Behar: McCain to Appoint Justices that 'Roll Back Civil Rights'

Photo of Justin McCarthy.
By Justin McCarthy | May 8, 2008 - 14:46 ET

John McCain’s anti-woman philosophy will guide him to appoint Supreme Court justices that will roll back civil rights, according to Joy Behar. Discussing the 2008 election on the May 8 edition of "The View," political pundit, Catholic theologian, and constitutional scholar Joy Behar offered her theory on why white women will vote for Obama, assuming he is the nominee, and even called Roe v. Wade "civil rights legislation."

"When these women, these white women that love Hillary so much, you know, there’s a lot of white, he gets the women vote. When they realize that McCain is going to load the Supreme Court up with more conservative justices who are going to probably roll back or try to roll back Roe v. Wade, civil rights legislation, you are going to see those white women go to the polls and vote for Obama."

Elisabeth Hasselbeck noted the absurdity of Behar’s point calling it "such a broad statement" and "an extreme prediction." Joy Behar proceeded to call McCain ideologically "off the wall" and repeated her recounting of labeling McCain "anti-woman" because he’ll allegedly appoint justices that will overturn Roe v. Wade.

The entire transcript is below.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

JOY BEHAR: When these women, these white women that love Hillary so much, you know, there’s a lot of white, he gets the women vote. When they realize that McCain is going to load the Supreme Court up with more conservative justices who are going to probably roll back or try to roll back Roe v. Wade, civil rights legislation, you are going to see those white women go to the polls and vote for Obama.

ELISABETH HASSELBECK: Like he’s going to take away all of our civil rights? Is that what you’re saying?

BEHAR: Well, it’s possible if he keeps putting Scalias and Alitos and all of these guys on the Court, those people have an agenda-

HASSELBECK: Their job is not to legislate.

BEHAR: -to roll back all of the liberal policies that we worked for, for the past fifty years.

HASSELBECK: That, that is such a broad statement. That’s like me stating that Barack Obama is going to take away all of your money because he’s going to raise everybody’s taxes. If I ever said that, you’d say "you know that’s, that’s a broad statement."

BEHAR: I think it’s going to happen.

HASSELBECK: You do?

BEHAR: I really do, yeah, I really do. I really think that, that’s what they want to do. They’ve been trying to do it with Bush all of these years and they haven’t been able to pull it off. But now, a couple of these liberal justices are either going to retire or maybe go to Heaven, wherever.

[laughter]

HASSELBECK: I don’t know. I think that’s, I think that’s an extreme prediction.

BEHAR: No, no, no. I asked John McCain-

WHOOPI GOLDBERG: That they’re going to go to Heaven? We pray that they do.

BEHAR: When John McCain was on the show that day, when we were in commercial, I said to him "John," because I like him. He’s a very nice guy. He’s a war hero. You want to like him. But his politics are off the wall.

HASSELBECK: They are not!

BEHAR: Well, to me.

HASSELBECK: To you.

BEHAR: This is my view. This is my view.

[laughter and applause]

HASSELBECK: Sing it Joy! Sing it.

BEHAR: So I said to him-

HASSELBECK: Thank you for clarifying.

BEHAR: I said "John, listen, you know, you can’t be, you know, rolling back Roe v. Wade it’s against women." And he said "I don’t really intend to do that exactly." I said "but you’re going to put these conservative justices on the Supreme Court and they will do it." And he looked at me and he said "Joy, I’m a conservative." I don’t know if he was winking or not, but he said it. "I’m a conservative." He’s, that’s his, those are his politics.

—Justin McCarthy is a news analyst at Media Research Center.

Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

"The View, political

"The View, political pundit, Catholic theologian, and Constitutional scholar Joy Behar", indeed she is a bevy of knowledge and cognitive thought.  Why hasn't she won a Nobel Prize yet as smart as she is.  Its a mystery.  I can see "white women" now flocking to the voter's booth to cast their vote for Obama.  Yeah, right.  I wonder if Joy will ever say something that isn't made up.  I guess not.

