ABC: Is CNN’s Gupta Qualified for Surgeon General?


On World News Saturday, during the show’s "A Closer Look" segment, ABC anchor David Muir gave attention to those who question whether CNN’s Dr. Sanjay Gupta has sufficient qualifications to be Barack Obama’s surgeon general. Muir even played a clip of David Letterman poking fun at Gupta twice during the show: "The choice, it was between a Gupta, Dr. Phil, and a guy on Scrubbs. I don’t know what the hell-" He also recounted that Muir was forced to apologized to liberal filmmaker Michael Moore after making errors in a report fact-checking Moore’s film Sicko. As Muir gave voice to those in the pro-Gupta camp who believe it is important for the surgeon general to be well known to the public, the ABC anchor reminded viewers that Dr. C. Everett Coop talked about AIDS while President Reagan was "largely silent," and that President George W. Bush’s surgeon general resigned in protest in 2006 charging he had been "muzzled by the White House."

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

ABC showed the first clip of Letterman mocking Gupta during a plug before a commercial break:

DAVID MUIR, BEFORE COMMERCIAL BREAK: From the doctor on TV to the nation’s top doc, tonight, the growing debate over Dr. Sanjay Gupta as surgeon general.

DAVID LETTERMAN: The choice, it was between a Gupta, Dr. Phil, and a guy on Scrubbs. I don’t know-

Muir introduced his report: "We're going to take ‘A Closer Look’ tonight at the debate brewing over President-elect Obama's potential pick for surgeon general, CNN’s Dr. Sanjay Gupta. Turning a doctor who’s on TV into the nation's top doctor. Proponents ask, when was the last time you knew who the surgeon general was? Picking Gupta would solve that. But opponents argue there should be far more to the role."

As Muir noted that Gupta has been "silent about whether he’ll accept" the job, but that "other voices have quickly filled the vacuum," the Letterman clip was played a second time, although it was incomplete due to technical difficulties. Letterman: "-Dr. Phil, and a guy on Scrubbs. I don’t know what the hell-"

After playing soundbites of advocates on each side of the question of whether Gupta has the qualifications, the ABC anchor recounted some of Gupta’s high-profile experiences and reporting, and reminded viewers that he was forced to apologize to Michael Moore for making error’s in his critique of the film Sicko. Muir: "But his reporting has also stirred controversy. Some of Gupta's facts in his critique of Michael Moore's documentary on the nation's health care woes were wrong. Gupta apologized to Moore."

Muir went on to remind viewers that Dr. C. Everett Koop talked about AIDS when Reagan was "largely silent," and that President Bush’s surgeon general resigned in protest. Muir: "Not since the Reagan years has a surgeon general been a household name. Dr. C. Everett Koop spoke out against cigarette smoking and spoke publicly about AIDS at a time when the President was largely silent. ... President George Bush's surgeon general resigned in 2006, claiming he’d been muzzled by the White House. Since then, the position hasn't been filled, which is why health advocates on both sides of the Gupta debate say Obama's choice now takes on even greater significance."

Below is a complete transcript of the report from the January 10 World News Saturday on ABC:

DAVID MUIR, BEFORE COMMERCIAL BREAK: From the doctor on TV to the nation’s top doc, tonight, the growing debate over Dr. Sanjay Gupta as surgeon general.

DAVID LETTERMAN: The choice, it was between a Gupta, Dr. Phil, and a guy on Scrubbs. I don’t know-

...

MUIR: We're going to take "A Closer Look" tonight at the debate brewing over President-elect Obama's potential pick for surgeon general, CNN’s Dr. Sanjay Gupta. Turning a doctor who’s on TV into the nation's top doctor. Proponents ask, when was the last time you knew who the surgeon general was? Picking Gupta would solve that. But opponents argue there should be far more to the role.

DR. SANJAY GUPTA, ON CNN: Good morning. Welcome to "House Call."

MUIR: Normally reporting medical news, this week Dr. Sanjay Gupta became the news. So far, he has been silent about whether he’ll accept any offer for surgeon general. But other voices have quickly filled the vacuum.

LETTERMAN, AFTER AUDIO GAP: -Dr. Phil, and a guy on Scrubbs. I don’t know what the hell-

MUIR: There are many, though, who are not laughing, arguing the doctor on TV shouldn't become the nation's top doc, the doctor who would advise the President and the nation about health and disease and lead some 6,000 uniformed health officers across this country.

