CNN medical correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta, whom President-elect Barack Obama has reportedly asked to take an administration post as Surgeon General and top health policy adviser, last year thought it noteworthy that the release of John McCain's medical records ignored the Senator's “mental health,” any “mention of post-traumatic stress disorder” or of “substance abuse.” Back in 2004, upon Ronald Reagan's passing, Gupta took to CNN to give legitimacy to claims of how throughout his presidency “many would accuse President Reagan of ignoring AIDS.” Gupta falsely charged that “the first time President Reagan would utter the word AIDS in public would be well into his second term, six years after the virus was discovered.”
The jump would take Gupta full circle back to activist liberal politics and policy-making. “He was a White House fellow in the late 1990s, writing speeches and crafting policy for then-First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton,” the Washington Post's Ceci Connolly and Howard Kurtz recalled in a story for Wednesday's paper (“Obama Picks TV's Gupta for Medical Post”) which relayed that in addition to the Surgeon General slot “he has also been offered a top post in the new White House Office of Health Reform, twin duties that could make him the most influential Surgeon General in history.” The Post article also noted that Gupta, who joined CNN in 2001 and has since also reported for CBS News, “met for more than two hours with Obama in Chicago on Nov. 25.”
My May 23 NewsBusters item, posted with video, “CBS: 'Substance Abuse'? People Think McCain War Injuries 'Funny'?” recounted:
The night after ABC's World News raised the possibility John McCain's POW ordeal caused "psychological damage," on Friday's CBS Evening News Dr. Sanjay Gupta thought it noteworthy that the release of McCain's medical records ignored the Senator's "mental health," any "mention of post-traumatic stress disorder" or of "substance abuse."...
From Fountain Hills, Arizona, CNN's Gupta, identified by Katie Couric as "a CBS News contributor" and on-screen as "contributing medical correspondent," marveled:
What I didn't see I thought was interesting, as well. There was hardly any mention of his mental health. There was no mention of depression. You know, this is man who had two admittedly weak suicide attempts when he was a prisoner of war. There was no mention of post-traumatic stress disorder or anything that may have been asked, or substance abuse, none of that was even mentioned.
The June 10, 2004 MRC CyberAlert, “CNN’s Cooper and Gupta Bemoan Reagan’s Indifference to AIDS,” reported:
On Tuesday night, CNN devoted a segment of Anderson Cooper 360 to how, as CNN’s Dr, Sanjay Gupta put it, throughout his presidency “many would accuse President Reagan of ignoring AIDS,” as if Reagan talking about it would have done more to prevent it than those in the homosexual community modifying their unsafe sex practices. Leading into a Reagan clip from 1987, Gupta complained that “the first time President Reagan would utter the word AIDS in public would be well into his second term, six years after the virus was discovered.” In fact, Reagan talked about AIDS in 1985 and cited it repeatedly in his 1986 State of the Union address. Gupta relayed how one “AIDS activist” believes “the administration avoided AIDS all those years because of homophobia.”
Deroy Murdock documented in National Review:
[A]s official White House papers cited by Steven Hayward, author of the multi-volume Age of Reagan show, the 40th president spoke of AIDS no later than September 17, 1985. Responding to a question on AIDS research, the president said: “[I]ncluding what we have in the budget for '86, it will amount to over a half a billion dollars that we have provided for research on AIDS in addition to what I'm sure other medical groups are doing. And we have $100 million in the budget this year; it'll be 126 million next year. So, this is a top priority with us. Yes, there's no question about the seriousness of this and the need to find an answer.”
President Reagan's February 6, 1986 State of the Union address included this specific passage where he says the word "AIDS" five times: “We will continue, as a high priority, the fight against Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS). An unprecedented research effort is underway to deal with this major epidemic public health threat. The number of AIDS cases is expected to increase. While there are hopes for drugs and vaccines against AIDS, none is immediately at hand. Consequently, efforts should focus on prevention, to inform and to lower risks of further transmission of the AIDS virus. To this end, I am asking the Surgeon General to prepare a report to the American people on AIDS.”
