“Ultimately,” President Barack Obama will get his way on “universal” health coverage, because of “just one fact” ABC's Dr. Tim Johnson declared “I want to let everybody hear,” and that is the “national shame” of how “we spend more than twice as much, per person, on health care in his country as the average of all other industrialized countries, yet we're the only one that doesn't have universal coverage.”
Answering a question from World News anchor David Muir on Sunday night about the likelihood health care reform will pass, Johnson predicted:
I think there's going to be an intense, partisan debate. But ultimately, David, there is just one fact I want to let everybody hear: We spend more than twice as much, per person, on health care in his country as the average of all other industrialized countries, yet we're the only one that doesn't have universal coverage. That's a national shame and I think ultimately that's what's going to unite Democrats and Republicans.
In a NewsBusters item last October, “ABC's Dr. Tim Johnson, 15 Years of Shilling for Universal Care,” Scott Whitlock cited numerous earlier examples of Johnson's left-wing advocacy.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Oh great...we hear yet
March 1, 2009 - 23:03 ET by bigtimerOh great...we hear yet again from another socialist expert.
What's new when it comes to any of these critters with the majority of these so-called leftist experts on differing television networks, some of them have been in my face for about as long as I can remember...they are just an arm of the socialist movement, always have been...always will be.
Look at where it seems to be getting Sanjay Gupta from CNN.
i know Nationalizing
March 1, 2009 - 23:13 ET by JAJTi know Nationalizing Healthcare is not going to work. people now might be cheering the idea, but when reality hits them they will not like it.
i work as a case manager and my job is to schedule medical appts for my clients (mental illness) and if you have medicaid only and you need to see a specialist right away, you are out of luck. sometimes it takes me a whole week just to find a specalist that will see my client sooner than a year and sooner to them is in 3-6 months. it is a frustrating situation and often results in my clients going to the ER. what is even more scarier is having the gov't decide what treatment you can and cannot recieve. what if the database they have on you shows that you are a conservative and they decide, "no treatment for her/him!"
JAJT... The whole damned
March 1, 2009 - 23:24 ET by bigtimerJAJT...
The whole damned program is terrifying...and I do not think people realize the control the govt. is going to have over your very life in the end with this system...none whatsoever, and they are counting on this...along with the power they have for the votes to get this crammed down our throats...it truly is terrifying, I know some of what I speak from personal experience too for what is coming down the road that will eventually hit each and everyone of us with time...and we will be regretting this...I sincerely mean this when I say now...may God help us all....we are really going to need this, and this will be one of the biggest regrets this nation has ever bestowed upon all of us in the long run....
I'll leave it at that.
even more likely
March 1, 2009 - 23:45 ET by justmeis a decision based on age...
In some (if not all, I haven't looked at them all) countries, if you are at a certain age, they simply will not treat you. Has it ever occurred to people to wonder not why we spend more but why other countries are spending less? Has it ever occurred to people that other countries choose not to treat people who are critically in need of care? A friend of mine was telling me how her friend's father had fallen off of his roof while re-roofing. He was considered to old to treat, and though his injuries were not life threatening, the injuries resulted in his becoming blind. Her friend went to live with and care for him for a time, while he healed as best he could and became accustomed to his new state. He was a fit man who is now reduced to blindness and dependence. All because they couldn't stand to spend the money on helping him.
Yeah, that's a better system....
Justme, what country ...
March 2, 2009 - 00:08 ET by legacyrepublicandid that friend's dad get hurt in?
even more likely is a decision based on age...
March 2, 2009 - 08:38 ET by Par for the CourseI saw this example of your statement.
NAtional Health care
March 2, 2009 - 07:31 ET by 10ksnookerOne of the main reasons England is looking for The Acting President to bail them out. I suspect the Obama double-talking jive act to be on display today.
Never seen a guy who could act the part of President so good, as long as no one kicks the teleprompter plug out.
The Milli Vanilli Prez,
March 2, 2009 - 08:28 ET by Red JeepThe Milli Vanilli Prez, BarryO.
Dr Feelbad
March 2, 2009 - 15:14 ET by Joe Blogs“we spend more than twice as much, per person, on health care in his
country as the average of all other industrialized countries, yet we're
the only one that doesn't have universal coverage.”
