CBS: ‘Some Conservatives’ Want Palin Off the Ticket

Photo of Kyle Drennen.

Katie Couric and Sarah Palin, CBS At the top of Monday’s CBS Early Show, co-host Julie Chen declared: "Palin on the hot seat as she readies for her debate. Some conservatives want Sarah Palin off the Republican ticket." In the segment that followed, co-host Maggie Rodriguez similarly proclaimed: "...the question a lot of Americans are asking this morning, including some prominent Republicans, is whether Sarah Palin is ready." Correspondent Jeff Glor then explained: "Sarah Palin has mostly been kept away from reporters but the interviews she has done are raising eyebrows."

Glor went on to cite one conservative columnist calling for Palin to step down: "But even some conservatives are concerned, including syndicated columnist Kathleen Parker who said 'Palin is clearly out of her league' and called for the Alaska governor to leave the race." Based on that, Alex Burns from politico.com concluded: " I think there are a small number of people who will publically say that they're worried about her abilities as a candidate. I think there's a larger number of people who privately express kind of muted criticism and concern."

Following Glor’s report, Rodriguez talked to Republican strategist Leslie Sanchez and University of Virginia political science professor, Larry Sabato. Rodriguez began by asking Sanchez: "Sarah Palin is getting on a plane, going to Arizona to his ranch for four days of intense preparation with his top aides...Do you think four days is enough to stop the bleeding?" When Sabato was asked the same question, he replied: "Well, I've seen students do a lot of cramming in four days, so I guess it's possible that she could manage to learn enough to do reasonably well in that one vice presidential debate, but that's beside the point. Look, if you're running for president or vice president, you shouldn't have a choice. Your obligation is to run the gauntlet of the press corps. Can they be mean and nasty? You bet they can. It's part of the price of running for national office."

At the end of the segment, Rodriguez briefly asked Sabato about Joe Biden: " I just want to know what you're thinking if you're Joe Biden?" Sabato pointed out: "Well, Joe Biden has his own set of problems. He better be careful not to be presumptuous or arrogant or too dominating in the debate. He has to be careful from his own perspective. He tends to be verbose." The Early Show has been silent on Biden’s growing list of gaffes on the campaign trail, including most recently when Biden declared in an interview with CBS’s Katie Couric: "When the stock market crashed, Franklin Roosevelt got on television and didn't just talk about the, you know, princes of greed." Of course the stock market crashed in 1929, before Roosevelt was president, and television did not exist.

Here is the full transcript of the segment:

7:00AM TEASER:

JULIE CHEN: Palin on the hot seat as she readies for her debate. Some conservatives want Sarah Palin off the Republican ticket but in their first TV interview, Palin's parents defend their daughter.

HARRY SMITH: What would you tell them?

CHUCK HEATH: She's ready to do anything she wants to be.

7:07AM SEGMENT:

MAGGIE RODRIGUEZ: You can bet the vice president candidates will be asked about the bailout during their debate on Thursday. But the question a lot of Americans are asking this morning, including some prominent Republicans, is whether Sarah Palin is ready. Early Show national correspondent Jeff Glor is in Columbus, Ohio. Jeff, good morning.

JEFF GLOR: Maggie, good morning to you. This is a state, Ohio, that could, once again, decide this election. It's one of the reasons why we're here. It's one of the reasons why John McCain and Sarah Palin will be here today as the campaign deals with these continued questions. Sarah Palin has mostly been kept away from reporters but the interviews she has done are raising eyebrows.

SARAH PALIN: It is from Alaska that we send those out to make sure that an eye is being kept on this very powerful nation, Russia, because they are right there.

GLOR: The most recent, with Katie Couric, provoked widespread criticism from liberals on the web and a lampooning on 'Saturday Night Live.'

TINA FEY: Katie, I'd like to use one of my life lines.

AMY POEHLER: You don't have any life lines.

FEY: Well, in that case, I'm just going to have to get back to you!

