CBS's Smith to Haley Barbour: 1994 GOP Win 'Didn't End So Well'
In an interview with Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour on Monday's CBS Early Show, co-host Harry Smith was already predicting failure if the GOP won control of Congress: "1994 was an important year for Republicans....Some people would say that didn't end so well for the Republicans, especially with the stalemated government. Have you any concerns that that might happen again?"
Barbour, who is also head of the Republican Governors Association, shot back: "It's going to be up to the President. I think the Republicans are going to hear the people very plainly, 'cut out all this spending, don't raise our taxes. Focus on job creation, economic growth.' What's the President going to hear? And I can't answer that."
Earlier in the interview, Smith was incredulous of a Republican pledge to cut spending in the new Congress: "One of the promises is they're going to cut $100 billion out of the budget in this first year. Is that really possible?" Barbour cited significant spending cuts in state governments as evidence: "$100 billion is less than 3% of the federal budget. In Mississippi, our appropriations this year are 13.3% below where they were two years ago....In Virginia, they've just cut their spending by billions of dollars. I mean, the idea that the federal government can't save 3%, the American people know better than that."
Here is a full transcript of the November 1 interview:
7:04AM ET
HARRY SMITH: Also in Washington for an exclusive interview, is Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour, chairman of the Republican Governors Association. Governor, good morning.
HALEY BARBOUR: Hey, Harry, good morning.
SMITH: So Republicans predicted to win big in the House tomorrow. Are you going to go so far as to say they're going to take the Senate, too?
[ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: One Day To Go; GOP's Plan for Shifting Balance of Power]
BARBOUR: Well, I hope it's as good as Bill Plante says. I think it is highly likely we will win a majority in the House. But, it's harder in the Senate. It's more of a stretch. We have to win a net of ten. I think we'll make significant gains in the Senate but I don't know if we can make it to ten. You have to run the table.
SMITH: Yeah. You know an interesting piece in the Wall Street Journal editorial page today and it says that last – the last election was a voting out the other party and that this election, again, will be the same thing, that Americans are going to vote out the party in power. What promise can you make that what Americans are yearning for will be answered in the election tomorrow?
BARBOUR: I think it's a very important observation that this is a referendum on Obama's policies and the American people do not like Obama's policies. They don't like all of this outrageous spending. They don't like running up the deficits. They don't like piling trillions of dollars of debt on our children and grandchildren, and they don't think it works. They think it's been bad for the economy, that it has made it harder to create jobs.
SMITH: But if that's-
BARBOUR: So we Republicans – we have to understand they're not saying 'hey, we love you Republicans,' they're saying, 'we're not satisfied with this and we'll give you guys a chance.'
SMITH: Okay. Because that becomes interesting. If that's true now and that was true two years ago, what do the Republicans understand now that they didn't understand two years ago?
BARBOUR: Well, I think, very importantly, what you're going to see is the Republicans are going to respond to what the American people are saying. Less spending, no taxes, no-
SMITH: $100 billion – one of the promises is they're going to cut $100 billion out of the budget in this first year. Is that really possible?
BARBOUR: Harry, $100 billion is less than 3% of the federal budget. In Mississippi, our appropriations this year are 13.3% below where they were two years ago. I was on TV yesterday with Tim Kaine, the Democratic National Chairman, a very nice guy, by the way. In Virginia, they've just cut their spending by billions of dollars. I mean, the idea that the federal government can't save 3%, the American people know better than that.
SMITH: Last but not least, a lot of people are wondering, 1994 was an important year for Republicans and Republicans swept in two years after Bill Clinton took office. Some people would say that didn't end so well for the Republicans, especially with the stalemated government. Have you any concerns that that might happen again?
BARBOUR: Well, I think it's very likely. It's going to be up to the President. I think the Republicans are going to hear the people very plainly, 'cut out all this spending, don't raise our taxes. Focus on job creation, economic growth.' What's the President going to hear? And I can't answer that.
SMITH: Alright.
BARBOUR: We're going to have to hear from the President.
SMITH: Last but not least, are you going to run for president?
