GOP Strategist Mark McKinnon: Sarah Palin ‘Cost Republicans the Leadership of the Senate’
Appearing as a guest on Tuesday’s Last Word on MSNBC, Mark McKinnon - former media advisor to the Bush and McCain presidential campaigns who writes a column for the Daily Beast- blamed Sarah Palin for the Republican Party’s failure to recapture control of the Senate, charging that "she put up some candidates that really weren’t qualified." He continued: "They lost. We lost. The Republicans could have taken the Senate if not for Sarah Palin. And so her stock is falling and pretty rapidly now, I think."
He soon reiterated: "It wasn't strategic. It was impulsive and it cost the Republicans the leadership of the Senate."
After quipping that Palin is "getting closer to her sell-by date," McKinnon also mocked Palin as being unworthy of comparison to Republican hero Ronald Reagan. McKinnon: "You know, she's comparing herself to Ronald Reagan. And, you know, I didn't know Ronald Reagan, Ronald Reagan was not a friend of mine, but I can guarantee you this, Sarah Palin is no Ronald Reagan. And she talked about his movie. She didn't even get the name of his movie right."
Below is a complete transcript of the relevant segment from the Tuesday, November 9, Last Word on MSNBC:
LAWRENCE O’DONNELL: Joining me now, media advisor for the presidential campaigns of President George W. Bush and John McCain, Mark McKinnon. Mark, thank you very much for joining us. Mark, you worked with Sarah Palin in debate prep during the vice presidential campaign. Did you see anything in that candidate that indicated this loser of the vice presidency was capable of bucking that history that goes all the way back to Henry Cabot Lodge in 1960? Every vice presidential candidate in the television age never, ever, ever gets to the presidency after they lose the vice presidency?
MARK MCKINNON, MEDIA ADVISOR OF BUSH AND MCCAIN CAMPAIGNS: Well, Lawrence, I think Sarah Palin’s getting closer to her sell-by date. Congratulations on your evolution on the show, by the way. You know, she’s comparing herself to Ronald Reagan. And, you know, I didn’t know Ronald Reagan, Ronald Reagan was not a friend of mine, but I can guarantee you this, Sarah Palin is no Ronald Reagan.
And she talked about his movie. She didn’t even get the name of his movie right. And she’s comparing herself to a real icon of the party. So, you know, I think it’s problematic. I think that the Republican Party is beginning to realize that Sarah Palin’s crashed this party a little too long and that it’s not good for the Republican Party. It’s not good for the prospects of a Republican nominee and then win a general election in 2012.
O`DONNELL: Mark, what do you think is going on with guys like Newt Gingrich, Rudy Giuliani, who publicly say, Gingrich did this on television recently, that, of course, she’s qualified, she was more qualified than Joe Biden. And Giuliani the same thing. They pump up Sarah Palin and her credentials. Is that, are they just playing to Palin backers, hoping that they don’t alienate them in any way for their own future possible political prospects?
MCKINNON: Yeah, I think that that’s the interesting thing about the primary. Everybody is dancing around Sarah Palin. The interesting thing is that they talk about was she as qualified as Barack Obama, but then they turn around and say that Barack Obama is not qualified. So that doesn’t really square very well. We’re beginning to see very quickly now, as a result of these elections, that she put up some candidates that really weren’t qualified. They lost. We lost. The Republicans could have taken the Senate if not for Sarah Palin. And so her stock is falling and pretty rapidly now, I think.
O`DONNELL: Mark, is there any way of Palin rewriting what we know to be, based on the mathematical history of this last election, which is if she didn’t help Christine O’Donnell get that nomination in Delaware, if she didn’t help some of these Tea Partiers to get those nominations to the Senate, then the Democrats would have lost those seats, that they were then able to win because of the nominees that Sarah Palin delivered to the Democrats. Is she going to be able to somehow rewrite that in the Republican convention as some kind of champion?
MCKINNON: No, she’s not. It wasn’t strategic. It was impulsive and it cost the Republicans the leadership of the Senate. And that’s what people are seeing now. They’re looking at this and they’re realizing that she may be able to win the nomination, and you look at a crowded field in Iowa and if she runs, you can see a pathway there, particularly if you have eight guys and Sarah Palin, and look at the constituency of those primary voters. It’s possible, but it’s highly problematic because she may be able to win a nomination, but there’s no way that she can win the general election.