GLOR: But even some conservatives are concerned, including syndicated columnist Kathleen Parker who said 'Palin is clearly out of her league' and called for the Alaska governor to leave the race.

ALEX BURNS: I think there are a small number of people who will publically say that they're worried about her abilities as a candidate. I think there's a larger number of people who privately express kind of muted criticism and concern.

GLOR: McCain himself was asked about the chatter on Sunday.

MCCAIN: I'm so excited about the reaction that Sarah Palin has gotten across this country, huge turnouts, enthusiasm, excitement. She knows how to communicate directly with people. They respond in a way that I've -- that I've seldom seen.

GLOR: Palin will be interviewed again today by Katie Couric, which you can see on the 'Evening News.' And then Palin is off for a couple of days of debate preparation in Arizona before Thursday's much anticipated vice presidential debate in St. Louis. Maggie.

RODRIGUEZ: CBS's Jeff Glor in Ohio, thank you, Jeff. We're joined now by Larry Sabato, professor of political science at the University of Virginia and here in the studio with me, Republican strategist Leslie Sanchez. Good morning to you both.

LESLIE SANCHEZ: Thank you.

LARRY SABATO: Good morning.

RODRIGUEZ: Leslie, le me begin with you. After she leaves Ohio, at John McCain's urging, Sarah Palin is getting on a plane, going to Arizona to his ranch for four days of intense preparation with his top aides.

SANCHEZ: Sure.

RODRIGUEZ: Do you think four days is enough to stop the bleeding?

SANCHEZ: Well, I think there's definitely an amount of skepticism for any new candidate, if somebody who's new on a national stage. She does need the debate prep time, but also I think once we get past the debate it's going to be a really good opportunity for her to go out in the public and get her kind of bearing. She needs to be more comfortable on the stump and stop being so managed, I think, in the campaign.

RODRIGUEZ: What do you think, Larry? Four days enough?

SABATO: Well, I've seen students do a lot of cramming in four days, so I guess it's possible that she could manage to learn enough to do reasonably well in that one vice presidential debate, but that's beside the point. Look, if you're running for president or vice president, you shouldn't have a choice. Your obligation is to run the gauntlet of the press corps. Can they be mean and nasty? You bet they can. It's part of the price of running for national office. And I think the McCain campaign has made a mistake with Palin in keeping her so bottled up. I think that she would do better if she had been out earlier and more frequently. And she's become, as you noted, a lampoon, an object of ridicule in part because of that Katie Couric interview, which was a real turning point in her campaign.

RODRIGUEZ: I'm wondering if the problem is that she's not prepared, Leslie, or that they're over-preparing her, that they're giving her too many talking points and answers that she's not allowed to just be herself?

LESLIE SANCHEZ: Oh, I think it's probably a combination of both of them. One, she's a new candidate on the scene. It takes candidates some time to get used to the national pressure and the national media scrutiny, and there is national -- it's normal to have that kind of pressure. The media would like to dictate and have more interviews.

RODRIGUEZ: If she didn't have the pressure, would she have the answers?

SANCHEZ: I think it takes time to get comfortable with those policy answers on very intricate details. We have to go back to her executive experience. Her experience as a mayor, the fact that -- don't forget, governors are really strong and good candidates for national office because the founding fathers wanted them to be democ – laboratories of democracy. They wanted to test ideas. I think she's a proven executive in that sense and people need more time to see that capacity out on the road.

RODRIGUEZ: Larry, I literally have ten seconds. I just want to know what you're thinking if you're Joe Biden?

SABATO: Well, Joe Biden has his own set of problems. He better be careful not to be presumptuous or arrogant or too dominating in the debate. He has to be careful from his own perspective. He tends to be verbose.

RODRIGUEZ: Okay, Larry Sabato, said very concisely, and Leslie Sanchez, thank you both.

—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Well...

It is disturbing that someone who is running for such an important office is allowed to hide away and only do a handful of interviews.  I mean, if you want to look at Biden's gaffes, he's had many more opportunities to screw up because he's in the public eye more often.  I think the fact that the party is trying to keep her from talking too much is a legitimate beef.