Joy Behar is a blowhard nothing

I saw this today and almost recorded it to post on my blog. However, I was so disgusted by what Joy Blowhard was spewing I thought it was unworthy of my time.

I'm glad someone else did, because I couldn't stomach it.

More Blohar insights

Hey Blohar: At least Liz knows the difference between the legislative and judicial branches of our government.

Yes, what we really need is more Clintonesque nominees likes Ruth Darth-Badar Ginsburg. Hang on to this wish: BO wins and coaxes Janet Reno out of retirement! Yowee!

Janet Reno isn't retired

She's quite active as part of the ACLU's Guantanamo Dream (Nightmare) Team.  Quite busy trying to get violent criminals out of Cuba and into the United States.

It's incredibly ironic considering with the whole Elian Gonzales fiasco, she was busily trying to get an innocent legitimate political refugee deported from the US back to Cuba.

http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/04/the-aclu-assembles-a-terrorist-legal-defense-force-of-extraordinary-magnitude/

Gitmo detainee let go, now caught again in bombing

No where today have I seen the story of the GITMO detainee who was released only to be recaptured as part of bomb squad in IRAQ.  Anyone else see it?

Liberal logic

  1. All liberal positions are civil rights. Conservatives oppose liberals. Therefore, conservatives oppose civil rights.
  2. Overturning racism was a liberal victory. Therefore, overturning liberals is a return to racism.
  3. All civil rights are untouchable. Therefore, all we have to do is label something a civil right, and no one will be allowed to question it.
  4. Liberals will unify the country. Conservatives will wreck it. The fact that liberals want conservatives to join them means that conservatives will only join the union if they abandon conservatism.

Hey, I didn't say it was valid logic.

Liberals

Joy is just another "liberal" genius. Funny, since the "liberals" took over Congress again, gas and food prices are skyroketing with no end in sight. The cost of living is going through the roof. Coincidence? If Barry wins, I give it about 6 months and the sky will start falling, especially on the middle class.

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"

who appointed some of our

who appointed some of our most liberal judges...?

Reagan? Nixon...?

both flaming conservatives next to McCain...

it's the pro-LIFE people like me who worry about McCain...

This is just fear-mongering.

Liberals always whine about some judge "rolling back" civil rights. 

Now, they are either ignorant of the constitutional provisions for amending the constitution and the making of laws, or they are fully aware that much of Liberalism has been established through judicial activism, which is really what they're afraid will be rolled back.

Whether it's ignorance or not, the motive is to scare people into voting Democrat by painting Republicans as evil racists who would reinstate slavery if they could.  It's sickening.

I'm not worried. If Roe v.

I'm not worried. If Roe v. Wade could survive Bush's Evangelism-intensive first term and SCOTUS appointees, it'll survive McCain.

Who can revolt if man has become a simple conglomerate of organs, a person barely free enough to use a remote control to choose his channel? -J. Kristeva

Sadly, your baby murdering

Sadly, your baby murdering industry is pretty safe.

If the baby killers had simply enacted the legalization of their bloody industry through the legislative process, rather than through the illegitimate practice of judicial activism, they wouldn't have to worry even if every supreme court justice was a Scalia.

But I wouldn't expect ignorant Libs to understand that.

Yeah, conservative judges

Yeah, conservative judges will "roll back the clock" on civil rights. Since conservative judges rule on laws and constitutional principles, libs are admitting that some of these earlier liberal decisions were not sound. 

  MSM - shaping all the perceptions you need to believe.

Behar changes a light bulb

In this episode, Joy decides to change a perfectly good incandescent bulb to a politically correct flourescent bulb.

Behar: I shall grab the bulb and . . Yikes! That's hot!

Elizabeth: You should shut the light off first.

