As Support for 'Surge' Rises, CBS Loses Interest in Its Polling

Photo of Brent Baker.

On the day of the long-anticipated report from General David Petraeus on the “surge,” the CBS Evening News ignored how its latest poll discovered the third straight month of an increase in the percent of Americans who believe the surge has “made things better” in Iraq. As the percentage has gone up, CBS's interest in the result has gone down. In July, anchor Katie Couric led with how only 19 percent thought the surge was “making things better” and a month later, in August, when that number jumped to 29 percent, CBS and Couric gave it just 12 seconds 20 minutes into the newscast..

While Monday's CBS Evening News skipped how the share crediting the surge for “making things better” rose to 35 percent in the survey conducted through Saturday, the newscast found time to highlight three other findings that stressed public opposition to the war and distrust of President Bush. Jim Axelrod relayed how “in the latest CBS News/New York Times poll, just four percent think Iraq will become a stable democracy in the next year or two. More than half [53%] say it'll never happen. [On screen: Yes, but it will take longer: 42%] And just five percent think the Bush administration best able to make the right calls on the war. [Congress: 21%; U.S. military commanders: 68%].” A bumper before the first ad break showcased how on “U.S. troop levels in Iraq,” 30 percent said they “should increase/keep the same,” while 65 percent responded they “should decrease/remove all.”

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

PDF of the results of the poll conducted September 4-8.

My August 13 NewsBusters posting revealed:

When a CBS News poll in July found 73 percent believed the surge of troops in Iraq was making the situation “worse” or having “no impact,” the CBS Evening News led with that number. But on Monday, when a new CBS poll discovered that percent had fallen 12 points to 61 percent, as the percent who think the surge is making the situation “better” jumped ten points from 19 to 29 percent, CBS gave it 12 seconds 20 minutes into the newscast. “Major attacks decline in Iraq: Military credits troop increase, civilian tipsters,” declared the headline at the top of Monday's USA Today front page. Katie Couric, however, ignored that report and, after briefly relaying the new poll number, couldn't resist highlighting “one thing that hasn't changed, two-thirds say that, overall, things are still going badly in Iraq.”

Couric had led the July 18 CBS Evening News: “In a CBS News/New York Times poll out tonight, nearly three out of four Americans say the troop surge is not working, that it's having no impact, or actually making matters worse.” On Monday, she acknowledged: “Americans are starting to come around on that troop surge in Iraq. In our CBS News poll out tonight, 29 percent say the surge is making things better. That's a ten point increase since July.” It's doubtful the ten percent who have come around are consumers of CBS or other mainstream media outlets which concentrate on the negative.

My July 18 NewsBusters item recounted how Couric led that night's CBS Evening News:

Hello, everyone. Senate Democrats failed today in their latest attempt to bring American troops home from Iraq. After a rare, all-night debate, they couldn't come up with the votes today to bring the latest troop withdrawal measure to the floor. And that is in spite of pressure from the voters themselves. In a CBS News/New York Times poll out tonight, nearly three out of four Americans say the troop surge is not working, that it's having no impact, or actually making matters worse. And nearly two out of three want the President to bring some or all U.S. forces home.

—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

That was then...

Bin Laden was a threat after 9/11: Today the libs are kneeling before him. The public is not buying it.

JDW

CFR: Chung, Riady, Hsia, Trie, Huang, Hsu, Paw... Who's looking?

 

Those stats paint more than

Those time-stats paint more than just the whole picture; they illustratrate the complete CBS agenda.

----------------

“What we have done for ourselves alone dies with us; what we have done for others and the world remains and is immortal.” - Albert Pike

Live and die by polls

During today's testimony, some dim congresswoman from Calif tried to throw the "Iraqi poll" at Petraeus and Crocker. What a hoot. "But General, and Ambassador, even if you don't know about these polls, they were conducted by respectable polling agencies, surely you have to bow down to them, don't you"? That was the theme of this Congressjerk on the polls -- the polls say this, you must believe them.