CBS

Constant Bull Shit network.

Where in the constitution

does it say that the press gets to dictate the activities of the candidates? Why should she have to do any at all when the hyenas in the media are so in the tank for the "Annointed One" that all they're looking for is something to drag her and McCain down with. This is a witch hunt pure and simple not a dispassionate search for facts.

It's no wonder that the press currently rates even below congress when you see them breathlessly report that Sarah Palin got a free facial, and reduced taxes on private aircraft.

The media sent a small army to Alaska to try to find dirt on Governor Palin and got virtually nothing.

 

so what

Dealing with the press is part of holding public office, whether she likes it or not.  When has something like this even happened before?  I can't remember any Vice President in any previous elections not doing interviews.  After the debate, Biden did a quick interview with just about every network - why couldn't Palin do the same?

I don't get your point. 

I don't get your point.  Palin's done two extended interviews with Charlie Gibson and Katie Couric as well as with Sean Hannity; it's not as if she's been hidden away somewhere.  She's got a debate on national TV in a few days against Biden.  The media is more friendly to the Obama/Biden ticket.  Why would Biden avoid most of them?  Democrats have avoided FOX News for some time.  Should they be called on the carpet for it?  Obama finally agreed to an interview by Bill O'Reilly.  Who knows what O'Reilly gave up in exchange for that honor. 

At the end of the day, the fact remains that there is still much more in Barack Obama's background that has been virtually ignored by the media.  He has not been asked tough questions (including in last Friday's debate, which started out as a publicity stunt for his campaign).  We know more about Governor Palin than we do about Barack Obama.  And you're griping about why Palin doesn't do more interviews?

debate

Biden talked with Fox News right after the debate.

It's your opinion that the media is more generous to Obama/Biden.  Either way, she should be more accessible.  People have a right to be upset.

Rest assured, arkansas, if

Rest assured, arkansas, if Palin were a Democrat and she was being handled the exact same way by her party, the media would not be pressing the issue.  It would be accepted. 

Again, please tell me why you are more concerned about the lack of media access to Palin as opposed to the lack of media curiosity of Obama?  Who is closer to being president of the U.S. right now, Palin or Obama?  Yet, we still know little about Barack Obama.

opinion

That is the opinion of someone that is convinced that the whole world wants a Democrat in office, and that the left is the only side that spins anything.  Give me a break - you can't actually believe that, can you?  And no, it wouldn't be accepted.  That's probably why this has never happened before.

Let's not forget how the

Let's not forget how the media fawned over 'Hillary-tears' and in hard hitting interviews questions consisted of "diamonds or pearls" and such crap as that.

On a side note did anyone notice all the fainting for Obama ceased?

"Forget change, I want improvement!"

"On a side note did anyone

"On a side note did anyone notice all the fainting for Obama ceased?"

Oh, that was just another one of the Great One's many miracles in this election season.

The major media report only half the news. Why are they surprised they have only half the potential audience?

"More generous?"

Who cares if Biden gives out interviews 24/7?

Don't you read any of the hundreds of examples of the media's vicious, insulting, unprecedented attacks and 100% biased coverage of Palin posted here weekly?

If there was a local bar where everybody hated my guts and picked fights with me whenever I stopped by, I wouldn't go.

The media has nobody to blame but themselves, and they have no implied rights to call the plays here.

like I said

Like I said before, go check out mediamatters.org, or one of the many liberal sites that whine about conservative bias.  The bias is on both sides, you just choose to only see the bias that is negative towards your team.

ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC,

ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, NYT, WaPo, LAT - national media 100% in the tank.

Fox & NY Post - not in the tank.

I'm very familiar with mediamatters.org. Unfortunately, any whining they do re: conservatives is pure fiction.

fiction

Yes, fiction to you, because you are "SickofLibs."  Of course you would think that any knocks against your team are total BS.  Don't feel bad though, it's just human nature.

