CBS’s Smith: ‘Republicans and Conservatives Question’ Palin on Ticket

Photo of Kyle Drennen.

Harry Smith and Katie Couric, CBS While talking to CBS Evening News anchor Katie Couric about her interview with Sarah Palin, on Wednesday’s Early Show, co-host Harry Smith asked: "...there is a -- I won't say growing -- but there are a number of Republicans and conservatives have started to question whether or not she's good for this ticket. What -- what is the feeling in the McCain camp about that?" Couric actually defended Palin: "Well, you know, she has helped the McCain campaign raise $30 million. Helped them double their get-out-the-vote effort. And as you can see, she's energized the crowds." On Monday, co-host Julie Chen described how "Some conservatives want Sarah Palin off the Republican ticket."

Prior to that question, Smith asked Couric: "What did she have to say about troopergate?" To that, Couric explained: "Well, you know, there is a preliminary report coming out October 10. She didn't tell me that, but she basically said that whole investigation into whether she fired the public safety commissioner because he wouldn't get rid of the trooper who had been married to her sister...had been highly politicized, that it belonged in the hands of the personnel board, rather than the state legislature, despite the fact that 8 out of the 12 who initiated the investigation are Republicans."

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Several parts of Couric’s interview was aired, including one question and answer that was not aired on Tuesday night:

COURIC: They were heading to a key swing state. We were invited up to chat with the candidate, who's press availability has been tightly controlled. Do you think the coverage of you has been sexist?

SARAH PALIN: No, I don't. I mean, I know that there's -- it's obvious there's a double standard here in terms of what -- what the media has been doing. But I think that's more -- I think more attributable to just the media elite, the Washington elite, not knowing who I am and just asking a whole lot of questions and not so much based on gender, though, but based on just the fact that I'm not part of the Washington herd.

COURIC: Having said that, do you think it would be sexist, Governor, not to question your credentials and your policy positions?

PALIN: It would be sexist if the media were to hold back and not ask me about my experience, my vision, my principles, my values. You're right.

Here is the full transcript of the Early Show segment:

7:00AM TEASER:

HARRY SMITH: Sarah Palin exclusive -- on the eve of the vice presidential debate, Sarah Palin, one-on-one with Katie Couric on everything from sexism-

KATIE COURIC: Do you think the coverage of you has been sexist?

SMITH: To the issue of abortion.

SARAH PALIN: If you're asking, though, kind of foundationally here, should anybody end up in jail for having had an abortion -- absolutely not.

SMITH: Katie Couric joins us live.

7:01AM TEASER:

SMITH: Katie, some of the most riveting and revealing television of the last week has been provided with Katie's exclusive interviews with Sarah Palin. We have brand new information and some new stuff that has not yet been seen on the 'Evening News.' Katie is here with that this morning. And we have some important questions for her as well.

7:06AM SEGMENT:

HARRY SMITH: Over the past week, CBS 'Evening News' anchor Katie Couric has been interviewing Sarah Palin, an opportunity to get an inside look at the governor of Alaska as she gets ready for tomorrow's big debate against Joe Biden in St. Louis. And Katie Couric is with us in the studio this morning. Good morning.

KATIE COURIC: Hi Harry, Good morning. Well, as you know, last week when she was here in New York City meeting with world leaders, I spoke with Governor Palin primarily about foreign policy and the economy. But then, Harry, I spent much of the day with her on Monday, focusing on domestic issues, an area she feels more comfortable discussing. Life for Sarah Palin is a whirlwind. In Philadelphia, her 14-year-old daughter, Willow, was along for the ride. So nice to meet you, too. I didn't realize you were going to be coming along. That's exciting, are you having a good time with all of this?

PALIN: It's so fun.

COURIC: They were heading to a key swing state. We were invited up to chat with the candidate, who's press availability has been tightly controlled. Do you think the coverage of you has been sexist?

SARAH PALIN: No, I don't. I mean, I know that there's -- it's obvious there's a double standard here in terms of what -- what the media has been doing. But I think that's more -- I think more attributable to just the media elite, the Washington elite, not knowing who I am and just asking a whole lot of questions and not so much based on gender, though, but based on just the fact that I'm not part of the Washington herd.

COURIC: Having said that, do you think it would be sexist, Governor, not to question your credentials and your policy positions?

PALIN: It would be sexist if the media were to hold back and not ask me about my experience, my vision, my principles, my values. You're right.

COURIC: Later, in their first joint interview, Palin focused on energy policy and the importance of developing alternative sources.