DR. DOUGLAS KAMEROW, FORMER ASSISTANT SURGEON GENERAL: He obviously knows a lot, and he spent a lot of time reporting about all kinds of things in medicine, but still, it's not the same as spending 15 or 20 or 25 years working in various public health locations, working in these issues and working in the government.

MUIR: During the Clinton years, Gupta was a White House fellow advising then-First Lady Hillary Clinton on health care. But some argue, years of service in the public health arena isn't necessarily what's most important.

DR. LINDA DEGUTIS, FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION: One of the reasons that it is a good pick is that Dr. Gupta is already recognized by the public, and one of the key roles of the surgeon general is to communicate with the public.

MUIR: The 39-year-old doctor embedded with the Navy medical unit in the Iraq war drawing attention when he performed surgery on an injured Iraqi child. He reported on the health crises after the tsunami and hurricane Katrina. But his reporting has also stirred controversy. Some of Gupta's facts in his critique of Michael Moore's documentary on the nation's health care woes were wrong. Gupta apologized to Moore.

GUPTA, APPEARING ON CNN’S LARRY KING LIVE WITH MICHAEL MOORE: We want to get these facts and figures right, as a doctor and a journalist, so we corrected that.

MUIR: But proponents argue a Gupta appointment would bring renewed prominence to the role. Not since the Reagan years has a surgeon general been a household name. Dr. C. Everett Koop spoke out against cigarette smoking and spoke publicly about AIDS at a time when the President was largely silent.

DR. C. EVERETT KOOP, FORMER SURGEON GENERAL: Let's stop the rumors and misinformation about AIDS.

MUIR: President George Bush's surgeon general resigned in 2006, claiming he’d been muzzled by the White House. Since then, the position hasn't been filled, which is why health advocates on both sides of the Gupta debate say Obama's choice now takes on even greater significance. Our "Closer Look" for tonight.

—Brad Wilmouth is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

So, basically, who cares if

So, basically, who cares if Sanjay is qualified, he looks Mahhvelous on the tube? And who really gave a rip what C. Everett Kook ever said? I remember that I was a teenager then, and we made fun of him frequently. Kids don't give a rip what some doctor on t.v. says.

doesn't seem to matter, does it?

Qualification for office does not seem to be much of a prerequisite for anyone in the new administration.

Another Clinton re-tread.  Who'd a-thunk it? 

I don't like Letterman, but

I don't like Letterman, but he was dead on with his comment.

Obama seems determined to be "cool" by picking people who are in the "in" crowd, so to speak. Rick Warren for his inauguration is another "pop culture" pick.

As for the Clinton re-treads: George Bush was denigrated for picking people who had been around when his father was President. It was a tacit admission that he was seeking the "gravitas" that he himself lacked.

Barack Obama, however, is hailed as surrounding himself with an all-star group of people with vast experience and blinding intelligence.  

Now, suddenly, people from two administrations ago are welcome.

 

 

you got it!

As usual, motherbelt, you hit the nail on the head.  No, there's no media bias here!

Maybe he could have gotten Hugh Laurie to play "House, S.G.".  As much as I love Hugh Laurie and "House", 'tis pretty obvious which side of the aisle he sits on! 

Aw, shucks, thanks. They

Aw, shucks, thanks.

They would be fine if people just wouldn't remember what they did before!!

As George Stephanopoulos used to say when he worked for Bill Clinton: 

That explanation is no longer operative.

Bush's SG quit? In protest?

Who was that?

Is Gupta qualified to be SG? As compared to who? At least he is a Doctor.

That was Richard

That was Richard Carmona.

 

 

Thank you!

I never knew of this man. Thank you for the article. Guess the MSM missed their chance to use this guy to bash President Bush with.

You're welcome. No

You're welcome.

No matter; they had plenty of others.

He should have written a book; he would have been all over TV!

Gupta

I wondered about your second question as well, so I looked him up (okay on Wiki, it's early and I'm lazy).

Dr. Gupta is a neurosurgeon, went to the University of Michigan medical school (directly from high school) in a new program designed to do that.  He's an associate professor of neurosurgery at Emory and an associate chief of neruosurgery at Grady Memorial Hospital in Atlanta.

