America Sees Through Jon Stewart: Obama’s Clown No Longer Fooling Anyone
I have no obligation to the Democrats or progressives or unions. We’re not warriors in their cause[.] – Jon Stewart defending his anti-Beck rally
You work on the message, I’ll work on the logistics. — Arianna Huffington to Jon Stewart regarding her offer to provide buses to his rally.
Jon Stewart always tries to make it seem like he rises above it all, and that’s not the case. He certainly has a point of view that’s fairly strident.” — Tea Party Organizer Jamie Radtke.
…And therein lies Jon Stewart’s problem: We are on to him. And it appears as though his fans in the media are also finding it difficult to carry his I’m just a performer water this time, as well.
The mistake Stewart made, I think, was letting his hubris get ahead of him. The whole DC rally idea is too clever by half and and now the state-sanctioned comedian’s credibility is taking on a little water as he’s found himself in the unwinnable position of having to explain his motivations again and again and again.
For so long Stewart’s floated above it all, for so long he’s been the MSM’s darling and so he probably started to see himself as invincible and just assumed his media friends would help keep the clown mask in place no matter how audaciously politicized his antics became (they are on the same side, after all). But even the media can only swallow so much, and to ask them to swallow the story that Saturday’s Restore Sanity rally is an apolitical event and not in any way inspired by, or a left-wing response to, the incredible success of Beck-a-Palooza, pretty much insults everyone’s intelligence.
Mr. SmugFaceClownBoyFunnyMan can protest all he wants about his Mock The People rally being hijacked by the left, but Stewart’s no idiot and some journalist worth his or her salt might want to follow the following up with, What did you expect?:
But some liberal groups are doing their best to adopt the rally as their own. Democratic clubs from colleges across the country are sending buses to the event, offering a seat in exchange for a few hours of volunteer time. …
His efforts to shape expectations of the rally have been overshadowed by figures such as Huffington and Oprah Winfrey, an Obama ally who is also paying for hundreds of people to attend the rally. …
“This is basically the anti-tea party rally. It’s saying, These people are absolutely crazy and we can’t have them in the government,” said Emma Ellman-Golan, president of the Democratic club at the University of Pennsylvania.
Gee, why would these groups think they’ve found such a kindred spirit in Jon Stewart? Well, maybe they watch “The Daily Show.”
And as we can see, it’s not just people on the right who see through Stewart, it’s his own people, as well — hardcore Leftists eager to lock arms with the star and sneer at the workaday moms and dads who count themselves among the Tea Partiers. Even WaPo had to admit the Stewart event has a political “tinge”:
It was, of course, inevitable that a politically tinged event on the Mall three days before the midterm elections would turn, well, political. In a year when conservatives have been more enthusiastic, liberals were quick to view the rally as a call to arms - even if it is inspired by a man who has lately been skewering the Obama administration[.]
Yeah, inspired by a man who’s been so hard on the Obama administration that President Obama himself – the same President Obama who endorsed Stewart’s rally – will be a guest on the “Daily Show” just a few days before the rally, which coincidentally just happens to take place a few days before the crucial midterms.
I may vigorously disagree with Bill Maher but he does deserve points for not hiding behind a clown mask. Maher has the stones to come right at you ready to roll – he suits up, steps into the ring and says, “Take that teabaggers.” Stewart, on the other hand, is a spy — a leftist wolf in above-it-all sheep’s clothing. He’s terrified of having to defend his ideas or answer for his insults so he refuses to wear the uniform:
Don’t shoot, don’t shoot, I’m only a performer!
…which has never been the case.
Exceptions prove the rule and always have. The fact that we righties are positively giddy whenever Stewart launches an effective attack on the Left proves just how seldom he does. Hey, I loved the Race Card and Union sketches as much as anyone, but that’s TWO sketches out of how many on a show with the word DAILY in the title. And sure, Stewart may hit Obama now and again, but only when His One’s not liberal enough.