Behar: O-k.  . . Yikes! That's hot!

Elizabeth: You should let it cool first.

Behar: O-k. Now I will grab the bulb and turn it counter-clockwise and . . .It won't move!

Elizabeth: Counter-clockwise means to the left.

Behar: O-k. Now I'll turn the bulb counter-clockwise and . . Yikes! It broke.

Elizabeth: It's amazing. You'd never believe it but counter-clockwise STILL means to the left even after all this time had passed!

Behar: O-k. Now I'll grab what's left of the bulb, the sharp chard of glass, with my bare hand and . . . . .

Good one Mica. But you

Good one Mica. But you forgot her last line...

Behar: It's too dark to see how to get this broken bulb out. I know! I'll turn the light back on so I can see how to remove .....ZZzzzzzaaappppp!!!

When asked if he went to war with Iraq to derail the impeachment vote: “I don’t think any serious person would believe that any President would do such a thing." - President Clinton (Dec 1998).

Better to remain silent and

Better to remain silent and be thought a fool

Once again, Behar speaks, and removes all doubt.

Joy Brainless

This woman is the epitome of stupidity, I'm surprised her brain can even generate enough synapses to even move her lips not to mention making words

 

Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.  Abraham Lincoln 16th president of US (1809 - 1865)

Tom...how do you know she

Tom...how do you know she is not a puppet controlled by Rosie back stage?

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

If she was...

She would be hanging upside-down

I really don't see what Joy the Brainless is worried about.

Even in the unlikely event that McCain does somehow manage to eek out a win in November, the only judges he will nominate for SCOTUS will be those who have received a stamp of approval from the that bloated blowhard from the People's Republic of Taxachusetts.

And you can be darn sure that he will not be nominating anyone who might throw a monkey wrench into his "Comprehensive Immigration Reform" plans, either.

What the American people are looking for is somebody who can solve their problems. - Barack Obama, April 27, 2008

thanks

Thanks for keeping an ear on this idiot. The news bits posted here at NB concerning this mental midget are always good for a full blown belly laugh or even an occasional coffee spew.

I nominate Joy Blowhard as Liberal Icon of the year. Nobody does it better as they say.

Civil rights for whom Joy?

The rights of the women looking to kill their babies or the rights of the women who are being killed before they have a chance to pass through the birth canal?

Behar is my favorite moron.  You can literally watch her IQ go down as the show progresses.  :-)

Joyce

The time has come for the View's producers to make Joyce pee in a cup....do they not have drug testing?

Don't worry Bonehead

It's near impossible (reverse lobotomy?) to remove your "right" to be ignorant.

Ron White was right...

"You can't fix stupid"

Anti woman?? maybe I'm

Anti woman??

maybe I'm wrong but about half of the babys born, grow up to be.....

 

Ronald Reagan, 1962: I did not leave the Democratic party, the party left me.

Insert: your name, 2008, and the Republican party.

Romney / Jendil 2012 (if,we survive)

Do any of these mental

Do any of these mental giants think that they should be glad their Mom and Dad did not share their "View"..

 

Ronald Reagan, 1962: I did not leave the Democratic party, the party left me.

Insert: your name, 2008, and the Republican party.

Romney / Jendil 2012 (if,we survive)

I've never thought much of

I've never thought much of that argument. Isn't it about on par with saying of those in favor of the Iraq War: "How would they feel if their house was hit during Shock and Awe".

While I might feel some abstract sense of gratitude that my mother chose not to abort, and pro-war people surely are glad that they are not residents of Baghdad, these things seem like pathos-laden rhetorical landmines, not compelling argument.

Who can revolt if man has become a simple conglomerate of organs, a person barely free enough to use a remote control to choose his channel? -J. Kristeva

Jason, I don't see the

Jason,

I don't see the correlation between getting killed by your enemies during a time of war and getting killed by your loved ones for the sake of convenience.

