CBS Hits Unpresidential Palin’s ‘Revisionist History,’ Newsweek’s Hirsh Sees ‘Disturbing Vindictiveness’

  • Bookmark and Share

On the November 14 Saturday Early Show on CBS, as substitute co-anchor Debbye Turner Bell hosted Newsweek’s Michael Hirsh for a discussion of Sarah Palin’s soon-to-be released book, Going Rogue: An American Life, Turner Bell suggested that there was "a little bit of revisionist history" in the book -- a book which, according to her, is "already stirring controversy." She also contended that one of Palin’s quotes praising her husband Todd’s good looks "doesn’t sound very presidential," and suggested that Palin showed "naivete" by complaining about vicious attacks made against her early on in the campaign by some liberals.

For his part, Hirsh agreed with Turner Bell’s suggestion about "revisionist history," and called it "somewhat disturbing" that Palin responded to some of the criticism against her, calling it a "streak of vindictiveness toward her political enemies."

After the two theorized that the book was meant by Palin as a way of kicking off a presidential campaign for 2012, Turner Bell brought up charges of "revisionist history," which she tried to distance from herself by theorizing that others might call it that: "She seems to be trying to get her side of the story out. Some would maybe call that a little bit of revisionist history. Is that your take on this book?"

Hirsh agreed: "Well, there is. I mean, there are a couple things, you know, that were somewhat disturbing about Palin that appear in this book, this streak of vindictiveness toward her political enemies, which we see now include many in the McCain camp."

He soon added: "So Going Rogue is probably an appropriate title. Whether it's the kind of President America wants, assuming that Sarah Palin is gearing up for a presidential run, is another question."

And, even though there were gross attacks on Palin and her family early on as she entered the 2008 campaign – including the theory advanced by liberal bloggers that her youngest child, Trig, was really her daughter's baby – Turner Bell treated Palin's complaint about "character assassination" as a sign of "naivete" by Palin. Turner Bell: "Let's quickly take a look at some of the quotes that are in the book. One, she says about when she first got in, and she says, ‘Before my plane even touched down in Anchorage, shocking character assassinations of those I love began.’ So she seems to be surprised by that. Is this a reflection of her naivete?"

Turner Bell also characterized some of Palin’s words of admiration for her husband as "not very presidential," though Hirsh suggested that such "blunt" talk helps make her popular. Turner Bell: There was, of course, a rumor that she and her husband, Todd, might be divorcing, and this was what she said, "Dang, I thought. Divorce Todd? Have you seen Todd?" That doesn't sound very presidential, does it?"

Below is a complete transcript of the segment from the November 14 Saturday Early Show on CBS:

DEBBYE TURNER BELL: There's a lot of high drama surrounding Sarah Palin's memoir, Going Rogue: An American Life. The former Republican vice presidential candidate and Alaska Governor's new book hits the store shelves on Tuesday, but portions have leaked, and they're already stirring controversy. So what effect does all this publicity have on Palin’s future? Joining us now from Washington is Newsweek’s senior editor, Michael Hirsh, to talk about this. Good morning, Michael. How are you this morning?

MICHAEL HIRSH, NEWSWEEK: Good morning. Very well, thanks.

TURNER BELL: It seems to be an unwritten rule when any politician is gearing up to run for President, they write a book. Is that what this is about you think?

HIRSH: I think very much so. You know, I mean, there's a long and storied history there. And Palin has put her own particular stamp on this tradition. Whether it's going to get her what she wants, which is apparently, you know, a national stage leading into 2012, is another question.

TURNER BELL: She seems to be trying to get her side of the story out. Some would maybe call that a little bit of revisionist history. Is that your take on this book?

HIRSH: Well, there is. I mean, there are a couple things, you know, that were somewhat disturbing about Palin that appear in this book, this streak of vindictiveness toward her political enemies, which we see now include many in the McCain camp. You know, basically the book confirms all of the stories that have been out there for many months about the dissensions within the McCain camp, as well as some of the questions about her mastery of the issues. You know, we see that in this book, as well. So Going Rogue is probably an appropriate title. Whether it's the kind of President America wants, assuming that Sarah Palin is gearing up for a presidential run, is another question.

TURNER BELL: Let's quickly take a look at some of the quotes that are in the book. One, she says about when she first got in, and she says, "Before my plane even touched down in Anchorage, shocking character assassinations of those I love began." So she seems to be surprised by that. Is this a reflection of her naivete?

HIRSH: Perhaps. It, you know, again, she seems to be mainly out for repudiation of her critics here, and what you see is, you know, a lot of self-involvement. And, again, is that the kind of thing that the American people want in a presidential candidate with all of these other issues pressing?

TURNER BELL: And another quote – oh, I’m so sorry, Michael – I want to get another quote in, though, before we have to leave. There was, of course, a rumor that she and her husband, Todd, might be divorcing, and this was what she said, "Dang, I thought. Divorce Todd? Have you seen Todd?" That doesn't sound very presidential, does it?