Yes, but we have near universal coverage (80%). And the quality of health care is off-the-charts better than in states with socialized medicine. Those without healthcare insurance tend to be young, single people -- for whom it's not so important because they are unlikley to be sick -- and illegal aliens, who prefer to sponge off US urban hospitals and send money home to their relatives in Mexico than buy insurnace. And for this we have to give up the kind of prompt and innovative treatments available to us under our current care system? Great. Obama is a jerk.
The real shame is how we spend three times more than European nations per student for education and all we get are idiots who can't read a bus schedule -- but still manage to check the box for Hopey in the voting booth.
Why the hell do liberals
March 1, 2009 - 23:15 ET by Clear thinkerWhy the hell do liberals and Marxists think the only way to get peoples allegience is to try and depress the hell out of them???
National Shame my ass!
Newt vs Rush
Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/
My fear
March 1, 2009 - 23:18 ET by KC MulvilleHere's what bothers me. We know human nature. And even though we all admire doctors, they're still human. And in my experience, human beings work for whoever pays them.
They recently came out with the national healthcare information czar. The idea was that the government would "offer" a best practices list to the attending doctor for cases similar to the current patient. Now we all know how they play this game. They make it out to be helpful advice. But sooner or later, in some malpractice case, a lawyer is going to ask a doctor (on the witness stand) why he didn't follow the best practice advice from the national database? And when the jury comes back with a million dollar judgment against the doctor, every other doctor will learn the lesson. Follow the database or risk malpractice.
At that moment, the art of medicine will have died. From then on, you'll just have to hope that your illness fits the federal guidelines, or they'll be giving you whatever the computer tells them to give you.
Dear Tim
March 1, 2009 - 23:17 ET by Joe CamelDear Tim, I think I would much rather take my chances here in this country with our health care thank you. By the way old buddy, if we weren't being stiffed for illegals and such using our system, the cost would not be where it is today. I would not expect you or congress to understand this, being out of touch as you are with the real world.
No Logic Allowed
March 1, 2009 - 23:25 ET by slickwillie2001Yet these same liberals can look at the amount we spend on education K-12 per student compared to other countries and come to completely different conclusions.
I can dig up a statistic to support any conclusion about any program you can dream up.
Socialism, Not the American Way
March 1, 2009 - 23:32 ET by deerjerkydaveMr. Johnson fails to recognize that the American way is different from the rest of the world. It's the American way that made it the greatest nation on earth. It's the American way that has drawn untold millions away from their native countries to live the American dream. What is the American way? It's the distribution of freedom and power among the public who govern themselves through moral goodness.
What Obama calls for is centralized power and authority WHICH HAS NEVER WORKED. Many of the failings of society today exist because slowly but surly the politicians have been drawing more and more power to themselves. The high cost of health care in this country is caused by the intervention of government mandates on the healthcare system and its failure to control the border. As power is centralized around a politician or government the less power the consumer has in the deal on the cost of goods and services. Centralized authority is not the American way.
Why is it that many goods or services become more and more affordable? Why is it that others become more expensive? Might I suggest that market tampering by politicians is almost always reason. Healthcare is no different. And socialist healthcare will not sustain itself anymore than social[ist] security which is headed for bankruptcy. Socialist education is another HUGE drain on resources and the quality of it is a shame for the cost! Once health care is "free" to the public the hospitals will become jammed up with people seeking unnecessary medical attention. Hospitals will dumb down their services to handle the volume. I have acquantences in socialist Europe and the quality of their "free" healthcare is about as good as the service at the DMV or Post Office. You're just one more patient who needs to be shuffled on through the system.
By the way, the most liberal states in the USA like California and Michigan have double digit unemployment, just like the socialist countries of old Europe.
Price, Quality, Speed...
March 1, 2009 - 23:41 ET by JPR1Pick any two Doc. You can't have all three.
There's 300 million of us here and we we get the best healthcare, faster than any other industrialized nation on the planet.