Another way to look at it is that whereas Bill Maher is MSNBC, Jon Stewart is NPR, another media giant hiding behind the false veil of objectivity but only because they believe that particular posture gives them some sort of advantage in the war to destroy the right and advance the left. Thankfully, most people saw through NPR some time ago, and now we’re finally getting a chance to see the phony shine start to fade from Stewart.
Stewart’s problem, however, doesn’t end there. Obama’s Jester has just caught himself a tiger by the tail. What’s been described as a Million Moderates March will be nothing of the kind. HuffPo, the unions, fringe groups such as PETA and the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, and Tea Party-haters like the woman quoted above are likely to represent a majority of the crowd. If Stewart’s going to break any kind of a record Saturday it will be for gathering together the largest group of people incapable of laughing at themselves. They’re going to want red meat, not apolitical, down-the-middle pablum.
So what’s he gonna do? Play Mr. Non-Partisan and risk Oscar-night flashbacks complete with flop-sweat, or play to his rabidly left-wing audience? Stewart’s a smart guy. He might just be able to thread that needle. But the damage to his credibility’s already been done.
The worst part of it for Stewart is that he’s not used to being a subject of ridicule, but this charade has everyone chuckling at him. Time to man up, Stewart. Time to drop the mask and put on the uniform — if only for the good it will do your own self-respect.
Cross-posted from Big Hollywood.
- John Nolte's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Mock the People Rally
Submitted by jackieaxe on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 12:58pm.
"Mock the People Rally" is a very appropriate name. These two so-called comedians are holding a rally to mock working tax-paying people who take days off from werk to protest the every growning over-blown federal government. Oprah's giving out plane tickets, Ariana's renting buses but no matter how hard they try, they will only get a fraction of Beck's rally. As I say, "if you think Comedy Central is a news channel and Fox News is not, you may be a raving loony moonbat"!
The boy been playing with
Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 1:03pm.
The boy been playing with fire and his house is about to be burned up.
If Stewart has done one
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 1:05pm.
If Stewart has done one positive thing, it's that he's gotten the youth interested in politics.
None of this so called mocking is going to hurt him one bit. Stewart has a strong base who enjoy his mixture of politics and comedy, most of whom have never even heard of sites like Newsbusters.
But I get why conservatives are in an uproar over this. Beck's rally was categorically full of truths, whereas Stewart's rally will be full of nothing but lies to indoctrinate more of our country's youth into socialism.
If Stewart has done one
Submitted by motherbelt on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 1:11pm.
If Stewart has done one positive thing, it's that he's gotten the youth interested in politics.You're joking, right?
Why would I be joking about
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 1:12pm.
Why would I be joking about that? It's true.
Yeah, right, Dead.
Submitted by motherbelt on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 4:22pm.
If you really believe that, you're delusional.
Just what we need: more idiots to vote for the likes of Jesse Ventura and Al Franken, because they think it would be cool.
Stewart is laughing at the useful idiots who follow him and get him more publicity.
The worst amendment to the Constitution
Submitted by ahusser on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 5:53pm.
Allowing 18 year olds the vote. Total disaster but great for the leftists. I recall the impetus for that amendment. When the Vietnam war was was raging the battle cry of many was I can die for my country but I cant buy a beer or vote. They still can't buy a beer (or cigarettes) but they can vote. Talk about a windfall for the the party of immaturity and fantasy, the dems of course. Maybe we should take a cue from auto insurance companies who don't drop their rates until said immature individuals reach the age of 25. I am sorry but children not out of their teens don't understand what is at stake or even have a stake in the outcome of elections.
"Somehow, I told you so, just doesn't quite say it." Will Smith in 'I, Robot.'
So then you think it is fair
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 6:08pm.
So then you think it is fair to send our kids off to fight wars for us, but then revoke their right to elect leaders whose decisions affect their lives?
Maybe we should take a cue from the DMV and let 'em vote at 16.
ADK
Submitted by ahusser on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 11:04pm.