HIRSH, laughing: Well, there have been those stories out there, and, of course, she abruptly quit the Alaska governorship, and the stories swirled that she was having personal problems with Todd Palin. But they're still together. And, you know, look, I mean, it's also what people like about her. She's very blunt. Whether that makes her a presidential candidate, again, is really something that people are going to have to decide as the book sells.

TURNER BELL: Certainly, no one can deny in certain sectors she's wildly popular. Is this book – in just a word or two – is this book going to help her or hurt her cause?

HIRSH: I think it's going to help her, you know, with her base, her relatively narrow Republican base. I don’t know that it helps at all with what she would need to actually be elected President, which is to appeal to something beyond the conservative base of the Republican party.

TURNER BELL: All right, we'll certainly see. Michael Hirsh, thank you so much for your time this morning. Appreciate it.

HIRSH: Thank you.

—Brad Wilmouth is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Vindictiveness?

I would call these so-called news people the vindictive and petty ones. You would think with their failing ratings they would learn that most people in the US are more like Todd and Sarah Palin and not the elite liberal media. 

It's never-ending with the

It's never-ending with the msm.

It's tiring at this point, boring in fact.

Guess they think they are making some kind of a difference....so much for their brain process...it's the usual shtick.

'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart

Code words from the liberal play list

They really pulled out all the code words, didn't they?

Streak of vindictiveness
Naivete
Revisionist history
Controversy
Disturbing
Political enemies

And they complain about Palin talking about people who trash her -- and then they trash her with those code words. Tell me, can anyone put together a couple of paragraphs -- using these code words -- that don't manage to trash her? Once you pick these words -- the tone of your conversation is set in stone. And they chose those words very carefully. After all -- they're simply from the liberal play list.

__________
"mmm, mmm, mm. Barrack-Hussain-Øbama↓." - The liberals coolaid drinking song

Sweet! The sound of little pigs squealing...

Sigh!

DONT INSULT PIGS!

These are misogynistic dopes who cant stand her amazing following and rock star status.  It's like they hope all their vindictive, petty complaints are really true......but even they know that it is not.  I read the AP "fact check" on her book, and while the headline screamed "revisionist," the actual checking had only minor differences with her opinion (ie Palin claims frugal? Well, one time she wasnt etc etc).
This IS amazing coverage for someone: not in office, and not seeking office.    Lib fear is palpable, and pretty it is not!

Bell and Hirsch

Their opinions mean so much more since their network tried to revise the history of GW's National Guard service, and to alter the future of the 04 election.

 Oh, almost forgot....they make me sick.

 

Gun Control - The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her own pantyhose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound.

It's petty jealousy. Nothing new.

Palin's book has sold more before its release than anything that these people have written in their entire lifetimes, is my bet. And as far as "not sounding presidential goes", I don't hear them complaining about Obama's multiple stupidities, or Biden's assinine statements. So what's at the root of their behavior? Petty jealousy and fear of losing prestiege. 

-----
Random-jumbled-thoughts.blogspot.com

Haw! It is to laugh!

The PRESS?  Having the gall to speak of 'disturbing vindictiveness'??  Daring to lecture ANYONE about engaging in 'revisionist history'?

Ha ha ha!

Oh wait - they were SERIOUS.  Let me laugh even harder.

BAH-HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!

Ah me - these people are so insane they can't even see how stupid they look to the American people anymore...

Wouldn't it have been great

Wouldn't it have been great if "Going Rouge" was a complete ruse with nothing but fake cover art and a few quotes made up by members of C4P while the real release was a children's book?

The sexism of liberals

If Obama or Gore or Clinton rebut their political foes in their books, they are praised for hitting back and defending themselves forcefully. When Sarah does it, she's "vindictive," which I believe is also spelled "bitchy." 

Ah well, while Sarah says, "Have you seen Todd?" which is so unpresidential, our real President Obama is bowing fully at the waist to the Emperor of Japan, definitely presidential but not so much sovereignly. 

I want to wait

"So Going Rogue is probably an appropriate title. Whether it's the kind
of President America wants, assuming that Sarah Palin is gearing up for
a presidential run, is another question."

I want to wait. I want to see if a Ninja runs.

1uncle: You shouldn't expect

1uncle: You shouldn't expect anything  different from Newsweek or CBS.  I will never understand their lack of fairness in this or the last election. This is the most un-American administration ever, yet these people don't get off their knees.

Doesn't sound very Presidential

"The police acted stupidly"  Barrack "Presidental" Obama

 

Stay Free!!!

Vindictive?????

 If the Obama administration is not the nastiest, most vindictive administration in the history of administrations then just who the hell is?   My God they go after Saturday Night Freaking Live because they made a less than flattering skit about the Greatest President Ever?   They go to War with Fox News.  They ask people to TURN IN their friends and Neighbors who say anything "fishy" about the health care bill.  What does 'vindictive' mean again?

 

Stay Free!!!

These people are running

These people are running scared about Palin 2012.

