George Carlin's 'View': Wildfire Victims 'Get What's Coming to Them'

Photo of Justin McCarthy.

Comedian George Carlin blames the victims on the Southern California wildfires. Appearing on the October 24 edition of "The View" Carlin said, because many of these home owners "overbuild" and "put nature to the test," "they get what’s coming to them."

This rant was too much even for noted left-wing co-host Joy Behar who felt his statement was "a little harsh." Carlin continued that he "can’t wait for the sea levels to rise" and "for some of these cities to disappear." Carlin added that these people who "do all this moron stuff" are selfish and "want their toys."

Carlin should note that these homeowners who "do all this moron stuff’ were let down by their government who did not properly manage their own forests.

The transcript is below.:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

GEORGE CARLIN: The planet is fine. The people are [bleeped out]. Because everyone is trying to save the planet. The planet doesn’t need that. The planet will take care of itself. People are selfish. And that's what they're doing is trying to save the planet for themselves to have a nicer place to live. They don't care about the planet in theory. They just care about having a comfortable place. And these people with the fires and the floods and everything, they overbuild, they put nature to the test and they get what's coming to them. That's what I say.

JOY BEHAR: Well, that's a little harsh.

CARLIN: That's what's happening, and I can't wait for the sea levels to rise. I can't wait for some of these cities to disappear.

SHERRI SHEPHERD: I can't swim, George.

[Laughter]

CARLIN: There are places that are going to go away. The map is going to change and that's because -- people think nature is outside of them. They don't take into them the idea that we are part of it. They say, "oh, we're going for a nature walk. We're going to the country because we like nature." Nature is in here. And if you're in tune with it, like the Indians, the Hopis, especially, the balance of life, the balance, the harmony of nature, if you understand that, you don't overbuild. You don’t do all this moron stuff. There are too many people-

BEHAR: What about the polluters? Let's go after them, the polluters, the corporations that pollute.

CARLIN: It's a symphony. Everybody is in the band. You know, it's not just one group. People are, people want their goodies. They want their toys. Everybody wants the newest gizmo. We're, we’re slaves to gizmos and toys.

Earlier in the show, Joy Behar echoed the erroneous Democratic talking point that the firefighting has been hampered by the national guard deployments in Iraq.

"Anyway, there was a guy on television on Chris Matthews’ MSNBC. Lieutenant Governor John Garamendi, okay, and he was on, he’s in the middle of all of this. And he said, they asked him, ‘Bush is coming.’ They said ‘President Bush is coming on Thursday,’ and, you know he really has this reputation of screwing things up, Katrina, as well as other people who were involved in that. So he’s going to make an appearance this week, Bush. So he said ‘do you think it’s public relations rather than action?’ Chris Matthews asked this lieutenant governor, Garamendi. And he said ‘it’s public relations, of course.’ And he doesn’t even want him to come because it takes the focus out of the hard working fire fighters. So, you know, he basically said ‘stay home.’ But then he goes, listen to this, he goes ‘okay President Bush comes out. We’ll be polite. But frankly that’s not the solution. How about sending our national guard back from Iraq, so that we have those people available here to help us?’ [applause] Okay, well, just let me finish this. What happened was on Joe Scarborough and other sort of right wing personalities. They thought that, that was just disgusting. And my question to the panel is, is it disgusting or is it timely?"


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Carlin is mostly

Carlin is mostly right:

The planet is fine. The people are [bleeped out]. Because everyone is trying to save the planet. The planet doesn’t need that. The planet will take care of itself. People are selfish. And that's what they're doing is trying to save the planet for themselves to have a nicer place to live. They don't care about the planet in theory. They just care about having a comfortable place. And these people with the fires and the floods and everything, they overbuild, they put nature to the test and they get what's coming to them.

Homes are being built in areas that have always been prone to brushfires. So why should they be surprised? And why do they build again after the last time? Where are the homeowners insurance companies warning these people about the liability?

It also doesn't sound like he is a true-believer in this global warming hysteria.

 

People build, then blame the governement

People constantly build in areas known for destoying homes and when it happens, where do they go?

To the Governement to rebuild their homes.

How many people get to live in beautiful beachfront house that get rebuilt every few years because of Hurricanes?

Carlin is right.

PS - Any time Man thinks he is above God, God makes sure there is no doubt he's not.

If people build in high

If people build in high risk areas, they should assume all the risk, not the Government. Period...end of story... the debate is over!