Thank you, I remain unbowed

Thank you, I remain unbowed and true to my 100% obvious nom de plume.

Just to finish up here, your example as to bias on the 'other side', your example of mediamatters.org has a mini-section devoted entirely to calling out Chris Matthews' "conservative bias." This would be the same Chris Matthews who has been walking around for six months with a self-admitted, Messiah-induced woodie, who even his own NBC associates have publicly called embarrassing and out of control.

Tired

I'm just tired of hearing that same argument over and over - liberal bias, liberal bias!  You sound like a broken record.  Don't you have any ideas of your own?  You know, ones that weren't planted there by a political party?

Zippy

So you believe that the mainstream media, sans Fox News and talk radio, is not liberally biased? LOL! Stop drinking the koolaid, you're killing me!

again...

See my Pistons analogy below.  Maybe you can understand that - it involves sports.

What a joke

 I'm just tired of hearing that same argument over and over - liberal bias, liberal bias!  Yet you are a registered user of a site that has a mission statement of "Exposing Liberal Media Bias".  If what you said was true, why even hit this site?

Don't you have any ideas of your own?  You know, ones that weren't planted there by a political party?  Once again, a Leftist accusing Rightists of what Leftists routinely do.  If you bothered to actually read NB, you will see that some of the best, most passionate discussions of ideas occur between the Rightists that populate the board.  The Leftists seldom, if ever, contribute ideas of their own. 

Of course, the irony here is that I have yet to see you put forth an idea - yet you whine that we have none.  Go ahead, offer one.  I dare you.  You might actually be confronted with contrary ones. 

Whoever casts a vote for Obama-Biden is nothing more than a common thief.  Whoever fails to vote against them is nothing more than a moral coward.

I did

I did - the shocking idea that there is bias on both sides.  It's obviously a new idea around here.  The way everybody here talks you'd think it was a miracle a repbulican ever won anything.

Example

Bias on all sides?  Gee, as someone who has a liberal arts degree, I would have NEVER guessed!!!  (sarcasm)

But, as Jules queried of Vincent in Pulp Fiction: "Example."

Republicans DO win - but they must communicate with the American people over the media.   

Whoever casts a vote for Obama-Biden is nothing more than a common thief.  Whoever fails to vote against them is nothing more than a moral coward.

Zipper & Unsane

Like Unsane points out, why are you here on a site that was created because conservatives and centrists had had enough with what they saw as the very obvious trend of our MSM leaning heavily to the left? What's your real purpose in signing on and joining in?

This site and it's editors and readers have done so much extensive observing of the behaviors and idoleogical leanings of about 85-90% of ALL media outlets for three years now, since it went up in 2005.

Which of these will you argue, with some real back-up?:

Major (mainstream) outlets that lean left:

CNN, MSNBC, NYTimes, LATimes, AP, BBC (which matters as it's the biggest European/Int'l news outlet), Chicago Tribune, all 3 major networks (ABC, NBC, CBS), PBS (publicly funded), TIME, Newsweek (both have featured Obama roughly 4-5 times more than McCain, for example).

Majors that lean right:

Fox News, NY Post, Wall Street Journal

So, not to be condescending but to be honest, you're way out of your league here.

We've had many liberals come on like yourself weakly whining and asking why we go on and on about this. If you're not coming here fully equipped with strong evidence to the contrary, you're going to look pretty foolish.

 

NOW PLAYING:
Governor Palin Get Your Gun

 

az... I'm curious, why do

az...

I'm curious, why do you keep ignoring this sites mission... “Exposing & Combating Liberal Media Bias”

OMG - Obamas As The Waltons

 

 

Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/  

Shocking

That is an extremely shocking idea to a number of the people who post on this site.  Their message is clear: The MSM has a liberal bias and there is no room for argument.  Cheers to you for trying though. People aren't here because they want to be challenged.  They are here because they want to reinforce their ideology.