PALIN: John McCain has some great plans there also, tapping in to the nuclear, the clean coal, to biomass, geothermal, tides, waves, all those things that we have as alternative energy sources. It's got to be an all-of-the-above approach to energy independence.

COURIC: Speaking of energy, she's producing plenty of it out on the campaign trail. And she doesn't hold back.

PALIN: Our opponent likes to point the finger of blame. But when it comes to major reform, has he ever lifted a finger to help?

COURIC: While she shakes hands on the rope line, her running mate and his wife Cindy, engage in a bipartisan post hand shake ritual. Are you germophobes or just sensible?

CINDY MCCAIN: Sensible.

COURIC: You're heading to Sedona to work on your debate, what is your coach advising you?

PALIN: I don't have a debate coach.

COURIC: Well what are your coaches-?

PALIN: I don't -- I have quite a few people who are giving us information about the record of Obama and Biden. And at the end of the day, though, it is, it's so clear, again, what those choices are. Either new ideas, new energy, and reform of Washington D.C., or more of the same.

COURIC: Later on the campaign bus, our conversation continued. First topic, global warming. Last spring, the Governor was quoted as saying: 'I'm not one who would attribute it to being man-made.' She's now more open to the possibility.

PALIN: I'm not going to solely blame all of man's activities on changes in climate because the world's weather patterns are cyclical and over history, we have seen changes there. But it kind of doesn't matter at this point, as we debate what caused it. The point is, it's real. We need to do something about it.

COURIC: Because it if it's not man-made, then one might wonder well how can human beings contribute to a solution?

PALIN: Well, human beings certainly are contributing to pollution today. And to some adverse effects on the environment. And it's all of our jobs to do to clean things up and that's what we're committed to doing.

COURIC: John McCain proposed legislation calling for mandatory caps on global warming gases or CO-2 emissions. Do you agree with that?

PALIN: I support his position on that, absolutely.

COURIC: But he has somewhat backtracked on the campaign trail, saying it wouldn't -- they wouldn't -- the caps wouldn't be mandatory. So what do you think? Do you think voluntary caps go far enough or they should be mandatory?

PALIN: He's got a good cap and trade policy that he supports and details are being hashed out, even right now. But in principle, absolutely I support all that we can do to reduce emissions and to clean up this planet. And John McCain is right onboard with that.

COURIC: Voluntary or mandatory in your view?

PALIN: We're going to keep working on how it can be implemented to actually make sense and make a difference.

COURIC: Palin says she makes no apologies for her pro-life views and opposes abortion, even in the case of rape or incest.

PALIN: Personally, I would counsel that person to choose life despite horrific, horrific circumstances that this person would find themselves in. And if you're asking, though, kind of foundationally here, should anybody end up in jail for having had an abortion, absolutely not. That's -- that's nothing that I would ever support.

COURIC: Do you believe evolution should be taught as an accepted scientific principle or one of several theories?

PALIN: Oh, I think it should be taught as an accepted principle. And, you know, I say that also as the daughter of a school teacher, a science teacher, who has really instilled in me a respect for science. It should be taught in our schools and I won't ever deny that I see the hand of God in this beautiful creation that is Earth. But, that is not part of a policy or a local curriculum in a school district. Science should be taught in science class.

COURIC: Should creationism be allowed to be taught anywhere in public schools?

PALIN: Don't have a problem at all with kids debating all sides of theories, all sides of ideas that they have. Kids do it today whether it's on paper, in a curriculum, or not. Curriculums also, are best left to the local school districts instead of big brother federal government telling a district what they can and can't teach.

COURIC: And she took issue with news reports that claimed the Wasilla Bible Church sponsored a conference that could convert gays. She says the church, of which she is not a member, only promoted it.

PALIN: When the media gets it wrong, it frustrates Americans who are just trying to get the facts and be able to make up their mind on -- about a person's values. So, it does matter.

COURIC: Palin said she doesn't know, quote, 'what prayers are going to be answered or not answered,' end quote. And she told me one of her best friends is gay, but quote, 'she is not my gay friend, she is one of my best friends who happens to have made a choice that isn't a choice that I have made.'

SMITH: What did she have to say about troopergate?

COURIC: Well, you know, there is a preliminary report coming out October 10. She didn't tell me that, but she basically said that whole investigation into whether she fired the public safety commissioner because he wouldn't get rid of the trooper who had been married to her sister-

SMITH: Her sister, right.

COURIC: -had been highly politicized, that it belonged in the hands of the personnel board, rather than the state legislature, despite the fact that 8 out of the 12 who initiated the investigation are Republicans.