Just had to get in the debate is over comment just to keep our lib friends happy. 

Get Email updates from Fred http://socialnet.imwithfred.com/email_alert_july_26.html

You are right CT

I do think they should be able to purchase some high-risk private insurance though.

exlib... Absolutely! If

exlib... Absolutely!

If you can afford the insurance, fine.

Just don't go crying to the Government, because when you do that you are crying to me and my first words will be "did you have the full insurance coverage to cover you in the event that something like this happens?"

If you answered NO, it's all on you! 

Get Email updates from Fred http://socialnet.imwithfred.com/email_alert_july_26.html

Um, I hate to point out the

Um, I hate to point out the obvious...

If you choose to live in an inner city with a high crime rate... does that preclude you from expecting the police department from protecting you?  Or that somehow you are responsible if you are robbed?  Or that somehow you are less worthy of protection if you get robbed 2 weeks in a row?  Homeowners insurance which covers theft would be prudent, but not having it doesn't make you "deserving" of victimization.... but let me be crystal clear:  There is a BIG difference between expecting the government to help, and blaming the government for the event in the first place.  

Police and fire services are some of the few social services the government SHOULD be providing, and we as conservatives should be complaining whenever essential constitutional services are "inadequate" because funding has been diverted to things like "internet access for illegal aliens."  Fund our law enforcement and fire services to the point where they are capable of combating any plausible threat FIRST.  And yes, we know this threat was plausible because the fires have happened again and again.  When the government fails to provide the minimum safety through GROSS NEGLIGENCE, then yes, it should be liable to compensate those it has failed.  There is no gross negligence on the part of the fire fighters here... only on the state and local legislatures which have failed to support them.  Sound familiar?  Think troops and Congress.

As far as I'm concerned, the blame for all this lies squarely with the litigous environmentalists who are preventing the Healthy Forests Act(s) from moving forward, and the leftists who promote the welfare state before funding and manning essential services FIRST. 

While that would not have prevented natural flareups nor arson, it would have prevented the exacerbation to the point where fire crews were unable to contain it before it damaged properties.

Khyris, I don't think the crime analogy is accurate.

If someone is victimized by crime, there is a criminal to blame. Someone had to actively commit the crime in question. When Mother Nature, acts of God, or whatever term you prefer occurs, there is no "perpetrator."

I've often thought the same thing about people who build and live in the Mississippi flood plain. At some point, you should realize that this is not a good place to build a house.

Try this analogy: if you buy a house knowing that the basement floods every time it rains, how much sympathy do you deserve the next time it rains? Or similarly: people who get a great deal on a house because it's close to the airport, then spend all their time complaining about the noise?

At some point, you MUST be responsible for your own decisions.

I like your analogy, but in

I like your analogy, but in this case, your house isn't going to burn down every time there's a fire somewhere in SoCal.  And we don't have a "Rain Department" whos job is to protect people from flooded basements.  There's a big difference between a constant nuisance and a sudden disaster.... and my question is, why do we bother to have FEMA or a city Fire Department at all if we're only going to give them enough resources to keep HALF the city from burning down.... and use the rest of the resources for re-timing traffic lights.  To me, that's half-baked and half-a$$ed.  Hint, people won't appreciate the nicely timed traffic lights in the half of the city that burned down!  It's not that the state and local governments can't afford to fund fire protection to the level where there's near complete protection.  On the contrary, we get taxed PLENTY.  

It's that they COULD and CHOSE not to, and now the gripe is "oh it's Bush's fault for sending 3,000 of the 20,000 National Guardsmen to Iraq! If ONLY we had those 3,000 men! They could have blown the fire out with their mighty farts! What? My fault for being an incompetent budget legislator that gave all those grants to study global warming rather than the Fire Department?? Couldn't be!  The fact that we have to rent our fixed wing aircraft from Canada rather than own them means nothing!  The fact that our helicoptors are still from the Vietnam era means nothing! It's all Bush!"  Makes me sick.

I agree, at some point we must be responsible for our own decisions, but not one person decided "I'm going to build my house where it's going to get burned down 5, 10, 50 years later" as has been the simpleton rhetoric.  Shouldn't the morons who made the decisions to wipe their butts with the constitution when deciding the funding budgets have some responsibility?

"...not one person decided

"...not one person decided "I'm going to build my house where it's going to get burned down 5, 10, 50 years later" '

Okay, I grant that. But I, we (I assume, YOU) have been hearing about these wildfires for YEARS now. Just like the flooding of the Mississippi, it's a repeated, natural occurrence. It can be predicted.

