FNC's Bret Baier did something Friday night you rarely, if ever, hear from a journalist: He apologized for incomplete reporting, specifically for failing to identify as an illegal alien the man charged with murdering Chandra Levy. Picking up on a Friday Washington Times article which quoted media coverage information reported Tuesday night on NewsBusters (and Wednesday on MRC.org), Baier noted in his “Grapevine” segment: “The Washington Times reports CBS, CNN and the Associated Press described Ingmar Guandique either a 'Salvadoran immigrant' or a 'laborer from El Salvador.'” He then acknowledged:
Fox News is not escaping criticism on this. Although Bill O'Reilly has referred to Guandique as an "illegal alien," the report points out that Fox newscasts, including this one, have used the term "Salvadoran immigrant." We apologize for not being more precise.
My Tuesday night NewsBusters item, “National Media Avoid Identifying Levy Murder Suspect as an Illegal,” recounted:
CBS, CNN, FNC and the AP on Tuesday all failed to identify Ingmar Guandique, for whom an arrest warrant was issued for the 2001 murder of Chandra Levy, as an illegal alien. In a full story on the CBS Evening News, reporter Bob Orr described him simply as a “Salvadoran immigrant.” During CNN's Situation Room, Zain Verjee benignly called him “a laborer from El Salvador” and later, on Anderson Cooper 360, news reader Erica Hill referred to him as “a U.S. prison inmate from El Salvador.” (In between, the contrarian Lou Dobbs did identify Guandique as “a criminal illegal alien.”)
FNC's Bret Baier, on his 6 PM EST show, cited the new charge against “a Salvadoran immigrant” while multiple dispatches from the AP's Brian Westerly described Guandique as “an imprisoned Salvadoran immigrant.”...
An excerpt from the top of the March 6 front page Washington Times article, “To be 'illegal' or not to be: Newsroom question; Levy suspect's status stirs debate,” by Jennifer Harper:
It has become the dreaded "I-word" at many news organizations.Much of the press has shunned the terms "illegal alien" or "illegal immigrant" to describe Ingmar Guandique, recently charged by police and federal prosecutors in the 2001 slaying of Washington intern Chandra Levy.
The designation of Guandique -- who entered the U.S. illegally in 2000, was convicted of two nonfatal attacks on women and incarcerated -- has reignited a debate over whether a person's immigration status is relevant to the story. Journalists also are debating whether the words "illegal" and "immigrant" are too loaded to use in an already emotionally charged story. And maybe even racist.
The National Association of Hispanic Journalists has long cautioned journalists against using the word "illegal" in copy and headlines. The practice is "dehumanizing" and "stereotypes undocumented people who are in the United States as having committed a crime," said Joseph Torres, the group's spokesman.
That has not prevented Fox News commentator Bill O'Reilly from repeatedly calling Guandique an "illegal alien," though Fox used plain old "Salvadoran immigrant" in its news coverage. Guandique has been called "Salvadoran immigrant," "incarcerated felon," "suspect" and "jailed attacker" in assorted accounts.
"Too many journalists don't want to provide ammunition to those who want stricter immigration laws, so avoid connecting illegal immigrants to evidence which will bolster the argument that illegals cause harm," said Brent Baker of the Media Research Center.
"So, when police charge an illegal immigrant with murdering Chandra Levy, reporters for CBS, CNN and AP benignly describe him as a 'Salvadoran immigrant' or as simply 'a laborer from El Salvador,' " Mr. Baker said.
USA Today, the Washington Examiner and The Washington Times, however, referred to Guandique as an "illegal immigrant."
"We aspire to give our readers as much accurate and relevant information as possible. Ingmar Guandique's immigration status and his entire criminal history fell within our definition of reporting as near as possible the whole truth. We saw no reason to censor ourselves or deny information to our readers," said Michael Hedges, managing editor of the Examiner.
"The suggestion that immigration status somehow is irrelevant or should be treated like race in a crime story seems flawed. Being white or black or Hispanic or Asian isn´t a crime. Entering the country illegally is," said John Solomon, executive editor of The Times....
