NBC: 'Critics Blast' 'Bad Case' Against John Edwards, 'Did Government Overreach?'
At the top of Monday's NBC Today, co-host Matt Lauer touted objections to the indictment of former Democratic Senator John Edwards: "Some critics blast the government's case against the former presidential candidate. Why they say what he did may not have been against the law."
Introducing a later report on the scandal, fellow co-host Meredith Vieira similarly proclaimed: "There are growing questions over the indictment of former presidential candidate John Edwards for allegedly using campaign funds to hide an affair. Did the government overreach?" The headline that appeared on screen read: "Bad Guy or Bad Case?; Legal Experts Question Indictment of John Edwards."
Senior investigative correspondent Lisa Myers asserted: "Usually when a disgraced politician gets indicted, there is widespread applause. But not this time. Even some who find Edwards' behavior despicable question the strength of this case." She sympathetically portrayed Edwards: "A friend of Edwards' late wife Elizabeth told NBC that despite John's betrayal, nobody wanted him to face criminal charges. They worry about the couple's young children, Jack and Emma Claire."
Myers briefly noted that Edwards had been "charged with soliciting and covering up almost a million dollars, provided by two wealthy donors" to conceal an affair and child with Rielle Hunter during his 2008 presidential run. However, she then declared: "The indictment has triggered unusual criticism of the Justice Department. From conservatives.... And from campaign watchdogs."
The conservative she cited was Rick Henderson of North Carolina's John Locke Foundation, the supposed "campaign watchdog" she cited was Melanie Sloan of the liberal organization, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.
In addition, Myers also cited a Washington Post Editorial Board Op/Ed: "It is troubling that the Justice Department would choose to devote its scarce resources to pursuing this questionable case."
Myers' report was very much on par with the view of left-wing MSNBC host Chris Matthews. On his May 29 NBC Sunday program, The Chris Matthews Show, he asked his typically liberal panel of guests: "Was it appropriate, overall, for the Justice Department to go after John Edwards with a criminal charge on campaign finances from the past campaign?" Time's Joe Klein pleaded: "Leave him [Edwards] alone. I mean why waste our effort on that when we haven't indicted a single banker after the crash of 2008?"
Moments later, Matthews turned to The Daily Beast's Andrew Sullivan and implied political motives in the case against Edwards: "Andrew, do you like the smell of this case?" Sullivan replied: "No I don't. And I agree entirely with my esteemed colleague Joe that we should focus on the people who plunged this country into [the crash of 2008]." Matthews agreed: "We have enough real crime out there without worrying about this stuff, that's my view."
Here is a full transcript of Myers' June 6 report on Today:
7:00AM ET TEASE:
MATT LAUER: And out and about. John Edwards' former mistress spotted in public with their now-3-year-old daughter as some critics blast the government's case against the former presidential candidate. Why they say what he did may not have been against the law.
7:13AM ET SEGMENT:
MEREDITH VIEIRA: There are growing questions over the indictment of former presidential candidate John Edwards for allegedly using campaign funds to hide an affair. Did the government overreach? NBC's senior investigative correspondent, Lisa Myers, has the latest. Good morning, Lisa.
[ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Bad Guy or Bad Case? Legal Experts Question Indictment of John Edwards]
LISA MYERS: Good morning, Meredith. Usually when a disgraced politician gets indicted, there is widespread applause. But not this time. Even some who find Edwards' behavior despicable question the strength of this case. John Edwards' former mistress, Rielle Hunter, has made no public comment about his indictment. But this weekend she was all smiles, posing with the little girl she shares with Edwards, 3-year-old Frances Quinn. These photos obtained by NBC News, a striking contrast to this one, as Edwards prepared to face the media throng after being charged with six felonies.
JOHN EDWARDS: I did not break the law.
MYERS: Edwards spent the weekend out of sight at his estate, focused, a spokesman said, on getting daughter Emma Claire ready for camp. A friend of Edwards' late wife Elizabeth told NBC that despite John's betrayal, nobody wanted him to face criminal charges. They worry about the couple's young children, Jack and Emma Claire. Local reaction is less forgiving.
UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: I have no trust in someone that continually lies.
UNIDENTIFIED MAN: John Edwards has become a rather pathetic figure.
MYERS: Edwards is charged with soliciting and covering up almost a million dollars, provided by two wealthy donors. And used to keep Hunter, and later their child, hidden away in lavish homes and on private jets while he ran for president.
EDWARDS: Thank you! Thank you!
MYERS: Though the payments did not go to Edwards' campaign, the government alleges they amounted to unlawful campaign contributions because they were meant to keep his candidacy viable. Edwards' lawyers say the money was a gift from friends to hide the affair from his wife. The indictment has triggered unusual criticism of the Justice Department. From conservatives:
RICK HENDERSON [JOHN LOCKE FOUNDATION]: I think he's a reprehensible person, but not every scum or liar or reprehensible person is a criminal. And the federal government seems to be criminalizing bad behavior.
MYERS: And from campaign watchdogs:
MELANIE SLOAN [CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON]: I think that John Edwards is a lousy human being, but I think this is a really lousy and flimsy criminal case.
MYERS: A Washington Post editorial said, 'It is troubling that the Justice Department would choose to devote its scarce resources to pursuing this questionable case.' But others argue that prosecutors have more evidence than they reveal, and that these kind of campaign finance abuses need to be prosecuted.
JOE SINSHEIMER [POLITICAL CONSULTANT]: What the government says is, 'There has to be a line. John Edwards crossed that line. We believe it's criminal behavior.'