"Hint, people won't appreciate the nicely timed traffic lights in the half of the city that burned down!"

Are you suggesting that all other municipal functions should be either eliminated or put on hold to safeguard the property of people who made bad decisions about where to build their homes?

There are others to blame, I feel. For one, the environmentalists who won't allow the clearing of dead underbrush (read: kindling). But the bottom line is: you knew the risk when you took the chance.

 

Khrysis,

Sadly, the police are not there to "protect" you. They are only there in the event someone attacks you or, God forbid, kills you. In other words, after the fact.

When it comes to real-time protection from criminal predators, we are on our own.

Well this is rather very

Well this is rather very much the point I was trying to make with the crime analogy.... how can we be expected to be "on our own" against criminals and predators, when the government turns around and prevents legal citizens from having hand guns? Similarly, how can people be expected to keep themselves reasonably safe from a natural disaster when hamstrung by stupid forestry litigation?  If the state and federal governments are demonstrating gross incompetence by not allocating funds with the proper constitutional prioritization, then they should be accountable and liable. The idea that people "deserve it" because of where they live is downright absurd... we can't have everyone crammed into the 5 square miles of real estate that is free from fire flood tornado earthquake drought, etc etc etc. No matter where you live, there's SOME thing, and the inference that these homes are "the same ones" being burned down every time is the same feeble logic that it's the same trailers being hit by tornados every time.  I encourage everyone to take a look at the satellite photo on Rush's site and see how big SoCal really is, and where these fires actually are.

Khrys, a big part of the

Khrys, a big part of the problem is not legislative but, rather, judicial. When "environmentalists" file suit to stop preventive measures, and a judge rules in their favor then, there you go. It has been "environmentalists" who have prevented controlled burns and brush clearing in these areas. "It isn't natural." Well, BS. It's going to happen one way or another: either through wild fires such as are going on now, or by land owners (private and government) clearing it out themselves. As for it being "not natural", every critter in nature modifies the environment to make it as comfortable or advantageous to that critter as possible. From termites to beavers to humans, every critter modifies its environment to expand its habitat to accomodate more of its species. Humans are better at it than other creatures, but they are still part of nature.

As for the rest of your statement, if people want to build in high-risk areas (no matter what risk it is) it should be on their dime. If they can't afford the insurance, then they either need to build smaller until they can afford the premium, or they need to accept the risk. It should not be incumbent upon the taxpayer to replace a home or business if you choose to build in a flood plain, or an area prone to mud slides, rock slides, earthquakes, tornadoes, floods, or wild fires.

"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan

The judicial problem is

The judicial problem is holding up the repeal process of harmful policies, but it's a legislative problem that it ever became "illegal" to take preventative measures in the FIRST place.

It shouldn't be incumbent upon the taxpayer? It already IS incumbent on the taxpayer!  Taxpayers pay through the nose so that the local fire department all the way up through FEMA are ALREADY taking your hard earned dollars, as they should!  It is entirely appropriate!  The government takes 10 dollars,  gives 2 to the fire department, gives 3 to whatever crap pork project of the week is, and puts 5 in its own pocket for "administrative costs."  Then turns around and says "sorry we couldn't stop your house from burning down, but we're keeping your 10 dollars."  No business on the PLANET has its assets protected when it's selling a disfunctional product or service.... yet the Gov't gets a free pass to not only say "too bad" but doesn't give you a choice on whether you want to pay for the service in the first place while at the same time forbidding you from providing necessary preventative services for yourself???  It's not "taking from taxpayers", it's a refund of taxes they already paid for a service not delivered.  If we spent a thousand dollars on the coast guard for 3 rowboats and a canoe, while spending a billion dollars studying the CO2 emissions of ostriches... if my private ship was pirated, I'd want my money back too.

We need to get it into our heads that emergency services get funded FIRST, and when we fail to do so, there are consequences.

That's why I said, where are

That's why I said, where are the insurance companies? If you buy a house in a high risk zone uch as beachfront in the Hamptons, you either cannot get insurance or it will cost you a lot of money. Insurance companies should either not insure these homeowners who insist on rebuilding or charge them a hefty premium as a penalty.

Gat... No argument from

Gat... No argument from me. 

