In an interview on Tuesday's CBS "Early Show" with Sally Bedell Smith, author of the new book ""For Love of Politics: Bill and Hillary Clinton, the White House Years," co-host Harry Smith began the fluffy segment with this adoring intro (emphasis mine):
Brad and Angelina, Charles and Diana, Burton and Taylor, and you can count Bill and Hillary's union as one of the most scrutinized marriages of our time. A simple Google search reveals there are more than 40 books about this still-young couple. They met in law school, two bookish, wonkish, idealistic kids who somehow transformed themselves into political rock stars. Remember when Bill grabbed a sax on the Arsenio Hall show during the '92 campaign? Now it's Hillary who's handling Letterman and trading one-liners with Jon Stewart on the Daily Show.
Despite Bill Clinton being one of the most famous adulterers of all time, Smith managed to get through the interview without ever discussing the former president’s infidelity with the author, Bedell-Smith. Instead, Smith set up the interview with this question, "This is a meticulous reconstruction, or even deconstruction, of their lives, and the thing that I came away with...is ambition trumps everything. Could that be the subtitle?"
Bedell-Smith later commented on how the Clintons’ had "...such a unique collaborative relationship that when they were back in Arkansas, people called them "Billary." Smith wondered if Bill Clinton would maintain this "collaborative relationship" given the fact that, "...he has this separate life now. He is this world traveler. He is a solver of problems. The Clinton Global Initiative, et cetera..." Smith seemed to have a different take on Bill Clinton’s global achievements when fawning over Jimmy Carter two weeks ago: "Were you unhappy with the way the Clinton Administration picked up on the seed work, the tilling of the soil that you did in some of those trouble spots?"
When Bedell-Smith speculated on "...the notion of having two presidents in the White House...," Smith countered with his own speculation: "Right. Maybe worse yet, a Secretary of State." Yes Harry, that would definitely be worse.
After such a glowing segment that completely glossed over some of the most obvious flaws in the Clinton marriage, Smith oddly ended it by discussing how Bedell-Smith’s book "...is meticulous and at times an excruciating look at the two of them in their public lives." It was clear that this segment was neither.
Perhaps Smith’s tease of the segment earlier in the show can more accurately describe the Clinton marriage: "Also ahead a fascinating look at the Clinton marriage and our favorite scary movies for Halloween." One wonders, what’s the difference?
Bedell-Smith did a similar mushy interview with NBC’s Ann Curry just last Friday on "Today."
Here is the full transcript of the 8:07am interview:
HARRY SMITH: So many people say that Senator Hillary Clinton's biggest asset in her presidential bid is Bill Clinton, but it's only fair when he was president she was his biggest asset. And after 35 years, we still want to know what makes them tick. Brad and Angelina, Charles and Diana, Burton and Taylor, and you can count Bill and Hillary's union as one of the most scrutinized marriages of our time. A simple Google search reveals there are more than 40 books about this still-young couple. They met in law school, two bookish, wonkish, idealistic kids who somehow transformed themselves into political rock stars. Remember when Bill grabbed a sax on the Arsenio Hall show during the '92 campaign? Now it's Hillary who's handling letterman and trading one-liners with Jon Stewart on the Daily Show.
HILLARY CLINTON: I think you've got a future.
SMITH: Sally Bedell Smith explains the Clintons' complicated marriage and the impact it has had on all of us in her new book, "For Love of Politics." Bill and Hillary Clinton, the White House years. And she joins us. Good to see you again.
SALLY BEDELL SMITH: Good to be here.
SMITH: This is a meticulous reconstruction, or even deconstruction, of their lives, and the thing that I came away with -- and tell me if you agree with this. You're the one who spent all this time researching this book -- is ambition trumps everything. Could that be the subtitle?
BEDELL-SMITH: Well, I think ambition has been very much a part of their lives from the beginning. And politics is something that really attracted them to each other in the very beginning.
SMITH: Right.
BEDELL-SMITH: Back in 1972, one of the first things they did was work for the McGovern campaign. And they have been such a political unit. Their marriage is so unusual, and they have such a unique collaborative relationship that when they were back in Arkansas, people called them "Billary."
SMITH: Billary, yeah.
BEDELL-SMITH: It was even -- it was a term of sort of admiration and disparagement. And those habits of close collaboration carried through into the White House, which is why now that we are facing the prospect of possibly having two presidents in the White House...
SMITH: Right.
BEDELL-SMITH: Which is really unprecedented. The way to understand how they might work together in the White House were she to return as president and he to return as president, you have to look back and see the dynamics of that relationship.
SMITH: Which is the question, because she was sort of omnipresent in his presidency. If she were to become president, would you assume that he would have a similar sort of role?
BEDELL-SMITH: Well, I think it's -- it's absolutely consistent with the way they operated back then.
SMITH: But he has this separate life now. He is this world traveler. He is a solver of problems. The Clinton Global Initiative, et cetera, et cetera. He's not going to be -- have an office in the West Wing like she did, would he?