Maturity is necessary to vote. Again they don't pay taxes, don't have families. Have much property. They are just starting out. They are still children. They are allowed to drive but most states have learned their lesson and their licenses are provisional and restricted until 21 years of age. (at least in my state). Insurance companies wait till 25 years old for a reason.
There is no draft anymore which was the ill of the Vietnam War. Now all services are volunteer that is why the anti-military forces of the left can't get any traction out of the Iraq and Afghan campaigns against our servicemen. They still can't drink maybe they can buy cigarettes.
"Somehow, I told you so, just doesn't quite say it." Will Smith in 'I, Robot.'
They can drink and smoke and
Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 1:46am.
They can drink and smoke and probably do so on a regular basis; they just cant do it in the USA legally.
DK
Submitted by well99 on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 7:47am.
Maybe NY and Illinois should listen to you and send those absentee ballots to the troops.Must be conservative states holding back on those 18 year olds right to vote.As far as Stewie dont care what he does.It is a free country.I just think it is unfair to him to be a unpaid Dem shill.Maybe he can take it off his taxes or already does.
According to your logic,
Submitted by Rusty Shackleford on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 2:44pm.
According to your logic, should we allow 18 year olds the ability to have a seat in the Senate or House? Should we allow 18 year olds to run for President? Why not? Shouldn't an 18 year old that went to war deserve the right to be in a elected position where they can have an impact on whether or not we can go to war?
The fact is the military and voting are two separate things. Voting isn't even a right: it's a privledge that is only constitutionally protected in that the document specifies ways in which you cannot be granted the permission to vote (age, gender, etc).
What we ought to do is raise the voting age to 40. We need to increase the proportion of voters who are informed voters, we don't need to simply increase the total number of voters.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Matthews: The Joy Behar of MSNBC.
Bill Maher: The Joy Behar of HBO.
Paul Krugman: The Joy Behar of The New York Times.
No, the fact is that
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 2:53pm.
No, the fact is that conservatives are pissed off that the youth tends to vote Democrat, and if you could only revoke that right we could ensure Republican leadership.
Sound about right?
The apology demander continues to slur groups of people.
Submitted by The Vet on Thu, 10/28/2010 - 12:54am.
Dead Zippers: ...the fact is that conservatives are pissed off that...
Who put you in charge of speaking for ever single conservative, troll?
Do we go around saying - Trolls love... Trolls are... Trolls have... No, we call you are troll and stick to what YOU say.
Quit actly like you are the spokestroll for conservatives.
Nah
Submitted by KC Mulville on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 1:35pm.
Conservatives aren't in an uproar over this, first of all. We think it's all a lot of media adulation for a liberal media hero, but as for the rally itself, it isn't that important.
What annoys (not enrages or infuriates, just annoys) me about the rally is that, like Stewart's show, it's all posture and no substance. At least Stewart admits that his show is fake. The rally is fake, too.
Let's assume it gets a record-breaking turnout. Millions of people come, mostly college students. Why did they make the trip? To advocate for "sanity?" To declare to the world that they're not nutcases, like those Beck people? The equivalent would be for a bunch of people to show up and say, "we're for civility and politeness, not like those f***ing jerks over there." The message contradicts itself. This is a rally to proclaim sanity ... by mocking a rally that happened months ago.
They're not showing up to make a stand for civility and rational discourse. They're showing up to mock and "me too" the Glenn Back rally.
Question: how does this rally advance anything in our society? How does this move the ball downfield? It's a narcissist "expression" of the self-importance of a liberal TV comedian who has nothing real to say. And if he had anything real to say, why doesn't he say it in a forum that allows debate and response? Instead, it's a comedy event -- no rebuttal allowed.
Yes, a comedian is holding a
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 2:05pm.
Yes, a comedian is holding a mock-political rally. Don't you see the irony in conservatives mocking his rally that is a mocking response to Beck's rally? Whether you like him or not, most of the left finds Beck utterly revolting (much like your feelings for Olbermann and Maddow), which makes him an easy target.
What I think you're misunderstanding is the interests of those who support Stewart and his rally. Dare I say that the young adult in our country don't share the same interests as Beck's much older base? To many, civility and rational discourse IS standing up to conservatism. We don't like Beck and we don't like his message. So while it's okay for Beck to hold a rally attacking the left, you find it a complete mockery for someone on the left to do the same in an effort to promote our ideas and beliefs.
What did Beck's rally do for our society? Did attendees leave the rally with better or worse feelings for the left? Or was Beck's rally just another event to drive that wedge in between conservatives and liberals? While he certainly riled up his base, I hardly believe that anything productive came out of it.
You call Stewart a narcissist. Every single one of these goons on TV is narcissistic - that's why they're public figures. He gets ratings, and that makes Comedy Central more money (Much like Beck on FoxNews). You find it troublesome that Stewart doesn't speak in a public forum that allows debate and response. Once again, does Beck? They both do television shows where they get to talk about whatever they'd like, and so when you mock one while defending the other, you're not only being hypocritical but disrespectful for those whose opinions and interests differ from yours.
Any Charity Associated With Stewart Rally?
Submitted by sentry_99 on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 2:43pm.
"What did Beck's rally do for our society?" It raised millions for the Special Operations Warrior Foundation. Which charity will the youth of Ameirca attending the Stewart rally be giving to?Stewart/Colbert charity is
Submitted by sarcasmo on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 4:40pm.
http://www.donorschoose.org/ it's an education charity.
And I don't stop by often, but I don't see any open threads, so some who knew me might find this news regarding silver price manipulation: http://citywire.co.uk/money/price-of-silver-has-been-subject-to-attempte... amusing...Imagine a bureaucrat getting tired of his own slow bureaucracy, and then actually DOING something about it. I'm pretty proud of him.
And BTW, Mr. Chilton's a Democrat CFTC bureaucrat, too. Republican CFTC bureaucrats should take note, if only so they'll know for the future what vertibrates look like, since they've apparently never encountered one... http://www.gata.org/node/9212 has Mr. Chilton's statement.
And I *still* want to know why the conservative media is so quiet about Marco Rubio's Soros connections. It's as though Beck & Limbaugh suddenly became unable to Google, so here: http://www.aspeninstitute.org/leadership-programs/aspen-institute-rodel-... He's a Cuban-American Scott Brown. Congratulations on electing yet-another big spender if he wins. Sigh. Meanwhile, a USMC vet who served honorably for 8 years gets not just media bias but a media blackout. But that's ok, he had the temerity to be a Libertarian.
It's the spending that's killing us.
Hey! Sarcasmo is back!
Submitted by Free Stinker on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 5:24pm.
Hey! Sarcasmo is back! :-) Good to see you posting again!/// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 /// خال
I'd best be careful...
Submitted by sarcasmo on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 6:20am.
There may be a fine like between saying "I told you so" and "talking my book," to be honest, since it's a matter of interpretation and NB editors have been a bit truth-impaired about the issue in the past. But I thought it important that NB readers get informed of Mr. Chilton's courage regarding this ongoing crime.
And I still make trouble, I just don't have that much time for NB. Didja see what just one post from me did to the American Conservative Union's entire "others" Facebook wall? ACU deliberately nuked it themselves less than 24 hours later. They apparently disliked this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbaltnlkDNQ quite a bit, and ACU didn't want potential donors seeing it. Oops. :) Home run for me.
And do you have any theories as to why Beck & Limbaugh & O'Reilly suddenly became unable to use Google when it comes to Marco Rubio's obvious George Soros-connections? It's as if they're biased, and only think Soros money is bad when it goes to Democrats but it's just fine when it goes to ethically-challenged big-government Republicans!! I know that can't be true, because conservative news media blowhards are so damn principled when it comes to anything Soros. And the same people who so-loudly claim to "support the troops" would certainly never countenance a concerted media blackout of a guy who served this nation honorably for 8 years in the USMC. Media bias watchdogs would be up in arms if that happened, instead of acting like castrated lapdogs. (Libertarians don't get much, but we do get to be sarcastic!)
It's the spending that's killing us.
Delete duplicate
Submitted by Free Stinker on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 5:40pm.
Delete duplicate/// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 /// خال
Dead Link
Submitted by sentry_99 on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 7:40pm.
Doesn't work. Have another?
Edit: First and Last links don't work.
donors choose seems to be dead now
Submitted by sarcasmo on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 6:28am.
I don't know what happened to it. I got the apache-dead message too. Then I surfed around and tried again and http://www.donorschoose.org/ worked. Maybe I'm missing something.
I think the GATA link works, though. If not, http://citywire.co.uk/money/price-of-silver-has-been-subject-to-attempte... has the same info. And remember, even if you don't care about gold or silver, that this kind of long term government price rigging is done to affect things like inflation & interest rates, so manipulation of metals via unbacked paper derivatives can be a small lever that literally does, at least temporarily, move the world.
It's the spending that's killing us.
False assumption
Submitted by KC Mulville on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 3:33pm.
I didn't have much of an interest in Beck's rally, either. It wasn't that I was against it. I just wasn't much for it. I think you're assuming too much.
However, while we're here ...
You say, "So while it's okay for Beck to hold a rally attacking the left, you find it a complete mockery for someone on the left to do the same in an effort to promote our ideas and beliefs."
This rally isn't a "rational response." It's a reflex media event aimed at getting a lot of media attention right before the elections.
Are you suggesting Beck's
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 4:19pm.
Are you suggesting Beck's rally was a non-partisan event simply held as a fundraiser? There's only one reason people show up to a Beck rally - to hear him rally the conservative base, and most specifically, their faith in Christianity.
Make no mistake, regardless of the message this was a political rally aimed to make Christians feel superior to non-believers.
Is Stewart's rally an attempt to mock the right? Probably. But much like the Beck rally, we have no idea what Stewart will be speaking of or for. I forget, which liberals spoke at the Beck rally? Probably the same as the number of conservatives who will be granted mic time at Stewart's rally.
So what if this is just a media event? Wasn't Beck's rally the same? So it seems the bigger problem is that conservatives feel threatened that Stewart's event is so close to the elections that they just might get the youth to vote. Beck's rally was a mockery of much of my beliefs, but rather than attack him, I choose to defend another whose beliefs I tend to agree with.
There's nothing civil about Olbermann or Schultz, or Beck for that matter. Not sure what this has to do with Stewart other than to distract from the actual topic. You ask which of my beliefs are being defended at the Stewart rally? For a start, Beck is full of crap. If that's the only message behind it, I agree 100%. If anything, calling out the establishment GOP for their BS promises of returning America to a fictional utopia should be first and foremost.
And if this gets more people to vote, mission accomplished.
I see.
Submitted by KC Mulville on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 6:53pm.
Your beliefs as a liberal are: Beck is full of crap. The GOP is full of crap.
And yet the stated purpose of this rally is to ... restore civility.
Got it.
No need to get short with me.
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 6:57pm.
No need to get short with me. Just speaking my mind, for what it's worth around here.
Here is a couple of pesos.
Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 1:49am.
Here is a couple of pesos.
Dan the Man---
Submitted by matthewdean on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 2:34am.
Nice shot.
Ziiiiinger!!
MD
Excuse me, Make no
Submitted by Radical1979 on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 7:03pm.
Excuse me,
Make no mistake, regardless of the message this was a political rally aimed to make Christians feel superior to non-believers. I really don't think that was the intention of the rally. It seemed to be to bring people of various religious faiths together for a common cause.And what was that common
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 7:07pm.
And what was that common cause?
That to change our country we
Submitted by Radical1979 on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 7:11pm.
That to change our country we need to change ourselves. We need to live better lives and be better people.