Get Email updates from Fred http://socialnet.imwithfred.com/email_alert_july_26.html

Just wanted to say I agree

Just wanted to say I agree with you all. If you can't afford the flood insurance, don't buy a house on the beach. It's not the government's job to bail you out. 

 

 

card holding member of the vast right-wing conspiracy

Y`all

Don'tcha know ... That's Hillary's next plan, after universal healthcare passes ... Universal home owners' ins.

 Anyhow, unless I am mistaken, and a Tarheel can correct me, but a few years or so back didn't North Carolina forbid building or post-hurricane rebuilding on certain Outer Banks Islands because of the very insurance problems you've all addressed?

I have a cousin who has a house on Top sail Is.  Several years back a `cane hit the Outer Banks ... All the houses on her beach were either destroyed or severely damaged ... except hers.  However, I believe Top Sail is not in the group that forbids rebuilding.

As for Carlin, I mostly agree with what he is saying, although I can see the road ahead, when he's rambling on, where we would soon part ways.

As for that bundle of Joy ... The only thing she can claim to being an authority in is queen-size panty hose.

 

The government is NOT allowed to manage the forests with fire prevention methods ... (clearing otu or buring of old fuels ... cutting down of dead trees ... )  because the liberal eco-lunatic groups won't let them ... (BTW, when the hell did WE/government give these nothing groups power?)  Even our own fave Bobby Kennedy Jr. has said none of that helps the forest ... Yeah, show me your forestry degree ...

I certaily concur with that.

I certaily concur with that.

hefty premium as a penalty

Hefty premiums don't exist as a "penalty" but as the cost to insure a risk.

I once consulted to the Vice President of Marketing of a major, national insurer.  His statement was, "I would insure a burning building if the premium were right."

Additionally, mortgage holders require the home owner to have fire insurance to cover their exposure.

The overwhelming majority of the affected homeowners are insured by their homeowners policy.  Although they may have contents, the value of which exceeds their limits of the policy.

 

 

 

Ever seen San Diego?

Yes, some homes are in the hills and close to canyons, but a great many more are on flat land, many close to lakes and beaches. Most of this area's housing looks very much like housing elsewhere in the country. I don't live in a brush or tree-covered wilderness, I live in a small city in the northern part of the county. It's probably just like wherever you live. O I forgot, you live in that paradise that never has hurricanes, tornadoes, blizzards or any sort of bad weather.

You do realize that the people who live here do not have control of the Santa Ana winds, don't you? It's the WIND that whips up what otherwise would be a small local fire into the what we have now, not the people.

People from "back east" keep coming here. Should those of us already here tell them: "Too bad, we've got ours, you get out?" Last time I checked, it was still legal to travel from state to state.

And one more minor detail, the government we 'expect to cover the tab' is the one that [over] taxes us, too.

Chai


"Should those of us already

"Should those of us already here tell them: "Too bad, we've got ours, you get out?"

No but it would be worthwhile to get the government not to grant building permits in areas highly vulnerable to brushfires every year.

"You do realize that the

"You do realize that the people who live here have no control over the Santa Ana winds, don't you?" Yes, we do realize that.

You do realize that if controlled burns on windless days were allowed, there would be no fuel for these kinds of fires, don't you?

"Should we tell them [the people from back East] 'Too bad, we've got ours, you get out'?" No, but you should tell them it's risky to build here because of <fill in the blank>, so you'd better have good insurance and an evacuation plan, and accept the risk.

"...the government we expect to cover the tab is the one that (over)taxes us, too." We all realize that. One of the reasons we are over-taxed is because of the socialists wanting the government to perform functions that it shouldn't...like disaster relief and rebuilding for idiots who don't bother to insure, or under-insure in high-risk areas. It's morale hazard: "we're insured (or the government will replace it for us), so I don't need to go to the bother of taking preventive measures." If the government didn't replace stuff, then the property owner will have incentive to tell the "environmentalists" to go to H***, and clean out the underbrush, or not build in such areas.

"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan

"This rant was too much

"This rant was too much even for noted left-wing co-host Joy Behar who felt his statement was "a little harsh."

Yeah, Joy probably knows a lot of fellow libs who live in Malibu. It's okay for them to live there...

Wasn't that dumb one on

Wasn't that dumb one on Three's Company, Suzanne Sommers, one of the people who just had to evacuate -a nd didn't we see her sometime in the last 2 years after that same house burned down?

 

Who was it that said in the

Who was it that said in the last fire out there, "Well, at least I don't have anyone in Iraq ..." ??? I think it was Sommers ...

cut her a break, will ya?