BEDELL-SMITH: Well, he hasn't ruled it out. He said he'd take an office in the basement if somebody offered it to him. But, but she was, in effect, a kind of -- she was a sort of de facto vice president for him. I kind of think we should look at them as more a president and a chairman of the board.
SMITH: Interesting. Well, they dropped that two-fer stuff a long, long time ago. Remember back in '92, during the campaign.
BEDELL-SMITH: They did.
SMITH: For a little while, they were doing a two for one. They've stopped that. If you were thinking, if she -- assume she gets the nomination and you get a call and "I want you to be my vice-presidential candidate," are you -- what are you thinking in terms of the dynamic of the two of them? How do you fit into that?
BEDELL-SMITH: Well, I think that's a serious question, and it's one of the many questions that follow from the notion of having two presidents in the White House because this is something the Founders never anticipated, not only two presidents, but two presidents married to each other with all the undercurrents --
SMITH: Right. Maybe worse yet, a Secretary of State.
BEDELL-SMITH: Secretary of State because she's already said that one of the things that he would do would be ambassador to the world. I think when they talk about the notion of first spouse, or he says "Oh, I'll be First Laddy," that's really beside the point. I mean, we have a 22nd Amendment that precludes a president from serving more than two terms. And it might not be too far-fetched to say that this is sort of an end run. It was interesting during the health care debate, for example, somebody who was in the health care industry said at one point, the two Clintons are working so much at cross-purposes with each other that there's a Hillary White House and a there's a Bill White House, and we don't know who's in charge.
SMITH: Wow. Sally Bedell Smith, thank you very, very much for joining us this morning. It is meticulous and at times an excruciating look at the two of them in their public lives.
BEDELL-SMITH: But it needs to be looked at.
SMITH: There you go. You can read an excerpt from "For Love of Politics" on our website at cbsnews.com.
—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Let's not forget Hillary's
October 23, 2007 - 12:57 ET by dscottLet's not forget Hillary's temper, she is rumored to have hit Bill on a number of occasions and for that reason the Secret Service was not allowed in the residence area of the White House. By Law, the Secret Service would have been forced to arrest her if she struck the President. It's not beyond the realm of possibility when she is reported to have thrown items at people, used extremely foul language in meetings, and throws temper tantrums. In fact she is a controlling person as evidenced by Bill having to check with her on anything that he decides. That makes Hillary a Domestic Abuser by definition and MO.
I would go so far as to say Bill Clinton's lack of faithfulness has more to do with his own victimhood reacting to being overly controlled by Hillary. When a person is so controlled and manipulated by their spouse or parent, they "act out" in response as Bill does, in his case adultery or over eating.
Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. dscott's corollary: The line between malice and stupidity is called depraved indifference.
Hillary must have gone to therapy
October 23, 2007 - 15:12 ET by Daniel BakerShe now controls her temper by laughing it off.
Evangelicals for Mitt
The Clinton's are "rock
October 23, 2007 - 13:00 ET by Jack BauerThe Clinton's are "rock stars?"
Sure. But only if he's Keith Richards and she's Janis Joplin.
Picture Caption:
October 23, 2007 - 13:05 ET by drillanwrHillary: I wish you were a broad.
Bill: Right back at you ...
Hillary: <Hillary cackle>
Bill: <Bill lazy southern heh-heh-heh>
What A Pair
October 23, 2007 - 13:11 ET by Barker"Brad and Angelina, Charles and Diana, Burton and Taylor...."
I'd say they're more like Bonnie and Clyde.
Kermit and Miss
October 23, 2007 - 13:13 ET by Jack BauerKermit and Miss Piggy?
Although not married...
October 23, 2007 - 13:19 ET by sunandsteelBeavis and Butthead.
Texas has a population of nearly 21 million people, all of whom are ashamed to be from the same state as the Dixie Chicks. (IMAO.us)
Katherina Minola and her
October 23, 2007 - 13:26 ET by dscottKatherina Minola and her marriage to Petruchio in taming of the Shrew? But in reverse?
Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. dscott's corollary: The line between malice and stupidity is called depraved indifference.
LOL. Which one is
October 23, 2007 - 13:27 ET by Jack BauerLOL. Which one is Butthead?
Hmmm...
October 23, 2007 - 13:41 ET by sunandsteelThats a very good question. Bill would have to be butthead I think. Beavis was a little smarter than Butthead, Hillary is a little more evil than Bill.
Texas has a population of nearly 21 million people, all of whom are ashamed to be from the same state as the Dixie Chicks. (IMAO.us)
Cartman and Butters? Hugo
October 23, 2007 - 13:36 ET by drillanwrCartman and Butters?
Hugo and Fidel?
Clinton Couples
October 23, 2007 - 17:51 ET by stratmanMutt and Jeff
Frick and Frack
Jose and Manuel
Porky Pig and Daffy Duck
Sheryl Crow and Laurie David
* I would be hard pressed to call either Beavis or Butthead smarter than the other.
Killing them with kindness isn't working. Time to get scrappy with the Donkeys.