So, I'd imagine he's qualified.  He's also the son of Indian immigrants who moved to Dearborn MI in the 60's to work as engineers for Ford.  In my experience, that makes him, with his parents' background and his own educational path, smart as hell.

As for being a Clinton retread, he was in his mid-twenties when he did that, so again, I'd say that's a plus in this case, rather than a minus for the rest of the retread Clintonistas.

So, I'm going to go against the current on this one, and say Dr. Sanjay Gupta, while I don't care for his self-identified choice of political party, is qualified for this position, and with his media experience will be more than able to articulate the Obama administration's health care policies (as misguided as they may be). 

 

Blonde: I have no quibble

Blonde:

I have no quibble with Gupta as neurosurgeon nor with his parents.

What I take issue with is:

  • Gupta's avarice for celebrity and control
  • Gupta's methodology in obtaining the former

Gupta is an opportunist, the Deepak Chopra of Medicine.  He will say whatever he deems necessary to advance himself, eg obesity tax.  His brand of medical activism and eletism is emblematic of the demise of the American Medical Association.  Special interest rules the AMA roost more than ever before and the effect is magnified by the number of groups involved in the mix. 

Gupta has recognized the dark arts of gaining power in today's world and willingly panders to gain that power.  If he truly believes the crap that spews from his orifice then I am even more concerned for the politically correct national policy he may help squeeze out.

It is of note that both Koop and Carmona, former Surgeon General's in Republican administrations, did NOT politicize or use politics bluntly to formulate their message nor get their message out.  The same can not be said of their Democratically chosen compatriots.

Gupta WILL use politics to formulate, enact and enforce his politically correct activistism.  Our liberty will be diminished because of Obama and his underlings, including the patronizing Doctor Gupta.

Gupta is as qualified to be Surgeon General in that he has a medical degree as Barry Obama is as qualified to be POTUS in that he was at least 35 years of age and (presumptively) a natural born citizen of the United States.

Know what I mean?

 

Is Gupta qualified?  Does

Is Gupta qualified?  Does it really matter?  No, he's a see-le-bri-teee on Cnn.  That's all the qualifications he needs.  So it's a moot question.

What qualified Uber-Obama to be president?

I think Britney Spears should get a cabinet office - she's as qualified as anybody. 

→ Joycelyn Elders

It's not as though Surgeon General is a critical position.

Unless you're a 10 yr old boy hoping the US Government is mailing out dirty pictures.

Gupta's fine with me as long as he recognizes the real reason he was put in the position.

  • LYDSEXICS UNTIE!

It's funny how quickly you

It's funny how quickly you all move to criticize anything related to Obama's administration.  FYI, Dr. Gupta spent a few years in Iraq, saving soldiers lives on the battlefield, while most of you sat at home and read blogs.  Keep that in mind before you post.

Dr. Gupta did not spend "years" in Iraq

According to his CNN bio, Dr. Gupta joined the network in 2001, meaning he never served in Iraq.  To his credit, he has reported from Iraq.  Also to his great credit, he also used his surgical skills on the battlefield five times to save lives.  He deserves great honor for that.  But it is wrong to suggest that Gupta spent "years" in Iraq.

Welcome to the era of unity, you racist!

Good evening bazzarworld

There is nothing in this thread criticizing Dr. Gupta's ability or character. The criticsms of the other cabinet members however are well deserved.

You know, if your honest,

You know, if you're honest, your post is pretty illogical.

As a volunteer force, most people will never serve in the military. And there are over 300 million Americans -- so how many are in the armed forces at any one time? 3 million? Or 1% of the population? 

And even less will be doctor. How many doctors are in the US? A million? Or .33% of the pop?

So unless you are proposing that only those who are...

1. In the military; and/or

2. A doctor

... can criticize and dissent against someone who fulfills those criteria -- that mean 98.66% of Americans need to shut the eff up about Obama nominees.

That can't be right, right?

"The nature of an ideology is not determined by majority vote—but by logic... The logic of environmentalism leads to a society without technology... even if various environmentalists would deny this." Ayn Rand, 1971

Please note the following

Please note the following errors in the introductory paragraph on NB's home page:

Scrubs, not "Scrubbs"

Koop, not "Coop"

Gupta was forced to apologize, not "Muir was forced to apologized"

gooop-ta

who cares if he is qualified.  he has been anointed by the one so that makes it ok