Her point, explained at the time, that the loss of her home was unimportant compared to the possibility of losing a loved one in the war.

 

"Our people have shed more blood for the liberty and freedom of other peoples...than all the other countries put together. And I don't feel any need to apologize for the United States of America" - Fred Thompson

That's what I hoped against

That's what I hoped against hope that she meant ... Good on her then.

True, Chai.... But it

True, Chai....

But it does make the point that people tend to keep building in this high-risk area. Their prerogative, of course, but their (risky) choice, also.

Behar- Democrat Mouth Piece

Nice, so let's just echo leftist talking points.

 So the Ca Lt Gov says Bush don't come because it may look good for you to come here, but our friends in the media are doing our bidding with little prodding and already spinning it negative.

It's amazing Republicans can even get elected. 

 It just goes to show you that Democrats would probably NEVER get elected if it weren't for hand-outs (entitlements) and the Media.  The fact they get elected proves that people PREFER Conservative policies but need constant distortions from the media to get them to think negatively about Conservatives and favorable to liberal ideaologies.

Not this time

George Carlin is an established comedian, and a crass one at that. His job is to make inflamatory (pardon the pun) remarks with the hope that they're more funny then offending.

It's a high-wire act and sometimes the jokes don't fly. Imus is a prime example of this.

That being said, Behar is a slack-titted gorgon, in a nest of screeching harpies.

Ouch

"That being said, Behar is a slack-titted gorgon, in a nest of screeching harpies."

I hope her ego can take these jabs.  meow 

"We are going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."  Hillary Clinton, 6-28-04 San Francisco

Point of order...

George Carlin was an established comedian.  Now the Hippy Dippy Weatherman is just a grumpy old crank.

When a liberal speaks, the truth is busy elsewhere.

Carlin's a tired old comic

I caught his act here in San Diego last fall and all he did was read (poorly) from his notes. I would have rather watched a performance of him from 20 years ago on tape. At least the tickets were free.

Pathetic

I'm told it's okay for novice comedians to read from notes if they're doing an open-mike, but someone who's been doing this for 40 plus years and on a paid gig? Pathetic.

I've heard Garafalo (haggard harridan hack) does the same thing. Lazy. Pathetic. Weak.

http://radioequalize... Ha

http://radioequalize...

Harry Reid is blaming it on Global Warming

Randi Rhodes says it's BlackWater to blame

Mike Malloy chips in with the real deal is the Bush Crime Family

Randi Rhodes says she did

Randi Rhodes says she did some searching on Google and:

And you know, every time I look for it what comes up, believe it or not, is that Blackwater wants to move to San Diego and build this giant complex in San Diego right where most of the evacuations are taking place and you know.

Mike Malloy says:

They're not having electrical storms out there, they're not having any storms at all. What's causing it? But then the answer popped into my head, as easily as the answer about torture. The fires are being set, the fires are being set by elements of the Bush crime family. It's a great distraction, it's a wonderful distraction. And then I thought to myself, Jesus God! Did you really have that thought?! And the answer came back - yeah, loud and 'effing clear."

(Exactly who are these "elements", Mr. Malloy???)

These people are truly sick.

All we need now is Mother Sheehan out there raging about Bushco.

It's a miracle they haven't

It's a miracle they haven't thrown in Darth Vader and Halliburton yet!

Sick sick critters....all of them along with the leftist msm at this point they are now officially rabid with their crap...I just heard little ed Henry's report on CNN...enough to make me go outside and get some fresh air...

Oh enough already, what are these people going to do when they lose in '08....President Bush and Co. are leaving, they can't keep blaming them, we know they won't look at their own damage they are doing to themselves, while really helping the good side of life, which of course is us...ROFL!

Wolfie is already calling for a disaster on CNN with the insurance companies with the fires compared to the Katrina episode...these people are past pathetic...some people do not even know if they have a home to go to yet and these filthy msm sleaze-balls are already trying to make someone anyone as long as it is or could be connected to the conservative side somehow...blah blah blah...

Now CNN's Bill Whiz-bang Schneider is comparing Bush to Ahhhhnold with the difference in approval ratings, these people are absolutely nuts. 

bt, do you remember when

bt, do you remember when Clinton bombed I-forget-where on the eve of Monica Lewinsky's GJ testimony? Liberals claimed that anyone who even hinted at a wag-the-dog scenario was not only hateful, but a sick psychopath and a traitor to boot.