SMITH: Right, there is a -- I won't say growing -- but there are a number of Republicans and conservatives have started to question whether or not she's good for this ticket. What -- what is the feeling in the McCain camp about that?

COURIC: Well, you know, she has helped the McCain campaign raise $30 million. Helped them double their get-out-the-vote effort. And as you can see, she's energized the crowds. What some people wonder is it just the base -- people would have voted Republican anyway. Or will the impact affect independents and uncommitted voters? So, you know, clearly she has a lot of pluses as well in terms of how the McCain campaign views her.

SMITH: Yeah, and how is she getting ready for the debates now?

COURIC: I think she's being -- she's talking to all the different policy advisors. You know, Harry, every campaign has an economics -- a number of economics advisors-

SMITH: Foreign policy.

COURIC: Foreign policy. So I think she's in Sedona really talking with them and she's told me she was really looking into Joe Biden's record. So, I think she'll be armed with that as well.

SMITH: Yeah. Extraordinary, extraordinary stuff. And tonight on the 'Evening News,' five questions?

COURIC: No, two questions, actually.

SMITH: Two questions, vice presidential questions, we'll call them, right?

COURIC: That's right. You know, we posed the same questions to Joe Biden as well did to Sarah Palin. And you'll see their answers side-by-side tonight.

SMITH: Alright, and that will be on the CBS 'Evening News' this evening.

COURIC: Correct.

SMITH: Thank you very, very much.

COURIC: Thanks, Harry.

SMITH: That's it. See we have five questions later on this morning that you didn't know about Joe Biden and his wife.

COURIC: Way to do your homework, Harry.

SMITH: Not to be -- oh, that's cold. That's cold. Thanks, Katie. Always good to have you here.

—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I cannot believe that the MSM...

think that we are so stupid that we would not fact check everything that comes out of their sorry little mouths. I have never seen such acts of desperation to keep people from voting for McCain/Palin.

I can see the CBS teaser now; "News just in ONE conservative will not vote for McCain/Palin is this the end of the Republican presidential ticket!?"

"9 out of 10 doctors agree that flag burning is the number one killer of liberals."

  There are democrats who

  There are democrats who feel obama could have made a better VP choice.... and biden is one of them.

Palin/Steele-2012

That is how I feel about our VP choice.

Now that's a ticket that I

Now that's a ticket that I could vote for multiple times. :-) 

“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)

Maybe Couric forgot

That Alaskan GOP party leaders aren't exactly thrilled with Sarah Palin and with good reason. A lot of them are also under investigation and many are indicted or already in jail! When it comes to rooting out corruption Sarah Palin has been an equal opportunity governor. 

Well that's true, isn't it?

Well that's true, isn't it? Aren't there conservatives and Republicans that question Palin as a VP candidate?

   Well of course it's

   Well of course it's true.  No candidate anywhere at anytime has 100% support.  The attempt here is to make Anti-Palin sentiment seem abnormal and newsworthy.

But the insinuation of the

But the insinuation of the story is that this is unusual and applies solely to mcCain/Palin.

In fact, I remember hearing people questioning BillClintons choice of the addled eco-wurriur.  But the news never reported it.

The vast majority of

The vast majority of conservatives support Palin. Hell, they would rather the ticket was reversed and she was heading it!

“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)

Who are does consevative?

 

I want to know what conservatives are saying this, because
if it wasn't for Palin, McCain would not have a chance. Yes she has had a bad
couple of interviews and libs are making fun of it but whenever she is on the
trail it has a different feeling. The msm is desperate to kill Palin but they won’t.

Obama: "No, if we're going to ask questions about who is promulgating negative ads that are completely unrelated to the issues at hand, I think I win that contest pretty handily"

I'm one who has been saying it

The Couric interview was my worst fears realized.

Wanna play

Wanna play GOTCHA?????

"Katie, In your view, what is the Strategic Center of Gravity in the Current War against Islamo Fascism.?"   Deer in headlights look totally expected.

I can play GOTCHA ALL NIGHT LONG!  We call it "Stump the Chump" here at the Intel School and it is a bad way to understand whether someone if capable of doing a job.

My only solace from the

My only solace from the anger I feel at "Blah Harry" Smith and his dispicable bias against Republicans is the realization that what, only five or so people watch his crappy show. My other comfort is provided by the fact that Sweet Katie Purebred is going down in flames with no one on the way "to save the day".  