When asked if he went to war with Iraq to derail the impeachment vote: “I don’t think any serious person would believe that any President would do such a thing." - President Clinton (Dec 1998).

That makes no sense.  The

That makes no sense.  The people of Iraq are our enemies?  I thought we were, at least in part, acting on their behalf.  Saddam's thugocracy and all that bullshit...

Who can revolt if man has become a simple conglomerate of organs, a person barely free enough to use a remote control to choose his channel? -J. Kristeva

let's be fair

His comments have not insinuated anything about the innocent people in Iraq being the bad guys.

I am being fair. My

I am being fair. My original, rock-solid-logic comment was in regard to Baghdadian civilians, not the "insurgents" and "terrorists" that magically appeared in the region in the summer of 2003.

Who can revolt if man has become a simple conglomerate of organs, a person barely free enough to use a remote control to choose his channel? -J. Kristeva

Being Fair?

Being Fair? By insinuating that civilian houses are being hit during “shock and awe“ and equating this with abortions? How is that "being fair"? We don't intentionally target innocent civilians yet women INTENTIONALLY have abortions.

Your rock-solid-logic leave a lot to be desired.

Reread the thread. The

Reread the thread. The premise, posited by USA4Freedom before I even threw my hat in the ring, hinges on putting oneself in the shoes of a presumptive victim, not on the motives or intentions of the mother/smartbomb.

Jerry's reply to my first post basically then insinuated that all of the people of Iraq are our enemies, as opposed to the oligarchical cadre of Sunnis who were oppressing the rest.

Who can revolt if man has become a simple conglomerate of organs, a person barely free enough to use a remote control to choose his channel? -J. Kristeva

Actually Jason,

Actually Jason, your original post said nothing about civilians, innocent or otherwise.   I presumed, since you were talking about victims of "shock and awe", you were talking about our enemies, who hide among women and children.  

While I agree with you that NOBODY would want their homes hit during an event like "shock and awe",  my comments were directed at what I perceived to be an attempt at granting moral equivalence to death by war and death by abortion.  

When asked if he went to war with Iraq  to derail the impeachment vote:  “I don’t think any serious person would believe that any President would do such a thing." - President Clinton (Dec 1998).

"Never murder your opponent

"Never murder your opponent when she is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

Behar is an idiot.  If what

Behar is an idiot.  If what she is saying was true, I would have been supporting McCain LONG ago.  I would LOVE a President that appointed justices that upheld the Constitution and rolled back a few things that people mistakenly refer to as "civil rights".  For example, affirmative action programs are reverse discrimination and should be illegal.  Abortion is not a "civil right" but is the killing of an unborn fetus. Etc. etc.  Much of the "work" that Behar claims has been done over the last 50 years was not "work" at all.  In fact, much of it was "handouts" by an overly liberal government. 

LOLOL.  What an

LOLOL.  What an idiot.

What we need is more Scalias.  Anyone see the interview he did on 59 1/2 Minutes a couple weeks ago?  Awesome.  What do libs not like about an originalist?  Oh wait, they don't like when it's not an activist liberal judge who prefers to mark up the Constitution and put their own ideas in the margins and call them law.

Perhaps the libs didn't hear him talk about Roe v Wade in that interview.  If anyone didn't, find the transcript.  It is a very interesting thought process he gives to it, and no it's not to "roll it back."

Joy suffers from foot in

Joy suffers from foot in mouth disease. I can't believe she's that ridiculous.

Joy is also afflicted with Ed Zachary disease

I hope you know what that is.

She's was miserable failure as a comic and now she's a wonk?

Hey...Olberman imploded on numerous occasions as a sports guy and now is considered a wonk, If only by himself.

 

Rosie O'Donuts... Al Franken... Roseanne Barr... So what passes for liberal wonkdom is actually washed up has beens and never weres?

 

 

OK... Ed Zachary disease is an oriental disease whereby your face look "edzachary like your butt".