Now you, nearing the end of your career, may be OK with a 20% reduction in earnings to make healthcare more affordable, but I'm guessing the intern in his/her fifth year of med school is not too keen on the idea. And the poor soul who's paid for coverage 30 years on is not real enthusiastic about suddenly having to settle for cut rate medical care.
Don't bull-sh!t me Doc. Remember what Twain said about statistics? Some of us get it.
Tea Party II
March 1, 2009 - 23:50 ET by slickwillie2001Americans are getting riled up about the prospect of paying for the mortgage on grifters' homes. Wait until Obammy tells us we have to pay for free medical care for twenty million illegal aliens. That'll go over real well.
As I celebrate Texas
March 2, 2009 - 10:24 ET by TexasteacherAs I celebrate Texas Independence Day, I remember the battle of San Jacinto. Sam Houston's army kicked the dog s*** out of santa ana's army in 18 minutes and gave Texas it's independence. Now mexico is trying to get their lost land back through a slow occupation. We need another San Jacinto.
obama's notion of bi-partisanship is telling conservatives to shut up and do what he wants.
I know why....
March 1, 2009 - 23:52 ET by jcheneysocialized medicine is half the price. Because a funeral costs less than a kidney transplant or a double mastectomy or kemotherapy. That is what you and your 'less than valuable' relatives will be faced with....hey, isn't they why the Canadians cross the border and the British pay for private insurance if they can afford it?
No one talks about the problem
March 2, 2009 - 00:05 ET by richb313Dr. Johnson is right about the fact that we do spend twice as much as any other country on Health Care. What do we get for our money though. Well we do get the best Doctors, Hospitals, Treatments etc. I am going to address this another way. Why does Health Care cost so much and as a result the skyrocketing costs of Insurance. I am not an expert but you don't have to be. One is the High cost of Malpractice Insurance, and the Second is the state of modern Product Liability Law.
We do not want incompetent Doctors practicing medicine so the ability to sue for Malpractice is needed. The AMA is supposed to Police thier own Ranks. The results have been somewhat less than stellar. Malpractice suits continued to be filed and settlements reached. The AMA keeps allowing incompetent Doctors to practice. The risisng Malpractice insurance rates and the increasing number of suits being brought also has the side benifit of many unnecessary expensive tests being run just to cover thier collective rear ends.
The current state of Product Liability Law has also led to very expensive Insurance required on any thing that is used in the Medical field. The very same product may have applications outside of the Medical field and the costs are less by over 50%.
What do these two things have in common? Tort Law and the protected Attorney Class. Most of our laws, infact all of them are written by Lawyers, a clear case of conflict of intrest yet we need Lawyers to write them because it is only a Lawyer who can properly understand most of the implications of what becomes law. This is just crazy.
It is the corruption of the very systems meant to protect all of us that is the root cause of the increasing costs of about everything, especially Health Care which is so important to us all. How we got here is a tale of many well meaning people with the best of intentions but the Law of Unintended Consequences has brought us the current mess we are in.
I wish I could say that there is some simple magic solution to this problem, there is not. What is required is something that might be seen as radical as Universal Health Care so embraced by the left. What is required is a deep cultural change as well as a legal change. As a society we need to stop running to Lawyers for all things and expect the Courts to be able to be able to solve all our problems. The Courts and the Law in general have proved to be not only inadequate but incapable of addresssing these problems.
As a Country we need to honestly debate these problems. Just saying that everyone should have Health Care and the Govt. should pay for it does nothing to address the issue. Government, the Legal System, and in a large part, the Medical Profession has failed us. Doctors through the AMA protect Doctors and continue to allow the incompetent to practice. Silly Lawsuits are filed daily and clog up the system. Sky High Punitive Damages are awarded driving up Insurance Costs. Intrusive Insurance companies are dictating how it is best and what remedies are allowed. All of these problems are easily seen by anyone yet no one is addressing the problem instead all we discuss is which Party can throw the best Circus and who has the best Bread.
You make a good point as to
March 2, 2009 - 15:13 ET by dscottYou make a good point as to some of the expenses involved that the Europeans & Canadians don't really have. The assertion the US spends twice the per capita amount comparied to others is based on what? Apples and Oranges? The faulty premise of the Socialized Medicine vs Capitalist Model argument is based on:
1. will give the same quality of treatment for any given disease on a dollar for dollar basis - Demonstrably FALSE
2. will give equal access to everyone who needs care - FALSE when patients are forced to wait weeks to months for treatment that otherwise would normally given immediately under the Capitalist Model, those who die or get even sicker are in effect denied any access at all.