—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center





The night after ABC's World News raised the possibility John McCain's POW ordeal caused "psychological damage," on Friday's CBS Evening News Dr. Sanjay Gupta thought it noteworthy that the release of McCain's medical records ignored the Senator's "mental health," any "mention of post-traumatic stress disorder" or of "substance abuse."...
















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Well...
Wed, 01/07/2009 - 02:41 ET by ColdsnapAt least it wasn't Dr. Feelgood, Dr. Pepper or Dr. Dolittle.
I love religion. It keeps most people from killing me and stealing my stuff.
The best Christmas presents...ever:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggy9jNo5Nz0
Let's set the record staight. Clinton ignored Aids - not Reagan
Wed, 01/07/2009 - 03:15 ET by Gary HallLet's set the record straight.
If someone in the media wants to attack a president over the issue of doing something about HIV/Aids, then let's leave Reagan out of it. Brent Baker has set the record straight there.
Besides - at the time, aids was a new issue, few were talking about it, few understood it and it was not a recognized crisis at the time.
On the other hand, by the time Bill Clinton became President, not only was it well understood, but he was perceived, by the "elitists" as the man with the vision. Yes, Bill Clinton, as president, would lead on the issue of addressing world Aids.
OK, everyone laugh out loud together now.
It was the all-knowing President Bill Clinton who turned his back on a developing world HIV/Aids Pandemic and ignored the Aids crisis - not Reagan. His constituents, the left wing media know that all too well - but have conspired to keep it from the public; instead, preferring to blame Ronald Reagan for all - and to do in at every opportunity, for all eternity.
It was President George Bush who would step up to the plate and propose and announce, then get passed, almost unanimously, thru the congress of the United States the largest and most successful effort in the history of the world in combating this dreaded disease in the 3rd world. And the media? They would continue to give a pass on the Clinton record, continue to pile the fault on a long gone President Reagan, yet find a new angle at each and every opportunity to somehow fault President Bush for his bold and successful leadership.
Let the record reflect the widely accepted view of the left's David Corn, Washington editor of "The Nation" magazine. In Too little, too late - How many times is Bill Clinton going to apologize to Africa? Cat have the MSM's tongue?
What is it with the entire national media, that when one of their trusted voices lays out a challenging view for them on their beloved Clinton legacy, that they all must, in some conspiracy-like trance, always immediately go out, in unison, and attack their most hated conservative - rather than simply reporting the news?
The man to attack here, is President Bill Clinton, not President Ronald Reagan.
Ronald Reagan was beginning to express concern about the dreaded disease, early on in it's march of suffering. Bill Clinton, being all too aware of it, and holding the desires of the electorate to address the problem, turned his back on it. Instead, he would focus on standing watch over a historic economic bubble fueled by greed and fraud; he would consider his personal sexual needs with a young unpaid volunteer - an intern - more important than the health and welfare of the citizens of the United States of America and of the world.
President Bush answered the call; proposed and planned for and utilized well spent and focused $billions of dollars to save a million, perhaps millions more, of lives in Africa and Indonesia. And not just aids, but Malaria as well.
And the world noticed - the US mainstream media, like the biased agenda driven nutcases at CNN didn't notice, but world leaders like the following noticed. From Oct., 2008:
See - you feel good already - and it didn't take putting the MSM's man in the WH, did it?
(;~/ gary
....and substance abuse??
Wed, 01/07/2009 - 06:20 ET by sentforth5The Obummertrons may want to tread lightly around that one, as Larry Sinclair will tell you that Oblahblah doesn't really, uh, get along well without his crack cocaine.
Job Ch.40 God describes a dinosaur.
Oh! Bama
Wed, 01/07/2009 - 07:07 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsI wonder if Gupta will be spreading the news that children abandoned by their parents (Obama) are more prone to suffer from mental illness, or if maybe he (and the Obama administration) will ignore that little fact.
D
Keep the ILLEGALS out, join NumbersUSA to send free faxes to your reps.
Hairy palms back in style?
Wed, 01/07/2009 - 07:52 ET by SickofLibsSince this is the Clinton administration v.2, I'm guessing we'll be re-introducing masturbation instruction back into the classrooms.
Stay tuned for the first story about how stunning Gupta will look in that Horatio Hornblower uniform. [swoon]
What is Obama telling us?