Baier's item in the March 6 “Grapevine” segment on Special Report:
It seems much of the media is not referring to the man accused of killing Capitol Hill intern Chandra Levy in 2001 as an "illegal alien" or "illegal immigrant" even though he is in the country illegally. The Washington Times reports CBS, CNN and the Associated Press described Ingmar Guandique either a "Salvadoran immigrant" or a "laborer from El Salvador." Other media accounts call him an "incarcerated felon," "suspect," or "jailed attacker."Fox News is not escaping criticism on this. Although Bill O'Reilly has referred to Guandique as an "illegal alien," the report points out that Fox newscasts, including this one, have used the term "Salvadoran immigrant." We apologize for not being more precise.
—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center





CBS, CNN, FNC and the AP on Tuesday all failed to identify Ingmar Guandique, for whom an arrest warrant was issued for the 2001 murder of Chandra Levy, as an illegal alien. In a full story on the CBS Evening News, reporter Bob Orr described him simply as a “Salvadoran immigrant.” During CNN's Situation Room, Zain Verjee benignly called him “a laborer from El Salvador” and later, on Anderson Cooper 360, news reader Erica Hill referred to him as “a U.S. prison inmate from El Salvador.” (In between, the contrarian Lou Dobbs did identify Guandique as “a criminal illegal alien.”)















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Thanks Bret
March 7, 2009 - 17:09 ET by Delsahow great it is when there is somewhere to get the whole truth.
Good for Bret... It has
March 7, 2009 - 17:12 ET by bigtimerGood for Bret...
It has bothered me a lot that Fox in the majority of their reports regarding this subject excluded the word ILLEGAL time after time too....
Yeah...
March 7, 2009 - 17:29 ET by dborschjr68It bothered me, too. I thought maybe FOX News had crossed over to the "dark side" by failing to call this guy what he is. Bret definitely showed some responsible journalism here by correcting this. Hats off to ya, Bret!
“You have enemies? Good. That means you’ve stood up for something, sometime in your life.” -Winston Churchill.
F**K Socialism. -Me.
Thanks Bret.Good to see
March 7, 2009 - 17:25 ET by well99Thanks Bret.Good to see there is journalist not afraid of the truth.You have always been a stand up guy. Maybe the msm could watch you so they learn what journalistic integrity is about.
An illegal - no label. A Republican - label it.
March 7, 2009 - 17:29 ET by Gary HallNaturally enough, if Ingmar Guandique was a Republican, the MSM would have made that clear in the reporting.
(;~/ gary
→ Baier's apology
March 7, 2009 - 17:32 ET by Cool ArrowI saw that last night. Baier's a standup guy for it, even though I'd seen O'reilly address the issue of the illegal.
Condit should be happy he got his life and career upended by a matter of National security he didn't care about when he held office.
Obama - Change you can bereave in
LOL
March 7, 2009 - 17:34 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsSheesh Bret, what did you go and do that for? Now the NYT is going to trash your resume for sure.
D
Keep the ILLEGALS out, join NumbersUSA to send free faxes to your reps.
FoxNews, Fair and Ballanced and Honest
March 7, 2009 - 17:36 ET by c5thenHow refreshing!
Hey, I got the wrong "CHANGE"!
www.loyaltoliberty.com
I Like Brett
March 7, 2009 - 17:44 ET by BW222In fact, I like him better than Hume, who was a little to liberal for me. Bret is far better than Shrpard Smith (Mr. Light in the Loafers), who follows him.
BW222
Baier is Catholic, and is
March 7, 2009 - 20:28 ET by thebutlerdiditBaier is Catholic, and is extremely pro-life. Same for Hume. Hume is a registered Republican, I am guessing that Baier is, but I don't know for sure. Smith is a registered Dem. He is just prissy, not gay. He is not my favorite by a long shot, I have never forgiven him, (nor Anderson Cooper), for the way they handled Katrina coverage. Oh yeah, Gerry Rivers, too. He bit on the Katrina coverage. I did like the way Shep handled the beginning of the Iraq invasion. Classy there. He is too bad, overall. Even the Libs on Fox are classier than the Republicans on the other channels. Yikes!
All a Democrat needs is the upper-story window of public attention and the chamber pot of rhetoric. How else to explain the rise of Joe Biden? P.J. O' Rourke
tbdi...Actually, Brit Hume...