3. socialized medicine does not hold any medical care giver accountable for failure since all of them are forced to follow the "best practices" as choosen by government bureaucrats. Best practice is a euphemism for substandard treatment, not cutting edge treatment based on the criteria of how much the government is willing to spend. We have a legal tort system in place for a reason and we all pay for it. You can't have both, since suing the government over best practices essentially places you on a collision course with a brick wall.
4. it reduces the number of medical care providers as more and more practioners chose to drop out and discourages new ones from coming into the field. Why spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to get a medical education when for less you can make more money??? With way less legal hassles...
5. socialized medicine does not treat people equally, it favors those whom the government deems most useful. Older people are discriminated against, why else did over 10,000 elderly people in France die from the heat wave a few years back? All because the government was too cheap to for air conditioning. That's right there is more to health care than popping pills and having a doctor give a diagnosis or do a treatment.
We need to understand why the libs are so urgently trying to foist national health care, it has to do with Medicare obligations. The politicians raided the Medicare Trust fund, left IOUS with pitiful interest and soon more money will be flowing out than in, which means the theives have to pay the money back...there isn't any. Using the people on Medicaid they are the perfect distraction for politicians to claim not everyone is getting equal access. This is total BS. We all paid money into the system for our future care as seniors, they stole the money and now want us to pay again. They need to drag the rest of us into the ponzi scheme so they can put off the inevitable bankruptcy of the system to many years in the future for someone else to worry about. Then they will decide just like the British and Canadians they only have so much to spend and too bad so sad for anyone with a serious illness.
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.
Also...
March 2, 2009 - 01:25 ET by jcheney...our drug research would barely exisit. With American drug companies spending the money, doing the research, and trials for new life saving drugs more than any other country in the world..... guess what would happen if universal health care kicks in?
Sorry to be so cynical, but I've read about this for the last couple of years and understand the consequences of nationalizing/socializing health care.
Unfortunately a society that's spent their way into oblivian with credit cars they couldn't afford and bought houses they couldn't qualify for, only to hear that the government is going to bail them out can't grasp the concept of Trillions of dollar in deficits that they will ultimately have to pay back....one way or another.
I say children get free healthcare
March 2, 2009 - 01:50 ET by Daniel BakerNo medicaid or social security for anyone else.
-------------------------------------------
Google and Apple officially fought traditional marriage: . Please Boycott them. A Boycott changed McDonald's mind.
Mr. Deeds Goes to Washington
March 2, 2009 - 01:58 ET by WesenDr. Tim will never have to fall into line for common treatment but he quickly prescribes it for the little people... the people he's pushing into the ovens.
Ummm.....why is it a
March 2, 2009 - 02:25 ET by ckc1227Ummm.....why is it a national shame that in this wealthiest of countries, we're able afford the best, most advanced care available? Why is prosperity and success something to be ashamed of? I'm guessing we spend more on most everything than the rest of the world, but not sure why that has to be a bad thing. Clearly the good Doc only measures cost in dollars and cents. This is what happens when doctors want to be economists.
I'm assuming Dr. Tim practiced medicine at some point in his life, and maybe he still does. As such, he could have charged as little for his services as he wanted. Anyone want to bet he didn't?
I'm sure Dr. Tim
March 2, 2009 - 15:38 ET by Tim the EnchanterI'm sure Dr. Tim practiced. However, he didn't practice enough, so he never got it right.
Also- remember P.J. O'Rourke's comment: "If you thinnk that health care is expensive now, just wait until it's free."
We will end up spend three
March 2, 2009 - 02:34 ET by SlicksterWe will end up spend three times as much as we are now and will have poorer service.
Can socialized medicine work this fast?