But apparently some of them find it entirely plausible that President Bush would order the wholesale destruction of the lives of thousands of our own citizens, not to mention a big chunk of California, to further....what?

I don't know much about Malloy, but apparently Randi Rhodes' recent mishap threw both of her brain cells even further out of kilter.

mb... I remember that

mb...

I remember that well, the wag-the-dog scenario with Monica...and I still believe that was set-up.

The leftist msm are just plain insane pathetic sick creatures IMO.

They did the same thing to the President with Katrina too, he blew up the levees, he wants people to drown, just the minorities ect, which was brought up again today on CNN the racism issue, saying the difference with this and Katrina is most of the victims getting help so fast and orderly is because the majority of them are white.

Nothing to do with people listen and move the hell out of harms way and have a Gov. and others that are not like Gov.Blanco and their Mayor Naggin.

the racism issue, saying

the racism issue, saying the difference with this and Katrina is most
of the victims getting help so fast and orderly is because the majority
of them are white. -
bigtimer

bt, I responded to the same thing in another thread....said isn't is just possible that the difference is that California, and the towns being hit, are not governed by morons?

Yep.  Only when white

Yep.  Only when white people suffer does the government jump in.  Wait... I'm white.  Wait... I was in Katrina.  Wait... I lived in a parish of about 95% white people.  HEY!!!!!!! /me looks in mirror to make sure I'm still white.

Actually, it's partially about the morons governing this state.  Well, governED, I should say.  Hopefully Bobby will turn things around and do right by the people of Louisiana.  It's also the victim mentality. Most people here have lived their whole lives being coddled and cuddled and handed things on a silver platter, so when Katrina came and went, many saw it as an opportunity to see how much would be put into their empty hands if they stood, looking pitiful, with their hands out.  I know there are exceptions, and there are some people who legitimately can't help themselves, but if you saw how many new luxury cars were rolling around in the outlying areas after the storm that later got repo'ed, all the new stereos and rims, all the plasma televisions (not the ones that were stolen... LOL), all the jewelry, all the everything I saw, you'd understand that a good portion of the blame is to be laid at the feet of the people who are crying.  Schoolbus Nagin is an idiot, Kathleen Blank-OH! was ineffective, and a whole cast of others added their own screw-up to the FU stew, but it wasn't just them. The people in CA are pulling together and helping each other and doing for themselves instead of just sitting around waiting.

This still burns my ass... no pun intended.

It's amazing how these

It's amazing how these has-beens are always dredged up at times like these. Carlin was funny 30 years or so ago. Now, he's just another angry old man.

 

I was surprised at Carlin's reaction

The last time I heard a Carlin rant, he was claiming that WE (the US) hisotrically only made war with people because they were "brown".  And, that the only reason the US went after Germany was because they were "horning in on the US's territory by exterminating Jews".

Now if that isn't patently offensive, I don't know what is.  Yet since it was directed at The US and mostly white America, no one objected.

delete  

delete

 

Carlin was the last segment

Carlin was the last segment on Olberloons show last night.

George lathered Keith's butt big time.

Keith was love....lol!!!

I'm a refugee from the Democratic Party.

 

I've always liked George

I've always liked George Carlin.

He was funny as a hippie

He was funny as a hippie bus in "Cars." His schtick has always been that all people are stupid, left or right, so this really isn't that much out of character.

But I would be curious to see what Carlin's "place for all of his stuff" looks like.

**My Daughter at the WWII Memorial

I liked him when he was the

I liked him when he was the Hippy-Dippy Weatherman...me thinks he has spent too much time frying his brain with or without help from the sun.

I know he went to rehab not that long ago, but I think it may of been too late myself...lol.

I guess The View has become

I guess The View has become a sort of on-air rehab/therapy session for all these nut cases to vent their pet theories and get the venom out of their system.

Her again

[yadda, yadda, yadda]....And my question to the panel is, is it disgusting or is it timely?"

Behar prattle-brain does it again. I'm surprised she's able to dress herself.

To a liberal Democrat, there

To a liberal Democrat, there is no occurence in life or nature that can't be politicized.

A day or so ago the tards

A day or so ago the tards over at Huffpo were livid over Glenn Beck's outrageous verbiage. Let's see if George Carlin's outrageous verbiage was enough to make the Huffington Post, shall we? 

Okay, let's see...