What a whiny, uninformed post

Actually, this shows that you know absolutely nothing about NB, and the Rightists that populate this board.

If you actually bother reading NB, you would see that the best, most passionate, most intense discussions occur between Rightists and their ideas.  So much for needing to have our ideology reinforced.  If that were remotely true, I, for one, would have been run off of NB LONG ago. 

It is you and your fellow Leftists who can't stand any challenge to Leftist orthodoxy and wish to shut it up by any means necessary, from the "Fairness Doctrine", political correctness, and whiny posts such as yours.  Yours is yet another case of Leftists constantly accusing the Right of what Leftists do. 

Whoever casts a vote for Obama-Biden is nothing more than a common thief.  Whoever fails to vote against them is nothing more than a moral coward.

Wrong

I have read comments on a range of topics.  I wonder if you have?  Most of them are people just agreeing and patting each other on the back about how right they are.  You call that a discussion? 

What kills me about this site is that posters who disagree are automatically shut down and discredited by being called "liberals".   People here are so quick about throwing out labels.   I guess that's what America's come to now...let's give everyone a nice cute label so we can reduce them to a stereotype.

»→ Really nihon?

I disagree with you.  Now shut me down.  

Kill Bill II - Stop the bailout

nihon....go back to the KOS

and your buddies there, where you can commiserate about being treated badly by the rightist bloggers.  wah, wah,  i want my free sh!# from the govt, wah!  btw, no one here ever promised to be "fair and balanced".  i know you lefties expect that from the right even though there is NEVER any reciprocity.  soooo....eff off stereotype!

 

Ecclesiastes 10:2 The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.

This is not Dungeons &

This is not Dungeons & Dragons here, pal.

If you cannot accept the extensively documented reality of liberal media bias, there can be no serious debate on the issue.

Look around here - YOU are the one with the chip implant.

SoL...

"arkansaszippers" signed on just a week ago?

Me thinks I detect a troll... 

"...peace is the highest aspiration of the American People. We will negotiate for it, sacrifice for it, we will never surrender for it, now or ever." President Ronald Reagan, January 20, 1981

And a very industrious one

And a very industrious one at that - 36 posts, and counting, on this one thread. And none include even a single fact. Yikes.

Right! Isn't that a hallmark...

of libs? Talk, talk, talk...and never let a little thing like the facts get in your way!

 

"...peace is the highest aspiration of the American People. We will negotiate for it, sacrifice for it, we will never surrender for it, now or ever." President Ronald Reagan, January 20, 1981

Troll?

How does having a different viewpoint make one a troll?

zipper

I think you overlooked SickofLibs' post, above:

"...36 posts, and counting, on this one thread. And none include even a single fact. Yikes."

I'm like your personal dictionary.com for words like troll. :) 

 

NOW PLAYING:
Governor Palin Get Your Gun

 

Still

That still doesn't mean I'm a troll.  Duh.

Who cares if Biden gives

Who cares if Biden gives out interviews 24/7?

Apparently no one does.

  • This just in: Biden has given 100+ interviews since Obama chose him as his running mate.
  • In other news:  A tree fell in the forest. 

Governor Palin - She is the Real Deal !

Joe Biden would give an

Joe Biden would give an interview to my cat as long as he (Biden) got to talk about Joe Biden.

Gee, that's funny

I had to pick myself up off the floor. Show me where in the US Constitution it says a candidate has to deal with the press. That's true in the old Soviet Union, Obama's America, and other dictatorships, but not America.

Any candidate who wants can go right to the people, podcast or whatever they want.

The One, moo-Siah all merciful, uses his cell phone Obama-nuts to 'get in people's faces' -- May not be entirely legal but that's what dictators do.

so

Nobody said what she's doing is illegal.

 So you're saying you don't think a canidate should have to answer questions and address people before the election.  I mean, she was a virtual unknown until about a month ago, so I don't think 1 speech and 3 interviews is enough to bring the millions of people who will be voting up to speed, that's all.