March 2, 2009 - 03:04 ET by SPCOlympicsWe all heard the stories of endless waits just to see a doctor in countries that have govenment run health care. So here's my experience today with my private HMO plan and medical group:
I've had a hacking cough for a fews days now that got really bad last night. Call our clinic and they said urgent care has Sunday walk in hours. Went in and saw a Dr. within 15 minutes. He ordered chest x-rays, got those down the hall 30 minutes later. Dr. says I have pneumonia and prescribed anti-biotics. The drugs were available at the pharmacist as soon as I got there. Total time from calling in to see if a Dr. was on call to being home with appropriate medicines, less than 4 hours.
Can the government promise me that kind of efficiency?
If it's working, why are you guys determined to f*** it up?
Was I the only one who actually
March 2, 2009 - 05:21 ET by thebutlerdiditlaughed out loud, for real, when learning of Dr. Tim saying that Nationalized Healthcare was the issue he thought would bring the Republicans and Democrats together? WTH? Really? I find it hard to believe that the entire Republican base will just be jumping up and down at the idea.
All a Democrat needs is the upper-story window of public attention and the chamber pot of rhetoric. How else to explain the rise of Joe Biden? P.J. O' Rourke
No. They can't.
March 2, 2009 - 09:07 ET by 5kidsnadogIf they're planning on anything like what goes on in Canada, anyway. My family is all up there and I am constantly amazed by what they take for granted as necessary waiting. A few examples:
My little brother lives in a smaller town with a bigger hospital about 30 minutes away. He just mentioned to me the other day that anyone needing an MRI might be scheduled in the middle of the night now, because the shortage of equipment and the long lines for it dictate round the clock usage. Still you might wait six weeks or more, depending on what your problem was. My husband's uncle began having seizures and his wait was six weeks. He was dead within 3 months.
A friend of ours had his PSA (prostate specific antigen) test come back extraordinarily high in May of last year. His surgery was not scheduled until September, at which point the cancer had spread through his bowel, thus lowering his chances of recovery.
My older brother (an American) broke his finger on a Sunday. When he went to the emergency room, he was told that they only had a radiologist on duty weekdays from 9-5, and that he could come back the next day, or perhaps they might be able to find someone willing to come in, if he was willing to pay. He got in the car and drove back to Michigan, where he was treated and scheduled to have surgery within a couple of days (his finger had to be pinned back together).
Backups for various treatment centers are so great sometimes that you may be directed to a treatment center very far away from your home. My m-i-l's cancer treatment was several hours from home (which wasn't too bad), but we have known folks who are routed to places eight, ten, twelve hours away. Can you imagine being so far from home, staying in temporary housing while you're ill? To say nothing of how you coordinate having someone there to help you if you have a spouse who has to work....
As an aside, one thing that I find incredibly interesting is our insistence on including illegals in the plan. Canadians do NOT accept anyone without the proper card without payment on the spot. Last summer my son became very ill very quickly and we had to go the emergency room with him in Ontario. The kid's eyes were rolling back in his head, he was limp, and he was spewing vomit, and he was so dehydrated his skin tented when it was pinched but we got NO treatment before our charge card was run through. We also were not allowed to leave the ER without CASH being given to the doctor for her services. We have been through this several times with our children -- there's no being billed later. We even had a friend who broke his leg (in many places) in Quebec skiing, and they wouldn't operate until the money was wired to the hospital. We'll end up even worse off than Canada because we won't use the same measures.
The Case Against Socialized Health Care
March 2, 2009 - 06:44 ET by PopularTechAmerican Health Care in Critical Condition (John Stossel, ABC News)
Sick in America (1/6) (Video) (9min) (John Stossel, 20/20)
Sick in America (2/6) (Video) (7min) (John Stossel, 20/20)
Sick in America (3/6) (Video) (7min) (John Stossel, 20/20)
Sick in America (4/6) (Video) (5min) (John Stossel, 20/20)
Sick in America (5/6) (Video) (6min) (John Stossel, 20/20)
Sick in America (6/6) (Video) (6min) (John Stossel, 20/20)
A Short Course in Brain Surgery (Video) (6min)
Dead Meat (Video) (25min)
Uninsured In America (Video) (9min)
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is Not Pollution
Lead By Example
March 2, 2009 - 07:11 ET by MystapittHey Doc...why don't you lead by example and recieve your medical care from gov't health plans like Medicaid. Give up your physican and lets see what drugs you are taking. Let me decide if there aren't viable cheaper alternatives.
as mom used to say...