CBS and the rest of the

CBS and the rest of the propagandistsare delusional.

Those twatenheimers revise history on a daily basis.

A nation cannot be free without a free, unbiased media. We are not free.

Chutzpah

The Liberal media accusing Sarah Palin of vindictiveness?!?

Now that is rich!

- Relying upon the State Run Media for your information is like relying upon an embezzler for your portfolio management.

- I didn't leave the Republican Party; the Republican Party left me.

More controversy about Sarah Palin? Yawn.

The Liberal media trying to stir up more controversy about Sarah Palin?  Yawn.

Like the rest of the little people in America, I have not seen the book; but when I do I will be reading it for what Sarah has to say about the 44 years of her life that the media never reported, and not so much about the numerous scandals that they tried to fabricate.

- Relying upon the Liberal Media for your information is like relying upon an embezzler for your portfolio management.

- I didn't leave the Republican Party; the Republican Party left me.

The more I read of the

The more I read of the MSM's treatment of Sarah, the more I shake my head, and the more I overuse the muscles in my neck.  It's getting to the point that it hurts too much to read this stuff.

I would suggest that the only bona fide use for the MSM is as food for fishes.  Except, I doubt the fish would care for the taste.

fish

That wonderful fish known as the catfish would truly love and grow very fat with that diet. Hunger in this world would cease to exist if we can feed them all that sh*t the maobama news services could "dish" out

I can show him 'Disturbing'

Newsweek’s Hirsh Sees ‘Disturbing Vindictiveness’

Apparently, Hirsh has never watched Olbermann.

 

Sarah Palin: The Most Dangerous Conservative In America

another conspiracy theory of mine

ok here's goes my paranoid rant about CBS (again): I smell a concerted effort on CBS's part this past week-- on CBS's highest rated primetime show NCIS last Tuesday, a new episode aired in which one of the principal characters (DiNozo) gets shot at by a female suspect wielding a shotgun-- and he yells out, "Who does she think she is, Sarah Palin?"-- now this Early Show segment comes along right on its heels-- hmmmm a CBS plot against Palin? Stay tuned........

Typical bully

Msm starts and spreads vicious, obvious lies about Palin, calls her daughter a whore , says her new baby isn't even hers and finally says she should have killed that little boy before he was even born. Palin defends herself and gives the bully a bloody nose. The bully runs to the school Principal and whines, "She hit me", wha wha wha. Hirsch is typical liberal detritus, can dish it out but can't take it when the victim fights back.  Typical schoolyard bully behavior. And the rino's like Gingrich, Graham et al won't even defend themselves at all. Palin is the only "man" among them all on the National stage. 

Who's vindictive, Turner Bell?

Just because an Alaskan beaver pisses in her face, now she has to get retribution by attacking Palin?

So transparent these people are. 

 

Can anyone explain

why the MSM who routinely fawns over "how in love the Obamas are" and how attentive he is to that harridan finds it unPresidential for Palin to overtly display her appreciation for her husband?  Do those people not have eyes? 

kj---

Sure, they have eyes.

What the MSM lacks is a sense of fairness, objectivity, open-mindedness, professionalism, intelligence, straightforwardness, responsiblity, honesty, moral clarity, truthfulness, honor, and the desire to tell it like it really is or to treat American citizens as their equals.

Oh, and the ability to see with those eyes I mentioned.

MD

"There is no distinctly American criminal class - except Congress."

Mark Twain (1835-1910)

Round 2 is more interesting.

The McCain campaign allowed the press to present their view of Sarah Palin, for what reasons I can't say because I just don't know.  What I do know, what we all know, is they looked at the #2 Republican much more seriously than they did the #1 Democrat.  What this fair?  Of course not, and the treatment she's gottten since then is really bizarre.  If she is what the press tried to make her out to be, why not let her disappear from the scene and not cover her at all.  Instead, the press continues to trash her every chance they get. 

There is a lot we don't know about Sarah Palin, primarily because of our illustrious Mostly Specious Media.  Now, she's written a book and she'll give interviews all over the place where the press can have their fun. The problem for the media, if they try the same thing they did during the campaign,  all she has to say is read the book.  

My guess is you're going to see less stories about how mean she is, in the book, and how it's about getting even, once the interviews are over.  They're putting out these stories now to cut down on the amount of people that read this book.  Why?  I believe the press knows they treated her poorly and this book tour is going to prove that.  She may not come out of this being the savior of the Republican Party, but my guess is she comes out of this earning a lot of respect from the American people and, as a consequence, showing how poorly our press did its job during the campaign. 

Most people would have accepted Sarah Palin getting trashed, during the campaign, if the same fervor were applied to Obama, who had little experience and hardly any paper trail.  Hey, what about all the "present" votes in the Illinois Senate?   

Election 2008-God's way of showing us that elections count.  

These knuckleheads are

These knuckleheads are getting so beat up by Sarah Palin's mere existence.

Care to imagine what it would be like without her?

One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 86% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory.