Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

May 26, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Anti-religious Bias in the Media
  • Same-sex Marriage
  • 2012 Presidential Race
Home » Blogs » Jeff Poor's blog
  • CBS: 'Troubling Signs' For Obama, Like Bush in '92, But President 'Cannot Control' Economy
  • On and On It Goes: Networks Cover 'Predator Priests' As They Stay Silent on Catholic Liberty Lawsuits
  • NBC's Williams Touts L.A. Banning Plastic Bags As Effort to Keep Them 'Out of the Natural World'
  • Bozell, Carlson Note Media's Silence on Obama Supporter's Bribe to Hush Rev. Wright
  • Very Annoyed Matthews Rips ‘Horse’s Ass Right-Wingers’ Who Cite ‘Thrill Up My Leg,’ Calls C-SPAN Host a ‘Jackass’
  • CNN Asks Tony Perkins 'Why Do Homosexuals Bother You So Much?'
  • Reuters's Freeland: 'Anorexic' Americans Think Tax Bite Too Heavy When In Fact It's Dangerously Thin
  • Soledad O'Brien Spins Romney's Words on Bain, Suggests He's Dodging the Questions

Scarborough Rips Press for Coverage of Alleged Sestak-Obama Deal: 'It is a Federal Crime'

By Jeff Poor | May 24, 2010 | 17:28

Change font size:  A |  A
Jeff Poor's picture

MSNBC's Joe Scarborough has had a few missteps and stumbles over the years, perhaps tarnishing his conservative credentials in some people's view, but he still raises some great points every now and then.

On the broadcast of his May 24 "Morning Joe" program, Scarborough, in a segment with Politico's Mike Allen, wanted to know why an alleged deal that occurred between then-prospective Pennsylvania Democratic senatorial nominee, Rep. Joe Sestak and President Barack Obama, had not gotten more attention.

Sestak has hinted that he was offered the Secretary of Navy position if he were to have withdrawn his intentions to run for the U.S. Senate against Sen. Arlen Specter, D-Pa. With a raised voice, he said reporters eagerly wanted to give the White House a pass and suggested there was a double standard compared to the previous administration.

"We've had several reporters on today that seem to be going, bending over backwards giving the White House the benefit of the doubt, when if Dick Cheney had offered this had deal, indictments would already be down," Scarborough said. "This is so clear-cut."

Seeking clarity, "Morning Joe" co-host Mike Brzezinski asked Allen what the word "offer" meant in context of how Sestak has used it in prior public appearance pertaining to this deal:

BRZEZINSKI: Mike, I know you're trying to give us a sense of what the process is, but here's the issue. Congressman Sestak says he was offered a job. Tell me what "offer" means.
ALLEN: You know, that's why I say, I think he probably over-spoke what literally happened.

And that's where Scarborough really showed his disapproval for the media and the job it's doing on covering this alleged indiscretion - suggesting the press was working with a favorable set of assumption to benefit the image of the Obama administration.

"Why are you assuming and you're my friend, but why are you assuming as a reporter that he probably over-spoke when the White House denied it and then he came back out afterwards and said no, they offered me the job. He said it 100 times and we've been repeating it on this show and nobody's picked it up. Why is the press giving this White House the benefit of the doubt again on something that if Sestak is right, if this job was offered to him to keep him away from Arlen Specter, it is a federal crime. Why do you make the assumptions you make?"

The federal crime Scarborough was referring to was Title 18 U.S.C. Section 600, which says, "Whoever directly or indirectly promises any employment position, compensation, contract, appointment, or other benefit provided for or made possible in whole or in part by any Act of Congress, or any special consideration in obtaining any such benefit, to any person as consideration, in favor, or reward for any political activity or for the support of or opposition to any candidate or any political party in connection with any general or special election to any political office ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both."

Allen had no clear answer to the question and just said he would exercise better judgment in the future.

"I'm not going to make any more assumptions," Allen replied. "‘Bad News Bears' told us what happens when you do that."

Share this

About the Author

Jeff Poor is Click here to follow Jeff Poor on Twitter.
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • 2010 Congressional
  • Double Standards
  • Liberals & Democrats
  • Media Bias Debate
  • Joe Scarborough
  • Morning Joe
  • MSNBC
  • Obama Watch
  • Video
  • Campaign Watch
  • Jeff Poor's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

  • Is liberalism dead? (Roger L. Simon)
  • The media's next move on same-sex marriage (Get Religion)
  • Senate Dems pay women staffers less than male staffers (Washington Free Beacon)
  • Left targeting Chief Justice Roberts in attempt to save ObamaCare (IBD)
  • Walker's chance of defeating Wisc. recall looking great (Ace of Spades)
  • Ex-prez Bill Clinton poses for pic with porn stars (Fox Nation)
  • Protests against conservative group ALEC draw pitiful numbers (YouTube)

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB
Scott Rasmussen
Rasmussen Column: 'Austerity' Talk Is Just Political Cover for More Government Spending
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter Williams Column: Should Black People Tolerate This?
Cal Thomas's picture
Cal Thomas
Cal Thomas Column: The Media's Religion Deficit
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: IRS Gives Billions in Tax Refunds to Illegals
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Michelle Malkin Column: How the Gay-Marriage Mafia Slimed Manny Pacquiao
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Recent comments

  • There you go again ...
    3 sec ago
  • ha
    5 min 27 sec ago
  • Finally...
    6 min 25 sec ago
  • She's right ..
    24 min 22 sec ago
  • Moore is "clean" but not "articulate."
    51 min 3 sec ago
More >

More Like Farcebook
more cartoons
  • Bashir to Facebook Co-Founder: Go 'Play with the Traffic'
  • Piers Morgan Whacks 'Little Wretch' Who Says He Taught Phone-Hacking
  • GOP Rep. Saying Obama 'Not An American' Labeled 'Treasonous' by Ed Schultz
  • NYT's Maureen Dowd Whines on 'Women's Lower Caste' in the Catholic Church
  • Open Thread: How About That Arab Spring?
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.