Only ABC Cites 'Devastating' CBO Judgment & 50%+ Tax Rates to Pay for Health Care

Photo of Brent Baker.
  • Bookmark and Share

“Congress's chief budget analyst delivered a devastating assessment yesterday of the health care proposals drafted by congressional Democrats,” the Washington Post reported Friday, but of the broadcast network evening newscasts on Thursday only ABC's World News related how, as Jake Tapper put it, “the President's case was dealt a blow today” when CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf warned the health plans will require massive additional spending.

Noting “House Democrats would impose a surtax of up to 5.4 percent on top wage earners,” Tapper relayed how the Tax Foundation determined it “would push top tax rates to over 50 percent in most of the country. That has moderate House Democrats concerned.” Tapper pointed out that “if the President signed the House bill into law, which he has not ruled out, he would be breaking this campaign promise.” Viewers then saw a clip of Obama from last September: “Everyone in America, everyone, will pay lower taxes than they paid in the 1990s under Bill Clinton.”

Setting up Tapper's piece, ABC anchor Charles Gibson had led with good news for President Obama: “President Obama is a man on a mission. Everywhere he goes these days, he's pushing health care reform. He got a boost today. The American Medical Association said it supports it -- supports the House Democratic bill, that is. The AMA says that version of health care reform expands coverage but still gives patients a choice of plans.”

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Tapper concluded by citing another ally for Obama: “You may recall those Harry and Louise TV ads that helped sink health care reform 15 years ago. Harry and Louise are back in new ads, but this time, courtesy of the pharmaceutical industry, they're in favor of reform.”

Neither the CBS Evening News nor NBC Nightly News ran a health care story on Thursday night.

The night before, as recounted in my Wednesday night NB item, “CBS and NBC Push Obama's Health Agenda, Empathize with His Challenge,” those two programs advanced Obama's agenda:

The White House's decision to offer interviews with the President to the medical doctors who are correspondents for ABC, CBS and NBC paid off Wednesday night with stories that embraced the assumption health care must be reformed; and interviews on CBS and NBC which put Obama's efforts in the best light...

The MRC's Brad Wilmouth corrected the closed-captioning against the video to provide this transcript of the top story on the Thursday, July 16 World News on ABC:

CHARLES GIBSON, TEASE: Tonight, at what cost? Health care reform plagued by critical questions. Who will pay for it? Will it save money? And most importantly, does it have enough support?
...

GIBSON: Good evening. President Obama is a man on a mission. Everywhere he goes these days, he's pushing health care reform. He got a boost today. The American Medical Association said it supports it – supports the House Democratic bill, that is. The AMA says that version of health care reform expands coverage but still gives patients a choice of plans. But on Capitol Hill itself, there's a growing sense of caution. Some members of Congress telling the President to slow down, don't push so hard. Jake Tapper is at the White House again tonight. Jake?

JAKE TAPPER: Good evening, Charlie. Well, two key moderate Senators were frank with the President today, telling him that they thought his deadline to have health care reform legislation passed by the August recess was arbitrary, and would not necessarily result in the best product. But the President is determined, and for him, it's full speed ahead. At a rally in New Jersey this afternoon, President Obama continued his health care reform push.

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: The health care debate is starting to heat up.

TAPPER: The President said containing health care costs is essential.

OBAMA: The price of doing nothing about health care is a price that every taxpayer and every business and every family will have to pay.

TAPPER: But the President's case was dealt a blow today when the head of the Congressional Budget Office said Democratic health care legislation in the Senate will not reduce the government's health care costs – which the President has said is vital.

DOUGLAS ELMENDORF, CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE: On the contrary, the legislation significantly expands the federal responsibility for health care costs.

TAPPER: The administration said that bill is just one of three Democratic bills working their way through Congress and does not account for the savings that they hope to achieve through Medicare and Medicaid. But how to pay for reform is the big conundrum right now. House Democrats would impose a surtax of up to 5.4 percent on top wage earners, which a study by the non-partisan Tax Foundation said would push top tax rates to over 50 percent in most of the country. That has moderate House Democrats concerned.

REP. JIM COOPER, (D-TN): The tax increases on small businesses and upper income people is worrisome because you don't want to hurt job creation at a time like this.

TAPPER: And if the President signed the House bill into law, which he has not ruled out, he would be breaking this campaign promise.

BARACK OBAMA, SEPTEMBER 12, 2008: Everyone in America, everyone, will pay lower taxes than they paid in the 1990s under Bill Clinton.

TAPPER, SITTING AT A WHITE HOUSE PRESS CONFERENCE: My understanding is that the House bill would raise them even higher than that.

ROBERT GIBBS: Well, the – we're going to watch the process unfold.

TAPPER: The President has ruled out an idea endorsed by many Senators, to tax health care benefits, arousing the consternation of the Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee today.

SENATOR MAX BAUCUS (D-MT): Basically, the President is not helping us. He does not want the exclusion. That's making it difficult.

TAPPER: One other thing, Charlie. You may recall those Harry and Louise TV ads that helped sink health care reform 15 years ago. Harry and Louise are back in new ads, but this time, courtesy of the pharmaceutical industry, they're in favor of reform.

—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Wow...Great job abc and

Wow...Great job abc and especially Tapper.

I've been surprised lately, well, this last week anyway with abc, from Brian Ross to this.

Interesting....are they trying to undo what they did with being O's pet network for the ObamaCare two day forum that they teleised from the WH and got zilch for ratings...and we can't forget the plants in that so-called town hall audience.