"So you're saying you don't

"So you're saying you don't think a canidate should have to answer questions and address people before the election."

Personally, I absolutely believe this.  So, tell me, when does Obama begin to do just this?

By the way, Palin addresses people on a daily basis and has answered some tough questions.  Where have you been, arkansas?

Unknown to you

"I mean, she was a virtual unknown until about a month ago"

Unknown to you, but I'm pretty sure that the citizens of Alaska knows who she is.

Obama was a "virtual unknown" until HE ran for President, correct? And when it comes to his accomplishments and experience, he's STILL an unknown.

But here's the thing, if you want to know about ether candidate, there are plenty of resources available to you, far more than was available in the past.. You don't NEED the press to do your research for you. You are more than capable of doing that research yourself. This “interviews’ are nothing more than fluff, you won’t actually LEARN anything from them, at least nothing that you already didn’t learn if you pay attention to the candidate's campaign literature and speeches.

In the case of Palin, I suggest that you check out this website.

Obama: My job is above my pay grade

You are wrong. Nowhere does

You are wrong. Nowhere does it say a politician has to deal with the press. It is the job of the press to report the news, not create it.

"Forget change, I want improvement!"

"It is the job of the press

"It is the job of the press to report the news, not create it."

You forgot to preface that with 'used to be'....

hey zipper

you must be under 35yrs. old. bidens been stepping on his tongue longer then you been breathing.

Ever hear of a Press Secratary?

"It is disturbing that someone who is running for such an
important office is allowed to hide away and only do a handful of
interviews.
"

Ever hear of a Press Secretary? How about a Press Office? The President himself doesn't grant interviews very often, does he? How many press interviews did Clinton grant while in "public office?" How about Gore, or Hillary, or Pelosi, any other holder of public office? There's a reason that public officials, even t hose who are just running for office, have press secretaries, and that's to allow those people to perform their jobs without having to give daily interviews.

The press has no more right to access to a public official than you or I do. If you really want to "know' Sarah Palin, I suggest that you schedule an appointment to meet her, just as the press must do.

Obama: My job is above my pay grade

hey zippers....

"biden's gaffes"?!?! you call those gaffes? he is a complete and full fledged liar! and when he is not lying, he is the gaffe-meister of all gaffe-meisters.

besides not knowing who was president in '29 and all that, and when t.v. was invented  (  you'd think he would know that, since he was certainly around then ). you have him having to suspend a presidential campain in the past for plagerizing speech from others...was that a gaffe??  but the sickest of them all is biden alluding to the "fact" that his wife and daughter were killed by a drunk driver, when in fact that is not what happened.  what kind of sicko narcissist would exaggerate that to get some kind of sympathy from the public?  what a freakin' tool that jerk is!!   i actually don't like either mccain or obama....my vote for mccain/palin is totally a vote against that idiot biden!

This is another case of

This is another case of "some people say"

They are keeping this up regarding Kathleen Parker...this is the second day I have heard this BS about this woman.

Who the heck is K. Parker, I have never heard of her...ever, wow, as if she is speaking for the majority of the conservatives...

In their DREAMS!

McCain is where he is in the polls because of Palin...and they know this...they are just doing their devils work desperately...before Thursday night, and of course the election...

K. Parker may just be another David Brooks as far as a conservative goes, or David Gergen...you know, those real strong conservatives...that speak for us real strong conservatives...

I think not.

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

Some people say

The Bush National Guard memos I have in my hand are real ...

X

What I want to hear when one of these BSers, errr, news commentaters say "...some people say" is

 

What people?

Kathleen

bt, I have been reading Kathleen Parker for many years. She is extremely strong on family values. You need to read her column; she makes some valid points. I do not agree with her conclusion, but her points are valid. Trust me, she is NO David Brooks. She has been a consistent Conservative for many many years.

Read the column:

http://townhall.com/Columnists/KathleenParker/2008/09/26/the_palin_problem

 

bt..Kathleen Parker is a

bt..Kathleen Parker is a conservative columnist who writes for Townhall.com.

