NBC Touts Ethics Group Supporting John Edwards, Suggests He's Victim of Political Vendetta
On Wednesday's NBC "Today," correspondent Lisa Myers highlighted new support for John Edwards in his legal battle: "...it grabs your attention when a group dedicated to exposing political corruption takes his side against the Justice Department....Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington will file a motion arguing there should be no trial, calling for the case to be dismissed."
A sound bite was featured CREW president Melanie Sloan dismissing the corruption case against the disgraced former senator as "ridiculous" and questioned the motivation behind it: "...the Justice Department is taking such a novel and aggressive prosecution that you really have to wonder why they're doing this." Myers failed to label CREW as a liberal organization.
Later in the story, Myers touted how "Edwards' lawyers want the case thrown out, saying it's unprecedented and politically motivated." She then pointed out: "Republican U.S. Attorney George Holding oversaw the Edwards case, then quit his job to run for Congress weeks after Edwards was charged. Now Edwards claims his long-time adversary brought him down for political gain."
Back in June, Myers touted how: "The indictment has triggered unusual criticism of the Justice Department. From conservatives....And from campaign watchdogs." She proclaimed: "Usually when a disgraced politician gets indicted, there is widespread applause. But not this time. Even some who find Edwards' behavior despicable question the strength of this case."
Similar to her June report, on Wednesday, Myers portrayed Edwards as a sympathetic dad just trying to take care of his kids: "The trial in North Carolina is delayed until January....That means the trial won't interrupt the October wedding of Edwards' oldest daughter Kate to her college sweetheart. Edwards has now enrolled his youngest children in a private school, friends say, to protect their privacy."
Myers did question why CREW would voice support for Edwards: "Your group usually goes after political scoundrels. Why on earth would you be siding with a disgraced politician like John Edwards?" Sloan admitted: "It is hard to come to the defense of somebody as despicable as John Edwards really."
While CREW did defend the "despicable" Democrat, when the liberal organization found out some members of Congress were sleeping in their offices to save money, mostly Republicans, it denounced the practice as an ethical violation: "CREW asked the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE) to investigate whether members of Congress who sleep in their offices are violating House rules. CREW also asked the OCE to determine whether these members are violating tax law by failing to report lodging as a taxable fringe benefit."
Here is a full transcript of Myers' September 21 report:
7:15AM ET
ANN CURRY: John Edwards is getting some surprising help with his criminal defense. An ethics group plans to take an unusual step urging a judge to drop a six-count felony indictment against the former presidential candidate. NBC's senior investigative correspondent Lisa Myers is in Washington with the latest on this story. Hey, Lisa, good morning.
LISA MYERS: Good morning to you, Ann. John Edwards doesn't have a lot of friends these days, so it grabs your attention when a group dedicated to exposing political corruption takes his side against the Justice Department.
[ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Friends in Strange Places; Unlikely Group Defends "Despicable" John Edwards]
John Edwards has attended every court hearing since his indictment, actively involved in defending charges he used illegal campaign contributions to cover up his affair and child with Rielle Hunter. The trial in North Carolina is delayed until January so Edwards' lawyers can go through 400,000 pages of documents from the government's investigation.
That means the trial won't interrupt the October wedding of Edwards' oldest daughter Kate to her college sweetheart. Edwards has now enrolled his youngest children in a private school, friends say, to protect their privacy.
But today in federal court, the watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington will file a motion arguing there should be no trial, calling for the case to be dismissed.
MELANIE SLOAN [CREW]: I think the case is ridiculous frankly.
MYERS: Melanie Sloan, sometimes referred to as the most feared woman on Capitol Hill, heads the organization. Your group usually goes after political scoundrels. Why on earth would you be siding with a disgraced politician like John Edwards?
SLOAN: It is hard to come to the defense of somebody as despicable as John Edwards really. And yet, in this case the Justice Department is taking such a novel and aggressive prosecution that you really have to wonder why they're doing this.
