognized the factual inaccuracies, not that he really regretted making them However, more importantly he failed to express any sort of regret for his ambush tactics and accusatory tone when he was so eager to diminish Blackburn. I'm surprised he said that much with his foot firmly wedged in his mouth for the next 4 or 5 years.
Democrats are just becoming more unhinged, one nutjob at a time.
"Boats are safe in the harbor, but that's not what they're made for." -- Maritime quote
Shuster should pay pay pay
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 22:28 ET by Lame CherryDavid Shuster deliberately tried to use this to embarrass Marsha Blackburn so she would loose her job.
Shuster should pay now by loosing his job.
Forget the words of apology that some are demanding as talk is cheap. Make Shuster and MSNBC pay financially for their ghoul attack.
Fire Shuster and make him pay in more ways than one.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
My Great Grandmother,
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 23:20 ET by JPR1I do believe, would have spit in this mans face.
I can only hope one day I have a great-grandchild who will say I might have done the same and followed such with a grade A a**whuppin.
I think I better go clean the garage or sumthin'.
Ambush 'journalism'
Wed, 09/26/2007 - 23:50 ET by chazskiOne has to wonder if Shuster has ever asked an anti-war dem congressman (uh, I mean congressperson) if they know the name of the last soldier killed in Iraq in their district. After all, they’re the ones who claim to be soooooo concerned about our troops, who want them to have more time at home before deployment to Iraq, who want them to have the "right" equipment but link the funds to withdrawal dates which assure defeat of the bills, and who accept as fact every accusation of atrocities before hearing any evidence. But Shuster’s memo really says it all, he admits to ambush journalism and that his only purpose was to show up a Republican as hypocritical … in his view, that is, as a self-appointed later day Torquemada. Not exactly impartial, detached objectivity. Way to go, Shuster! He also says that the soldier’s name really wasn’t important, the soldier who gave his last full measure of devotion to defend, among other things, freedom of the press. Again I say, way to go Shuster. You really are a genuine liberal.
Again with the Dims and
Thu, 09/27/2007 - 08:35 ET by steviep831Again with the Dims and their half apologies. If you notice he apologies for making the mistake about the soldier being from another town, not for attacking Ms. Blackburn the way he did. Pathetic.