MYERS: Hunter's publicist said Edwards and Hunter now raise their daughter together and see each other quite often. A friend of Edwards told us that the Senator and his parents have a close relationship with Quinn and see her quite often. Meredith.
VIEIRA: Lisa Myers, thank you very much.
- Kyle Drennen's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
And as predicted, the liberal
Submitted by Beukeboom on Mon, 06/06/2011 - 12:30pm.
And as predicted, the liberal spin for Edwards has begun.
Only a liberal mind
Submitted by Dave81 on Mon, 06/06/2011 - 12:44pm.
Would think that investigating a presidential candidate for misuing campaign funding is government overreaching, but requiring every citizen to purchase private insurance isn't.
I know Johnny Boy.
Submitted by Newsbubba on Mon, 06/06/2011 - 12:46pm.
He is a scumbag. He has always been a scumbag. His deceased wife was one of his enablers.
The man could not carry his home precinct when he ran for the senate. His neighbors knew what he was.
He threatened to sue a non-profit sports league run by volunteer parents because he wanted to pick players for his team instead of having them assigned to keep the teams equal in ability and talent. He wanted to load up.
He needs to do hard time so we can all see who invites him to the spring prom in the big house. He's been dishing out grief for years, so now he needs to pay the piper.
He's guilty as hell. He knew the money was to save his sorry ass as a presidential candidate. If you don't believe that, you're definitely of the liberal persuasion.
Bubba
Submitted by ricklail on Mon, 06/06/2011 - 1:55pm.
Scumbag is too nice a word. I thought more like toe jam.
What is the difference between John Edwards and a carp? One is a fish and the other is a bottom feeder.
I don't hope out a lot of hope that he will see the inside of a cell.
Super Sleaze John Edwards Gets The Inside Track In Court
Submitted by Avitar on Mon, 06/06/2011 - 12:57pm.
As a super sleazy lawyer he may have triumphed again. One donor has died and the other one is age 100. If he can keep her from saying that she was making a campaign contribution in court before she dies then he is home free since even if they treated the donation as a campaign contribution and did not pay the gift tax that is their responsibility and not his. He may stink on ice but he is likely to walk on these charges.
Tears for Edwards
Submitted by Galvanic on Mon, 06/06/2011 - 12:52pm.
LISA MYERS: " . . . Usually when a disgraced politician gets indicted, there is widespread applause. But not this time."
Maybe amongst politicians and the Left. Hasn't she checked the conservative blogs?
LISA MYERS: "Even some who find Edwards' behavior despicable question the strength of this case. John Edwards' former mistress, Rielle Hunter, has made no public comment about his indictment."
She's not likely to. The difference between her testimony and her silence can be measured in $ millions, and she reportedly hopes that she and her millionaire will get married now that his wife is dead.
LISA MYERS: "But this weekend she was all smiles, posing with the little girl she shares with Edwards, 3-year-old Frances Quinn. These photos obtained by NBC News, a striking contrast to this one, as Edwards prepared to face the media throng after being charged with six felonies."
She's in the money, and she knows it.
A grand jury was convinced that there was enough evidence to indict Edwards and send the case to trial; that makes it worth prosecuting, regardless of what his defenders (Washington Post, NBC, etc.) think.
she has been paid, so what
Submitted by jkwtrading on Mon, 06/06/2011 - 5:42pm.
she has been paid, so what the hell would she care. Gold diggers love the cash, she does too.
big surprise!
Submitted by sometimesright on Mon, 06/06/2011 - 12:57pm.
circle those wagons NBC...circle those wagons!
DOJ has "scarce resources"?
Submitted by SickofLibs on Mon, 06/06/2011 - 1:08pm.
Oh really? Maybe Holder should redirect some of his precious resources from stonewalling to prosecuting and actually upholding existing laws. Right now, I'd say the ratio is probably about 10:1.
Well, Rielle Pol-Hunter had a good run. I'd sure like someone to spend almost a million bucks on me in two years.
Not really, Sicko.
Submitted by Newsbubba on Mon, 06/06/2011 - 1:29pm.
I'm sure you wouldn't want to do what Rielle had to do to earn it!
Lauer
Submitted by iveseenitall on Mon, 06/06/2011 - 2:46pm.
Lauer --- ignorant media dirtbag. And, dare we say it,---if Edwards were a REPUBLICAN.... [Never,Never trust a "liberal" (progressive)]
BTW---Today is June 6th-"D-Day" --- God Bless America!
Mark Levin mada a pretty good case that the government...
Submitted by Dave. on Mon, 06/06/2011 - 2:51pm.
...is going a little overboard here.
I find Edwards as distateful as anyone, but even that dirt bag doesn't deserve 30 years in the slammer.
I also agree with Klein, as those responsible for the financial meltdown should be held accountable.
Dodd, Waters, and Frank should be among the very first arrested.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
If it is an overreach by the DOJ ....
Submitted by Kenyon Schraeder on Mon, 06/06/2011 - 3:22pm.
.... then why aren't these MSM talking heads naming names instead of referring to the "bad guys" as simply "The Justice Department"? Oh wait, it's probably because this administration is leftist just like them. Talk about covering AND shilling for one another! It's all scripted for effect.
John Edwards is going to be made to pay not for this campaign fund problem but rather for something he most likely refused to do or threatened to do back in 2008 when he was still a viable candidate. I believe they still refer to it as "payback" and it's been the defining hallmark of Democrat politics.
Edwards will have the
Submitted by jkwtrading on Mon, 06/06/2011 - 5:39pm.
Edwards will have the opportunity to practice REAL law... his own defense
if as the critics say is correct, the scum bag known as Edwards will have plenty of lawyers to use. He will get a fair trial all his ill begotten previous monies earned can buy him.