George Bush is evil, George Bush caused the wildfires, George Bush's administration caused the wildfires, GOP candidates get all their money for rich white folk, George Bush is the anti-Christ (as if that actually existed), oooo! a much-needed Britney Spears update....

Nope. Nothing on George Carlin. Gee, I wonder why?

Meanwhile, Glenn Beck responded to the fabricated "scandal" in his usual way: "I hate to break it to, you know, those who don't listen to the show, but if they ever would listen to the show, let me give you a little piece of advice: You have to engage what I like to call 'your brain.' You actually have to think. I might be making a joke. I might be serious." Beck added, "We joke a lot about, you know, the Hollywood crowd living in Southern California."

 

The Screwed View is just a

The Screwed View is just a window into the rot of the soul of much of this country. I have always detested it more than anything else on the air, save Olbermann maybe.  It makes me think women are really dumb and naive these days, too.  I miss my grandparents' generation.  God, could the gene pool crashed this quickly?  No, it's just the permissive and ignorant cultural shift we are being smothered by. 

George Carlin was great as 'Mr. Conductor' on 'Shining Time Station' and 'Thomas the Tank Engine'.  He definitely was better than the other kook-lefty 'Mr. Conductor': Alec Baldwin.  Ringo was okay but one-dimensional.  Hey, I've been watching kids' t.v. for about 17 years now- 4 boys- and you've got to find something you like, too. 

Anyone who says they support the troops but not the mission is a liar. 

Carlin Isn't Endearing Himself...

to the far left-wing nutroots and AGW "true" believers, is he?

The thing is how he is doing it. Two words: Common Sense!

He understands that humankind simply does not have the power to influence nature the way that the far left-wing nutroots/AGW true believers would have us believe. He also understands the true meaning of the old saying, "Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it." If you want to live in an area with a history of fires or floods or tornadoes or hurricane or earthquakes or whatever, you have to assume the risk and DO NOT blame the government whenever the inevitable happens and you lose your house and personal belongings.

Of course, all of this is contrary to the far left-wing nutroots and their socialist agenda where the individual is never held accountable/responsible for their actions and can always look to the government to "bail them out" instead.

Just my $0.02

Too bad the panel isn't

Too bad the panel isn't more balanced. We need some kind of fairness doctrine. That way, somebody would be there to point out to George that only 3,000 CA Natl Guard troops are in Iraq and the other 17,000 are still in CA.

How hard would the libtarded audience clap then? 

Hey, at least he didn't

Hey, at least he didn't blame it on the president! So refreshing! :)

The Rocky Mountain Collegian: Illustrating Idiocy

Did George have the

Did George have the same issue with people in New Orleans living in a bowl, near the sea, below sea level? 

GregE... Of course not.

GregE...

Of course not.

I don't care how "legendary" he is

George Carlin used to be funny, but now he's just a bitter hateful cynical old crank. I saw part of his last HBO special, and he spent half of it telling rehashed jokes and the other ranting about (insert whatever). I don't care how famous he is, he has no right to sneer at other people's homes burning down. If it was HIS house, do any of you think he'd be sneering at himself or his lost possesions? What a jerk-off. OK George, everything and everybody sucks, we know, you've told us over and over again. Time for your nap.

I agree, I remember when he

I agree, I remember when he was funny. I have satellite radio
and hear him on the comedy channel. Really funny old stuff. But now he is just
a bitter man. I looked up his info on the internet because I was wondering
where he lived.. I did not find it. I did find out that his wife died in 1997
(I think). I wonder if that finished making him a old bitter man.

I watched (a small part) of his show on HBO at a friends
house. The crowd looked put upon. I would think they were thinking “hell if I
wanted to get yelled at I would have gone to their Mom’s house, where she would
have fixed them dinner, rather than charge them for the seats...  

Everyone has had someone at work that does nothing but bitch
and complain, about EVERYTHING! George Carlin has become that man.

When every line starts with: Ya know what else I hate..

These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc.
Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day

I remember when George

I remember when George Carlin was hilariously funny. Now he's just a bitter senile old man.

And one other thing, George - the world wont be destroyed by another flood no matter how much eco-nuts might want it.

I agree with Carlin but

I agree with Carlin but detest his lack of tact. 

Great-great grandpa said follow the native example as to where to settle.

Even the Bible advises not to build on sand.

 TAKE THE HIGH GROUND has another meaning.

God Bless the now homeless and expecially the firefighters who put their lives at risk to save the folk who would not listen.