O’DONNELL: Mark McKinnon of Public Strategies, a Republican insider, formerly of the Bush and McCain campaigns, thank you very much for joining me tonight, Mark.
MCKINNON: Hey, thanks, Lawrence.
- Brad Wilmouth's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
Epic rationalization
Submitted by motherbelt on Thu, 11/11/2010 - 11:24am.
Republicans lost because they didn't gain control. Palin's stock is falling rapidly.
Whatever you say, Mr. McKinnon.
And refresh my memory....wasn't this article discussed here a couple of days ago?
Klein: Soros-funded group: Progressives won midterms. Calls on Obama to govern via executive order to push radical agenda
If I read it somewhere else, and it wasn't, it should be.
Since progressive candidates won, that's a mandate for Obama to push the progressive agenda by executive orders if necessary (emphasis mine):
Progressives won in the 2010 mid-term elections,” wrote Karen Dolan, a fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies and director of the Cities for Progress and Cities for Peace projects based at the radical organization.[ ]“
The Congressional Progressive Caucus, the largest caucus in the House Democratic Caucus at over 80 members, emerged virtually unscathed,
what we do have now is a more solidly progressive bunch of Dems in Congress and a president presumably less encumbered by the false illusion that playing nice will get him a date with the other team.”[ ]
She went on to recommend that progressives “throw our support unabashedly behind the Congressional Progressive Caucus and let’s push Obama to finally do the right thing through as many Executive Orders as we can present to him.”
(BTW, since when do members of Congress "present" Executive Orders to the president?)
But, their side is right; so even if they're not in the majority, they should rule.
And I do mean rule.
Their arrogance is just jaw-dropping.
As I recall, Sarah Palin's political endorsements...
Submitted by Conservator on Thu, 11/11/2010 - 11:38am.
...faired very well in last week's election. In addition, she campaigned for many Republicans, rallied Tea Partyers and raised monies too.
Can McKinnon of the The Daily Beast claim he helped GOP candidates to win as many seats in any election of federal and state offices? No!
McKinnon DROPPED OUT of McCain's Campaign because of Axelrod
Submitted by TexasMom0517 on Thu, 11/11/2010 - 11:57am.
Mark McKinnon is not exactly a "principled" "Republican" strategist. As I recall, he told McCain from the get-go that he would not work for McCain's campaign if Obama/Axelrod won the Democrat nomination. He did drop out. He and Axelrod are friends and have worked together on campaigns, so he wasn't about to work against Axelrod.
As far as I'm concerned, electing RINOs is no better than electing a Democrat. In fact, it may be worse for authentic conservatives, since RINOs only perpetuate the perception among the public that there is little, if any, difference between the parties. I admire McCain because of his service to the country- and today I particularly honor him and all of his brothers in arms who have served our country. However, McCain's only appeal to me as a candidate was his choice of Sarah Palin as a running mate. I do not know whether or not I want Palin as our next Presidential candidate, but I do know that I want a reliably conservative candidate.
McKinnon does not speak for me or for the people I know.
McKinnon is not a Republican.
Submitted by Red Jeep on Thu, 11/11/2010 - 12:20pm.
Maybe a Meghan McCain RINO.
Oh, Crap!
Submitted by almostacowboy on Thu, 11/11/2010 - 2:19pm.
I forgot to set the DVR. Ms. McCain was on Imus this morning. Now, I've missed something very important (Wow! I nearly typed that with a straight face.)
Agreed
Submitted by KC Mulville on Thu, 11/11/2010 - 4:34pm.
One annoyance with the media is their tactic of identifying people as "Republicans" who then go on to contradict Republicans, or even demean and denigrate them.
I've read a few of McKinnon's pieces on The Daily Beast. His entire schtick is to be the house-Republican, always available to pander to liberal sensibilities, i.e., to trash conservatives. His self-serving diatribes do not represent Republicans. Or better, only a handful of Republicans who would rather be liberals.
Electing RINO's confuses
Submitted by MidAmerica on Thu, 11/11/2010 - 12:28pm.
Electing RINO's confuses the public's understanding what it is Republican's stand for.