I've been reading her for a long time, and I respect her opinion, so this kind of rattled me to read her evaluation of Palin.

I have said elsewhere that  everyone is so certain the Palin is going to clean Biden's clock in the debate:  like tempting fate.

Someone here talked about her fantastic performance in debates in Alaska.  Well, those were on issues before her every day.  She is having to be brought up to speed on a lot of issues she hasn't given much thought to.

On the other hand, they may "misunderestimate" her. And the more of a know-it-all blowhard that Biden shows up as, the better for her. 

What Parker says about her that I thoroughly disagree with is this: Palin's answer to Couric's questionabout poll numbers:

"I'm not looking at poll numbers. What I think Americans at the end of
the day are going to be able to go back and look at track records and
see who's more apt to be talking about solutions and wishing for and
hoping for solutions for some opportunity to change, and who's actually
done it?" 

I don't know why Parker has a problem with that!  Barack Obama has been saying for months his pablum about the "kind of politicis the American people are sick of" and  the "new kind of politics" that people are "hungry" for, where we all just magically come together to "get things done."

And seems to get by just fine on it; the liberal media swoon and applaud. But I guess conservative pundits expect more from their candidates.

Limited press access to Palin

The dicision to limit the press access to her was not made in a vacuum. This is clearly the most hostile press any vice presidential candidate has ever faced.

I don't think there is anything that she could say or do that would be reported in a positive way. So why give the press the opportunity to lie and spin her words?

press

If people are supposed to vote for a ticket that she is a part of, they should be able to hear what she has to say.  This is a very serious position, and they don't seem to be treating it that way.  There is bias on both sides - that's no excuse for not speaking to the public you may be leading someday.  Anyway, if she can't handle the media, how is she going to handle the duties of the Vice Presidency?

Give it a rest. She has

Give it a rest. She has been out enough. Katie did a hack job on her. Every time she goes on interview the networks cut it up to be the way they like it. Political hacks at CBS,NBC and ABC. The debate is Thursday. You will see what you need to then. And by the way. Palin is running for VP, not the top spot. Why all the whining? Sound like a bunch of spoiled 5 year olds.

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

what

Yeah, who cares about the Vice President?  Why do we even have one?

zipper you are close to being correct

prior to dick cheney most of our vp's were hardly visable, except for their senate position and attending foreign events.for example al gore is  most noted for being slick willie's bag man.to give you an example of the importance of the v.p., when roosevelt died they had to inform harry truman of the manhatten project. what we see coming from the msm [fellow travelers]is a  bunch scared leftists, not knowing their real job in our society,reporting not making the news.

 

 

Vice Presidents

We have one so that we have a President of the Senate and to break ties in the Senate if need be.

And politically speaking, Vice Presidents are groomed.  I'm 100% okay with Gov. Palin being groomed in the Vice Presidency.  I am much more comfortable with this than giving a President (with Socialist inclinations) on-the-job training. 

Whoever casts a vote for Obama-Biden is nothing more than a common thief.  Whoever fails to vote against them is nothing more than a moral coward.

Cause if we didn't have

Cause if we didn't have one, Nancy Pelosi would be a heartbeat away from the White House.  And even a lib like you would have to shudder over that!

 

“But maybe you obviously have a better memory about that."- Wolf Blitzer

Palin has done at least

Palin has done at least three extended interviews that I know of--with Charlie Gibson, Katie Couric and Sean Hannity.  In at least one of these, she was grilled with endless "gotcha" questions, the likes of which Obama has never had to face.  The final interview was also edited in such a way as to make her responses look far worse than they were.  

Palin has also been vetted by the media to the nth degree.  The Obama campaign sent a team of investigators to Alaska to look into her background; they've come up with little or nothing.  We also have a debate coming up this Thursday at which Palin will be standing on her own.  We know plenty about Governor Palin and her positions on the issues.  What do we know about Obama?  We know he has a list of questionable friends as long as his arm.  We know he attended a racist, anti-American church for two decades.  We know he's in the midst of this Fannie Mae "crisis," having received significant donations from these organizations.