The Dims only say that when the polls are in their favor. Otherwise, the polls either don't exist, or they have to be re-done (ala New York Times) to get them right.

___________________________________ 

If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber

the polls?

how about ignoring actual votes?

the state's 2000 Proposition 22 vote in which voters expressed the desire to limit marriage to a man and a woman.

 Support our Troops 

  What's really interesting

  What's really interesting is the fact that the public can have opinions not cultivated by the msm.  Where are these contrary opinions coming from?  It means an awful lot of just regular folks are digesting multiple news outlets and drawing their own conclusions.  That's got to be a scary thought to the 'journalists'.

cherry picked statistics and deception

How many democrats at the Petraeus hearings today said something to the effect, "this is based on nothing but cherry picked statistics and deception" in reference to the Petraeus report?

 

In other news future Pulitzer Prize winner Cindy Sheehan was arrested again today.

http://thehill.com/l...

 

CBS NYT Poll

Considering CBS and the New York Times only call up communists and anarchists, this is outstanding news that almost half of the nitwit crowd has figured out that Iraq will become a nation.

I was polled once by liberals and the questions were hillarious. In this case it would be, "Considering over 3000 dead Americans and 10,000 more wounded and the numbers growing in an Iraq more violent than when Saddam was president, do you think the surge is working and America should bring our people home to safety?"

Typical liberal polling question they see as fair and unbiased. 

 

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

Heck why spend "Valuable" broadcast time on Good News?

That is exactly why I turned of the evening news 20 years ago. And, that is exactly why I will never turn it back on. I am not a pessimistic person, and I never will be; no matter how hard the MSM tries. My motto "Just ignore them and they will go away".

Support for surge rises

What the Right Wing media poll would say if it existed :

"Almost two thirds of Americans, 65% support keeping troops in Iraq, only 30% want them brought home."

          US troop levels in Iraq should be ?

increased           11%

kept same          19%

reduced             35%

remove all          30%

_________________________________

Instead of reporting the answer as I did above, noting 2/3rds of Americans want troops kept in Iraq - the left wing anti-war pollers said this:

"As has been the case for the past few months, two thirds of Americans want to see U.S. troops come home from Iraq."

______________________________________

So obviously, they are so far gone from unbiased, they cannot even stop themselves from being anti-war in describing and releasing their own polls. What is a FAIR description ?

" About one third of Americans want all the troops or more to stay in Iraq, 35% want a reduction of troops, and another third wants them all brought home. "

______________________________________

I'm not blind, I know how things are characterized, and the continuous msm anti-war descriptions are BLATANT, and OBVIOUS, and EASILY REMEDIED.

 They of course will not do it, and they will NEVER use a pro-war characterization. 

 

 

Wording

"...two thirds of Americans want to see U.S. troops come home from Iraq."  Why isn't it ALL Americans?  I want them to come home...after final victory is achieved.

 

Duncan Hunter schools Dem fool Ike Skelton, as Ike cusses

This is a pefect example of the difference between a republican and a democrat. The democrat hasn't got clue one, and the republican has to help the fool dim with his job, and explain it all to him.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/10/lawmakers-caught-losing-their-cool-at-iraq-hearing/

18% approval is way too high

After yesterday's debacle, I can imagine today's opening comments: "General, yesterday only 18% of the American public approves of what we are about to do to you. But take heart -- today no one will approve -- that's how far we have sunk, and we have no excuse. So, let's get started with the name-calling, debasing, and simple rudeness. Before I begin, I need to play to my base, so let me point out once again that I believe you are a liar, a Benedict Arnold, and a lapdog of that evil dictator, Bush."

___________________________________ 

If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber

Lieberman: "The Personal

Lieberman: "The Personal Attack On Gen. David Petraeus Launched Today By Moveon.org Is An Outrageous And Despicable Act Of Slander That Every Member Of The Congress - Democrat And Republican - Has A Solemn Responsibility To Condemn."

dscott's postulate:  The degree to which someone exaggerates or deceives is inversely proportional to the merit of the advocated position.

A surge of impacted

A surge of impacted pollsters is bad for you health.