MYERS: The government says two wealthy donors provided almost a million dollars to hide a pregnant Rielle Hunter from voters and argues the money should have been reported as campaign contributions.
DANIEL BOYCE [FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTOR]: If you take away the seedy nature of the activity and boil it down to its essence, it's a typical fraud case.
MYERS: But Edwards' lawyers want the case thrown out, saying it's unprecedented and politically motivated.
GEORGE HOLDING: I'm George Holding and I'm running for Congress.
MYERS: Republican U.S. Attorney George Holding oversaw the Edwards case, then quit his job to run for Congress weeks after Edwards was charged. Now Edwards claims his long-time adversary brought him down for political gain. George Holding told us that he can't comment on an ongoing case, and Edwards continues to maintain that he did not break the law. Many veteran prosecutors believe this case will end with some kind of plea deal, Ann, because both sides have a strong incentive to avoid a trial.
CURRY: Alright, Lisa Myers, thank so much you for keeping an eye on all this.
- Kyle Drennen's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
How long did it take the MSM to break...
Submitted by USMC8411 on Fri, 09/23/2011 - 11:52am.
The Edwards story? They avoided it like the plague, but now it is a vendetta?
"Now Edwards claims his long-time adversary brought him down for political gain." Edwards also "claimed" that he had no affair. He also "claimed" that he had no children outside of his marriage!
Edwards brought himself down by cheating on his cancer riddled wife, and producing a child from that affair, and then he used CAMPAIGN funds to shut the mistress up. Picture any republican doing that. Vendetta? Nope, that prosecution would be "justice."
"Edwards has now enrolled his youngest children in a private school, friends say, to protect their privacy." Wow. Public school kids have no privacy! Thanks for the info.
"But Edwards' lawyers want the case thrown out, saying it's unprecedented and politically motivated."
Hey Johnny... This case may SET the precedent for scumbags like you that will follow! Some other (Supreme Court) cases with "no precedent:" Roe v Wade; Plessey vs Ferguson; Brown vs Board of Education; Marbury vs Madison....
Ethics Group Defending Adultery
Submitted by libBuster on Fri, 09/23/2011 - 11:59am.
So we have an "ethics group" defending adultery. How comical. Where were NBC's stories defending Palin against bogus ethics charges?
The criminal charges against Edwards are somewhat novel and apply the campaign finance laws in a new way. Edwards may well have a good legal case on appeal.
However, his popularity in North Carolina couldn't be much lower because of the way he treated his dying wife. He is likely to be convicted and the governments novel application of the law will be sorted out on appeal.
I bellieve Edwards was offered a misdemeanor plea and no jail time. He should have taken the deal. He will end up a jailed convicted felon. A North Carolina jury will not sympathize with him. If he wins on appeal that will come years later.
He has made some foolish choices.
He lives down the road from me ...
Submitted by CO2Maker on Fri, 09/23/2011 - 12:05pm.
That is, until he gets an apartment at a federal long-term care facility at Butner (where John Hinkley is staying).
Maybe — just maaaaaaybe — it's a misuse of prosecutorial discretion or the wrong application of the law. But, hey, it's John "Two Americas" Trick Pony Edwards we're talking about. Let's wait for another case of campaign finance misbehavior before we sort out the legal procedures. (Bad cases make bad law, and Edwards' is a bad case.)
Just think. A guy is on top of the world, got everything, superrich, smart wife, and he lets his trouser trout swim in other waters. Wow. Where have I heard that Greek tragedy before? Oh yeah, Tiger Woods. And who was that Bill guy with the chubby chick and blue dress and trailer trash and local TV news hottie?
John Edwards is "in a legal
Submitted by buddyc on Fri, 09/23/2011 - 12:52pm.
John Edwards is "in a legal battle'? Really? What over? Did NBC explain to its viewers (for the first time) what the "legal battle" was over? Wouldn't they have to understand the charges against Edwards before they could understand they were merely a "vendetta" against him?