March 7, 2009 - 20:46 ET by PrairieSkyis Episcopalian, not Catholic. But I agree that both he and Bret Baier are likely Republicans...I'm almost certain about Brit...I've been watching him for years and based on what I've seen of him in interviews, coupled with his news analysis, make me believe that he's a Repub...
"...peace is the highest aspiration of the American People. We will negotiate for it, sacrifice for it, we will never surrender for it, now or ever." President Ronald Reagan~ January 20, 1981
Only conservatives will be ILLEGAL in the NEW WORLD ORDER ...
March 7, 2009 - 17:55 ET by Jayke... being pushed on us by the self proclaimed "progressives". Can it be called "progress" if it leads you off a cliff? There is change that cannot be described as good.
Thanks FOX news for reporting the truth.
More Bias at Fox News
March 7, 2009 - 17:52 ET by slickwillie2001Next they need to do something about Reena Ninan's coverage from Israel. She always uses scare words re Netanyahu like 'hard-right', 'hardline', 'far-right', etc. Netanyahu's party is one of four principal parties with a significant showing in the last election, and is not the furthest to the right. If a label must be used it should be simply conservative.
At the same time, she generally does not label the Livni/Olmert government at all.
If we must editorialize with labels, let's at least be uniform.
If they're in the US
March 7, 2009 - 17:55 ET by GrannyGrump42If they're in the US illegally, they have committed a crime. Duh.
As the daughter of a LEGAL immigrant, and a big fan of another LEGAL immigrant (Craig Ferguson), I find it insulting to those who played by the rules that somebody who snuck in is treated the same way they are in the press.
You are NOT an immigrant of any sort until you've been naturalized and become a US citizen. Then you're either a visiting tourist, a resident alien, here on a student visa, or an ILLEGAL ALIEN. Hello?
You're trying to use logic ...
March 7, 2009 - 17:59 ET by Jayke... to convince the illogical. Er, I mean, the "undocumented" logical.
Hahahaah!
March 8, 2009 - 01:10 ET by avenarGood one!
Thanks Jayke. You made my day. :D
50 brownie points for FoxNews and Bret Baier...
March 7, 2009 - 18:28 ET by PrairieSkyWhere else would you see a major media outlet correct itself by identifying a criminal as an illegal immigrant, when they are, in fact, illegal? Every other news organization would obfuscate, omit and gloss over that whole fact...Gotta be "PC" dontcha know!
Keep up the good work, guys!
"...peace is the highest aspiration of the American People. We will negotiate for it, sacrifice for it, we will never surrender for it, now or ever." President Ronald Reagan~ January 20, 1981
Seems the arch-conservative Washington Times
March 7, 2009 - 18:38 ET by JerSeems the arch-conservative Washington Times is engaging in a little biased reporting also. Even Brent pointed out that Lou Dobbs of CNN had referred to the accused as a "criminal illegal alien" [probably the most emphatically negative label applied by any news source], but nowhere is that fact mentioned by the Times--just that CNN reporters used the benign (i.e. kindly) description "Salvadoran immigrant".
Apparently, the Times doesn't care as long as it discredits CNN.
Jer
You are correct about
March 7, 2009 - 18:42 ET by bigtimerYou are correct about Dobbs...he is also the exception.
I bet the Wa. Times thank you Jer for pointing this out!
Apology Accepted
March 7, 2009 - 18:47 ET by pvoceNow if only the MSM would follow suit.
Hume's influence probably explains Baier's mea culpa
March 7, 2009 - 20:51 ET by nkviking75Brett Baier worked for years under the leadership of Brit Hume. That alone would explain this aberration from modern journalistic ethics.
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
Oh, Boy. Geraldo is gonna be
March 7, 2009 - 21:51 ET by TeddyOh, Boy. Geraldo is gonna be Pissed! GOOD!
Hey
March 7, 2009 - 21:53 ET by bigtimerHey Teddy...
ROFL!
...That he really will be!
Thanks Bret! Your apology
March 7, 2009 - 23:55 ET by TN MomThanks Bret! Your apology is refreshing and much appreciated.
To show my appreciation, I will watch all your commercials during your broadcast.