We don't know where he really stands on the issues, as his positions have changed even during this campaign.  We don't know if he really likes the country that he seeks to lead.  We don't know a lot about Barack Obama.  And yet it is Governor Palin you are concerned about?

ok

You think the McCain campain hasn't looked into Obama's background?

It sounds like you know plenty about Obama.  And being unsatisfied with the country and not liking it are two different things.  I wouldn't want to vote for somebody who thought the country was fine the way it is.

There isn't a candidate

There isn't a candidate running who has stated the country is "fine as it is".  Who are you talking about?

Now you are contradicting yourself, arkansas.  You questioned why Palin is not more accessible to the press.  I've stated that neither is Obama really.  Your response is that McCain's team has investigated Obama.  That doesn't matter though.  When will the MEDIA investigate Obama.  It was the media you were talking about, wasn't it?  You want Palin to address the MEDIA.

Obama refused to wear an American flag pin.  He has publicly criticized middle-Americans as "clinging to their guns and religion".  His wife indicated she was never proud of her country, until her husband was nominated.  These are signs of more than being "unsatisfied".  These are signs of bitter resentment. 

Wow

First of all, go to mediamatters.org - it's the same as this website, except they bitch and moan about a consertive bias.  All the same complaints, different side.  This media bias complaint is one of the oldest political tools in the book.  Of course there's bias - from both sides.

And I thought his reason for not wearing the stupid pin was commendable - it was just an empty symbol of patriotism.  But then the MEDIA crucified him for it.  I mean, where do you think you get all of these convient little sound bites from Obama?  If not from the media, then who?

Arkansas

Go back to Soros and tell him he's wasting his money on trying to buy another election. If you can't see the bias in the media toward Palin, then you are just another Obamarobot who is just an idiot! If you want the America that Obama wants to change us into, move to Canada or Europe and leave us the fuck alone!

yes

Democracy at its finest - "If you don't think like me, then why don't you just leave the country!"  Why do people always say that?  It's that the opposite of democracy?

yes

Democracy at its finest - "If you don't think like me, then why don't you just leave the country!"  Why do people always say that?  It's that the opposite of democracy?

If Obama Loses

Should Obama lose, I have good reason to believe that he will, will that be the last effort by the socialist/marxist wing of the democrat party in this country to take it over? Real democracy occurs when we have unbiased reporting in this country and are allowed to think independently of the propaganda spewed out by most of the media. Most Americans are smart enough to see through the empty suit that is Obama and he will not be elected, much to the dismay of the mainstream media. Palin will be McCain's saving grace, having set the tone and direction this country will head in the next twelve years and for that, I am very grateful.

Palin

You don't think this Palin experiment has been a gimick to steal the Hillary votes?

ark-zip, just like the FIRST REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT

the one that FREED THE SLAVES.

yea a gimick like that...Yes it takes the Republicans to be the FIRST to place a WOMAN on the ticket.

FIRST= WINNERS

CLIMATE CRISIS

IranianUranium

The word gimmick has strong

The word gimmick has strong connotations.  Choosing a VP to appeal to a sector has long historical presedence.  Consider Obama's choice.  Was that a gimmick to appeal to the intellectually challenged? 

“But maybe you obviously have a better memory about that."- Wolf Blitzer

paperhead, something like this

soros

humm how much did he spend this time?????

CLIMATE CRISIS

IranianUranium

They have heard her say what she has to say.

She's been in front of the public almost every day and they're loving her! The public are the "deciders" not the magpies from the MSM.

What she doesn't have to do is spend time with "reporters" and I use the term very loosely, who, instead of trying to find out about the candidate, only want to set her up with a bunch of gotcha questions.

 

  

Absolutely correct.  I

Absolutely correct.  I think "arkansas'" intentions are not genuine here.

huh?

What is that even supposed to mean?