Hillary the Phony
October 23, 2007 - 13:13 ET by Six String SpiffIt blows my mind that Hillary has gotten so much traction. What happened to experience? Is the POTUS seat going to be dumbed down just like our education? Is it already too late? People voting on LOOKS and the PERCEPTION of their IMAGE. Thank you very much MSM. Never mind the tough questions. Let's just hug all the liberals. Then when something terrible happens and we temporarilly snap out of our euphoric state provided to us by our brave men and women in uniform that we bash to pieces on a daily basis, we'll scream, shout and foolishly ask "why did this happen?" before slipping back into the happy lala land.
The MSM is our enemy.
S3
October 23, 2007 - 20:52 ET by BlondeI know you're not here now, but hoping you'll check back manana.
Dick Morris was just on H&C making your point....What experience?
Then he said...."oh...she was in the White House for 8 years? Well so was the pastry chef. So....she knows where the light switches are?"
There's HRC's qualified experience to inhabit the Oval Office. LMAO!
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
Ah! Blonde, there you are!
October 24, 2007 - 07:26 ET by Six String SpiffI wish I could have seen that! I's so true. I don't get it, but then again, I don't get a lot things these foolish people do. Does being smarter always hurt this much? Hee hee!
The American Revolution Continued
Harry Smith’s intro was so
October 23, 2007 - 13:23 ET by maggieqpublicHarry Smith’s intro was so completely over-the-top I’ve got to believe that someone from Media Matters put the words up on his teleprompter.
Go Bill
October 23, 2007 - 13:49 ET by ts88Go ahead Bill, head butt the bitch
LOL! ts88 - Are you active
October 23, 2007 - 13:51 ET by drillanwrLOL!
ts88 -
Are you active military?
No, I just hate them
October 23, 2007 - 13:52 ET by ts88No, I just hate them
Well, you'll be proud to
October 23, 2007 - 13:55 ET by drillanwrWell, you'll be proud to know I have heard similar things from active duty Marines ...
military
October 23, 2007 - 13:58 ET by ts88I love our military, but hate Hill and Billary. The dam mutts
blegh!
October 23, 2007 - 13:53 ET by landsharkI accidently looked at that pic and threw up in my mouth a little...
happy
October 23, 2007 - 13:55 ET by ts88Landshark, I am so happy that I had lunch before I saw the Pic and your post, LOL
There is a HUGE difference
October 23, 2007 - 14:17 ET by Gat New YorkThere is a HUGE difference between Angelina Jolie/Elizabeth Taylor/Princes Diana and Hillary Rodham Clinton - - - - one guess.
“somehow transformed themselves into political rock stars.”
The only thing about the “somehow’ is that they met – two power hungry people.
And where in the Constitution did it state that a requirement to be President is that you are a “rock star” and is anyone sick and tired of that inane categorization?
Did you Hear Rangel?
October 23, 2007 - 14:17 ET by mattmCharlie Rangel, (on a clip on Rush's show) was defending Hillary against Rudy; claiming Rudy's personal life is fair game and that Hillary is beyond reproach because "she stuck with her husband during the tought times."
It's enough to make you puke. Hillary stuck with Bill for purely political reasons and no other. I wouldn't even be surprised if Chelsea would have been aborted if not for the good PR a "first family" brings to an election.
Now the one who first railed against the "politics of personal destruction," and who was personally involved with destroying Billy Dale and Paula Jones - among others, also Ken Starr...and who knows what happened with Vince Foster.... Now she is attempting to call Rudy's personal life into question, and Rangel is defending her??? This is unmitigated gall.
I'm not saying a candidate's personal life should be off limits, but that's just it! Ever since the 1992 campaign the Dems, especially the Clintons, have been trying to convince everyone that a person's private life is irrelevant. Yet they used a false accusation of an affair to help beat Bush I in 1992...and they have been aiming at people's private lives ever since...all the while scolding anyone who would dare do it to them.
And Rangel says "there's no comparison." He's right...Rudy never used a personal attack in an election where as the Klinton Machina has perfected the practice.
Remember Harlem?
October 23, 2007 - 15:07 ET by okiehawk44Do you remember when old Billy rented a suite of offices in NYC for some astronomical rent -- you know -- a good 'ole boy from Arkansas has a big 'ole office with plenty of cigars etc in the Big Apple -- well that blew up in his face and the next picture is 'ole Bill and Gravel Gertie (Rangel) looking at offices in Harlem -- and the MSM proclaimed it was really his FIRST CHOICE -- Huh?
Rangel got used by the Clintons and is bragging about it like he won something -- you're pitiful Charlie!
Charlie Rangel Says
October 23, 2007 - 18:55 ET by PAPA LA PROUD AMERICAN
Charlie my man, U sure can suck a** can't ya now!
She stuck to her man the same way a hooker (you know about them right?) sticks to a rich john. Who are you trying to kid. Your as bad as she is. You are stuck on to her butt like bubble gum off a bus seat.
Hillary can't satisfy
October 23, 2007 - 16:05 ET by AntiMediaHillary can't satisfy bill so how can she satisfy the Nation.
That has potential to be a
October 23, 2007 - 20:43 ET by Gat New YorkThat has potential to be a :30 commercial if I were the GOP campaign manager.