BARBOUR: Well, after this election's over, we'll sit down and see if there's anything to think about, but I appreciate the idea.
SMITH: Governor Barbour, as always, a pleasure to speak with you, thanks so much for your time.
BARBOUR: Thank you, Harry.
SMITH: Alright, take care. Maggie.
MAGGIE RODRIGUEZ: That is not a no. We will watch that.
- Kyle Drennen's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
We could do worse.
Submitted by Saint Zero on Mon, 11/01/2010 - 12:00pm.
He'd never raise Cig taxes, but might otherwise not be a bad choice. Of course, anyone could be better than Obama.
Splitting "hairs" Harry
Submitted by Tomorama on Mon, 11/01/2010 - 12:02pm.
Big fan of Barbour, plain speaker, but knows his stuff and IT SOUNDS LIKE he is listening to what WE are saying.
The meme already by bald pussies like Smith is that if nothing get's done, it's all the Republicans fault.
And "Baldy", the Country did alright after WE took over with a Dem President or did you forget about Welfare reform and a forced balanced budget.
Harry The Pervert
Submitted by AgentAmerican on Mon, 11/01/2010 - 12:12pm.
Let the vote I cast be a f***ing ice pick towards the ilk of Harry the Hack Smith.
I have never been this fired up to vote in my life.
This is the closest I have come to actually picking up a pitch fork and taking to the streets. The closest ANYONE has come to actually revolting.
May have to anyway
Submitted by jon_torlin on Mon, 11/01/2010 - 1:53pm.
A revolt may have to happen anyway, who knows how the Chairman will react if and when the Republicans take the win? (I say "if and when" because until it happens, it hasn't happened yet)
We already know that he sticks to his guns, as wrong as they are, no matter what. Hell, he called Americans who "disagree" with his policies "enemies" which is very troubling. This was just barely a few days ago too! If this doesn't bother people, there's a problem.
Rangel is pushing a bill to give the Chairman his own personal security force, the one he wanted. Wanna bet this might pass in the lame duck congress before January?
With everything that's happened in the last couple of days, including the terrorist plot with the toner cartridges on cargo planes, this is gonna get real ugly.
-Jon
I'm not sure it will pass as
Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Mon, 11/01/2010 - 2:54pm.
I'm not sure it will pass as there are some patriots still in congress. If Obama gets a security force then we have slid into the 1930's and NAZI Germany with the SS. We still have the USA military but with Barry ....
Of course the left said the same about President Bush teh younger. The things that say this might come to fruition is the Panthers at the polling place, the government sent 400 watchers to watch the pol watchers, and the seeming desperation of Barry as he loses power.
Be afraid very afraid.
"Stalemated government" One
Submitted by Edhenry on Mon, 11/01/2010 - 12:12pm.
"Stalemated government"
One can only wish!
1994 didn't end well for
Submitted by eaglewingz08 on Mon, 11/01/2010 - 1:28pm.
1994 didn't end well for Republicans? Then what was the cause of those budget surpluses that even these liberal tool 'reporters' notice happened during Republican Control of Congress from 1994-2000?
Halloween is over, Harriet... ditch the cheerleader costume.
Submitted by SickofLibs on Mon, 11/01/2010 - 3:21pm.
This guy is too much.
Anybody who knows anything about anything, knows that ...
Submitted by jawebster1 on Mon, 11/01/2010 - 5:56pm.
the success enjoyed by Clinton came after January 1995 when he was dragged, kicking and screaming, by the Republicans in Congress forcing him to do the right thing. (Which led him to welfare reform and budget surpluses.) If not for Newt Gingrich, Clinton would be known for two things: He'd be known for a 'failed' presidency and for Monica Lewinsky. Instead, he is considered by many, to be a better president than Carter was, or Obama is. Faint praise I know, but better than what could have been.
Mr. Smith should thank the 1994 GOP Congress for rescuing his hero. (He won't, because he is a Liberal, but he should.)
Well, jaw..you know a little about some things, but
Submitted by Jer on Mon, 11/01/2010 - 6:59pm.
not a lot about this thing.