McNotObama '08

I like the "Republicans and

I like the "Republicans and Conservatives" used to make it sound like more people. Sort of like "Liberals and Democrats and everything". Silly to say the least.

"Forget change, I want improvement!"

Harry... Here's how your

Harry...

Here's how your statement should have looked... "there are a small number of Republicans and conservatives..."

 Palin Is Caught And Her Career Is Over! 

 

 

Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/  

of course the dems are way beyond

questioning whether biden was the best pick for their ticket. there isn't even any debate about that. everyone knows he is not the best for their ticket.

 

Ecclesiastes 10:2 The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.

"A number of Republicans"

"but there are a number of Republicans and conservatives have started to question whether or not she's good for this ticket."

A "number" of Republicans and conservatives also said the same about every Republican VP pick since I can remember. How many of you remember how the "conservatives" were horrified about Ford as VP and how many complained that he was "hurting" the ticket? I wasn't even old enough to vote in that election, yet I know that Nixon/Ford won. The same was true of Reagan/Bush, Bush/Quayle, and Bush/Cheney. It seems to me that, the more "a number of Republicans and conservatives" complain, the better the candidates do. So, let them keep complaining about Palin for, as evident in Republican victories over the last 40 years, the more they complain, the better she'll and McCain will do in the election.

Obama: My job is above my pay grade

Ford and Quayle yes, Bush and Cheney no

The loudest complaints came about Quayle. But I don't remember much of an outcry over Bush Senior and especially not Cheney, if anything Cheney helped relieve all doubts about Bush.

Nitpick here

Ford never "ran" with Nixon. That was Agnew. Ford was appointed VP after Agnew resigned, and then became President when Nixon resigned.

 

 

McNotObama2008.com


"..a number of.." and "..some Republicans and Conservatives.."

Harry Smith : a number of Republicans and conservatives have started to question

Katie Couric: What some people wonder is ..

Names anyone? Who are these people?

Let's check out how using the 3rd rail of today's journalism - "that imaginary 3rd person," is looked on by a noted expert in biased journalism, NBC's David Shuster.

Almost a year ago, MSNBC "correspondent" David Shuster alleged that "a lot of people" don't believe Robert Novak has "any credibility as a journalist." Now, what was the basis for Shuster's attack on Novak's credibility? Well, Bob Novak, according to Shuster, had ran a story in which his source was simply, "Agents of Sen. Hillary Clinton:"  

DAVID SHUSTER: You now have the Clinton campaign saying the story is patently false -- it is not true. If Bob, Robert Novak has any integrity as a journalist -- which a lot of people would suggest he doesn't -- he would then say: "OK, here are the Clinton supporters who told me this." And if Bob Novak cannot do that, then I think the egg on the face of Bob Novak is clear

Oh, Novak didn't identify the folks by name. Hmm, seems to be a smaller group of a flock, then "a lot of people," or "some people," or "some Republicans or conservatives." You see, according to Shuster Novak's not credible because the "a lot of people" to who Shuster spoke with didn't know who the "Agents of Sen. Hillary Clinton" were. Therefore Novak is not credible. But Shuster is credible because the "many people" who Shuster spoke with are "the people" in the know.

Some people; people say; experts have said; they say; we are hearing; it's been stated; we've heard; we all know; people are saying; what we've been seeing; many people; lots of folks; and so on.

And so I add to my list; "numbers of Republicans and conservatives."

Oh, I guess the conservatives in this case, are not Republicans? At least Harry Smith's source comes from two groups of "some people."

I suspect that Couric's "Some people", might just be all the people on the set - or perhaps from Daily KOS. Isn't that where she gets her news?

(;~> gary

 

What Up!

Personally, I could care less what the MSM asks Sarah Palin.  Here's my big problem, you have a candidate, on the other side, who's the number one, on the ticket, that's got so many holes, in his resume, it hardly makes sense.  The MSM is out there, considering it their duty to expose the weaknesses of Sarah Palin.  How about the weaknesses of a possible President of the United States?  They have no concern. 