Well....whatever, they will revert to normal when need be, according to them and whatever agenda they are striving for at the time.

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

bigtimer, I am surprised

bigtimer,

I am surprised Jake Tapper still has a job.

Normal 0 This is what

Normal
0

This is what happens when the voting public
votes for president like it is just another round of American Idol. This what
happens when people vote with their emotions because they feel good about a candidate,
never mind they don’t know what he really stands for. You get inept leaders
that make insane statements about programs that we have no way to afford. Like Nero fiddling while Rome
burned the Obama administration is constantly trying to continue to look good in the eyes
of the media. Obama solution for health care is to ignore the fiscally wise and narcisstically pusheds forward. If he was a qualified leader he would not to have to have so many unaccountable
czars to help him govern. To top it all off Obama's Govt run health care
will be paid for on the backs of we the elderly through Medicare cuts and
treatment restrictions. AARP should be ashamed for endorsing Obama and Biden. Hopefully some Dems will wise up and bury this plan.

Some how we have to ban Czars (Dictators).

Either now or before the next president (if we survive as a nation that long).

Re Czars

Why can't someone like Judicial Watch simply challenge the existence of Czars in a federal court? Standing? Grounds? Isn't there some way to attack this unconstitutional approach of an administration? Isn't it an obvious shortcut around Senate confirmation and Congressional oversight?

Under a Republican President and a democratic Congress, Congress would be bouncing off the walls by now and have several hearings underway. Why the pass for the Bamster? Above all Congress usually protects their territory first.

When it's only a tanking

When it's only a tanking media outlet pushing the story, it's not going to make a difference. 

I guess these Libtards in

I guess these Libtards in New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, California, Pennsylvania and other states have money to burn.  

Have to respect them putting their hard-earned money where their mouths are.  Perhaps we can up another 25% in those bastions of Marxism so that they can help even more of the downtrodden masses and they can feel even better about themselves!

Incredible.  What a bunch of masochists.

One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).

A mere flesh wound

said the black knight. Let's get it on.

Or Achmed, the dead

Or Achmed, the dead terrorist.....

I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows.  -Bart Simpson

 

BARACK OBAMA, SEPTEMBER 12,

BARACK OBAMA, SEPTEMBER 12, 2008: Everyone in America, everyone, will
pay lower taxes than they paid in the 1990s under Bill Clinton.

George Stephanopolous (re President Clinton): The President kept all of  the campaign promises that he intended to keep.

But frankly, I think this is the howler of the piece:

TAPPER: The administration said that bill is just one of three
Democratic bills working their way through Congress and does not
account for the savings that they hope to achieve through Medicare and
Medicaid.

Well, sure, if you take people on Medicaid and sign them up into an "insurance" plan, that will save money on Medicaid, won't it?  Heck, they could even get rid of Medicaid altogether!  

And we all know the government's method of "saving" money:  forcibly reduce usage (rationing) and  the amount that doctors get paid.

I'm guessing a big part of the costs will be the bureaucracy required to run it.  Michelle Malkin has a rundown 

And when did bureaucracy ever decrease costs?

I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows.  -Bart Simpson

 

The AP is in full spin

The AP is in full spin mode, now.

  • ....in the only developed nation that does not have a comprehensive national health care plan.

  • [The United States] does no better on life expectancy and other measures than nations that spend far less.

  • Yet there was good news for Pelosi and the administration ... Republicans on the House Education and Labor Committee failed on party-line votes to delete major portions of the bill

The AP offered these statements. Didn't get any quotes. Didn't bother to give both sides of the story. For example, why is it that people from "other nations" come to the U.S. when they absolutely, positively have to have medical care? And where is the AP statement regarding the enormous amount of "wait time" these "other nations' citizens" have to endure standing in line for routine appointments?

And where are the true MSM outlets that challenge AP's pro-Obama approach to everything?

___________________________________ 

An optimist thinks that the glass is 1/2 full; a pessimist 1/2 empty; a realist thinks the glass is twice a big as it needs to be

[The United States] does

[The United States] does no better on life expectancy and other measures than nations that spend far less.

So I suppose the logic of this is SPEND LESS ON HEALTHCARE and your life expectency will rise.

Here's another little factoid... it's an absolute fact that more people die in hospital between the hours of 8pm to 6am.

So if you're in hospital, and want to live, make sure you leave the hospital between these hours.

Obama Lied... Jobs Died.

kiss ass charlie gibson

Yeah charlie, he's a man on a mission. So was Lenin.

I Can See The Ads Now

''You don't need an accounting degree or clairvoyant powers. The administrative costs and spillover spending effects will be astronomical.''

Earn your certificate in:
Accounting Czar
Administrative Czar
Astrologer Czar (to ''forecast'' costs)
Clairvoyant Czar (does the exact same thing as Astrologer, but hey, it's a government job!)
Czar Manager - Sweetest of the Sweetjobs!

Yes, you too can have a lucritive career in government.  Just mail in your application today and get ready to start raking in the dough from your fellow tax payers!!

''But Wait, There's More!''

Spillover Spending Czar - This job is twice as good as the Drunken Sailor job.  And the perks (loose, untraceable petty cash) speak for themselves.

Personally...

I am going for the Hooters Czar! And if I'm lucky in a few years: Strip Joint Czar!

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

MM

Seems like you skipped a couple of administrations. But your positions would have made Bubba-in-Chief very proud.

MM

I think sarc might come out of retirement and fight you for that title, fella.

I hope he fails, too.

 

 

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.