Pay Attention, Stephen King; New Study: Minorities, Women Satisfied in Military Jobs

Photo of Ken Shepherd.

Here's something Stephen King might want to read before scoffing at military service.

A new study shows women and minorities are more satisfied in general with their jobs than white men in the military and that military women are generally much more positive about their career and career prospects than their civilian counterparts, according to a new study.

Newsweek's Sarah Kliff has the story in a Web exclusive (emphasis mine):

Any list of the best places to work is sure to include cool favorites like Google. The U.S. military? The sacrifices and risks required of its members seem to make it an unlikely pick. But new research suggests that it may well belong on such a list, particularly for minorities and women. The members of those two demographics in the military consistently rate their jobs as more satisfying than white males do, according to new research in this month's American Sociological Review. Much like Manning's military experience, the study of over 30,000 active duty personnel suggests that the armed forces' social hierarchy-explicitly based on rank-overrides many of the racial or gender biases in civil society, which tend to act as barriers for women and minorities in career advancement.

"Whites are far and away the least satisfied [in the military]," says Jennifer Hickes Lundquist, a sociologist at the University of Massachusetts and the study author. "Black females tend to be the most satisfied. It's a direct opposite and complete reversal of what we know about civilian job satisfaction."

In civilian society African-Americans generally express higher dissatisfaction with their jobs than their white counterparts and are less committed. But Lundquist's study of 30,000 active-duty personnel found that those norms are largely flipped in the military. She looked at five measurements of career satisfaction, including overall quality of life and opportunities for advancement, and found African-American women to be the most positive and satisfied with their jobs, followed by African-American men, Latinas, Latinos and white women. White men are the least satisfied with their military careers, rating their satisfaction and overall happiness with their jobs much lower.

"It's not that the military environment treats white males less fairly; it's simply that, compared to their peers in civilian society, white males lose many of the advantages that they had," Lundquist says. "There's a relative deprivation when you compare to satisfaction of peers outside of the military."

The same leveling effect among ethnic minorities also occurred across genders, although that was a bit more challenging to explain. A third of the women in the military say they have been sexually harassed, according to a recent Pentagon survey, and women in male-dominated specialties consistently rank their job satisfaction lower than those largely occupied by women. But female job satisfaction ratings seemed largely unaffected by these factors. Among each ethnicity that Lundquist studied, the women consistently had higher levels of job satisfaction than the males.

—Ken Shepherd is Managing Editor of NewsBusters


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Overall this is a pretty

Overall this is a pretty decent article about our military. One sentence does get under my skin though.

The U.S. military? The sacrifices and risks required of its members seem to make it an unlikely pick.

Unlikely to who? The author? Miss Kliff is showing the standard attitude from the media about the military. I'm sure this statement was made without a second thought from Miss Kliff. She would never dream of serving in the military and thinks that that is how everybody thinks. The media just can't grasp the idea that a lot of people actually want to serve and protect their country. Regardless of "sacrifices and risks".

Well, said, DaBird.

Well, said, DaBird.

Thank you, sir.

Thank you, sir.

I'm waiting for the second shoe...

...to drop.

"It's not that the military environment treats white males less fairly; it's simply that, compared to their peers in civilian society, white males lose many of the advantages that they had," Lundquist says.

Obviously this is due to the preferential treatment the white males receive in the civilian workplace, right????

Well, I'm a middle-aged white male and I'm SHOUTING foul here!

This is a hit piece with a built-in back door, if I've ever seen one.

 

I think I know why there is

I think I know why there is greater satisfaction in the military for women and minorities (Let's be clear.  When the author is talking about minorities it the "chosen" minorities).  In the military you have to prove that you have the competence to get "hired" and then you have to prove each step up the ladder that you can handle the job that you are being promoted to.  That is how it was when I was in and I served for 26 years up to 1995.  My son's, who are both serving our Army, tell me that is how it is today. 

In civilian life, you get hired, at least in our largest corporations and government at all levels by committees that have a quotas for women and the annointed minorities.  Promotions are handled the same way.  The upshot is that the person being hired and promoted can never be sure if they really deserved their position and "rank."  Likewise, that person's peers lack any confidence that the person can do the job they were hire and/or promoted to do.   

In sum, it is the bigotry of low expectations.  It is saying to women and the chosen minorities that you lack what it takes to stand on your own.  You need a hand up. 

This is all handled without any view that our corporations are in a battle with their foreign counterparts that have no such policies that limit them for choosing the very best for each and every position. 

Which one do you think will win in the long run?  Thank God our military isn't run that way, yet.   

My wife, both a woman

My wife, both a woman (should be obvious from the term "wife," but so that there is no misunderstanding from any androgynist trolls out there) and a minority, served in the military for over 10 years and has nothing but accolades for it and how it had a tremendous positive impact on her life.

Pull the waders up its beging to get deep...

What a load of crap, I have a female friend right now in the Texas Reserve and she has been trying for 6 months to get on the rotation TO Iraq.  She know the boost it will give her career and she is eager to go over seas and help both her fellow troops and the Iraqi people. 

 

Maybe if they actually spoke with a few of the serving troops they might actually get the real story.