Republican's were elected in the early 2000's to be Republicans. If the voters had wanted democrats they would have elected them.
it was the actions and inactions of the last Republican Whitehouse and congress that set up the conditions for the election of obama, just as the actions of the current congress set up the conditions for the Republican wave we have just witnessed.
When politicians do not do what the public wants they will elect someone else. You may get RINO's elected but their voting patterns and public statements could sink the whole party in the next election.
GOP old guard should put forth better candidates next time
Submitted by esperanza4 on Thu, 11/11/2010 - 12:43pm.
Whining is so non-masculine. Rove, Graham, and this guy....'man up.' You would not have lost w/your old guard primary candidates if you had put forth a real campaign for them. Don't whine now because a less well funded new face beat them in the primaries. Sarah Palin did not make them win. She probably got more bodies out to rallies, got a few more people interested, raised the profile level of unknowns. But, the fact is, she is one person, and she turns off as many as she turns on to a name and face in politics. Period. In Alaska, the sitting Senator didn't take her opponents that seriously, and she lost in the primary. Only with assistance from a lot of Republicans in the Senate - who didn't take away her leadership roles - and GOP insiders who helped back her independent run (with a lot of DNC support I'm sure to boot) - is she going to win the write in vote this week. No doubt, she'll win.
Sarah Palin didn't cost McCain the election in 2008. Though McCain's camp likes to blame her for that. Senator McCain and his poor campaign staff did that - like this guy. Leaving the campaign to wrongly address the economic meltdown - bad move, bad result for McCain.
Sarah Palin isn't my choice for GOP 2012. I like her. I think she'll help the party raise lots of money and garner attention. No one fills a stadium or gets a crowd going like she does. There is no other figure in the party right now to do that........the party does need that. But, I would prefer the Gov. of New Jersey or Louisiana or Rubio or DeMint or even Thune or Romney.
When the GOP old guard get their panties out of that wad they've been in since Rove & McCain & their team of 'moderate' (RINO) groupies lost in 2008.....they will wake up and realize it is time to celebrate a bit 2010 win for the GOP....and stop using it as a time to blame and banish Palin. Only the GOP can figure out a way to waste this win. Don't grasp defeat in the wake of victory. Palin helped, the Tea Party helped, Rush helped, and figures like Pelosi-Reid-Feingold-Obama-Biden all helped too: the GOP needs to target them. Yes, GOP old guard - go after the Democrats w/the venom and spew you seem to save only for Palin.
Democratic Party voting tricks, vote cheating, massive bus rallies to polling places, much better on the ground organization in urban areas, lots of money in a few key races, and using the anti-Palin/anti-Tea Party GOP words and actions against the GOP candidates...helped the Democrats win the few key SEnate races they needed. Learn from what the Democrats did right in the last two months of the election in Nevada, Alaska, California, Washington....and copy it. Oh yeah, and have a Democrat be the Sec. of State and overrule objections to vote cheating allegations.
Sarah Palin
Submitted by Demonhunter on Thu, 11/11/2010 - 1:18pm.
If Mark is even being honest in his claim that Palin is nothing like Reagan, may I suggest he is a fool. No, I'll flat out say it, "Mark, you're a tool, I mean fool." (darn typos) I did meet Ronald Reagan when he was governor, but don't take my word for it. His son Michael agrees with me, she's Reagan in a skirt.
What you need to produce now Mark is evidence that you even support Reaganism. That and a dash of honesty and integrity might make you worth listening to. Until then, I will resume totally ignoring you, as I was until this article.
Can someone please forward this to Mark personally. I don't want to waste my time figuring out where to contact the #*%$pissant.
"If it's not the Crusades, it's the cartoons"
Mark McKinnon, lobbyist ....
Submitted by NL207 on Fri, 11/12/2010 - 10:45am.
IIRC, this Mark McKinnon waas a lobbyist with / for Rick Davis, the one man connected with the Republicans and John McCain who can be tied to the subprime mortgage crisis. His lobbying firm apparenty represented Fannie and / or Freddie during the time they were doing their dirty work. It did not take me long to find this :
"The organization also hired Public Strategies, a communications firm that included former Bush adviser Mark McKinnon."
This man is to be devoutly ignored. He is a ruling class RINO.