Clinton's Deficit Reduction Act which passed early in his first term without a single Republican vote was already producing economic success despite dire predictions to the contrary made by the likes of Gingrich and Limbaugh.
Furthermore, Clinton was not exactly dragged "kicking and screaming" into signing welfare reform legislation inasmuch as it had long been a goal of his from his time as governor of Arkansas, including an explicit endorsement of reform during the1992 presidential race. He did object to certain aspects of the Republican-written bill after the GOP gained congressional control in 1994. But he agreed to it, much to the chagrin of many liberals inside and outside of his administration.
Jer
And all you know about it, Jer---
Submitted by matthewdean on Mon, 11/01/2010 - 11:33pm.
is what you post up with your usual liberal Democratic talking points.
Gotta give you credit; though it gets you absolutely nowhere with convincing conservatives, you just will not give up.
A voice in the wilderness of politics, but unbelievably ubiquitous on NB threads.
Lost.
Lonely.
Forlorn.
Like an itch that can't quite be reached.
Rest up, Jer.
Tomorrow is gonna be a long day for libs.
MD
Matthew, not that I don't appreciate the attention, but...
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 11/02/2010 - 1:44am.
has it ever occurred to you that the reason I'm so 'ubiquitous' on the NB threads is that I'm trying like hell to lose you?
It's the only reason I was dreading the return of the "tracking" function. Now, I've got absolutely NO chance of escape.
Jer
Well Jer---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 11/02/2010 - 6:10pm.
even you yourself said you are outnumbered around here.
As a CAM (conservative attack machine), I like to mess with liberal trolls.
As an ultra-conservative, I must try and find liberals to bullyrag.
House liberals, of which, numbers are very, very, limited.
You, balboa, Dead Kennedy of the thousand names, grislybear, and once in a blue moon, Jason C.
balboa has apparently been hiding out, and Dead Kennedy has been too busy trying to put out the flames on his ass recently, to even bother with.
While that may kinda narrow down my search pattern, it almost assures, given your "ubiquitous ubiquity", where my laser sight will likely land.
Know what I mean? :^)
MD
Okay, Matthew...keep on bringing it
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 11/02/2010 - 7:37pm.
grizzlybear is hibernating, bal has posted just a couple of comments that I know of since the changeover, and blue moons are now more frequent that posts by JasonC.
There are a few sporadic comments by a handful of other libs, but not nearly enough.
[Anyway, I was just joshin' about trying to lose you]
Jer
Jer---
Submitted by matthewdean on Wed, 11/03/2010 - 12:59am.
Spot on with the bear, bal, and blue moons and Jason C.
For someone taking hits from every angle, you do astonishingly well.
MD
Thanks for tossing me the
Submitted by Jer on Wed, 11/03/2010 - 1:14am.
Thanks for tossing me the bone, Matthew, but it doesn't get you all the way out of the dog house. Maybe a couple of paws.
Jer
While that may give me pause, Jer---
Submitted by matthewdean on Wed, 11/03/2010 - 1:46am.
You have got to come to grips with the fact that being in a liberals doghouse is the equivalent of reaching nirvana for me.
It means I have pissed a liberal off.
There IS no higher praise.
MD
Two words
Submitted by KC Mulville on Mon, 11/01/2010 - 5:44pm.
How can we guarantee that the GOP won't vote for whopping spending increases?
Two words: tea party.
It astounds me that media bobbleheads can do one segment on how the tea party is going to dictate to the GOP establishment, and then switch to another interview where they suggest that the GOP is going to blow it again.
Put two and two together, will ya, guys?
Didn't end so well? Right,
Submitted by GregE on Mon, 11/01/2010 - 10:24pm.
Didn't end so well? Right, because Republicans lost their way. So it ended 12 years later. It always ends Harry. The nation doesn't remain in the direction of one party forever, last I checked.
Barbour could have shot back with something like...."Harry, did you say in 1994 that the Democrat 40 year reign 'didn't end so well'? Somehow I doubt you did."