Isn't Lisa Myers the one who sat on the Juanita Broderick story where she accused Bill Clinton of raping her?????
Edwards
Submitted by markprice1983 on Fri, 09/23/2011 - 1:47pm.
Those bastards!
Even though I still think the government may be going a tad...
Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 09/23/2011 - 3:13pm.
...overboard on this Edwards thing, I don't think he has a lot to worry about.
This current "Justice" Department under Herr Erich von Holderen is too corrupt and incompetent to successfully prosecute even Hitler.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
CREW is a pretty fair watchdog group
Submitted by red-sox-rudy on Fri, 09/23/2011 - 3:24pm.
Look, John Edwards is a scumbag. I don't think you will find much argument between the left and right on that statement. However, CREW has always been fair, and has no problems going after Democrats. Go look at their recently released list of the most corrupt members of Congress. As always it is pretty bipartisan list.
CREW is Fair? A bipartisan list? You've got to be kidding?
Submitted by Rush Fan on Fri, 09/23/2011 - 11:18pm.
You're joking right? I get it. You are new at NewsBusters, and you want to start off on the right foot by showing us that you have a sense of humor. Am I right?
Okay, your comment that "CREW has always been fair" is hilarious. I can't stop laughing!
CREW's list that you referenced of the 2011 Most Corrupt Members of Congress consists of 14 members. Of those 14 "Corrupt Congress Members", TEN (10) or 71.4% of them are REPUBLICANS! Is that your definition of fair and bipartisan?
Yes they are fair
Submitted by red-sox-rudy on Sat, 09/24/2011 - 1:24am.
The list of the most corrupt members includes members of both parties. I guess you are suggesting that it is not because it did not have 7 members from each party. The listed members that they could lay out a convincing case for, using extensive foot notes and citing independent sources.......as opposed to just making wild ass accusations because they heard it from Rush or whomever.
red......Do you have a problem with Rush Limbaugh?
Submitted by Rush Fan on Sat, 09/24/2011 - 5:14am.
Melanie Sloan, who is CREW's Executive Director, is a committed Lefty who worked for Democrats John Conyers, Charles Schumer, and Joe Biden. Wikipedia notes that ""Sloan serves as legal counsel for former Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson and his wife, retired CIA officer Valerie Plame Wilson."
You seem to be an intelligent individual Red. Why are you characterizing CREW as fair, when we both know that it is a fact that ALL Lefties lie, are untrustworthy and dishonest, and have a destructive agenda?
Rush has described Lefties in those aforementioned terms, so I know they are true. Surely you don't question the validity of Rush Limbaugh's factual pronouncements? If so, you would force me to retract my description of you as intelligent. Do you really want me to do that?
p.s. I still can't stop laughing. You are one funny newbie.
Haha
Submitted by red-sox-rudy on Sat, 09/24/2011 - 9:17pm.
Yeah, I do question the validity of his "factual pronouncements." Though you are totally and utterly wrong.....I do have to admit that I enjoy your sense of humor. And no I don't mean that in a snarky way.
red,,,,,,I appreciate your humor as well. You are a good sport .
Submitted by Rush Fan on Sat, 09/24/2011 - 11:40pm.
I did enjoy the exchange with you, in spite of our disagreement. We definitely don't agree on CREW, but we both presented our sides without animosity or the use of pejorative expressions. Even a little humor was injected into our discussion. By the way, we do agree that John Edwards is a scumbag.
Take care, and have a great weekend.
regards,
RF
Poor John Edwards!
Submitted by CobraMan on Fri, 09/23/2011 - 4:26pm.
Poor John Edwards. He's facing a political vendetta for violating campaign finance laws! So he perpetrated an illegal act, that's no reason to prosecute the guy, is it?
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
Vendetta, my [take your pick]
Submitted by needle on Wed, 09/28/2011 - 9:34pm.
Can you imagine what this airhead would be saying a Republican were caught doing half of the things that John Edwards did? I thought so.
- Looking forward to the self-annihilation of the Manipulated Stories Machine.