Wed, 01/07/2009 - 08:10 ET by KC MulvilleObama is revealing a lot of superficiality here. What's he trying to tell us?
Remember, Obama only has two years of real senate experience. That's not enough time to develop a relationship with committee witnesses or department officials, so he doesn't know who's doing what at any departments. Since he doesn't have that knowledge himself, he has to rely on others to give it to him ... and he apparently is relying on the old Clinton team.
You are right. All the Dems know that it's just PR.
Wed, 01/07/2009 - 08:29 ET by c5thenObama doesn't even know what most of the Departments do. And for good reason. Most of the Departments don't need to exist anyway and, IMO, some are completely unconstitutional. The Federal Government is given authority to perform only certain tasks by the Constitution and the rest it specifically reserves to the States or the People. Obama, being a true naiive liberal, is making his picks to head the Departments based on PR and a form of superficial cronyism. Look at the Panetta pick for head of the CIA! Absolutely no intelligence background at all. The SG is just some guy who goes on TV occassionally to warn everybody about smoking and stuff, right? Obama didn't even listen to those warnings himself.
Hey, I got the wrong "CHANGE"!
Alan Keyes / Sarah Palin - 2012
KC
Wed, 01/07/2009 - 09:32 ET by BlondeI'm kind of surprised Mark hasn't put up a Morning Joe thread on the Surgeon General nomination yet....Tucker Carlson was off the hook about it. Gupta?
To paraphrase..."a most useless position, but it comes with a cute little uniform...needs to be abolished, and since it won't be why not Gupta".
He then told Mika he didn't need another mommy (oh, but she insisted we need a Nanny State to keep us from being fat). No videos up yet, but it was a hoot.
Questions
Wed, 01/07/2009 - 10:20 ET by KC MulvilleSymbolic jobs, and symbolic departments, just muddy the waters for effective and intelligent government. Let's be rid of them.
Was Gupta the guy who convinced Broom Hilda to throw...
Wed, 01/07/2009 - 09:58 ET by R D Helm...us in the slammer if we went outside of her hideous Health-Care-Plan-from-Hell and paid our doctor out of our own pockets?
This would be a really good chance for PEBO to demonstrate (or at leat try to make it at least look like) that "change" thingy wasn't the meaningless campaign drivel we all suspect it was:
Get rid of the position of Surgeon General, including the staff.
I'm not sure, but this meaningless "feel good" position may be as useless as the Department of Redundancy Department.
Just think of the tax dollars that would be saved.
-Dave
“Them that’s going get on the wagon. Them that ain’t get out of the way.” -Because enough is enough.
Call Nancy
Thu, 01/08/2009 - 10:35 ET by StarAZThey have a woman named Nancy to check for redundancy--maybe she can check out the Surgeon General's office. Will this guy have the moxie to say shoot anyone who leaves a bird flu quarantine center or sorry, no one in or out of NY because of the epidemic? This man has no public health background that I can see and may be all about window dressing...wait, I forgot which admin he will be in. Never mind.
Um, Gupta is aware that The
Wed, 01/07/2009 - 10:01 ET by HockeyKidUm, Gupta is aware that The One smokes and has a history of cocaine use, right?
"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me
It was organic tobacco and
Wed, 01/07/2009 - 10:02 ET by SemperrightIt was organic tobacco and free range cocaine though, so it's OK
Semper Fi
Freedom is not free, but the U.S. Marine Corps will pay most of your share.
Ned Dolan
Now "Free Range Cocaine" is
Wed, 01/07/2009 - 14:15 ET by dark_dsNow "Free Range Cocaine" is funny ... and the coke was proccesed by Unionized Columbians who work under strict enviornmental and saftey regulations.
Seriously I dont care if Lord Barry did Coke in his youth .. but if Gupta was upset about McCains lack of info on substance abuse in his medical records then he should be every bit upset about the lack of information within Lord Barrys medical records
"dumb bombs for dumb people" dark_ds said that
Well, I'll give Obama
Wed, 01/07/2009 - 10:09 ET by fitzfongWell, I'll give Obama credit for one thing: by selecting Sanjay "Dr. Nick Riviera" Gupta as his Surgeon General, he's showing that he at least has a sense of humor.
