Polls: Public Dislikes Bias, Dems Want 'Fairness'


"The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that 55% believe media bias is more of a problem than big campaign contributions." As Tom Blumer pointed out when first reporting on this poll on Monday,

it looks like twenty or so years of very hard work by the Media Research Center and affiliates, including just over three years at NewsBusters, has paid some dividends.

But we--including those of us new to the fight--shouldn't rest on our laurels.

This latest survey adds credence to an earlier Rasmussen poll that showed that "49% believe most reporters are trying to help Barack Obama win the election this year," while "just 14% believe they’re trying to help McCain."

Every new poll released shows a public increasingly disenchanted with news coverage and unwilling to suspend their disbelief while watching the liberal news. This is why, as Matthew Sheffield pointed out yesterday, they consume more and more of their news on the internet.

Of course, this is part of a larger narrative in which people are moving away from traditional media towards the internet. This is probably also why, in Rasmussen surveys about so-called "Fairness Doctrine," so many respondents consistently call for the government to require ideological balance on TV & radio (41% in 2007, 47% in 2008), while far fewer call for the same requirements for the internet (34% in 2007, 31% in 2008).

There are two other points revealed collectively by the three polls which we all already intuitively know:

  1. Conservatives believe bias in the media is a bigger problem than liberals.
  2. Liberals favor government regulation of the media in far larger numbers than conservatives. 

Besides pointing out the obvious, I raise this issue for another reason: the added context of the Presidential election. Again, from Rasmussen:

With the Congress expected to stay firmly under Democratic control, the responses of those who plan to vote for the party’s presidential candidate Barack Obama versus his Republican opponent John McCain suggest what direction the Fairness Doctrine debate is likely to take in the coming year. Fifty-eight percent (58%) of likely Obama voters believe the government should make all radio and TV stations offer equal amounts of conservative and liberal commentary, as opposed to 40% of potential McCain voters who feel that way.

If Obama is elected in November, you can bet the Fairness Doctrine (or whatever other euphemism they decide to use) will be high on the agenda of Barack Obama and his MSM enablers.

—Jacob S. Lybbert is an editorial associate at NewsBusters.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

These people don't

know what the "Fairness Doctrine" is or means!

Everybody wants "fairness" whatever the hell that is!

Explain the doctrine and then as the question.

Fairness is letting me listen to what I want to listen to, or watch, or read without haveing me listen, watch, or read an opposite view.

But I doubt this question, without explanation, has answers with any real validity.

Naturally, the question is asked in a blind way to absolutely clueless respondents.

The answer is exactly what the questioner intended it to be.

While most people don't undertand the "fairness doctrine"

The surprising and depressing part is that so many think that it's OK for government to get involved in regulating free speech at all.

The 1st amendment is perfectly clear that the government shall not get involved in what people should or should not say, PERIOD.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or
of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition
the Government for a redress of
grievances.

Extremely clear and concise. This is why any manifestation of the "fairness doctrine" is unconstitutional, as well as any "hate speech" laws.

The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.

Conservatives need to be loud about the television part

and demand it there. The survey shows that Dems would even have a hard time convincing their own supporters why it would be okay for radio but not television. If conservatives demand television be included then it will never pass. If they just try to block it all together it will pass.

I agree completely, Jacob

The job that MRC, NB, et al have done so well to this point is about half done, at best. 

 

What COnservatives Think

Ironically, conservatives love fairness and they mistakenly believe that, with fairness, the nightly news from the networks will actually have to be fair.  The liberals idea of fairness is to hear nothing from the ignorant conservatives so they will do everything in their power to shut down all conservative voices, on television, radio, and the internet.  Thems the facts, as I see them. 

With the fairness doctrine, there will be no fairness.   

Democrats: Stuck on Stupid since 2000.