I'm reminded that, the night John McCain made his acceptance speech, at the convention, Fox News head over 9 million viewers.  For a network that normally has between 3 and 4 million, why that drastic increase?  Obviously, the MSM is not doing its job.  If I'm the MSM, I look at those numbers and wonder what I'm doing wrong.  They, on the other had, could care less because nothing has changed.  They haven't asked Obama anything tough.  They haven't going through the 3 and 4 follow-up questions with him, that they did with Palin.  Is that enough to change poll numbers?  I honestly don't know.  What I do know is that the MSM has been so obvious about this they're losing credibility, IMHO, which is shown in that 9 million viewer figure.  If that's the case, and I'm certainly no expert here, how does that change what you're seeing in the polls and how people are going to vote.  If the normal way of doing business, in elections, is changing, how much has changed?  Does the way you poll for accuracy have to change?  Honestly, I don't know, but I do know that people are not reacting well to how Obama is being portrayed and they need their questions answered, before the election, or the Senator is not going to get their vote.  Now, if they're a majority of the voters and the MSM hasn't done it's job, one could make the case that Obama could have won, if the MSM did their job, instead of forfeiting before the game even started, in the hope that their candidate would win by default.   

Democrats: Stuck on Stupid since 2000.

Conservatives Win

In the re election of George H W Bush, he told his aides the night before the election that America would never elect a dope smoking, draft dodging American hating Bill Clinton.

He was absolutely correct. What he did not factor in America would not re elect someone who lied to them on not raising taxes again and who would be patrician in not knocking the stuffing out of Clinton so Lawrence Walsh could indict Republicans a few days out thereby tanking Bush 41.

I know Gov. Palin is right for the United States, because I literally know what is going to start taking place. She is with the ability of John McCain the only people capable on the tickets who are not going to wet themselves and go into jello brain when events happen.
In knowing this, I know that the problems which will hit America are going to be magnified on the left and leftist coasts due to their almost 100 million people concentrated there. This the home of Letterman, Harry Smith, Katie Couric, Biden, Charlie Gibson, Diane Sawyer and this list of ilk. None of them are the least bit prepared as they are naked to the necessary preparations.
It doesn't matter if you are Jeff Rense, Alex Jones or Steve Quayle hiding out in Montana, their gold and used silver with stashes of grain are not going to be the answer either.

So for all these anarchists, marxists and Palen haters, I know Sarah Palin is going to have her revenge for what is being done to her just as Jesus was avenged on those of the elite who abused him. It is not going to take 50 years and it will come to American shores in forms these people have no idea how to deal with.

I will believe McCain / Palin will win as they are necessary. In this though Sarah Palin and all Conservatives are going to win in this no matter what. We will get the Republic back one way or the other. It will take several years, but the Amyrgio Sacae of Machir will have this nation back.

John McCain seemed to have found a word often used here in the cocktail crowd today. The cocktail crowd politically raping Gov. Palin is either going to be saved by her from themselves to their right humiliation or they are going to consumed by their own flame and Gov. Palin will be available for this nation in a future time.

Here lies Arthur, the once, and, the future King. 

 

 

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

The Couric Interview - My Worst Fears Realized

If anyone watched that interview and was not a little concerned then they need to be.

Yup. She had some answers

Yup. She had some answers that weren't actually answers, that danced around specifics, landing instead on generic lingo. She didn't demonstrate much knowledge. 

I must have missed the part

I must have missed the part about all of the Democrats thrilled to unite behind Obama.  I guess Hillary's PUMAs have moved on to organize something else.  Does anybody have a link to some coverage about what I've missed?

"Fighters are fun but bombers make policy"

I will continue to watch Katie from time to time...

I will watch Katie from time to time, but only to see that I'm not supporting any of her sponsors--at least most of them. I know that in the scheme of things it will matter little, but it matters to me.

Couric Interviewing Biden and Palin

Couric:  Sarah, what is John McCain's plans for inducting Georgia into Nato and the ramifications if Russian invades South Ossetia again?

Couric: Sen. Biden, are you comfortable?  Do you need a pillow?

Couric: MooseSlayer, How is McCain going to solve the credit crisis, considering that it was republicans that caused it, (never mind that YouTube video from a 2004 House committee)?

Couric:  Sen. Biden, is Chuck standing up yet?  Has Barack laid his healing hands on him and gotten him out of the wheelchair?

 You guys NEED to relax.  Our media, as always, is as corrupt and biased as they always have been.  I remember a story that Rush Limbaugh talked about when Clinton and Gore were visiting Monticello museum (Thomas Jefferson) before the inaugration and Al Gore asked one of the curators when looking at some of the various busts, (for you Clinton lovers, bust in this term means a head sculpture), "who are these person?"

The curator responded, "That sir is Benjamin Franklin and George Washington." (New York Times, 1/17/93

 So if Palin can't answer a loaded question, that is bad news?  BUT if Biden asks Chuck Graham, IN A WHEELCHAIR to 'STAND UP' and Gore can't recognise Washington or Franklin, that gets ignored...