"...Through Christianity and
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 7:16pm.
"...Through Christianity and faith in God." Right?
So the message is unless we all believe, we're doomed. Only those with faith can help save our country.
This was the message. Do you care to dispute it?
As I recall there were
Submitted by Radical1979 on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 7:19pm.
As I recall there were representatives of many faiths there. Beck never said those without faith couldn't save our country through changing their behavior.
How does someone being told they need to improve themselves put them above others? I find that humbling personally.
America is losing faith. Was
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 7:24pm.
America is losing faith. Was that not the message? There are many productive members of society who aren't believers, but we still do good, and we do it with a lot more integrity than many of our conservative counterparts.
What if I don't want to return to the church? Does that mean I can't contribute positively to America? That's the feeling I'm left with.
The biggest mistake anyone
Submitted by motherbelt on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 1:07pm.
The biggest mistake anyone can make is expecting liberals to be honest about their motives.
Remember the first big Tea Party tax day rally. The Liberal-in-Chief was supposedly "not aware" of it. However, he was attending a different rally that day, which, of course, was NOT a response to it.
He’s terrified of having to defend his ideas or answer for his insults so he refuses to wear the uniform:
Don’t shoot, don’t shoot, I’m only a performer.
I agree wholeheartedly. That's why I call him Jon "It's a fake news show!" Stewart. That's the excuse he uses on his show when something goes over the line.
He's used to playing both sides against the middle. You are right about him having a tiger by the tail. He's going to find out how it feels to be tarred by the slime of every far-left wacko who shows up.
Maybe, after this, Stewart and his ilk on the left will think twice about making it the fault of the Tea Party that some weirdos glom onto them for reasons of their own.
But I'm not holding my breath.
The only thing that matters is that cameras...
Submitted by stage9 on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 2:08pm.
be at the ready on Saturday. Every sign, every coarse word needs to be documented. I predict there will be marxist, socialist and anti-Conservative/anti-American propaganda available in bulk to foist upon young minds of mush.
"If God is dead, somebody is going to have to take his place. It will be megalomania or erotomania, the drive for power or the drive for pleasure, the clenched fist or the phallus, Hitler or Hugh Hefner." — Malcolm Muggeridge
truer words never spoken
Submitted by ripper58 on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 3:57pm.
body, td, input { font-family: arial; font-size: 16px; }#container { padding: 5px 20px; }#header h2 { font-size: 27px; color: rgb(208, 208, 208); margin: 22px 0pt 10px; }#searchform { width: 470px; margin: 0pt; }#searchform input { font-size: 18px; border: 1px solid rgb(170, 170, 170); color: rgb(170, 170, 170); }#searchform input:hover, #searchform input:focus, #searchform input:active { border: 1px solid rgb(136, 136, 136); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); }#searchform input.searchbox { padding: 4px; width: 300px; }#searchform input.searchbutton { padding: 3px 10px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); }#searchform div.poweredby { float: right; width: 80px; text-align: center; }#searchform div.poweredby span { font-size: 10px; }#searchform div.poweredby img { width: 60px; }"He’s terrified of having to defend his ideas or answer for his insults so he refuses to wear the uniform:
Don’t shoot, don’t shoot, I’m only a performer"
Poor little Jonny the Court Jester is in WAAAAY over his head. The not necessarily the news wannabe will be sweatin on Saturday fer sure!!
(No subject)
Submitted by ripper58 on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 3:57pm.
NNCs (Narrow Newsbusters Columns) vs. Breightbart.com
Submitted by Free Stinker on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 7:02pm.
I enjoyed this blog post . . . when I read it this morning at Breitbart's BigHollywood.com. And they don't have those aweful NNCs. (Narrow Newsbusters Columns).
Is Newsbusters trying get us to go to Breitbart instead of here?
This on top of the what seems to be the NB plan to drastically reduce page views and comments through use of NNCs. Just sayin'
/// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 /// خال