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan
fitzfong.blogspot.com
"Hello
Wed, 01/07/2009 - 10:14 ET by Semperright"Hello Everybody"
Semper Fi
Freedom is not free, but the U.S. Marine Corps will pay most of your share.
Ned Dolan
Even the Simpsons have
Wed, 01/07/2009 - 10:19 ET by fitzfongEven the Simpsons have enough sense to go to Dr. Hibbert.
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan
fitzfong.blogspot.com
The sad part is that Duh1
Wed, 01/07/2009 - 21:31 ET by HockeyKidThe sad part is that Duh1 wanted to appoint Dr. Nick, but then Rahm told him it was just a cartoon. Since Duh1 knew that Dr. Ross left ER medicine to become a commercial fisherman, he settled on the only other doctor he's ever seen on TV. That's where all the famous doctors are found, you know.
"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me
Obama once again
Wed, 01/07/2009 - 10:16 ET by celatorObama once again miss-stepped with the Gupta nomination.
Here was his chance to nominate, say, the dean of a prestigeous medical school, or a world-class medical researcher, or even a Nobel Laureate. In other words, someone with outstanding peer-recognized credibility in the medical field. Someone who had already made important contributions in medicine would have been an ideal choice.
Nope. Couldn't do that. Had to nominate a media hack with nice hair.
Since this is Carter2 or Clinton3
Wed, 01/07/2009 - 10:23 ET by BlondeThe One went with Gupta.
Remember, Clinton Gave us Jocelyn Elders. She looked kinda cute in that uniform though, all 4'9" of her.
Blonde.. imagine what would happen
Wed, 01/07/2009 - 11:50 ET by Gary HallBlonde.. imagine what would happen to the gene pool if Jocelyn Elders would hitch up with former Clinton Labor Secretary, Robert Reich? Gary
wait wait wait.. they'd have little..
Wed, 01/07/2009 - 11:51 ET by Gary HallI've got it, by golly. They'd have little Krugmans.
Thanks, Gar!
Wed, 01/07/2009 - 11:55 ET by BlondeI needed a laugh, and that sure produced one!
Little Krugmans....sheesh!
Sanjay
Wed, 01/07/2009 - 12:55 ET by sembyHe is a socialist who will want to impose HIS WILL on the American people.
Mr. "KNOW-IT-ALL" in the Obama Administration is a very scary thing!
Mark my words......................
I'm sure we'll be hearing about
Wed, 01/07/2009 - 13:15 ET by katiejanethe effects of crack and "a little blow " any day now. Right after a discussion about the psychological impact of parental desertion and being mixed race raised by white grandparents.
Oh, yeah, that'll come up
Wed, 01/07/2009 - 16:36 ET by StarAZGupta probably also hates "obesity" and thinks it is the scourge of the earth and fat people should be recycled or put in camps. At very least, more food pyramids! Tax sodas. List calories. At least he will look cute in his uniform.
No "probably" about it.
Wed, 01/07/2009 - 21:26 ET by HockeyKidNo "probably" about it. Goober's one of the biggest anti-obesity crusaders out there. He will definitely support a "fat tax".
"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me
My bad..
Wed, 01/07/2009 - 21:17 ET by Sergeant ROCK.. when I saw the name, I thought this was the guy from last years American Idol. Well.. it only stands to reason.
Bolton/KEYES 2012
→ That's him Rock
Wed, 01/07/2009 - 21:34 ET by Cool ArrowSanjaya Gupta
Can't you see the teeny-boppers screaming?
Rock the Vote!
Wed, 01/07/2009 - 21:39 ET by Sergeant ROCKCNN, msDNC, CBS, etc., etc. should show that guy's picture on their reports of this nomination so as to garner fan.. er.. I mean, the voter's support.
Bolton/KEYES 2012
It looks like we are
Thu, 05/28/2009 - 10:51 ET by GordmanIt looks like we are building an history with presidents and candidates with former drug problems. Is our nation that bad? Why do these people had drug problems? What can we expect for common citizens? If you ask me I don't think there are enough drug rehab centers to cure this nation.