March 2, 2009 - 07:39 ET by AJBWhen I was a small child and I was told I couldn't do something, my retort was 'but Jimmy's mom let's HIM do it'. Mom always said, "well, if Jimmy told you to jump in a lake, would you do that too?'
So, all the other countries are bankrupting their economies and ruining their healthcare with socialized medicine. Wonder what mom would say?
Is this really cause for
March 2, 2009 - 07:49 ET by snaggletoothieIs this really cause for shame. The USA develops and tests and brings to perfection the majority of new treatments and new medications. And that is not free. The rest of the worlds's medical care is dependent on our ability and willingness to innovate. Yet the ignorance of this 'medical expert' of this calls into question anything he has to say.
Also...
March 2, 2009 - 09:12 ET by jcheney...check out this site:
http://www.biggovhea...
Shark Lawyers
March 2, 2009 - 10:42 ET by misterbee241And let's not forget the contributions to exhorbitant health costs by the shark lawyers like John Edwards.
"I dont need to read a newspaper to know the world's been shaved by a drunken barber."
Walter Brennan, The Colonel, Meet John Doe, 1941
Why is it we spend so much?
March 2, 2009 - 11:03 ET by moderncommentaries83Why do we spend twice as much? Well, in Canada and the UK - two places liberals love to point to as prime examples of how socialized medicine "works", they have:
America spends more because we treat people far more extensively than socialized systems do.
And, frankly, I'd rather go bankrupt - sell everything I own - to pay for medical treatment here rather than have some government bean-counter with limited or NO medical training tell me I have to die to save a few pennies.
Aut viam inveniam aut faciam
Why is it we spend so much?
March 2, 2009 - 11:03 ET by moderncommentaries83Why do we spend twice as much? Well, in Canada and the UK - two places liberals love to point to as prime examples of how socialized medicine "works", they have:
America spends more because we treat people far more extensively than socialized systems do.
And, frankly, I'd rather go bankrupt - sell everything I own - to pay for medical treatment here rather than have some government bean-counter with limited or NO medical training tell me I have to die to save a few pennies.
Aut viam inveniam aut faciam
See?
March 2, 2009 - 11:09 ET by sherylsimsMy evil will soon be on EVERY thread. (The double post for those of you not paying attention) I will contact you all soon with a list of demands.
:o) SSS strikes again!
In the UK, someone said
March 2, 2009 - 11:20 ET by SeashellIn the UK, someone said it's the "duty" of elderly citizens to die if
they get too sick. Tom Daschle, Obama's former choice for HSS, said
that the elderly need to "deal with" aging and not expect to have every
ailment treated.
I'm so glad that this wasn't around when my Dad had his heart-transplant. He was the oldest person (at the time) to have it done at Carolina's Medical Hospital in Charlotte. He was 67 at the time and lived to be 83. He lived to see his grandson go off to college and to see his granddaughter born and watch her grow up into a lovely lady.
He had a wonderful life because of this transplant. I guess Daschle would have let him just die.
Where's the AARP?
March 2, 2009 - 14:36 ET by slickwillie2001Can any of you remember an election where the AARP went as silent as they did in 2008? Retired people on fixed incomes are the biggest losers in the new Obamanation. They don't benefit from IRS-welfare, or refundable tax credits as they are called. Inflation will decimate their fixed incomes, and Obammy's rage against the stock market will destroy their private retirement funds, 401Ks, and IRAs. They will pay greatly increased utility bills, while receiving no benefits from 'Carbon Taxes'. They are the ones told by Daschle to accept old age and death. Those of them on private-pension subsidized healthcare enhancement plans stand to lose them in favor of universal government healthcare which will be worse.
Why did they go silent?
Ever notice how these guys
March 2, 2009 - 17:43 ET by RR GOPEver notice how these guys tend to be paid MSM experts?
I wonder how physicians who, oh, I don't know, actually treat patients for a living feel about how the government has already hamstrung their ability to make the money they feel they should be getting?
One of the 24% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 89% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory.